United Telecontrol Electronics, Inc., No. 2890 (May 24, 1988) Docket No.SIC-88-4-12-43 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS WASHINGTON, D. C. 20416 SIC APPEAL OF: ) ) United Telecontrol Electronics, ) Inc. ) ) Appellant ) Docket No.SIC-88-4-12-43 ) Solicitation No. ) N00019-87-R-0111 ) Department of the Navy ) Washington, D.C. ) DIGEST A classification appeal filed after the original deadline for receipt of proposals set forth in the solicitation is untimely and will be dismissed. An extension of the deadline for receipt of proposals which does not relate to the procurement's classification or size standard does not extend the deadline for filing a classification appeal. DECISION May 24, 1988 RIOTTO, Administrative Judge, Presiding: Jurisdiction This appeal is cognizable under 15 U.S.C. 632 and 13 CFR Part 121. Issue Is the instant appeal timely? Facts On March 4, 1988, the Department of the Navy issued the above-captioned request for proposals for "Telemetry Data, Transmitting Sets" for the Sparrow Missile. The procurement was set aside for small business and was classified within Standard Industrial Classification ("SIC") code 3663 - "Radio and Television Broadcasting and Communications Equipment." The solicitation originally designated April 4, 1988 as the deadline for receipt of proposals. Subsequently, the solicitation was amended to clarify several ambiguities. The amendment, which did not affect the procurement's classification or size standard, extended the deadline for receipt of proposals to April 29, 1988. By letter dated April 11, 1988, counsel for United Telecontrol Electronics, Inc. ("United") appealed the classification of the procurement which had been designated by the procuring agency. United alleged that SIC code 3769 - "Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment" - was a more appropriate classification for the products to be purchased. Discussion SBA's timeliness regulation for size appeals and classification appeals provides, inter alia, that an appeal from a product or service classification must be filed before the procurement's bid-opening day or deadline for submitting proposals or quotations. 13 CFR 121.11(e)(3). The Office of Hearings and Appeals has issued numerous decisions construing this regulation. In particular, it has been held that extension of a bid-opening date does not alter the deadline for filing classification appeals with SBA where such extension is not accompanied by any change in the contract's classification or size standard. See, e.g., SIC Appeal of Williams Mobile Offices, No. 2515 (1986); SIC Appeal of Resource Consultants, Inc., No. 2544 (1986). In the case at hand, United's classification appeal was not filed until after the original (unamended) deadline for receipt of proposals. Consequently, it is clearly untimely and may not be considered. Conclusion The appeal is DISMISSED. This is the final decision of the Small Business Administration. See 13 CFR 121.11(t) - (v). Joseph K. Riotto (Presiding) Administrative Judge Gloria E. Blazsik (Concurring) Administrative Judge Jane E. Phillips (Concurring) Administrative Judge