The
EERC expands the liquid refrigerant in two steps. The first step
is through a specifically designed nozzle where the liquid is used
to increase the pressure of the gas returning to the compressor.
After this stage, the liquid refrigerant is collected in a receiver
where it is metered into the evaporator by conventional methods.
Prior
Success Indicates Goals Are Possible
Before applying for ATP funding, Calmac had expended
significant internal resources to overcome prior EERC failures in
the industry. For example, industry efforts to achieve EERC had
not generated sufficient pressure within the ejector nozzle to enhance
refrigeration efficiency. Calmac, however, had developed techniques
to achieve a six-percent improvement in energy expended for refrigeration
through the use of the EERC. That level of improvement was not high
enough to make the technology cost effective, but, with further
research and refinement, Calmac expected a 10-percent improvement
for air-conditioning and up to a 20-percent improvement for other,
lower temperature applications. Moreover, more efficient refrigeration
would reduce both the size of the equipment needed in the process
and the potential release of CFCs into the environment. When improvements
reached the 10-percent threshold, cost savings would then be high
enough to encourage original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to use
the EERC process. At that point, economic and environmental spillover
could be achieved.
Limited internal funds had hindered efforts, however, to reach the
commercially viable 10-percent improvement stage. Furthermore, given
the previous failures to develop EERC technology within the industry,
external funds through the private market were not available to
Calmac.
Improved
Refrigeration Efficiency Has Potential Spillover Benefits
Because
refrigeration is used in almost every residential and commercial
structure, and because it accounts for such a high percentage of
the nation's consumption of electric power, improvements in refrigeration
efficiency could result in lower overhead costs across many
|
|
industries. In
the commercial setting, cost savings could then be invested
back into
product development.
In the residential
setting, the decrease in money spent each month on electricity could
free up spending for a host of consumer items or for personal savings.
The potential spillover benefits supported Calmac's proposal to receive
cost-shared funds from ATP. Therefore, in 1993, ATP awarded the company
$729,000 to pursue further development of the EERC technology.
Unforeseen
Obstacles Block Increased Efficiency and Commercialization
In
the first 18 months of the project, Calmac engineers researched
materials and engineering advances that had the potential to push
the EERC above the 10-percent efficiency improvement threshold.
The following six months were spent integrating these innovations
into the EERC technology.
At the start of the third year of the project, however, Calmac encountered
unforeseen instability in the ejector's operation. Three sources
of the instability were examined, but Calmac was unable to completely
pinpoint and solve the problem. The specific operating parameters
needed in the ejector for the EERC operation introduced inherent
instabilities to the system outside this design window.
Calmac conducted
research into the cause of the instability and generated extensive
documentation of its findings. However, the company could not make
the EERC operate efficiently for the equipment's complete range
of operation.
Calmac
encountered unforeseen instability in the ejector's operation.
|
Consequently, Calmac
could not commercialize a component package for retrofitting older
machines or for installation by OEMs because the costs were still
prohibitive. When the ATP project concluded in 1996, Calmac decided
not to continue its work on EERC.
|
|