|
DEA
Congressional Testimony
June 14, 2005
Remarks by
Anthony P. Placido
Assistant Administrator for Intelligence (Acting)
Drug Enforcement Administration
United States Department of Justice
Before the
House Committee on Government Reform
Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy
& Human Resources
Regarding
“Threat
Convergence Along the Border:
How Does Drug Trafficking
Impact our Borders?”
Introduction
Chairman Souder, Ranking Member Cummings and Members of the Subcommittee, thank
you for the invitation to testify today to discuss the impact of drug trafficking
on our borders. My name is Anthony Placido and I am the Acting Assistant Administrator
for Intelligence for the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). On behalf of
DEA Administrator Karen P. Tandy, thank you for your continued support of the
men and women of the DEA and our mission. As the former Regional
Director for the DEA’s Mexico-Central America
Division and a 25-year veteran of the agency, I am acutely aware of the
challenges at our borders. Addressing a threat of the magnitude our Nation
faces along our international borders requires an extraordinary level
of coordination and cooperation among and between American law enforcement
and intelligence organizations and our foreign counterparts. While there
has been enormous progress in certain areas, much more needs to be done
to secure our borders and protect the Nation from the scourge of transnational
crime.
The Scope of Drug Trafficking on the Southwest Border
The Southwest Border (SWB) is the primary arrival zone for the majority
of illicit drugs smuggled into the United States as well as the principal
area for the subsequent consolidation and distribution of these drugs
throughout the United States. According to El Paso Intelligence Center
(EPIC) drug seizure data, most of the cocaine and marijuana, as well
as much of the heroin and methamphetamine available in the United States
is smuggled into the country across the Southwest border (SWB). In fact,
2004 data from EPIC show that the amount of drugs seized at or between
land ports of entry (POE) along the SWB is far greater than the amount
seized at other U.S. arrival zones, including the Northern Border with
Canada.
The border between Mexico and the United States consists of approximately
2,000 miles of mostly open border. The vastness of this region, inhabited
by over 50 million residents, and the huge volume of persons and goods
that cross the border to facilitate legitimate international commerce,
converge to make law enforcement in this region a daunting task. In a
post September 11, 2001 world, it is critical that we do not fail in
this collective security mission, yet closing our borders is not a viable
option. In attempting to strike the proper balance, law enforcement organizations
must have better intelligence to inform and drive their efforts, and
there must be extensive coordination and cooperation at the inter-agency
and international levels.
The SWB is used extensively by Mexico based drug trafficking organizations
to smuggle drugs into the United States. Drug trafficking organizations
capitalize on geography and the high volume of legitimate cross border
traffic between Mexico and the United States to provide cover for their
illegal smuggling operations. Millions of private and commercial vehicles
as well as pedestrians cross the land POEs between the two countries
each day. According to Customs and Border Protection (CPB) statistics,
over 48 million pedestrians, 90 million private vehicles, and 4.4 million
trucks entered the United States through the 25 land POEs in 2004.
Tunnels are also used by Mexican drug trafficking organizations to smuggle
drugs across the SWB. To date, 30 tunnels have been discovered along
the SWB: 19 in Arizona (17 in Nogales), and 11 in California. We expect
that the SWB will continue to be the main transit route for the major
drugs of abuse entering the United States for the foreseeable future.
Cocaine: Mexico continues to be the primary transit route for cocaine
destined for the United States. According to the Interagency Assessment
of Cocaine Movement (IACM) reporting, the volume of cocaine transiting
the Mexico-Central America Corridor to the United States rose to 92 percent
during 2004. This is a significant increase from the 77 percent estimated
flow of cocaine projected to have moved through this corridor in 2003
and continues to reflect a five year trend of increased cocaine movement
through Mexico to the U.S. market. Maritime vessels, primarily go-fast
boats and fishing vessels are the primary conveyances used to move cocaine
from South America into Mexico. In 2004, the Government of Mexico (GOM)
reported seizing 25 metric ton of cocaine which was five metric tons
higher than the previous year. An additional 22.4 metric tons of cocaine
was seized entering the U.S. SWB in 2004, primarily in South Texas.
Heroin: Despite
Mexico’s
relatively small percentage of global opium production (less than five
percent), it is currently the second
largest supplier of heroin to the U.S. market. Most of the heroin produced
in Mexico is smuggled across the SWB. In 2004, the potential production
of pure heroin in Mexico was estimated to be 9 metric tons (approximately
23 metric tons of black tar heroin). Mexican black-tar and brown-powder
heroin continues to dominate the market west of the Mississippi River
and is increasingly making inroads into the Midwest.
Marijuana: Mexico
is also the largest foreign supplier of marijuana available in the
United States.
In 2004, Mexico had an estimated production
capacity of 5,800 hectares of cannabis. This represents a potential of
10,400 metric tons of marijuana for the U.S. and Mexican markets, which
is above the average of 8,500 metric tons produced over the previous
five years, but below last year’s high of 13, 500 metric tons.
Eradication of cannabis by the GOM continued at robust rates in 2004.
The relative low-cost, easy processing, and high profits associated with
marijuana ensure its place as a staple source of revenue for Mexican
drug trafficking organizations. In 2004, 1,089 metric tons of marijuana
was seized along the SWB. Arizona accounted for the majority of seizures
at 368.7 metric tons, followed closely by South Texas with 368.6 metric
tons.
Methamphetamine: Perhaps the greatest emerging drug threat from Mexico
is the production of methamphetamine for sale and use in the United States.
Seizures of methamphetamine along the SWB have increased 74 percent since
2001 when 1,172 kilograms of methamphetamine was confiscated. In 2004,
a record 1,639 kilograms of methamphetamine was seized along the SWB,
including approximately 1,018 kilograms of methamphetamine in Arizona.
Of particular concern, Mexican drug trafficking organizations have been
establishing methamphetamine laboratories closer to the U.S. border (in
conjunction with their traditional manufacturing locations in central
Mexico) to better reach markets in the U.S. as well as the growing user
population within Mexico.
Drug Trafficking Organizations: The SWB serves as the entry point for
a national distribution network for drugs destined for all regions of
the country. The cities of Albuquerque, Brownsville, Dallas, El Paso,
Houston, Laredo, Los Angeles, McAllen, Oklahoma City, Phoenix, Tulsa,
San Antonio, San Diego and Tucson function as primary staging locations
used by Mexican drug trafficking organizations. Mexican drug trafficking
organizations use familial ties and long standing relationships to maintain
control over transportation and distribution groups along the SWB. Mexican
drug trafficking organizations are the dominant transporters and distributors
of illicit drugs from the SWB. This function has allowed them to become
the dominant drug distributors throughout the United States. Mexican
drug trafficking organizations have established relationships with a
variety of criminal groups including Colombians, Dominicans, Jamaicans,
as well as street gangs, prison gangs, and outlaw motorcycle gangs, who
conduct most of the retail and street-level distribution throughout the
country.
Mexican drug trafficking organizations pose the greatest drug trafficking
threat not only along the SWB but also to the entire United States. Fifteen
of the 42 organizations on the FY 2005 Consolidated Priority Organization
Targets (CPOT) list (35 percent) are based in Mexico and Central America.
As of the end of the second quarter of FY 2005, DEA had 372 active Priority
Target investigations linked to these 15 CPOTs, of which 20 were foreign
Priority Target investigations.
Currently, the most powerful drug trafficking organizations in Mexico
are led by Ignacio Coronel-Villarreal, Joaquin Guzman-Loera, Arturo
Beltran-Leyva, Juan Jose Esparragosa-Moreno and Ismael Zamada-Garcia.
These leaders comprise the “Federation,” an organized crime
syndicate founded upon long-standing relationships between Mexico’s
major drug kingpins. Although the Arellano-Felix organization and the
Gulf Cartel have been weakened under the Fox Administration, they continue
to control the strategic border states of Baja California Norte and
Tamaulipas. Capitalizing on disruptions to the Arellano-Felix and Gulf
Cartels, the Federation is conducting a violent campaign of elimination
against them to gain control of these important transit corridors.
The Scope of Drug Trafficking on the Northern Border
The border between Canada and the United States comprises almost 4,000
miles (excluding Alaska). Drugs are smuggled across the border by use
of All-Terrain Vehicles, tractor trailers, privately-owned vehicles,
backpackers, snowmobiles, canoes, and boats.
During my recent
assignment as Special Agent in Charge of DEA’s
New York Field Division, I had the opportunity to tour the northern border
and meet with U.S. and Canadian officials regarding transnational drug
trafficking and money laundering. The northern border is fraught with
its own challenges, including semi-autonomous Indian reservations that
straddle the international border and rely largely upon tribal authorities
to regulate the international movement of people and goods. Moreover,
the substantially larger northern border has fewer law enforcement resources
to deal with a growing drug threat.
Marijuana: Although Canada is not a primary marijuana source for the
United States, exportation of marijuana to the United States is a flourishing
business. In the United States, Canada-produced marijuana represents
approximately two (2) percent of all border marijuana seizures. Canadian
cultivation estimates range between 800 and 2,000 metric tons, with the
majority of the product designated for U.S. markets. In the recent past,
cross-border shipments of Canadian marijuana was limited to relatively
small amounts ranging from 50 to 200 pounds; however, subsequent to alliances
between Canadian groups and Asian Organized Crime, law enforcement has
seen a significant increase in the movement of tractor-trailer borne,
ton quantity shipments. While the amount of Canadian marijuana available
for import into and actually being smuggled into the United States is
significantly less than that of Mexican-cultivated marijuana, the THC
content of Canadian marijuana can be twice to three times that of its
southern competition.
Heroin: Southeast Asian, Southwest Asian, and other Middle Eastern criminal
organizations, which maintain connections to heroin source countries,
continue to be largely responsible for heroin importation and heroin
trafficking activities within Canada. Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal
remain the prominent centers for heroin trafficking and abuse. Analysis
indicates that traffickers of Southeast Asian (SEA) heroin have shifted
from sending the product directly to New York, the traditional center
of SEA trafficking in the country, to also smuggling the heroin into
the United States via Canada.
Ecstasy: 3.4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or Ecstasy) historically
arrived in Canada from Europe via courier aboard commercial aircraft.
In recent years, however, increasing numbers of clandestine MDMA laboratories
have been located in major population areas to include Toronto, Vancouver,
and Montreal. Asian groups (ethnic Chinese and Vietnamese) and Outlaw
Motorcycle Gangs (OMGs), as well as independent operators, have been
associated with this trafficking activity.
Europe-produced MDMA continues to be transported through Canada en route
to the United States. Asian, Israeli, and to a lesser extent, Russian
criminal groups transport MDMA from Europe to Canada via couriers on
commercial flights, although large quantities are commonly transported
via air cargo. MDMA is also smuggled across the border by commercial
vehicles, mail and courier services, and vessels. The amount of MDMA
seized at or transiting Canadian ports of entry increased from 1.8 million
tablets in 2002 to over 2.1 million tablets in 2004.
Methamphetamine: New regulations within Canada’s Health Act took
effect in January 2003, governing the sale of pseudoephedrine and ephedrine
for export. These regulations require that companies involved in the
sale of precursors to be registered and provide background information
on persons responsible for this activity. Subsequent to the implementation
of these regulations and the successes of U.S./Canadian law enforcement
efforts, U.S. law enforcement authorities have reported a large decrease
in Canadian pseudoephedrine seizures and availability. Organized crime
groups, however, continue to be involved in diverting chemicals both
within Canada and from Canada to the United States.
Mexico - Law Enforcement Cooperation
During the Administration of Mexican President Vicente Fox, DEA and
Mexican officials have improved cooperation in law enforcement
matters. Anti-corruption
initiatives and institutional reforms have increased our ability
to share information and conduct joint investigations. Moreover,
Mexico
has steadily eradicated record amounts of cannabis and opium poppy
as well as seized record amounts of drugs. Mexican authorities have
acted to varying degrees against all of the major cartels in Mexico.
Mexican authorities have arrested some of the largest drug traffickers
in the country, including Benjamin Arellano-Felix the leader of the
Tijuana Cartel and Osiel Cardenas-Guillen the leader of the Gulf
Cartel. Sensitive Investigative Units (SIUs), specialized investigative
teams
that undergo a full vetted process, continue to serve as effective
mechanisms for sharing sensitive intelligence without compromise.
In addition, extraditions from Mexico to the United States increased
in 2004, with the GOM extraditing a record 34 fugitives to the United
States. Of particular importance to the DEA was the January 29, 2005,
GOM extradition of fugitive Agustin Vasquez-Mendoza to the U.S. to
stand trial for his role in the 1994 murder of DEA Special Agent
Richard Fass.
Also, Mexico used its authority to expel or deport 135 fugitives who
were in Mexico illegally.
There have been several joint U.S. - Mexico law enforcement operations
where the DEA has cooperated with our counterparts within the Mexican
Government that I would like to highlight.
Operation United Eagles: In August 2003, DEA, the U.S. Marshal Service,
and the GOM initiated Operation United Eagles, a fugitive apprehension
effort to apprehend CPOTs operating or living in Mexico. A fugitive
apprehension team was created and currently consists of 50 members
of the Mexican
Federal Investigative Agency (AFI) trained by DEA, US Marshals, and
the FBI. Initially, this initiative facilitated the exchange of information
and cooperation between law enforcement in Mexico and the U.S. in an
effort to identify and apprehending key leaders of the Arellano-Felix
Organization. As of December 31, 2004, Operation United Eagles has
resulted
in the arrest of 19 members of the AFO, including five “Tier I” members:
Efran Perez, Jorge Aureliano-Felix, Gilberto Higuera-Guerrero, Giberto
Camacho Valle, and Marco Antonio Simental-Garcia.
Operations Cold Remedy and Aztec Flu: Relations between Mexican authorities
and DEA are very good in terms of precursor chemical control. To date,
under the auspices of Operation Cold Remedy and Aztec Flu, Mexico’s
Organized Crime Prosecutor’s Office, Hong Kong law enforcement
authorities, and DEA have seized nine shipments, totaling 67.26 million
pseudoephedrine tablets between September 2003 and December 2004. Pseudoephedrine
is one of the primary essential chemicals use in the manufacturing of
methamphetamine. The last seizures were a shipment of 35 million tablets
seized in Los Angeles and a shipment of 400,000 tablets seized in Mexico
in November 2004. Seven of these nine shipments were controlled delivery
attempts, accounting for 29.86 million tablets, which could have produced
over one metric tons of pseudoephedrine (60 percent yield from 60mg tablets).
Operation Money Clip: On October 19, 2004, Operation Money Clip,
a year long multi-jurisdictional Organized Crime Drug Enforcement
Task
Force
(OCDETF) investigation coordinated by the DEA Special Operations
Division, resulted in the dismantling of a Mexican-based money
laundering and
poly-drug trafficking organization. As of December 31, 2004, Operation
Money Clip
has resulted in 90 arrests and seizures of $5.2 million in U.S. currency,
2.5 metric tons of cocaine, 33 kilograms of crystal methamphetamine,
18.2 metric tons of marijuana, and one kilogram of heroin. Since
2002, the target organization laundered as much as $200 million
in drug proceeds
and was responsible for the monthly distribution of the U.S. market
of approximately 1,100 pounds of cocaine, 200 pounds of methamphetamine,
44 pounds of heroin, and 10,000 pounds of marijuana per month since
2002.
U.S.-Southwest Border Initiatives: In addition to these completed
operations, the DEA, in cooperation with its Southwest Border partners
and the
Mexican government, has been developing additional initiatives to
combat the
substantial threat posed by Mexican based poly-drug trafficking organizations
as well as their Colombia based associates who use Mexico as a staging
area for drugs destined for the United States. These initiatives
seek to disrupt and dismantle these organizations through the combining
of resources and the sharing of intelligence from federal, state
and
local
law enforcement agencies, as well as, Mexican law enforcement counterparts
via DEA Mexico City Central America offices.
Long term, multi-jurisdictional initiatives are required to truly
impact these poly-drug organizations. These initiatives include:
the Bulk
Currency Initiative, the Trap Vehicle Initiative, the Tunnel Initiative,
Marine
Task Force Initiative and the Clan Lab Initiative. Developed leads
are disseminated throughout the U.S. and Mexico to insure a top to
bottom
enforcement approach in attacking the command and control centers
of major trafficking organizations.
Despite concerted efforts by the GOM to crack down on drug production
and trafficking, problems persist. Powerful Mexican drug traffickers
continue to operate and Mexico continues to be the primary transit
country for cocaine and a major producer of heroin, methamphetamine,
and marijuana
destined for U.S. markets. Given the magnitude of drug production
and flow through Mexico, and the enormous power of the major drug
kingpins,
significantly more progress is needed to impact the problem. The
GOM continues face challenges in making tangible accomplishments
against
the major drug cartels, stemming the flow of drug through the country,
reducing public corruption, ensuring public security, and strengthening
the rule of law.
The single largest impediment to seriously impacting the drug trafficking
problem in Mexico is corruption. DEA has highly productive, long-standing
relationships with a number of key GOM counterparts. The individual
courage, personal integrity and dedication of many of these individuals
are truly
remarkable. Unfortunately, on a national level, officials of this
caliber are the exception. They exist in a system that is fraught
with organizational
inefficiency and corruption. In actuality, law enforcement in Mexico
is all too often part of the problem rather than part of the solution.
This is particularly true at the municipal and state levels of government.
The success of the vetted units in Mexico has been noteworthy but
much more needs to be done to address a threat of the magnitude we
face
in that country. Mexican law enforcement also suffers from poor training,
high turn-over, and a lack of resources. These problems and Mexico’s
unique geographic location virtually assure that the country will
continue to be the primary location used to facilitate the flow of
drugs destined
for the United States.
The GOM has scored a series of blows against the major cartels, especially
the Arellano-Felix Organization; however, other drug trafficking
organizations, most notably the Federation, continue to operate and
some appear to
be gaining strength.
Furthermore, actions by the GOM against the Gulf and Tijuana Cartels
have ignited turf-wars in nearly every major drug trafficking plaza
along the SWB resulting in scores of deaths that the GOM seems incapable
or
unwilling to subdue. The magnitude of this violence along the SWB
is reflected in the U.S. Department of State’s two Public Announcements
issued this year warning U.S. citizens entering Mexico of continued
high levels of violence. The worst violence has been centered in
the border
city of Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas, where more than 30 U.S. citizens
and scores of Mexican citizens have been kidnapped or killed over
the past
eight months.
The Mexican corrections systems faces problems. Mexico has been unable
to recapture CPOT Joaquin Guzman-Loera, a major trafficker who escaped
from prison in 2001, demonstrates the continuing power of the major
drug trafficking organizations and the weakness of the corrections
system
in Mexico. Another example occurred just a month ago, on May 13,
2005, when another CPOT—Otto Herrera-Garcia—escaped from
prison in Mexico. Many of the major traffickers incarcerated in Mexican
prisons
continue to operate their drug trafficking organizations from prison
with the assistance of corrupt officials. Moreover, over the last
year, there have been multiple targeted assassinations of rival drug
traffickers
even in the most secure of Mexican prisons. The Mexican Government
has tried to address this problem by sending in the military but
this is
temporary solution and additional prison capacity and the training
of qualified personnel within the Mexican corrections system are
sorely
needed to incarcerate and secure convicted traffickers.
As mentioned previously, Mexico extradited a record 34 fugitives
to the United States in 2004, up from 31 in 2003 and according to
the
State
Department deported or expelled many more to the United States to
face trial. Despite this increased number, and substantial cooperation
from
the Government of Mexico in returning fugitives to the United States,
no major drug kingpin of Mexican citizenship has ever been extradited
from Mexico to the United States. (Major drug kingpin Juan Garcia-Abrego
was extradited to the U.S. in 1995, but he held dual U.S.-Mexican
citizenship enabled that unprecedented legal proceeding.) The ability
of cartel
leaders to avoid or delay extradition protects them from the actions
major kingpins
fear most: facing justice in U.S. courts of law and serving long
sentences in U.S. prisons.
According to the U.S. Department of State, Mexico exercises its discretion
under the 1978 U.S. Mexico Extradition Treaty to deny extradition
in cases where the death penalty is an applicable punishment unless
the
United States assures Mexico that the death penalty will not be sought
or imposed. Further, Mexico is unable to extradite fugitives that
face life imprisonment without the possibility of parole pursuant
to a 2001
decision of the Mexican Supreme Court holding that to do so would
be unconstitutional. The Government of Mexico has worked extensively
to
limit the negative impact of this and other problematic Mexican judicial
decisions. Mexican defense lawyers frequently submit amparos (similar
to writs of Habeas Corpus in our legal system) on behalf of their
clients which can result in lengthy delays in extradition cases,
and on occasion,
the rejections of the extradition requests. Modification and streamlining
of the amparo process would increase the likelihood of the extradition
of cartel leaders to the United States. Finally, many major narco-traffickers
who are subjects of pending extradition requests are facing the possibility
of long prison sentences in Mexico. The United States has requested
that Mexico consider the possibility of temporary surrendering these
individuals,
so that they may face trial in the United States prior to the commencement
of their sentences in Mexico.
Finally, traditional investigative tools that law enforcement agencies
such as DEA depend upon to develop cases in the United States have
not been approved for use in Mexico. For example, undercover operations
in
Mexico are complicated and difficult, as approval from the Mexican
Attorney General is necessary before any operation can be implemented.
Moreover,
DEA continues to work with the GOM on telephone intercept capabilities;
however, significant obstacles are still encountered in the jurisdictional
process and technical intercept capabilities. The GOM still has not
established a routine and reliable process to seek and obtain court
authorization
for wire intercepts. Furthermore, controlled deliveries are not permitted
by Mexican law and would take an act of Mexican Congress to change.
Canada - Law Enforcement Cooperation
Bilateral cooperation between Canada and the United States on counter-narcotics
matters continues to be exceptional. The two countries collaborate
closely at both the federal, state or province, and local levels,
and this also
extends into the multilateral arena. In May 2003, the Government
of Canada announced the renewal of its Drug Strategy and a commitment
to invest
$245 million in additional funding over five years. The Canadian
Drug Strategy (CDS) shows that Canada is committed to dealing
with the root
causes of substance abuse and is focusing on prevention, education,
treatment and increased enforcement responses for those who are
involved in the
production and trafficking of illegal drugs.
The United States-Canada Cross Border Crime Forum is the principal
bilateral cooperative initiative between the two countries and
serves to enhance
and expand intelligence sharing, investigative collaboration, and
joint training opportunities. At the October of 2004 Forum, the
two governments
announced the establishment of four new intelligence exchange sites
to support the International Border Enforcement Team (IBET) program.
The
IBETs allow for the timely and accurate sharing of intelligence
between Canadian and U.S. law enforcement agencies; protects
both countries
from the potential terrorist threats; and impedes the smuggling
of drugs and
other illicit substances between the two countries. The IBETs,
with agency participation from the Customs and Border Patrol,
Immigration
and Customs
Enforcement, U.S. Coast Guard, DOJ, DEA and FBI, and the RCMP,
consist of 15 regional offices that have been strategically located
along
the border between the two countries to ensure that the Canada-U.S.
border
remains open to legitimate trade and travel, but closed to drug
traffickers, terrorists, and other criminal elements.
In addition both countries released an updated “Border Drug Threat
Assessment” in 2004. This document was produced to enhance the
understanding of the flow drugs and precursor chemicals between the two
countries. This study highlighted the emerging concern of MDMA production
in Canada as well as emphasized Canada’s recent regulatory
controls on the import and export of precursor chemicals. These
regulations have
had a positive impact in reducing the cross-border trafficking
of chemicals used in the production of synthetic drugs in the
United States such as
methamphetamine.
There is perhaps no greater example of cooperation between Canadian
and U.S. law enforcement authorities than Operation Candy Box.
This operation
represented the largest Canadian and U.S. enforcement action
ever taken against MDMA drug traffickers. This two year investigation
resulted in
the dismantling of a drug trafficking organization operating
in
both countries that was responsible for the production of MDMA
and marijuana
in Canada, the distribution of these drugs in the United States,
and the laundering of illicit funds. During the course of this
investigation, law enforcement authorities identified the increased
importation
of MDMA
powder, rather than tablets, into Canada from Holland. Tableting
operations were then conducted in Canada for subsequent U.S.
distribution. Several
significant seizures of MDMA powder were conducted and tableting
operations were subsequently dismantled. During this two year
initiative, numerous
arrests and seizures took place throughout the course of the
investigation. Operation Candy Box resulted in 212 arrests
and the seizure of
$8,995,811 in U.S. currency, 1,546 pounds of MDMA powder, 409,300
MDMA tablets,
1,976 pounds of marijuana, 6.5 pounds of methamphetamine, jewelry
valued at $174,000, 38 vehicles, and numerous weapons.
Intelligence Sharing Overview
Intelligence sharing and cooperation between relevant agencies
is the key to combating transnational organized crime. DEA
leads and
participates
in such sharing through a variety of mechanisms. One of DEA’s
oldest and most important intelligence sharing initiatives
that focuses on the
SWB is the El Paso Intelligence Center, or EPIC.
El Paso Intelligence Center: More than 30 years ago, EPIC
was formed as a joint endeavor between DEA and the former
Immigration
and
Naturalization Service, with the former U.S. Customs Service
soon joining in the
effort. The following agencies are currently represented
at EPIC: DEA, Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Coast Guard, FBI, U.S.
Marshals Service, ATF, the Internal Revenue Service, the
Federal Aviation
Administration,
U.S. Secret Service, the Department of State, the Department
of Defense, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Department
of Interior,
Texas
Department of Public Safety, Texas National Guard, and the
National Security Agency.
EPIC has strong relationships for information sharing and
coordination with a number of other Federal, state and
local agencies, including
representation from all 50 states, the District of Columbia,
Puerto Rico, Guam, and
the U.S. Virgin Islands. These long-standing relationships – and
the trust and understanding that have developed as a result – are
the cornerstone of EPIC’s success and continued viability
as an information sharing and coordination center.
With the added threat from terrorist organizations, EPIC’s
original transnational crimes mission of drugs, aliens, and
weapons is even more
critical to maintaining our national security. EPIC continues
to move forward to capitalize on its past successes and current
capabilities
and to provide leadership in the area of interagency coordination,
cooperation and information sharing. The motivation for seeking that cooperation is based on the belief that
a more comprehensive understanding of the threats along the Southwest
border can best be achieved by combining the information that is available
from DEA offices in Mexico and South America together with information
that CBP and ICE collect along the Southwest border. To assure that EPIC
is positioned to provide the most effective and timely support to the
national and homeland security and law enforcement efforts of its member
and partner agencies, EPIC continues to seek the commitment of member
and partner agencies to enhance their analytical participation at EPIC.
Even as this greater
participation is being sought, cooperative efforts among Southwest
border intelligence
centers are already underway. For
example, EPIC, the Joint Task Force-North (JTF-N), and Border Field Intelligence
Center (BORFIC) have joined together in the Tri Centers Collection Management
Tiger Team and are developing a Collections Requirement Management System
(CRMS) to coordinate and manage intelligence requirements. In response
to the needs of its customers, an anticipated increased requirement from
the intelligence and homeland security communities, and a recommendation
developed by the Justice Intelligence Coordinating Committee (JICC),
this CRMS will begin to take advantage of DEA’s capabilities overseas
with the information that can be collected by DHS entities along the
Southwest border.
Another cooperative
endeavor among EPIC, BORFIC, and JTF-N also includes the U. S. Customs
and Border
Protection’s Air and Maritime Operations
Center (AMOC) and JIATF-S. They recently met June 7-9 in Dallas to determine
how to develop a common operating picture using the individual agencies’ Satellite
Tracking (SATTRACK) capabilities. Other agencies also participated to
discuss coordination and program development in this key operational
area.
To meet its information sharing commitments in the future, and thanks
to the support from the Congress for essential funding, EPIC is in the
middle of a major expansion in the use of information technology. These
infrastructure improvements will expand access to EPIC for member and
partner agencies, and improve the national information sharing programs
being led by the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security. Critical
improvements include: continued development and implementation of the
EPIC Open Connectivity Project; the implementation of the National Seizure
System; development of a web-based portal to allow EPIC users to electronically
access EPIC; and establishment of a Continuity of Operation Plan (COOP)
at an external facility.
The development and implementation of the EPIC Open Connectivity Project
is critical to the overall future of EPIC. This is the most ambitious
and dynamic initiative related to information sharing with state and
locals ever undertaken by EPIC. Successful implementation of this project
will provide web-based access by EPIC customers to EPIC services, as
well as analytical tools not previously available to many EPIC partners.
The result will be a significant enhancement in the ability of agencies
to share information, coordinate joint operations and investigations,
and, most importantly, enhance officer/personnel safety. The project
will incorporate and ensure data security and audit capabilities, as
required by statutes and policies.
EPIC is a national
resource, and the many reasons for its creation in 1974 are still valid
today.
The vast number of intrusions across our
Southwest Border relate to drugs, aliens, weapons, and money. Terrorist
organizations may attempt to take advantage of these transnational criminal
groups or methods to try to penetrate our borders. Numerous federal agencies
need to work together to see EPIC’s mission as their own. EPIC
looks to its many partners who together can accomplish a complex mission
through improved coordination and synergy. In summary, EPIC is a National
Center supporting federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement through
information sharing, analysis, coordination, and de-confliction; EPIC’s
core mission is to provide information and intelligence to assist in
the interdiction of drugs, aliens, currency, and weapons, especially
along the SWB; and EPIC’s capabilities are used to ensure that
potential terrorist intrusions receive proactive attention as well as
reactive response.
CONCLUSION
Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, the DEA is committed to working
both harder and smarter in dealing with the threat of transnational
drug crime that affects
our borders. This hearing comes at an opportune time, as Administrator
Tandy has tasked me to lead an effort to make EPIC more relevant
and useful particularly
with regard to our Federal law enforcement counterparts. We recognize that
coordination and cooperation are essential elements of the National Drug
Control Strategy and we are working tirelessly to enhance the effectiveness
and efficiency of our operations. We thank you for your continued support
of DEA. This concludes my formal statement and I would be happy to attempt
to answer any of your questions at this time.
|