\relax 
\citation{intcon}
\citation{execsum}
\citation{intlincol}
\citation{intcomfut,gdewebpage}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{Preface}{viii}}
\bibcite{intcon}{1}
\bibcite{execsum}{2}
\bibcite{intlincol}{3}
\bibcite{intcomfut}{4}
\bibcite{gdewebpage}{5}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{ix}}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\\ \bf  1\ \ The Machine and Detector}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}The Machine}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}Required Energy and Luminosity}{1}}
\newlabel{sec:EandL}{{2.1}{1}}
\citation{LEPhiggs}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Cross sections for some real and possible processes in the Linear Collider energy range}}{2}}
\newlabel{fig:totalsigma}{{1}{2}}
\citation{MAC_raimondi_IEEE}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Why a Linear Collider?}{3}}
\newlabel{sec:whyLC}{{2.2}{3}}
\citation{TEDW,Wiedemann}
\citation{MAC_raimondi_IEEE}
\citation{TEDW,Wiedemann}
\citation{MAC_brinkmann_IEEE,MAC_raubenheimer_IEEE}
\citation{beamstrahlung}
\newlabel{eqn:lumi}{{1}{4}}
\newlabel{beamstrahlung}{{1}{4}}
\citation{PT_Shintake}
\citation{shintake}
\newlabel{item:shintake}{{3}{5}}
\citation{MAC_GAN}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\citation{MAC_Cubook}
\citation{MAC_JLC-1}
\citation{cband}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}The Proposed Machines}{7}}
\newlabel{table:machines}{{2.3}{7}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Design parameters for NLC/JLC X-band, TESLA and CLIC}}{7}}
\citation{breakdown}
\citation{autopsy}
\citation{clic}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\citation{MAC_Subashiev_polarisation}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.4}X-ray Free Electron Laser}{9}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.5}Electron and Positron Sources}{9}}
\citation{MAC_ATF}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.6}Damping Rings}{10}}
\citation{MAC_raimondisery}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.7}Final Focus}{11}}
\newlabel{sec:final_focus}{{2.7}{11}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.8}Crossing Angle and Number of Collision Points}{11}}
\newlabel{sec:crossingAngle}{{2.8}{11}}
\citation{MAC_Cubook}
\citation{OPAL_lumi}
\citation{SLCspectr}
\citation{MAC_renton_ICHEP}
\citation{OPAL_lumi,lumi}
\citation{MillerFrary}
\citation{Moenig_acoll,STB-DJM}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.9}Measuring Beam Energy and Luminosity Spectrum}{13}}
\newlabel{sec:measuringELP}{{2.9}{13}}
\citation{ginztel}
\citation{gamgamrefs}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.10}The $\gamma \gamma $, $\gamma e$ and $e^- e^-$ Options}{14}}
\newlabel{sec:gamgam}{{2.10}{14}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.11}The GigaZ Option}{15}}
\newlabel{sec:gigaz}{{2.11}{15}}
\citation{DET_lcws2k_markiewicz}
\newlabel{sec:DET_MDI}{{3}{16}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Machine Detector Interface }{16}}
\newlabel{sec:DET_backgrounds}{{3.1}{16}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Backgrounds }{16}}
\citation{DET_lcws2k_buesser}
\citation{DET_schulte_thesis}
\citation{DET_lcws2k_buesser}
\citation{DET_lcws2k_buesser}
\citation{DET_lcws2k_schulte}
\newlabel{sec:DET_mask_region}{{3.2}{18}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Mask Region}{18}}
\citation{DET_schulte_thesis}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\citation{henrique}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\citation{DET_Brau_sitges}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Requirements for the Detectors}{20}}
\newlabel{sec:detector}{{4}{20}}
\citation{lcnotes}
\newlabel{sec:DET_energy_flow}{{4.1}{21}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Energy Flow }{21}}
\newlabel{eqn:DET_tracking_error}{{2}{21}}
\citation{DET_LEP_energy_flow}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\newlabel{eqn:DET_cal_error}{{3}{22}}
\citation{DET_higgs_recoil}
\citation{Gluckstern}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\newlabel{sec:DET_tracking}{{4.2}{23}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Tracking }{23}}
\newlabel{sec:DET_tracking_momentum}{{4.2.1}{23}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {4.2.1}Momentum Vector Measurement }{23}}
\newlabel{eqn:DET_gluck}{{4}{23}}
\citation{DET_JLC_detector_general}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\citation{DET_JLC_jet_chamber}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\citation{DET_GMSB}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {4.2.2}Vertexing Systems}{25}}
\newlabel{sec:DET_flavour_id}{{4.2.2}{25}}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\newlabel{eqn:DET_ip_param}{{5}{26}}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\newlabel{sec:DET_calorimetry}{{4.3}{27}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Calorimetry }{27}}
\newlabel{sec:DET_ECAL}{{4.3.1}{27}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {4.3.1}Electromagnetic Calorimeter }{27}}
\citation{DET_brient}
\citation{DET_solenoid}
\citation{MAC_tdr}
\citation{MAC_tdr,DET_takeshita}
\citation{DET_brient}
\newlabel{sec:DET_HCAL}{{4.3.2}{29}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {4.3.2}Hadronic Calorimeter }{29}}
\bibcite{LEPhiggs}{1}
\bibcite{DESY123}{2}
\bibcite{LCWS2k}{3}
\bibcite{sitges}{4}
\bibcite{morioka}{5}
\bibcite{waikoloa}{6}
\bibcite{saariselka}{7}
\bibcite{MAC_tdr}{8}
\bibcite{orngebook}{9}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{30}}
\bibcite{acfarpt}{10}
\bibcite{lcnotes}{11}
\bibcite{MAC_raimondi_IEEE}{12}
\bibcite{TEDW}{13}
\bibcite{Wiedemann}{14}
\bibcite{MAC_brinkmann_IEEE}{15}
\bibcite{MAC_raubenheimer_IEEE}{16}
\bibcite{beamstrahlung}{17}
\bibcite{PT_Shintake}{18}
\bibcite{shintake}{19}
\bibcite{MAC_GAN}{20}
\bibcite{MAC_Cubook}{21}
\bibcite{MAC_JLC-1}{22}
\bibcite{cband}{23}
\bibcite{breakdown}{24}
\bibcite{autopsy}{25}
\bibcite{clic}{26}
\bibcite{MAC_Subashiev_polarisation}{27}
\bibcite{MAC_ATF}{28}
\bibcite{MAC_raimondisery}{29}
\bibcite{OPAL_lumi}{30}
\bibcite{SLCspectr}{31}
\bibcite{MAC_renton_ICHEP}{32}
\bibcite{lumi}{33}
\bibcite{MillerFrary}{34}
\bibcite{Moenig_acoll}{35}
\bibcite{STB-DJM}{36}
\bibcite{ginztel}{37}
\bibcite{gamgamrefs}{38}
\bibcite{DET_lcws2k_markiewicz}{39}
\citation{LCWS2k}
\bibcite{DET_lcws2k_buesser}{40}
\citation{LCWS2k}
\bibcite{DET_schulte_thesis}{41}
\bibcite{DET_lcws2k_schulte}{42}
\citation{LCWS2k}
\bibcite{henrique}{43}
\bibcite{DET_Brau_sitges}{44}
\bibcite{DET_LEP_energy_flow}{45}
\bibcite{DET_higgs_recoil}{46}
\bibcite{Gluckstern}{47}
\bibcite{DET_JLC_detector_general}{48}
\bibcite{DET_JLC_jet_chamber}{49}
\bibcite{DET_GMSB}{50}
\bibcite{DET_brient}{51}
\citation{LCWS2k}
\bibcite{DET_solenoid}{52}
\bibcite{DET_takeshita}{53}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Layout of the TESLA collider}}{34}}
\newlabel{fig:TESLA_layout}{{2}{34}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Conceptual layout of the NLC }}{35}}
\newlabel{fig:NLC}{{3}{35}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Artists concept of the JLC tunnels. The linac is in the small tunnel on the right, linked by waveguides to the klystrons on the left}}{36}}
\newlabel{fig:JLC}{{4}{36}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces How a free electron laser works. The undulator must be some tens of metres long to achieve saturation of the radiation power in the output photon pulse.}}{36}}
\newlabel{fig:FEL}{{5}{36}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the brilliance of X-ray sources, including FELs}}{37}}
\newlabel{fig:FELbrill}{{6}{37}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Definition of the acollinearity angle $\theta _A$ in Bhabha scattering}}{37}}
\newlabel{fig:MAC_acoll}{{7}{37}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Compton scattering of laser light to give high energy $e^- \gamma $ collisions. For $\gamma \gamma $ collisions laser light is scattered from both incoming $e^-$ beams.}}{38}}
\newlabel{fig:egam}{{8}{38}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces  Simulation of $e^+e^-$ pair production via beam-beam interactions in the TESLA detector, with a magnetic field of 4\nobreakspace  {}T. The scale is relatively expanded by a factor two in the vertical direction. Only about 0.1$\%$ of a single bunch crossing is shown. }}{38}}
\newlabel{fig:DET_mask_event}{{9}{38}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces The detector concept proposed for JLC.}}{39}}
\newlabel{fig:DET_JLC_detector}{{10}{39}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces The detector concept proposed for TESLA.}}{40}}
\newlabel{fig:DET_TESLA_quadrant}{{11}{40}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces Efficiency and purity of flavour tagging using a five-layer CCD vertex detector, including information from the event topology and jet mass in a neutral network. The circles show the c-tag performance with b-background only ({\it  i.e.} no uds quarks). The performance at the SLD is indicated for comparison. }}{41}}
\newlabel{fig:DET_flavour_tag}{{12}{41}}
\citation{hhg,Gunion:1996cn,snow96,Murayama:1996ec,Accomando:1998wt,higgsreview}
\citation{nlc,jlc}
\citation{tesla}
\citation{resourcebook}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\\ \bf  2\ \ Higgs Physics at the Linear Collider}{42}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{42}}
\newlabel{seca}{{1}{42}}
\citation{Ginzburg:1983vm,Ginzburg:1984yr}
\citation{hggpheno}
\citation{Asner:2002aa}
\citation{futureprecision}
\citation{gigaz}
\citation{decoupling}
\citation{susyguts}
\citation{resourcebook}
\citation{precision}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Expectations for electroweak symmetry breaking}{45}}
\newlabel{secb}{{2}{45}}
\citation{precision}
\citation{LEPHiggs}
\citation{techni}
\citation{takeuchi}
\citation{peskinwells}
\citation{EFT}
\citation{Dashen,hambye}
\citation{quiros}
\citation{Dashen}
\citation{npHiggs,finalNeuberger}
\citation{LuscherWeisz}
\citation{npYukawa}
\citation{finalNeuberger}
\citation{hambye,Riesselmann}
\citation{Dashen,hambye}
\citation{quiros}
\citation{Riesselmann}
\citation{Dashen,hambye}
\citation{quiros}
\citation{Riesselmann}
\citation{Isidori:2001bm}
\citation{naturally}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces 0}}{49}}
\newlabel{trivial}{{13}{49}}
\citation{Nilles84,Haber85}
\citation{susyguts}
\newlabel{natural}{{6}{50}}
\newlabel{tevscale}{{7}{50}}
\citation{hhg}
\citation{hdecay}
\citation{hdecay}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}The Standard Model Higgs boson---theory}{51}}
\newlabel{secc}{{3}{51}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Standard Model Higgs boson decay modes}{51}}
\newlabel{secca}{{3.1}{51}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces 0}}{52}}
\newlabel{fg:1}{{14}{52}}
\citation{Accomando:1998wt}
\citation{Accomando:1998wt}
\citation{ememhan}
\citation{Djouadi:1992tk}
\citation{Dittmaier:1998dz}
\citation{Djouadi:1992tk}
\citation{Dittmaier:1998dz}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Standard Model Higgs boson production at the LC}{53}}
\newlabel{seccb}{{3.2}{53}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {15}{\ignorespaces 0}}{53}}
\newlabel{higgs:fig:HZdiagram}{{15}{53}}
\citation{LEPHiggs}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {16}{\ignorespaces 0}}{54}}
\newlabel{smhiggsxsec}{{16}{54}}
\citation{precision}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {17}{\ignorespaces 0}}{55}}
\newlabel{ttbarhiggs}{{17}{55}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}SM Higgs searches before the linear collider}{55}}
\newlabel{secd}{{4}{55}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Direct search limits from LEP}{55}}
\newlabel{secda}{{4.1}{55}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Implications of precision electroweak measurements}{55}}
\newlabel{decdb}{{4.2}{55}}
\citation{deltaral2}
\citation{deltaral2}
\citation{deltaral2}
\citation{deltaral2}
\citation{gigaz}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {18}{\ignorespaces }}{56}}
\newlabel{fig:mw2l}{{18}{56}}
\citation{tevreport}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Expectations for Tevatron searches}{57}}
\newlabel{secdc}{{4.3}{57}}
\citation{tevreport}
\citation{tevreport}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {19}{\ignorespaces 0}}{58}}
\newlabel{f:combined-final}{{19}{58}}
\citation{atlashsmref}
\citation{atlashsmref}
\citation{atlashsmref}
\citation{cmshsmref,higgs-CMS_Higgs_lumi}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4}Expectations for LHC searches}{59}}
\newlabel{secdd}{{4.4}{59}}
\citation{zeppenfeld}
\citation{zeppenfeld}
\citation{atlashsmref2}
\citation{Gunion:1996cn}
\citation{Zeppenfeld:2000de,zeppenfeld}
\citation{deRoeck}
\citation{higgs-Eboli}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {20}{\ignorespaces 0}}{60}}
\newlabel{f:atlashsm}{{20}{60}}
\citation{wise,hhgchap4}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {21}{\ignorespaces 0}}{61}}
\newlabel{f:zeppenfeld}{{21}{61}}
\newlabel{fig:LHCwidths}{{21}{61}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Higgs bosons in low-energy supersymmetry}{61}}
\newlabel{sece}{{5}{61}}
\citation{Inoue82,Gunion86}
\newlabel{hpmstate}{{9}{62}}
\newlabel{hastate}{{10}{62}}
\newlabel{scalareigenstates}{{11}{62}}
\citation{hewett}
\citation{schrempp}
\newlabel{hbdef}{{12}{63}}
\newlabel{htdef}{{13}{63}}
\citation{decoupling,gunhabdecoup}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}MSSM Higgs sector at tree level}{64}}
\newlabel{secea}{{5.1}{64}}
\newlabel{susymhpm}{{14}{64}}
\newlabel{kv}{{15}{64}}
\newlabel{kviii}{{16}{64}}
\newlabel{cbmasq}{{17}{64}}
\newlabel{largema1}{{18}{64}}
\newlabel{largema2}{{19}{64}}
\newlabel{largema3}{{20}{64}}
\newlabel{largema4}{{21}{64}}
\citation{wise,hhgchap4}
\newlabel{vvcoup}{{22}{65}}
\newlabel{hvcoup}{{23}{65}}
\newlabel{qqcouplings}{{24}{65}}
\citation{hhprl}
\newlabel{hpmqq}{{25}{66}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}The radiatively corrected MSSM Higgs sector}{66}}
\newlabel{seceb}{{5.2}{66}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {22}{\ignorespaces 0}}{67}}
\newlabel{cosgraph}{{22}{67}}
\citation{higgsrad}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {23}{\ignorespaces 0}}{68}}
\newlabel{mhtanb}{{23}{68}}
\newlabel{deltamh}{{26}{68}}
\citation{singlets}
\citation{Espinosa:1998re}
\citation{Tobe:2002zj}
\newlabel{mhmaxvalue}{{27}{69}}
\citation{hffsusyqcd,deltamb,deltamb1,deltamb2,hffsusyprop}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {24}{\ignorespaces 0}}{70}}
\newlabel{massvsma}{{24}{70}}
\newlabel{couplings}{{28}{70}}
\citation{deltamb,deltamb1,deltamb2}
\citation{deltamb1,deltamb2}
\newlabel{yukbmass}{{29}{71}}
\newlabel{deltamb}{{30}{71}}
\citation{Carena:2001bg}
\citation{deltamb1,deltamb2}
\citation{Carena:2001bg}
\citation{chhiggstotop2,eberl}
\citation{CMW,Wells,bdhty}
\newlabel{bbcouplings}{{34}{72}}
\citation{loganetal}
\citation{7}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}MSSM Higgs boson decay modes}{73}}
\newlabel{secec}{{5.3}{73}}
\citation{13a}
\citation{rosiek}
\citation{Gunion:1993ce,Muhlleitner:2001kw}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.4}MSSM Higgs boson production at the LC}{74}}
\newlabel{seced}{{5.4}{74}}
\citation{LEPHIGGS}
\citation{LEPHIGGSgroup}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}MSSM Higgs boson searches before the LC}{76}}
\newlabel{secf}{{6}{76}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.1}Direct search limits from LEP}{76}}
\newlabel{secfa}{{6.1}{76}}
\citation{tevreport}
\citation{tevreport}
\citation{tevreport}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.2}MSSM Higgs searches at the Tevatron}{77}}
\newlabel{secfb}{{6.2}{77}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {25}{\ignorespaces 0}}{78}}
\newlabel{fullmhmax95}{{25}{78}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.3}MSSM Higgs searches at the LHC}{78}}
\newlabel{secfc}{{6.3}{78}}
\citation{atlasmaxmix}
\citation{atlasmaxmix}
\citation{atlasmaxmix}
\citation{cmsmssmhref}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {26}{\ignorespaces 0}}{79}}
\newlabel{f:atlasmssm}{{26}{79}}
\citation{Carena:2001bg}
\citation{susytohiggs}
\citation{gwp}
\citation{Dobrescu:1999cs}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Non-exotic extended Higgs sectors}{81}}
\newlabel{secg}{{7}{81}}
\citation{Cvetic:2000nc}
\citation{hhg}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.1}The decoupling limit}{82}}
\newlabel{secga}{{7.1}{82}}
\citation{Chankowski:2000an}
\citation{gunhabdecoup}
\citation{Gunion:2000ab}
\citation{Gunion:2000ab}
\citation{Chankowski:2000an}
\citation{Gunion:2000ab}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.2}Constraints from precision electroweak data and LC implications}{83}}
\newlabel{secgb}{{7.2}{83}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {27}{\ignorespaces  The outer ellipses show the 90\% CL region from current precision electroweak data in the $S,T$ plane for $U=0$ relative to a central point defined by the SM prediction with $m_{h_{\rm  SM}}=115$ GeV. The blobs of points show the $S,T$ predictions for 2HDM models with a light $A^0$ and with $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta $ such that the $A^0$ cannot be detected in $b\overline  bA^0$ or $t\overline  tA^0$ production at either the LC or the LHC; the mass of the SM-like $h^0$ is set equal to $\sqrt  s=500\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ (left) or $800\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ (right) and $m_{H^\pm }$ and $m_{H^0}$ have been chosen to minimize the $\chi ^2$ of the full precision electroweak fit. The innermost (middle) ellipse shows the 90\% (99.9\%) CL region for $m_{h_{\rm  SM}}=115$ GeV after the Giga-$Z$ operation {\it  and} a $\Delta m_W\lsim 6$ MeV threshold scan measurement. The stars to the bottom right show the $S,T$ predictions in the case of the SM with $m_{h_{\rm  SM}}=500\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ (left) or $800\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ (right). This figure is from \cite {Gunion:2000ab}.}}{84}}
\newlabel{dsdt}{{27}{84}}
\newlabel{drhonew}{{37}{84}}
\citation{peskinwells}
\citation{Ellwanger:1999ji}
\citation{Espinosa:1999xj}
\citation{Espinosa:1998re}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.3}Constraints on Higgs bosons with $VV$ coupling}{85}}
\newlabel{secgc}{{7.3}{85}}
\newlabel{hsumrules}{{38}{85}}
\citation{Gunion:1996fb,Ellwanger:2001iw}
\citation{Gunion:1996fb}
\citation{Ellwanger:2001iw}
\citation{Gunion:1996fb}
\citation{Ellwanger:2001iw}
\citation{Gunion:1996fb}
\citation{gungrnew}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.4}Detection of non-exotic extended Higgs sector scalars at the Tevatron and LHC}{86}}
\newlabel{secgd}{{7.4}{86}}
\citation{Ellwanger:1999ji}
\citation{Kamoshita:1994iv}
\citation{Espinosa:1999xj}
\citation{hpair}
\citation{Djouadi:1992tk,Bar-Shalom:1995jb,Gunion:1996vv,Dittmaier:1998dz,dawsontth,dawsonbbh,Dittmaier:2000tc,Grzadkowski:2000wj}
\citation{hbb,dawsonbbh,Dittmaier:2000tc,Grzadkowski:2000wj}
\citation{Djouadi:1992tk,Kanemura:2000cw,htb}
\citation{Kanemura:2000cw,htaunu,cpyuan}
\citation{cpyuan}
\citation{logansu}
\citation{hhcouplings}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.5}LC production mechanisms for non-exotic extended Higgs sector scalars}{87}}
\newlabel{secge}{{7.5}{87}}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{gunfarris}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{gunfarris}
\citation{Grzadkowski:2000wj,Chankowski:2000an}
\citation{Haber:1993jr}
\citation{gunfarris}
\citation{gunfarris}
\citation{gunfarris}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{Gunion:1996pq}
\citation{gvw}
\citation{leftright}
\citation{hhg}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {28}{\ignorespaces  The stars form an outline of a wedge of $[m_{A^0},\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta ]$ parameter space inside which the LC operating at $\sqrt  s=800\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ yields fewer than 20 events per $1000\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {fb$^{-1}$}$ in both the $t\overline  t A^0$ and $b\overline  b A^0$ production modes. Also shown by the arrow is the $m_{A^0}$ value above which the process $e^+e^-\to \nu \overline  \nu A^0A^0$ yields fewer than 20 events per $1000\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {fb$^{-1}$}$. The $+$ symbols on the grid of $[m_{A^0},\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta ]$ values show the points for which a $4\sigma $ signal for $\gamma \gamma \to A^0$ would be achieved using LC operation at $\sqrt  s=630\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ after three years of operation assuming running conditions and strategies as specified in \cite {gunasner} using the NLC-based design of the $\gamma \gamma $ collider. (The nominal $e^+e^-$ luminosity for the underlying NLC design employed is $220\nobreakspace  {}{\rm  fb}^{-1}$ per year at $\sqrt  s=500$\nobreakspace  {}GeV.) The circles (triangles) show the additional points that would yield a $4\sigma $ signal for twice (four times) the integrated luminosity of the current NLC $\gamma \gamma $ interaction region design. The small squares show the additional points sampled in the study of \cite {gunasner}. This figure was taken from \cite {gunfarris}. }}{89}}
\newlabel{wedge}{{28}{89}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {29}{\ignorespaces 0}}{90}}
\newlabel{aaz_nnaa_fig}{{29}{90}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {8}Exotic Higgs sectors and other possibilities}{90}}
\newlabel{seck}{{8}{90}}
\citation{Georgi:1985nv,Chanowitz:1985ug}
\citation{hhg}
\citation{Gunion:1996pq}
\citation{Gunion:1996mq}
\citation{Gluza:1997kg}
\citation{Alanakian:1998ii}
\citation{Barenboim:1997pt}
\citation{Alanakian:1998ii}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {8.1}A triplet Higgs sector}{91}}
\citation{Barger:1994wa}
\citation{Casalbuoni:1999fs,Lane:2002wb}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {8.2}Pseudo Nambu Goldstone bosons}{92}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {9}LC Measurements of Higgs Boson Properties}{92}}
\newlabel{sech}{{9}{92}}
\citation{Battaglia:2000jb}
\citation{tesla_report}
\citation{resourcebook}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.1}Mass}{93}}
\newlabel{secha}{{9.1}{93}}
\citation{LCD}
\citation{haijun_mass}
\citation{Ronan}
\citation{Juste:1999xv}
\citation{Barger:1997pv}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {30}{\ignorespaces 0}}{94}}
\newlabel{fig:haijun_mass}{{30}{94}}
\citation{fnal_report}
\citation{kuskinen}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {31}{\ignorespaces 0}}{95}}
\newlabel{fig:juste_direct}{{31}{95}}
\citation{haijun_mass}
\citation{Garcia-Abia:1999kv}
\citation{rvk_separate}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {32}{\ignorespaces 0}}{96}}
\newlabel{fig:haijun_cross}{{32}{96}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.2}Coupling Determinations -- Light Higgs Boson}{96}}
\newlabel{sechb}{{9.2}{96}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {9.2.1}Cross Sections}{96}}
\newlabel{sechba}{{9.2.1}{96}}
\citation{brau_vtx}
\citation{brau_def}
\citation{Jackson:1997sy}
\citation{brau_update}
\citation{hildreth,Borisov:1999mu,battaglia}
\citation{battaglia}
\citation{brau_update}
\citation{Battaglia:2001vf}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Predicted branching ratio precisions in the LCD Large detector and typical vertex detector configuration for 500\nobreakspace  {}fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt  {s} = 500$\nobreakspace  {}GeV\nobreakspace  {}\cite {brau_update}.}}{97}}
\newlabel{tab:higgs_br}{{2}{97}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {9.2.2}Branching Ratios}{97}}
\newlabel{sechbb}{{9.2.2}{97}}
\citation{Gunion:1996qg}
\citation{Boos:2000bz}
\citation{Eboli:2000ze}
\citation{higgschi}
\citation{higgsmaj}
\citation{higgsnu}
\citation{higgsradion}
\citation{Berger:2002vs}
\citation{Vankooten:2001a}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {33}{\ignorespaces 0}}{98}}
\newlabel{fig:nnet_brs}{{33}{98}}
\citation{Djouadi:1992tk,Bar-Shalom:1995jb,Gunion:1996vv,dawsontth,Dittmaier:1998dz,dawsonbbh,Dittmaier:2000tc,Grzadkowski:2000wj}
\citation{Gunion:1996vv}
\citation{optimalobservables}
\citation{dawsontth,dawsonbbh}
\citation{Juste:1999af}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {34}{\ignorespaces 0}}{99}}
\newlabel{fig:hmumu}{{34}{99}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {9.2.3}Radiative Production, $t\overline  {t}h$}{99}}
\newlabel{sechbc}{{9.2.3}{99}}
\citation{smhhcouplings}
\citation{hhcouplings}
\citation{Miller:1999ji,Castanier:2001sf}
\citation{Battaglia:2001nn}
\citation{hhcouplings,mssmhhcouplings}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {35}{\ignorespaces 0}}{100}}
\newlabel{fig:hgamgam}{{35}{100}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {9.2.4}Self-Coupling}{100}}
\newlabel{sechbd}{{9.2.4}{100}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {36}{\ignorespaces 0}}{101}}
\newlabel{fig:brinvis}{{36}{101}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {37}{\ignorespaces 0}}{101}}
\newlabel{fig:hself}{{37}{101}}
\citation{Carena:2001bg}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {9.2.5}Implications for the MSSM Higgs Sector}{102}}
\newlabel{sechbe}{{9.2.5}{102}}
\citation{Carena:2001bg}
\citation{Carena:2001bg}
\citation{battaglia}
\citation{Carena:2001bg}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {38}{\ignorespaces 0}}{103}}
\newlabel{mssmdbrs}{{38}{103}}
\citation{precision}
\citation{haijun_mass,rvk_separate}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.3}Coupling Determinations -- Intermediate Mass Higgs Boson}{104}}
\newlabel{sechc}{{9.3}{104}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {9.3.1}Cross Sections}{104}}
\newlabel{sechca}{{9.3.1}{104}}
\citation{Borisov:1999mu}
\citation{battaglia}
\citation{fnal_report}
\citation{Borisov:1999mu}
\citation{fnal_report}
\citation{fnal_report}
\citation{tesla_report}
\citation{peskinwells,Choudhury:2002qb}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {9.3.2}Branching Ratios}{105}}
\newlabel{sechcb}{{9.3.2}{105}}
\citation{Choudhury:2002qb}
\citation{fnal_report}
\citation{Alcaraz:2000xr}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.4}Coupling Determinations -- Heavy Higgs Boson}{106}}
\newlabel{sechd}{{9.4}{106}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {9.4.1}Cross Sections}{106}}
\newlabel{sechda}{{9.4.1}{106}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {9.4.2}Branching Ratios}{106}}
\newlabel{sechdb}{{9.4.2}{106}}
\citation{Bardin:2001yd}
\citation{Battaglia:2000jb}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Summary of measurement precisions for the properties of a SM-like Higgs boson, $h$, for a range of Higgs boson masses. Unless otherwise noted (see footnotes below the table), $\sqrt  {s}=500$\nobreakspace  {}GeV and the total integrated luminosity is taken to be 500\nobreakspace  {}fb$^{-1}$.\ }}{107}}
\newlabel{tab:summary}{{3}{107}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.5}Summary of Couplings}{107}}
\newlabel{seche}{{9.5}{107}}
\citation{Gunion:1996cn}
\citation{Gunion:1996cn,Drollinger:2001bc}
\citation{Gunion:1996cn}
\citation{Ronan}
\citation{Meyers:2001a}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.6}Total Width}{108}}
\newlabel{sechf}{{9.6}{108}}
\citation{yangsak}
\citation{Miller:2001bi}
\citation{Miller:2001bi,Hagiwara:1994sw,Barger:1994wt,Han:2001mi}
\citation{Han:2001mi}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {39}{\ignorespaces  Fit to the reconstructed $h_{\rm  SM}$ mass to directly extract $\Gamma _{h_{\rm  SM}}$.}}{109}}
\newlabel{fig:widthfit}{{39}{109}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.7}Quantum Numbers}{109}}
\newlabel{sechg}{{9.7}{109}}
\newlabel{eq:zzh}{{40}{109}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {40}{\ignorespaces 0}}{110}}
\newlabel{fig:thresh}{{40}{110}}
\newlabel{eq:zzhX}{{41}{110}}
\citation{Hagiwara:1994sw,Barger:1994wt}
\citation{fnal_report}
\citation{Grzadkowski:1995rx,Grzadkowski:1994kv,Kramer:1994jn}
\citation{Bower:2002zx}
\citation{Gunion:1996bk,Gunion:1996vv}
\citation{Bar-Shalom:1995jb}
\citation{Grzadkowski:1992sa,Gunion:1994wy,Kramer:1994jn}
\citation{Boe:1999kp}
\citation{Gunion:2001qy}
\citation{Gunion:2001qy}
\citation{Gunion:1996qd,Gunion:1997cc,Feng:1997xv,Barger:2000fi,Gunion:2001qy}
\citation{Gunion:2001qy}
\citation{tanbloopdef}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.8}Precision studies of non-SM-like Higgs bosons}{112}}
\newlabel{sechh}{{9.8}{112}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {41}{\ignorespaces 0}}{113}}
\newlabel{fig:tanbdetermination}{{41}{113}}
\citation{lcstop}
\citation{gigaz}
\citation{gigaz}
\citation{gigaz}
\citation{tbmeasurement}
\citation{lhctdr}
\citation{tesla_report}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {10}The Giga-$Z$ option---implications for Higgs physics}{114}}
\newlabel{seci}{{10}{114}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {10.1}Giga-$Z$ and the MSSM}{114}}
\citation{gigaz}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {42}{\ignorespaces 0}}{115}}
\newlabel{fig:MSt2MA}{{42}{115}}
\citation{Asner:2002aa}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {10.2}Giga-$Z$ and non-exotic extended Higgs sectors}{116}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {11}\relax \mathversion  {bold}The $\gamma \gamma $ collider option}{116}}
\newlabel{secj}{{11}{116}}
\citation{Gunion:1993ce}
\citation{Ginzburg:1983vm,Ginzburg:1984yr}
\citation{cainref}
\citation{cainref}
\citation{resourcebook,gunasner}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{cainref}
\citation{resourcebook,gunasner}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{hjikia,Niezurawski:2002aq}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{Grzadkowski:2000wj}
\citation{Muhlleitner:2001kw,gunasner}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {43}{\ignorespaces 0}}{118}}
\newlabel{fig:higgsspec}{{43}{118}}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{Asner:2002aa}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{Asner:2002aa}
\citation{resourcebook,gunasner}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {44}{\ignorespaces 0}}{119}}
\newlabel{fig:higgs}{{44}{119}}
\citation{Gunion:1995bh,Gunion:1997cc,Feng:1997xv,Muhlleitner:2001kw}
\citation{Grzadkowski:1992sa}
\citation{Grzadkowski:1992sa,Kramer:1994jn}
\citation{Gunion:1994wy,Kramer:1994jn}
\citation{gunasner}
\citation{gunasner}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {12}Concluding Remarks}{121}}
\newlabel{secl}{{12}{121}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{Acknowledgments}{121}}
\bibcite{hhg}{1}
\bibcite{Gunion:1996cn}{2}
\bibcite{snow96}{3}
\bibcite{Murayama:1996ec}{4}
\bibcite{Accomando:1998wt}{5}
\bibcite{higgsreview}{6}
\bibcite{nlc}{7}
\bibcite{jlc}{8}
\bibcite{tesla}{9}
\bibcite{resourcebook}{10}
\bibcite{Ginzburg:1983vm}{11}
\bibcite{Ginzburg:1984yr}{12}
\bibcite{hggpheno}{13}
\bibcite{Gunion:1993ce}{14}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{122}}
\bibcite{hjikia}{15}
\bibcite{mmelles}{16}
\bibcite{gunasner}{17}
\bibcite{velasco}{18}
\bibcite{Asner:2002aa}{19}
\bibcite{futureprecision}{20}
\bibcite{gigaz}{21}
\bibcite{decoupling}{22}
\bibcite{susyguts}{23}
\bibcite{precision}{24}
\bibcite{LEPHiggs}{25}
\bibcite{techni}{26}
\bibcite{takeuchi}{27}
\bibcite{peskinwells}{28}
\bibcite{EFT}{29}
\bibcite{Dashen}{30}
\bibcite{hambye}{31}
\bibcite{quiros}{32}
\bibcite{npHiggs}{33}
\bibcite{finalNeuberger}{34}
\bibcite{LuscherWeisz}{35}
\bibcite{npYukawa}{36}
\bibcite{Riesselmann}{37}
\bibcite{Isidori:2001bm}{38}
\bibcite{naturally}{39}
\bibcite{Nilles84}{40}
\bibcite{Haber85}{41}
\bibcite{hdecay}{42}
\bibcite{ememhan}{43}
\bibcite{Djouadi:1992tk}{44}
\bibcite{Dittmaier:1998dz}{45}
\bibcite{deltaral2}{46}
\bibcite{tevreport}{47}
\bibcite{atlashsmref}{48}
\bibcite{cmshsmref}{49}
\bibcite{higgs-CMS_Higgs_lumi}{50}
\bibcite{atlashsmref2}{51}
\bibcite{Zeppenfeld:2000de}{52}
\bibcite{zeppenfeld}{53}
\bibcite{deRoeck}{54}
\bibcite{higgs-Eboli}{55}
\bibcite{wise}{56}
\bibcite{hhgchap4}{57}
\citation{hhg}
\bibcite{Inoue82}{58}
\bibcite{Gunion86}{59}
\bibcite{hewett}{60}
\bibcite{schrempp}{61}
\bibcite{gunhabdecoup}{62}
\bibcite{hhprl}{63}
\bibcite{higgsrad}{64}
\bibcite{singlets}{65}
\bibcite{Espinosa:1998re}{66}
\bibcite{Tobe:2002zj}{67}
\bibcite{hffsusyqcd}{68}
\bibcite{deltamb}{69}
\bibcite{deltamb1}{70}
\bibcite{deltamb2}{71}
\bibcite{hffsusyprop}{72}
\bibcite{Carena:2001bg}{73}
\bibcite{chhiggstotop2}{74}
\bibcite{eberl}{75}
\bibcite{CMW}{76}
\bibcite{Wells}{77}
\bibcite{bdhty}{78}
\bibcite{loganetal}{79}
\bibcite{7}{80}
\bibcite{13a}{81}
\bibcite{rosiek}{82}
\bibcite{Muhlleitner:2001kw}{83}
\bibcite{LEPHIGGS}{84}
\bibcite{LEPHIGGSgroup}{85}
\bibcite{atlasmaxmix}{86}
\bibcite{cmsmssmhref}{87}
\bibcite{susytohiggs}{88}
\bibcite{gwp}{89}
\bibcite{Dobrescu:1999cs}{90}
\bibcite{Cvetic:2000nc}{91}
\bibcite{Chankowski:2000an}{92}
\bibcite{Gunion:2000ab}{93}
\bibcite{Ellwanger:1999ji}{94}
\bibcite{Espinosa:1999xj}{95}
\bibcite{Gunion:1996fb}{96}
\bibcite{Ellwanger:2001iw}{97}
\bibcite{gungrnew}{98}
\bibcite{Kamoshita:1994iv}{99}
\bibcite{hpair}{100}
\bibcite{Bar-Shalom:1995jb}{101}
\bibcite{Gunion:1996vv}{102}
\bibcite{dawsontth}{103}
\bibcite{dawsonbbh}{104}
\bibcite{Grzadkowski:2000wj}{105}
\bibcite{Dittmaier:2000tc}{106}
\bibcite{hbb}{107}
\bibcite{Kanemura:2000cw}{108}
\bibcite{htb}{109}
\bibcite{htaunu}{110}
\bibcite{cpyuan}{111}
\bibcite{logansu}{112}
\bibcite{hhcouplings}{113}
\bibcite{Haber:1993jr}{114}
\bibcite{gunfarris}{115}
\bibcite{Gunion:1996pq}{116}
\bibcite{gvw}{117}
\bibcite{leftright}{118}
\bibcite{Georgi:1985nv}{119}
\bibcite{Chanowitz:1985ug}{120}
\bibcite{Gunion:1996mq}{121}
\bibcite{Gluza:1997kg}{122}
\bibcite{Alanakian:1998ii}{123}
\bibcite{Barenboim:1997pt}{124}
\bibcite{Barger:1994wa}{125}
\bibcite{Casalbuoni:1999fs}{126}
\bibcite{Lane:2002wb}{127}
\bibcite{Battaglia:2000jb}{128}
\bibcite{tesla_report}{129}
\bibcite{LCD}{130}
\bibcite{haijun_mass}{131}
\bibcite{Ronan}{132}
\bibcite{Juste:1999xv}{133}
\bibcite{Barger:1997pv}{134}
\bibcite{fnal_report}{135}
\bibcite{kuskinen}{136}
\bibcite{Garcia-Abia:1999kv}{137}
\bibcite{rvk_separate}{138}
\bibcite{brau_vtx}{139}
\bibcite{brau_def}{140}
\bibcite{Jackson:1997sy}{141}
\bibcite{brau_update}{142}
\bibcite{hildreth}{143}
\bibcite{Borisov:1999mu}{144}
\bibcite{battaglia}{145}
\bibcite{Battaglia:2001vf}{146}
\bibcite{Gunion:1996qg}{147}
\bibcite{Boos:2000bz}{148}
\bibcite{Eboli:2000ze}{149}
\bibcite{higgschi}{150}
\bibcite{higgsmaj}{151}
\bibcite{higgsnu}{152}
\bibcite{higgsradion}{153}
\bibcite{Berger:2002vs}{154}
\bibcite{Vankooten:2001a}{155}
\bibcite{optimalobservables}{156}
\bibcite{Juste:1999af}{157}
\bibcite{smhhcouplings}{158}
\bibcite{Miller:1999ji}{159}
\bibcite{Castanier:2001sf}{160}
\bibcite{Battaglia:2001nn}{161}
\bibcite{mssmhhcouplings}{162}
\bibcite{Choudhury:2002qb}{163}
\bibcite{Alcaraz:2000xr}{164}
\bibcite{Bardin:2001yd}{165}
\bibcite{Drollinger:2001bc}{166}
\bibcite{Meyers:2001a}{167}
\bibcite{yangsak}{168}
\bibcite{Miller:2001bi}{169}
\bibcite{Hagiwara:1994sw}{170}
\bibcite{Barger:1994wt}{171}
\bibcite{Han:2001mi}{172}
\bibcite{Grzadkowski:1995rx}{173}
\bibcite{Grzadkowski:1994kv}{174}
\bibcite{Kramer:1994jn}{175}
\bibcite{Bower:2002zx}{176}
\bibcite{Gunion:1996bk}{177}
\bibcite{Grzadkowski:1992sa}{178}
\bibcite{Gunion:1994wy}{179}
\bibcite{Boe:1999kp}{180}
\bibcite{Gunion:1996qd}{181}
\bibcite{Gunion:1997cc}{182}
\bibcite{Feng:1997xv}{183}
\bibcite{Barger:2000fi}{184}
\bibcite{Gunion:2001qy}{185}
\bibcite{tanbloopdef}{186}
\bibcite{lcstop}{187}
\bibcite{tbmeasurement}{188}
\bibcite{lhctdr}{189}
\bibcite{cainref}{190}
\bibcite{Niezurawski:2002aq}{191}
\bibcite{Gunion:1995bh}{192}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {45}{\ignorespaces 0}}{134}}
\newlabel{wedgeplot}{{45}{134}}
\citation{cdf}
\citation{dzero}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\\ \bf  3\ \ Top Quark Physics}{135}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{135}}
\citation{jk1}
\citation{kuehn}
\citation{peskin}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Top Quark Threshold Region}{136}}
\newlabel{threshold-region}{{2}{136}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}Physics Motivations and Goals}{137}}
\citation{exp}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Top Quark Mass}{138}}
\newlabel{topmassdet}{{2.2}{138}}
\citation{renormalon}
\citation{topcollab}
\citation{exp,sumino-app}
\newlabel{nrhamiltonian}{{46}{140}}
\newlabel{qcd-pot}{{47}{140}}
\citation{renormalon}
\newlabel{selfene}{{50}{141}}
\citation{ks}
\citation{fadin-yak}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {46}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip The total production cross sections for $e^+e^- \to t\overline  {t}$ in the threshold region, where the leading-order (LO), next-to-leading-order (NLO) and next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) curves are shown. The vertical lines represent the locations of the corresponding $1S$ resonances when the top width is artificially taken to zero; also the position of $2 m_t$ is shown by vertical lines. The two figures correspond to (a) the pole-mass scheme, and (b) the $\overline  {\rm  MS}$-scheme.  }}{143}}
\newlabel{nagano}{{46}{143}}
\citation{rho}
\citation{bdecay}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {47}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip $\mu $-dependences of the sums of the series expansion for the $1S$ energy level. The ${\pcal O}(\alpha _s^4)$ term is evaluated in the large-$\beta _0$ approximation.  }}{144}}
\newlabel{mu-dep}{{47}{144}}
\citation{topcollab,bss,nosht}
\citation{topcollab}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}Dynamics and Observables}{145}}
\newlabel{dyn}{{2.3}{145}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {48}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip The time evolution of the $t\overline  {t}$ system.  }}{146}}
\newlabel{SM}{{48}{146}}
\citation{htmy,py}
\newlabel{qmhamiltonian}{{52}{147}}
\newlabel{h0}{{53}{147}}
\newlabel{h2}{{55}{147}}
\citation{fk,sp}
\newlabel{totcs-f}{{62}{148}}
\citation{sfhmn,jkt}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {49}{\ignorespaces }}{149}}
\newlabel{totcs}{{49}{149}}
\citation{sfhmn,jkt}
\citation{ms}
\newlabel{msgf}{{63}{150}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {50}{\ignorespaces }}{151}}
\newlabel{momdist}{{50}{151}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {51}{\ignorespaces }}{152}}
\newlabel{fbasym}{{51}{152}}
\citation{r26,ps}
\newlabel{tabpolt}{{2.3}{153}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces The polarization of top quarks in the $t\overline  {t}$ threshold region for a linearly polarized $e^-$ beam and an unpolarized $e^+$ beam ($P_{e^+}=0$).}}{153}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {52}{\ignorespaces }}{153}}
\newlabel{on-basis}{{52}{153}}
\citation{jk2}
\newlabel{spara}{{66}{154}}
\newlabel{sperp}{{67}{154}}
\newlabel{snorm}{{68}{154}}
\newlabel{yukawapot}{{69}{154}}
\citation{kuehn}
\citation{langdist,r43}
\citation{ps}
\newlabel{leneangular}{{70}{155}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {53}{\ignorespaces }}{156}}
\newlabel{fsidiagram}{{53}{156}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {54}{\ignorespaces }}{156}}
\newlabel{mdistfsi}{{54}{156}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {55}{\ignorespaces }}{157}}
\newlabel{tbardecay}{{55}{157}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {56}{\ignorespaces }}{158}}
\newlabel{spin}{{56}{158}}
\citation{ps}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {57}{\ignorespaces }}{159}}
\newlabel{semildecay}{{57}{159}}
\newlabel{born}{{71}{159}}
\citation{r26}
\newlabel{full}{{72}{160}}
\newlabel{del1}{{73}{160}}
\newlabel{delS}{{74}{160}}
\citation{r26}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {58}{\ignorespaces }}{161}}
\newlabel{xi}{{58}{161}}
\newlabel{def}{{78}{162}}
\newlabel{thabar}{{79}{162}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.4}Measurements of Top Quark Couplings}{162}}
\newlabel{topcoupling}{{2.4}{162}}
\citation{exp}
\citation{exp,hjk}
\citation{param}
\citation{iwasaki}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {59}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip (a) Effects of the initial state radiation (ISR) and the beam energy spread and beamstrahlung on the threshold shape for $m_t=175$\nobreakspace  {}GeV and $\alpha _s(M_Z)=0.12$: with no ISR and no beam effects (dash), with ISR but without beam effects (dotdash), and with both ISR and beam effects (solid). (b) Threshold cross section including the effects of ISR and natural beam energy spread but leaving out the effect of beamstrahlung. Two kinds of spectra, flat-top (dot) and double-peaked (solid), which is more realistic, are examined for various beam energy spread: 0.1\%, 0.4\%, 0.7\%, 1.0\%, 1.4\%.  }}{165}}
\newlabel{beameff}{{59}{165}}
\citation{rg}
\citation{exp}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {60}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip The dependence of the cross section as $\Gamma _t \propto |V_{tb}|^2$ is varied. An example of energy scan is superimposed, where each point corresponds to 1\nobreakspace  {}fb$^{-1}$.  }}{167}}
\newlabel{widtheff}{{60}{167}}
\citation{exp}
\citation{ikematsu}
\citation{nosht}
\citation{topcollab}
\citation{sjo-kho}
\citation{sumino-app}
\newlabel{effop}{{80}{170}}
\citation{EDM-2HDM}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {61}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip (a)The time evolution of the $t\overline  {t}$ system when the effects of ${\pcal L}_{\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {\relax \fontsize  {7}{8}\selectfont  CP-odd}}$ are included. $\otimes $ represent the anomalous couplings. (b)The potential $V_{\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {\relax \fontsize  {7}{8}\selectfont  CP-odd}}$ tends to align the $t$ spin in the direction of the color-electric field and the $\overline  {t}$ spin in the opposite direction.  }}{171}}
\newlabel{cpodd}{{61}{171}}
\citation{cuypers-rindani}
\newlabel{cppot}{{81}{172}}
\citation{new}
\citation{LR-asym}
\citation{LR-asym}
\citation{dkz}
\citation{acfarep-Yukawa}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Open Top Region}{175}}
\newlabel{open-top-region}{{3}{175}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Short Review}{175}}
\newlabel{short-review}{{3.1}{175}}
\citation{heavyHiggs-yukawa}
\citation{bmhdhkbdk,abl}
\citation{hollik-sch}
\citation{desyA}
\citation{yeh}
\citation{new}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Use of Inclusive Observables in Studying Form Factors}{178}}
\newlabel{inclobs-ff}{{3.2}{178}}
\citation{new}
\citation{r27}
\citation{frey}
\citation{fuji-yama}
\citation{cuypers-rindani}
\citation{iwasaki}
\citation{new}
\citation{soniatwood,gr-hioki2}
\citation{optimal-obs}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Conclusions}{182}}
\bibcite{cdf}{1}
\bibcite{dzero}{2}
\bibcite{jk1}{3}
\bibcite{kuehn}{4}
\bibcite{peskin}{5}
\bibcite{exp}{6}
\bibcite{htmy}{7}
\bibcite{yakov}{8}
\bibcite{pp}{9}
\bibcite{renormalon}{10}
\bibcite{topcollab}{11}
\bibcite{sumino-app}{12}
\bibcite{comas-miq-mar}{13}
\bibcite{exp2}{14}
\bibcite{ks}{15}
\bibcite{fadin-yak}{16}
\bibcite{rho}{17}
\bibcite{bdecay}{18}
\bibcite{bss}{19}
\bibcite{nosht}{20}
\bibcite{py}{21}
\bibcite{fk}{22}
\bibcite{sp}{23}
\bibcite{sfhmn}{24}
\bibcite{jkt}{25}
\bibcite{ms}{26}
\bibcite{r26}{27}
\bibcite{ps}{28}
\bibcite{jk2}{29}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{184}}
\bibcite{r44}{30}
\bibcite{r27}{31}
\bibcite{r28}{32}
\bibcite{langdist}{33}
\bibcite{r43}{34}
\bibcite{hjk}{35}
\bibcite{param}{36}
\bibcite{iwasaki}{37}
\bibcite{rg}{38}
\bibcite{ikematsu}{39}
\bibcite{sjo-kho}{40}
\bibcite{EDM-2HDM}{41}
\bibcite{cuypers-rindani}{42}
\bibcite{new}{43}
\bibcite{LR-asym}{44}
\bibcite{dkz}{45}
\bibcite{yukawa1}{46}
\bibcite{yukawa2}{47}
\bibcite{acfarep-Yukawa}{48}
\bibcite{heavyHiggs-yukawa}{49}
\bibcite{jlzdks}{50}
\bibcite{jkd}{51}
\bibcite{mac-orr}{52}
\bibcite{ckshs}{53}
\bibcite{sbfu}{54}
\bibcite{bbc}{55}
\bibcite{bmhdhkbdk}{56}
\bibcite{abl}{57}
\bibcite{hollik-sch}{58}
\bibcite{csscst}{59}
\bibcite{hagiwara-kitazawa}{60}
\bibcite{mahanta}{61}
\bibcite{snowmass2001}{62}
\bibcite{mschmitt}{63}
\bibcite{bbo}{64}
\bibcite{frey}{65}
\bibcite{desyA}{66}
\bibcite{yeh}{67}
\bibcite{soniatwood}{68}
\bibcite{zhou}{69}
\bibcite{pra}{70}
\bibcite{sonirep}{71}
\bibcite{fuji-yama}{72}
\bibcite{gr-hioki2}{73}
\bibcite{optimal-obs}{74}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\\ \bf  4\ \ Supersymmetry and the Linear Collider}{187}}
\newlabel{Schap:supersymmetry}{{4}{187}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{187}}
\newlabel{Ssec:intro}{{1}{187}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}The Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model}{189}}
\newlabel{Ssec:MSSM}{{2}{189}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}Particle Content}{189}}
\newlabel{Salgebra}{{93}{189}}
\newlabel{Spoincareops}{{94}{189}}
\newlabel{Ssusyops}{{95}{189}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Particles of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and their SU(3), SU(2), and U(1)$_Y$ quantum numbers. All chiral fermions are left-handed, and the superscript $c$ denotes charge conjugation. We will also use the common alternative notations $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}_L \equiv \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}^-_L \equiv \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}$, $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}^*_R \equiv \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}^+_R \equiv \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}^c$, and so forth. }}{191}}
\newlabel{Stable:particles}{{5}{191}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Supersymmetric Matter Interactions}{191}}
\newlabel{Ssec:matter}{{2.2}{191}}
\newlabel{Scomponents}{{99}{192}}
\newlabel{SLmatter}{{102}{192}}
\newlabel{SW}{{103}{192}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {62}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Quadratically-divergent contributions to the Higgs boson mass in supersymmetry. These cancel exactly in the limit of exact supersymmetry. }}{193}}
\newlabel{Sfig:Higgs}{{62}{193}}
\newlabel{SRp}{{104}{193}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}Supersymmetric Gauge Interactions}{194}}
\newlabel{Ssec:gauge}{{2.3}{194}}
\newlabel{SDterms}{{106}{194}}
\newlabel{Sgauginoterms}{{107}{194}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.4}Supersymmetry-breaking Terms}{194}}
\newlabel{Ssec:soft}{{2.4}{194}}
\newlabel{Ssoft}{{109}{195}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.5}Sleptons}{196}}
\newlabel{Ssec:sleptons}{{2.5}{196}}
\newlabel{Sfullslepton}{{110}{196}}
\newlabel{Smsleptondiagonal}{{111}{196}}
\newlabel{Smsnu}{{113}{197}}
\newlabel{staumassmatrix}{{114}{197}}
\newlabel{sleptonsplitting}{{117}{198}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.6}Charginos and Neutralinos}{198}}
\newlabel{Schamass}{{119}{198}}
\newlabel{UVmixingangles}{{120}{198}}
\newlabel{Sneumass}{{121}{199}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Successes and Puzzles}{199}}
\newlabel{Ssec:successes}{{3}{199}}
\citation{Martin:1997ns}
\citation{Martin:1997ns}
\citation{Dienes:1996du,Horava:1996ma}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {63}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip The renormalization group evolution of the three gauge coupling constants in the standard model (dashed) and in the MSSM (solid)\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Martin:1997ns}. }}{200}}
\newlabel{Sfig:running}{{63}{200}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Unification}{200}}
\newlabel{Ssec:unification}{{3.1}{200}}
\citation{Martin:1997ns}
\newlabel{Sgauginomasses}{{122}{201}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Dark Matter}{201}}
\newlabel{Ssec:dm}{{3.2}{201}}
\citation{Gabbiani:1996hi}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {64}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Neutralino dark matter annihilation processes. }}{202}}
\newlabel{Sfig:annih}{{64}{202}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Flavor Violation}{202}}
\newlabel{Ssec:flavor}{{3.3}{202}}
\citation{Contino:1998nw}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {65}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Neutralino dark matter scattering processes. }}{203}}
\newlabel{Sfig:scattering}{{65}{203}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {66}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Supersymmetric contribution to the $K_L$--$K_S$ mass splitting. }}{203}}
\newlabel{Sfig:deltaK}{{66}{203}}
\citation{Moroi:1995yh}
\citation{Suzuki:2001rb}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {67}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Supersymmetric contribution to the electron's electric dipole moment. A photon attached to the charged internal line is implicit. }}{204}}
\newlabel{Sfig:EDMe}{{67}{204}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.4}CP Violation}{204}}
\newlabel{Ssec:CP}{{3.4}{204}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.5}Proton Decay}{204}}
\newlabel{Ssec:proton}{{3.5}{204}}
\citation{Goto:1999iz}
\citation{Goto:1999iz}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {68}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Contribution to proton decay in supersymmetric grand unified theories\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Goto:1999iz}. }}{205}}
\newlabel{Sfig:proton}{{68}{205}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Models}{205}}
\newlabel{Ssec:models}{{4}{205}}
\newlabel{Ssoftgen}{{130}{206}}
\newlabel{Smgravitino}{{131}{207}}
\newlabel{Sgravitinointeractions}{{132}{207}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Minimal Supergravity}{207}}
\newlabel{Ssec:msugra}{{4.1}{207}}
\newlabel{SscalarRGE}{{137}{208}}
\newlabel{SRGEs}{{137}{208}}
\newlabel{SEWSB1}{{138}{208}}
\newlabel{SEWSB2}{{139}{208}}
\citation{Feng:2000gh}
\citation{Feng:2000gh}
\newlabel{Smsugra1}{{142}{209}}
\newlabel{Smsugra2}{{143}{209}}
\citation{Feng:1999mn,Feng:1999zg}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {69}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip The character of the LSP in minimal supergravity with $A_0 = 0$ and $\mu < 0$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Feng:2000gh}. In the unshaded regions, the LSP is the lightest neutralino, and contours of the gaugino-ness of the LSP $R_{\chi } \equiv |N_{11}|^2 + |N_{12}|^2$ are given (in percent). In the narrow upper left shaded regions, the LSP is the lighter stau. The lower right shaded regions are excluded by bounds on the chargino mass. }}{210}}
\newlabel{Sfig:gfraction}{{69}{210}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Focus Point Supersymmetry}{210}}
\newlabel{Ssec:focuspoint}{{4.2}{210}}
\citation{Feng:2000bp}
\citation{Feng:1999zg}
\citation{Feng:1999zg}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {70}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Renormalization group trajectories of $m_{H_u}^2$ in minimal supergravity for various $m_0$ as labeled and $M_{1/2}= 300\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $A_0= 0$, $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta = 10$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Feng:1999zg}. These focus to a point at $Q \sim m_W$. }}{211}}
\newlabel{Sfig:focuspoint}{{70}{211}}
\newlabel{SfpEWSB}{{145}{211}}
\citation{Drees:1986jx}
\citation{Dvali:1996rj}
\citation{Feng:1999iq}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Superheavy Supersymmetry}{212}}
\newlabel{Ssec:superheavy}{{4.3}{212}}
\citation{Dine:1993yw,Giudice:1998bp}
\citation{Dimopoulos:1997ww}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4}Gauge Mediation}{213}}
\newlabel{Ssec:gmsb}{{4.4}{213}}
\newlabel{Sgmsbmasses}{{149}{213}}
\citation{Feng:1997zr}
\citation{Feng:1997zr}
\citation{Stump:1996wd}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {71}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Contributions to scalar and gaugino masses in gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking. }}{214}}
\newlabel{Sfig:ssi_gmsbfeyn}{{71}{214}}
\citation{Randall:1998uk,Giudice:1998xp}
\citation{Gherghetta:1999sw}
\citation{Pomarol:1999ie}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {72}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip The NLSP in various regions of minimal gauge-mediation model parameter space\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Feng:1997zr}. $M$ is the messenger mass or scale, and $N_5$ is the number of messenger multiplets. In the region above the labeled contours, the NLSP is a stau; in the region below, the NLSP is a neutralino. The boundary between the two regions depends slightly on $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta $; the boundaries for $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta = 3$, 10, and 30 are shown. In the shaded region, gauge coupling constants become non-perturbative below the GUT scale under two-loop renormalization group evolution. }}{215}}
\newlabel{Sfig:n5}{{72}{215}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.5}Anomaly Mediation}{215}}
\newlabel{Ssec:amsb}{{4.5}{215}}
\citation{Chen:1995yu}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {73}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Fields in anomaly-mediation: MSSM fields $Q$ are separated from supersymmetry-breaking fields $Z$ in extra dimensions. }}{216}}
\newlabel{Sfig:sequesteredbranes}{{73}{216}}
\citation{Kaplunovsky:1993rd}
\citation{Barbieri:1994pv}
\citation{Drees:1986vd,Kawamura:1994ys}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.6}GUT and Planck Scale Frameworks}{217}}
\newlabel{Ssec:GUTmodels}{{4.6}{217}}
\citation{Huitu:1997qu}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Slepton Studies}{218}}
\newlabel{Ssec:slstudy}{{5}{218}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Signal and Background}{218}}
\newlabel{Ssec:slsgbg}{{5.1}{218}}
\citation{unknown:1992mg,Tsukamoto:1993gt}
\newlabel{Spolarizedsigma}{{157}{219}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Slepton Masses}{220}}
\newlabel{Ssec:slmasses}{{5.2}{220}}
\citation{unknown:1992mg,Tsukamoto:1993gt}
\citation{Martyn:1999tc}
\citation{Martyn:1999tc}
\citation{Martyn:1999tc}
\citation{Dima:2001jr}
\citation{Feng:1994sd}
\citation{Aguilar-Saavedra:2001rg,Feng:1994sd,Wagner_1,Lykken:1997np}
\newlabel{Sdecaykin}{{161}{221}}
\citation{Aguilar-Saavedra:2001rg}
\citation{Aguilar-Saavedra:2001rg}
\citation{Martyn:1999tc,Feng:2001ce}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {74}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Muon energy distribution from the signal $e^-_R e^+_L \to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }^+_R\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }^-_R \to \mu ^+ \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1 \mu ^- \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1$ (open), and the dominant backgrounds (shaded), for $\sqrt  {s} = 320\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ and an integrated luminosity of $160\nobreakspace  {}{\rm  fb}^{-1}$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Martyn:1999tc}. The underlying supersymmetric masses are $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }_R}=132\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ and $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1}=71.9\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$.  }}{222}}
\newlabel{Sfig:M1}{{74}{222}}
\citation{Feng:1998ud,Feng:2001ce}
\citation{Feng:2001ce}
\citation{Barger:1998qu}
\citation{Martyn:1999xc}
\citation{Feng:2001ce}
\citation{Martyn:1999xc}
\citation{Feng:2001ce}
\citation{Hinchliffe:1996iu,Bachacou:1999zb}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {75}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Minimum mass distribution for smuons from the process $e^-_R e^+_L \to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }^+_R\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }^-_R \to \mu ^+ \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1 \mu ^- \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1$, for $\sqrt  {s} = 320\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ and an integrated luminosity of $160\nobreakspace  {}{\rm  fb}^{-1}$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Aguilar-Saavedra:2001rg}. The underlying supersymmetry parameters are $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }_R}=132\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ and $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1}=71.9\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$.  }}{223}}
\newlabel{Sfig:minmass}{{75}{223}}
\citation{AtlasTDR:1999fq}
\citation{Allanach:2000kt}
\citation{AtlasTDR:1999fq}
\citation{Allanach:2000kt}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {76}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Left: Threshold cross sections for $e^+e^-\to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }_R^+ \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }_R^-$, with $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }}$ = 132 GeV and smuon width $\Gamma _{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }_R}=0.3$ (solid) and 0 and $0.6\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ (dashed)\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Martyn:1999xc}. The error bars are for a 10 point scan with total integrated luminosity ${\pcal L} =100\nobreakspace  {}{\rm  fb}^{-1}$. Right: Threshold behavior for $\sigma (e^-e^- \to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}^-_R\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}^-_R)$ (upper two contours) and $\sigma (e^+e^- \to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}^+_R \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}^-_R)$ (lower two contours) for $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}_R}=150$ GeV and $M_1=100$ GeV and beam polarizations $P_{e^-} = 0.8$ and $P_{e^+} = 0$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Feng:2001ce}. In each pair, the dotted curve neglects all beam effects, and the solid curve includes the initial state radiation, beamstrahlung, and beam energy spread of flat beams. }}{224}}
\newlabel{Sfig:M2}{{76}{224}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {77}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Left: The $e^+e^- + \mu ^+\mu ^- -e^{\pm } e^{\mp }$ mass distribution for LHC minimal supergravity Point 5 with $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_2\to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{l}l \to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1 l^+l^-$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {AtlasTDR:1999fq}. Right: Scatter plot of reconstructed values of the $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{l}_R$ and $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1$ masses for LHC point 5 (S5) and for a different model (O1) using the decay chain $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{q}_L \to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_2 q \to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{l}_R l q \to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1 llq$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Allanach:2000kt}. }}{225}}
\newlabel{Sfig:M3}{{77}{225}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}Polarized Cross Sections}{225}}
\newlabel{Ssec:slcrosssection}{{5.3}{225}}
\citation{unknown:1992mg,Tsukamoto:1993gt}
\newlabel{b1}{{165}{226}}
\newlabel{SselectronR}{{171}{226}}
\newlabel{SselectronL}{{172}{226}}
\citation{Feng:2001ce,Blochinger:2002zw}
\citation{Nojiri:1996fp}
\citation{Nojiri:1996fp}
\citation{Nojiri:1994it}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {78}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Contours of $\sigma (e^+ e^-_R \to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}_R^+ \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}_R^-)$ for $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}_R}=200\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ and $\sqrt {s}=500\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$ in the $(M_1,\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta )$ plane\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Nojiri:1996fp}. At each point in the plane, $\mu $ is chosen so that $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1}=100\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$. Solid lines correspond to a $\mu >0$ solution and dashed lines to $\mu <0$. }}{228}}
\newlabel{Sfig:M4}{{78}{228}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.4}Lepton Flavor Violation}{229}}
\newlabel{Ssec:lfv}{{5.4}{229}}
\citation{Arkani-Hamed:1996au,Arkani-Hamed:1997km}
\citation{Arkani-Hamed:1996au}
\citation{Arkani-Hamed:1996au}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {79}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip The solid contours are for $\sigma (e^+e^-_R\to e^{\pm } \mu ^{\mp } \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1 \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1 )$ in fb for $\sqrt {s} = 500\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}_R}, m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }_R} \approx 200\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, and $M_1 = 100\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Arkani-Hamed:1996au}. The thick contour represents the LFV discovery reach given $50\nobreakspace  {}{\rm  fb}^{-1}$. Constant contours of $B(\mu \to e\gamma )=4.9\times 10^{-11}$ and $2.5\times 10^{-12}$ are also plotted for degenerate left-handed sleptons with mass 350 GeV and $-(A + \mu \qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta )/m_R = 0$ (dotted), 2 (dashed), and 50 (dot-dashed). }}{231}}
\newlabel{Sfig:MLFV}{{79}{231}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.5}Tau Polarization from Stau Decay}{232}}
\newlabel{Ssec:stau}{{5.5}{232}}
\citation{Nojiri:1996fp}
\citation{Nojiri:1996fp}
\citation{Nojiri:1996fp}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {80}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip The flow of chirality in interactions of $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\tau }_R$ with gauginos and Higgsinos. }}{233}}
\newlabel{Sfig:M6}{{80}{233}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {81}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Distributions in $z_c$ for $\rho $ candidates selected from $10^4$ $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\tau }_1$ pairs decaying exclusively into $\tau _R$ (left) and $\tau _L$ (right), together with the best fit histograms\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Nojiri:1996fp}.  }}{234}}
\newlabel{Sfig:M8}{{81}{234}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Chargino and Neutralino Studies}{234}}
\newlabel{Ssec:chaneustudy}{{6}{234}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.1}Signal and Background}{234}}
\newlabel{Ssec:sigbg}{{6.1}{234}}
\newlabel{chaneuprocesses}{{179}{234}}
\citation{Tsukamoto:1993gt,Feng:1995zd,Choi:1998ut,Moortgat-Pick:1999yj}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.2}Masses and Polarized Cross Sections}{235}}
\newlabel{Ssec:chmass}{{6.2}{235}}
\newlabel{Schaparameters}{{181}{235}}
\citation{Feng:1995zd}
\citation{Feng:1995zd}
\newlabel{Schaobservables}{{182}{236}}
\citation{Moortgat-Pick:1999yj}
\citation{Moortgat-Pick:1999yj}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {82}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Contours of $\sigma (e^+e^-_R \to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^+_1 \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^-_1)$ (in fb) in the $(\mu , M_2)$ plane for fixed $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta =4$ and $\sqrt  {s}=500\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$. The cross-hatched region is excluded by current bounds, and charginos are kinematically inaccessible in the hatched region\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Feng:1995zd}. }}{237}}
\newlabel{Sfig:fengch}{{82}{237}}
\citation{Ibrahim:1998je}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {83}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip The forward-backward asymmetry of the final state electron from chargino decay in chargino pair events as a function of the sneutrino mass (in GeV)\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Moortgat-Pick:1999yj}. The curves are for $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}_L} = 130\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $150\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $200\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, and $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}_L}^2 = m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\nu }_e}^2 - m_W^2 \qopname  \relax o{cos}2 \beta $, from above. The other underlying parameters are fixed to $M_2 = 152\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $\mu = 316\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta = 3$, and $M_1 = 79\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, and the center-of-mass energy is $\sqrt  {s} = 500\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, with beam polarizations $P_{e^-}= -0.85$ and $P_{e^+}= -0.6$. }}{238}}
\newlabel{Sfig:chaafb}{{83}{238}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.3}CP Violation}{238}}
\newlabel{Ssec:CP1}{{6.3}{238}}
\citation{Choi:1998ut}
\citation{Choi:1998ut}
\citation{Choi:2001ww}
\citation{Barger:2001nu}
\citation{Barger:2001nu}
\citation{Barger:2001nu}
\citation{Barger:2001nu}
\citation{Barger:2001nu}
\citation{Choi:1998ut}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {84}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip The dependence of various observables on CP-violating phases for the $\mu $ parameter and Bino mass, assuming magnitudes of the supersymmetry parameters as given in minimal supergravity with $m_0=100\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $M_{1/2}=200\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $A_0=0$, $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta =4$ and $\mu >0$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Barger:2001nu}.  }}{240}}
\newlabel{Sfig:M9}{{84}{240}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {85}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip The best fit values of $M_1$ and $\phi _1$ given measurements of three cross sections, $\sigma ( \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1 \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_2)$, $\sigma (\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_2 \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_2)$, and $\sigma (\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^\pm _1 \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^\mp _1)$, and three masses, $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1}, m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_2}$, and $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^\pm _1}$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Barger:2001nu}. The effects of experimental resolution and finite statistics have been included (see text). The parameter $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta $ is either fixed to its underlying value (dark) or included among the fitted parameters (light green). The right-hand panel summarizes the distribution of best-fit $\phi _1$ phases.  }}{240}}
\newlabel{Sfig:M10}{{85}{240}}
\citation{Cheng:2002ab}
\citation{Feng:1995zd}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Testing Supersymmetry}{241}}
\newlabel{Ssec:testsusy}{{7}{241}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.1}Verifying Supersymmetry}{241}}
\newlabel{Ssec:verifying}{{7.1}{241}}
\citation{Tsukamoto:1993gt}
\citation{Tsukamoto:1993gt}
\citation{Tsukamoto:1993gt}
\citation{Tsukamoto:1993gt}
\citation{Tsukamoto:1993gt}
\newlabel{Snewpara}{{186}{242}}
\citation{Nojiri:1996fp}
\citation{Cheng:1997vy}
\citation{Cheng:1997vy}
\citation{Mahanta:1999hx}
\citation{Cheng:1997sq}
\citation{Nojiri:1996fp}
\citation{Nojiri:1996fp}
\citation{Chankowski:1990du}
\citation{Hikasa:1996bw}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {86}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Left: Reconstruction of the slepton production angle\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Tsukamoto:1993gt}. Each parent slepton's direction lies on a cone around the observed lepton momentum. Since the sleptons are produced back-to-back, the slepton directions are then determined up to a two-fold ambiguity to lie along the dashed lines. The cone for $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}^-$ solution has been inverted in the figure. The dashed lines represent the solutions for the $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}^+$ direction. Right: Angular distribution of $e^+e^- \rightarrow \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}^+_R \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}^-_R$ reconstructed from the final state $e^+e^-$ for underlying parameters $\sqrt  {s}=350\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}_R=142\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, and $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1=118\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Tsukamoto:1993gt}. The data points with error bars show angular distributions with (a) both right and wrong solutions and (b) with the wrong solution distribution, assumed flat, subtracted (see text). The histograms are the distribution of correct solutions (a) after and (b) before selection cuts. }}{243}}
\newlabel{Sfig:M11}{{86}{243}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.2}Super-oblique Parameters}{243}}
\newlabel{Ssec:super-oblique}{{7.2}{243}}
\citation{Peskin:1990zt}
\citation{Cheng:1997sq,Nojiri:1997ma,Katz:1998br}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {87}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip $\Delta \overline  {\chi }^2_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}}=1$ contour in the $M_1$-$Y_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07EB}$ plane for integrated luminosity $100\nobreakspace  {}{\rm  fb}^{-1}$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Nojiri:1996fp}. $\Delta \chi ^2_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}}=1$ is defined by constraints from electron energy and differential cross sections measurements and is roughly equivalent to a significance of $\Delta {\chi }^2=1$. Input values are $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}_R} = 200\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $\mu = 300\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $M_1 = 99.57\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, and $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta = 2$. }}{244}}
\newlabel{Sfig:M12}{{87}{244}}
\citation{Cheng:1997sq}
\citation{Bagger:1995bw}
\citation{Diaz:1997kv}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {8}Determining the Scale of Supersymmetry Breaking}{246}}
\newlabel{Ssec:scaleofSUSYbreaking}{{8}{246}}
\citation{AtlasTDR:1999fq}
\citation{Ambrosanio:1999iu}
\citation{Blair:2000gy}
\newlabel{SNLSPdecay}{{192}{247}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {9}Extrapolation to the Planck Scale}{247}}
\newlabel{Ssec:extraplanck}{{9}{247}}
\citation{Blair:2000gy}
\citation{Blair:2000gy}
\citation{Blair:2000gy}
\citation{Blair:2000gy}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {10}Connections to Cosmology}{248}}
\newlabel{Ssec:cosmology}{{10}{248}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {88}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Renormalization group evolution of gaugino (left) and sfermion (right) mass parameters from the weak scale to the GUT scale in a minimal supergravity model with $m_0=200\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $M_{1/2}= 190\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $A_0=500\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta =30$, and $\mu <0$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Blair:2000gy}. $H_u$ denotes the $m_{H_u}$ renormalization group trajectory. The weak-scale experimental inputs are discussed in the text, and the bands indicate 95\% CL contours. }}{249}}
\newlabel{Sfig:M13}{{88}{249}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {89}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \listparindent \itemindent \parsep \z@ \labelsep .5em \topsep 6.5\p@ plus3\p@ \itemsep 0\p@ {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Evolution of sfermion mass parameters in a gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking model with $M_{{\rm  mess}}=2 \times 10^8\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {GeV}$, $\Lambda = \delimiter "426830A F \delimiter "526930B /M_{{\rm  mess}}= 28\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {TeV}$, $N=3$, $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta =30$ and $\mu <0$\nobreakspace  {}\cite {Blair:2000gy}. $H_u$ denotes the $m_{H_u}$ renormalization group trajectory. }}{249}}
\newlabel{Sfig:M14}{{89}{249}}
\citation{Griest:1990kh}
\citation{Moroi:1999zb}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {90}{\ignorespaces The road to understanding supersymmetric dark matter. }}{250}}
\newlabel{Sfig:darksusy}{{90}{250}}
\citation{Giudice:1998bp}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {11}Conclusions}{252}}
\newlabel{Ssec:conclusions}{{11}{252}}
\bibcite{Bagger:1990qh}{1}
\bibcite{Haber:1993wf}{2}
\bibcite{Bagger:1996ka}{3}
\bibcite{Drees:1996ca}{4}
\bibcite{Tata:1997uf}{5}
\bibcite{Martin:1997ns}{6}
\bibcite{Weinberg:cr}{7}
\bibcite{Polonsky:2001pn}{8}
\bibcite{Abe:2001nn}{9}
\bibcite{Aguilar-Saavedra:2001rg}{10}
\bibcite{Abe:2001gc}{11}
\bibcite{Feng:1994sd}{12}
\bibcite{Baer:1996vd}{13}
\bibcite{Bartl:1997yi}{14}
\bibcite{Drees:1999yz}{15}
\bibcite{Bartl:2000kw}{16}
\bibcite{Kitano:2002ss}{17}
\bibcite{Dienes:1996du}{18}
\bibcite{Horava:1996ma}{19}
\bibcite{Goldberg:1983nd}{20}
\bibcite{Krauss:1983ik}{21}
\bibcite{Ellis:1983wd}{22}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{Acknowledgements}{253}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{253}}
\bibcite{Jungman:1995df}{23}
\bibcite{Gabbiani:1996hi}{24}
\bibcite{Contino:1998nw}{25}
\bibcite{Moroi:1995yh}{26}
\bibcite{Goto:1998qg}{27}
\bibcite{Babu:1998ep}{28}
\bibcite{Goto:1999iz}{29}
\bibcite{Suzuki:2001rb}{30}
\bibcite{Chamseddine:jx}{31}
\bibcite{Barbieri:1982eh}{32}
\bibcite{Hall:iz}{33}
\bibcite{Feng:2000gh}{34}
\bibcite{Feng:1999mn}{35}
\bibcite{Feng:1999zg}{36}
\bibcite{Feng:2000bp}{37}
\bibcite{Drees:1986jx}{38}
\bibcite{Dvali:1996rj}{39}
\bibcite{Feng:1999iq}{40}
\bibcite{Dine:1993yw}{41}
\bibcite{Giudice:1998bp}{42}
\bibcite{Dimopoulos:1997ww}{43}
\bibcite{Feng:1997zr}{44}
\bibcite{Stump:1996wd}{45}
\bibcite{Randall:1998uk}{46}
\bibcite{Giudice:1998xp}{47}
\bibcite{Gherghetta:1999sw}{48}
\bibcite{Pomarol:1999ie}{49}
\bibcite{Chen:1995yu}{50}
\bibcite{Kaplunovsky:1993rd}{51}
\bibcite{Barbieri:1994pv}{52}
\bibcite{Drees:1986vd}{53}
\bibcite{Kawamura:1994ys}{54}
\bibcite{Huitu:1997qu}{55}
\bibcite{unknown:1992mg}{56}
\bibcite{Tsukamoto:1993gt}{57}
\bibcite{Martyn:1999tc}{58}
\bibcite{Dima:2001jr}{59}
\bibcite{Wagner_1}{60}
\bibcite{Lykken:1997np}{61}
\bibcite{Feng:1998ud}{62}
\bibcite{Martyn:1999xc}{63}
\bibcite{Feng:2001ce}{64}
\bibcite{Freitas:2001zh}{65}
\bibcite{Mizukoshi:2001nc}{66}
\bibcite{Blochinger:2002zw}{67}
\bibcite{Barger:1998qu}{68}
\bibcite{Hinchliffe:1996iu}{69}
\bibcite{Bachacou:1999zb}{70}
\bibcite{AtlasTDR:1999fq}{71}
\bibcite{Allanach:2000kt}{72}
\bibcite{Nojiri:1996fp}{73}
\bibcite{Nojiri:1994it}{74}
\bibcite{Arkani-Hamed:1996au}{75}
\bibcite{Arkani-Hamed:1997km}{76}
\bibcite{Feng:1995zd}{77}
\bibcite{Choi:1998ut}{78}
\bibcite{Moortgat-Pick:1999yj}{79}
\bibcite{Ibrahim:1998je}{80}
\bibcite{Choi:2001ww}{81}
\bibcite{Barger:2001nu}{82}
\bibcite{Cheng:2002ab}{83}
\bibcite{Cheng:1997sq}{84}
\bibcite{Cheng:1997vy}{85}
\bibcite{Nojiri:1997ma}{86}
\bibcite{Katz:1998br}{87}
\bibcite{Kiyoura:1998yt}{88}
\bibcite{Mahanta:1999hx}{89}
\bibcite{Chankowski:1990du}{90}
\bibcite{Hikasa:1996bw}{91}
\bibcite{Peskin:1990zt}{92}
\bibcite{Bagger:1995bw}{93}
\bibcite{Diaz:1997kv}{94}
\bibcite{Ambrosanio:1999iu}{95}
\bibcite{Blair:2000gy}{96}
\bibcite{Griest:1990kh}{97}
\bibcite{Moroi:1999zb}{98}
\bibcite{Sikivie:1996nn}{99}
\bibcite{Gelmini:2000dm}{100}
\bibcite{Calcaneo-Roldan:2000yt}{101}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\\ \bf  5\ \ Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking}{259}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{259}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.1}Particle masses}{259}}
\citation{EFTtwo}
\citation{Higgs}
\citation{GSW}
\newlabel{v}{{194}{260}}
\citation{Su84}
\citation{asf}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.2}Exponentials}{261}}
\newlabel{exponential}{{195}{261}}
\citation{NDA}
\citation{Hlimit}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.3}Higgs or no Higgs?}{262}}
\newlabel{Lambda-TC}{{196}{262}}
\newlabel{Lambda-prime}{{197}{262}}
\citation{tH79}
\citation{LHM}
\citation{HS02}
\citation{dynEWSB}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.4}Models of dynamical symmetry breaking}{263}}
\citation{ETC}
\citation{topcolor}
\citation{tc2}
\citation{t-ss}
\citation{HS02}
\citation{EFTtwo}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Effective Theories of Electroweak Interactions}{264}}
\newlabel{sec:eft}{{2}{264}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}The bottom-up approach}{264}}
\newlabel{L3f}{{198}{265}}
\newlabel{L6-gen}{{203}{266}}
\newlabel{L6-weak}{{204}{266}}
\newlabel{L6-aux}{{207}{266}}
\newlabel{L2W}{{208}{266}}
\newlabel{W-rot}{{209}{266}}
\newlabel{ZA-rot}{{210}{266}}
\newlabel{L-fermi-gauge}{{211}{266}}
\newlabel{DL-new}{{212}{266}}
\newlabel{DR-new}{{213}{266}}
\citation{CCWZ}
\citation{ChPT}
\citation{CCWZ}
\citation{ChPT}
\newlabel{L4W}{{214}{267}}
\newlabel{vW}{{215}{267}}
\newlabel{vB}{{216}{267}}
\newlabel{Sigma-trafo}{{217}{267}}
\newlabel{vev-sigma2}{{218}{267}}
\newlabel{exp-par}{{220}{267}}
\newlabel{chpt}{{227}{268}}
\citation{EWChPT}
\citation{NDA}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Anomalous couplings}{269}}
\newlabel{sec:anomalous}{{2.2}{269}}
\newlabel{rho-op}{{228}{269}}
\newlabel{L1}{{229}{269}}
\newlabel{L2}{{230}{269}}
\newlabel{L3}{{231}{269}}
\newlabel{L4}{{232}{269}}
\newlabel{L5}{{233}{269}}
\newlabel{L6}{{234}{269}}
\newlabel{L7}{{235}{269}}
\newlabel{L8}{{236}{269}}
\newlabel{L9}{{237}{269}}
\newlabel{L10}{{238}{269}}
\newlabel{L11}{{239}{269}}
\citation{SU2c}
\citation{EFTtwo,SU2c}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}Custodial symmetry}{270}}
\newlabel{rho}{{242}{270}}
\citation{Goldstone}
\citation{EQT}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Goldstone boson scattering}{271}}
\newlabel{sec:Goldstone}{{3}{271}}
\citation{LET}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Quasielastic scattering at leading order}{272}}
\newlabel{LET-wwww}{{245}{272}}
\newlabel{LET-zzzz}{{248}{272}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Custodial symmetry relations}{272}}
\citation{NDA,DW89,CG87}
\newlabel{SU2c-wwww}{{249}{273}}
\newlabel{SU2c-zzzz}{{253}{273}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Next-to-leading order contributions}{273}}
\newlabel{A-1loop-log}{{256}{273}}
\citation{Uni}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.4}Unitarity constraints}{274}}
\newlabel{sec:unitarity}{{3.4}{274}}
\newlabel{Argand}{{259}{274}}
\newlabel{a-LET}{{263}{274}}
\citation{Kmatrix,Kmatrix2}
\citation{Pade}
\newlabel{K-matrix}{{267}{275}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {91}{\ignorespaces $K$ matrix construction for projecting a real scattering amplitude onto the Argand circle.}}{275}}
\newlabel{fig:K-matrix}{{91}{275}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.5}Resonances and new particles}{276}}
\newlabel{sec:res}{{3.5}{276}}
\citation{dynEWSB,BESS}
\newlabel{s1}{{272}{277}}
\newlabel{v3}{{273}{277}}
\newlabel{t1}{{274}{277}}
\newlabel{A-s1}{{275}{277}}
\newlabel{A-v3}{{276}{277}}
\citation{HS02,dynEWSB}
\citation{STU}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Measuring Higgs sector parameters at a Linear Collider}{279}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Precision observables}{279}}
\newlabel{sec:precision}{{4.1}{279}}
\citation{PW01}
\citation{ST01}
\citation{ST01}
\newlabel{STU-alpha}{{279}{280}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {92}{\ignorespaces Exclusion countour in the $ST$ plane allowed by the electroweak precision data. The arrows denote the directions of increasing top mass and increasing Higgs mass \cite {ST01}.}}{281}}
\newlabel{fig:ST}{{92}{281}}
\citation{TGC}
\citation{EWPrec}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Triple gauge couplings}{282}}
\newlabel{TGC}{{281}{282}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}$W$ and $Z$ scattering amplitudes}{284}}
\newlabel{sec:pheno}{{4.3}{284}}
\citation{DNN02}
\citation{WWZ}
\citation{BHKPYZ}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {93}{\ignorespaces Structure functions for the emission of a transversally and longitudinally polarized $W$ boson from an electron or positron.}}{286}}
\newlabel{fig:EWA}{{93}{286}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Conclusions}{287}}
\bibcite{EFTtwo}{1}
\bibcite{Higgs}{2}
\bibcite{GSW}{3}
\bibcite{Su84}{4}
\bibcite{asf}{5}
\bibcite{NDA}{6}
\bibcite{Hlimit}{7}
\bibcite{tH79}{8}
\bibcite{LHM}{9}
\bibcite{HS02}{10}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{288}}
\bibcite{dynEWSB}{11}
\bibcite{ETC}{12}
\bibcite{topcolor}{13}
\bibcite{tc2}{14}
\bibcite{t-ss}{15}
\bibcite{CCWZ}{16}
\bibcite{EWChPT}{17}
\bibcite{ChPT}{18}
\bibcite{SU2c}{19}
\bibcite{Goldstone}{20}
\bibcite{EQT}{21}
\bibcite{LET}{22}
\bibcite{DW89}{23}
\bibcite{CG87}{24}
\bibcite{Uni}{25}
\bibcite{Kmatrix}{26}
\bibcite{Kmatrix2}{27}
\bibcite{Pade}{28}
\bibcite{BESS}{29}
\bibcite{STU}{30}
\bibcite{PW01}{31}
\bibcite{ST01}{32}
\bibcite{TGC}{33}
\bibcite{EWPrec}{34}
\bibcite{DNN02}{35}
\bibcite{WWZ}{36}
\bibcite{BHKPYZ}{37}
\bibcite{BCHP}{38}
\bibcite{CR00}{39}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\\ \bf  6\ \ Physics of Electroweak Gauge Bosons}{291}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{291}}
\citation{ref:pdg}
\citation{ref:ewppe}
\citation{tdr_phys,orange,acfa}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {94}{\ignorespaces Generic Feynman graph for vector-boson scattering in $e^+e^-$-annihilation}}{293}}
\newlabel{fig:vvscatfeyn}{{94}{293}}
\citation{ref:comphep}
\citation{YFSWW3:2000}
\citation{ref:comphep}
\citation{YFSWW3:2000}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Production of Gauge Bosons}{294}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {95}{\ignorespaces Feynman graph for $s$-channel $Z$-production}}{294}}
\newlabel{fig:zfeyn}{{95}{294}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {96}{\ignorespaces Dominating Feynman graph for single $W$ production in $e^+e^-$-annihilation}}{294}}
\newlabel{fig:sinwfeyn}{{96}{294}}
\citation{YFSWW3:2000,ref:racoon}
\citation{ref:lep_workshop}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {97}{\ignorespaces Feynman graphs for the production of $W$-pairs in $e^+e^-$-annihilation}}{295}}
\newlabel{fig:wpairfeyn}{{97}{295}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {98}{\ignorespaces }}{295}}
\newlabel{fig:wsigma}{{98}{295}}
\citation{ref:pdg}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Properties of Gauge Bosons}{296}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Standard Model predictions}{296}}
\citation{ref:epspar}
\citation{ref:stdef}
\citation{ref:pdg}
\citation{ref:ewppe}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Status at present colliders}{299}}
\citation{ref:nick}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Results of the precision tests at LEP, SLD and the {\sc  Tevatron}}}{300}}
\newlabel{tab:lepprec}{{6}{300}}
\citation{tdr_det}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {99}{\ignorespaces left: $\Delta \chi ^2$ of the electroweak fit as a function of the Higgs mass. right: $\varepsilon $-parameters obtained from the LEP and SLD data compared to the Standard Model and to a technicolour model.}}{301}}
\newlabel{fig:lepint}{{99}{301}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Prospects for the linear collider}{301}}
\citation{ref:ewppe}
\citation{ref:sldrev}
\citation{alain}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Possible improvements in the physics quantities derived from the $Z$-lineshape after high luminosity $Z$-running at TESLA\hbox {}. For $\alpha _s$ and $\Delta \rho , N_\nu =3$ is assumed.}}{302}}
\newlabel{tab:line}{{7}{302}}
\citation{kmrpp}
\newlabel{eq:alrblondel}{{296}{303}}
\citation{lhcprec}
\citation{ref:wscan}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {100}{\ignorespaces Sensitivity of the $W$-pair threshold scan to the $W$-mass. The vertical axis shows the ratio of the cross section to the predicted cross section for $m_{{W}}=80.39$ GeV\hbox {}. The error bars represent the expected errors for the scan described in the text.}}{305}}
\newlabel{fig:wscan}{{100}{305}}
\citation{jens}
\citation{ref:aem_data,ref:aem_data_new}
\citation{ref:aem_data_new}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.4}Interpretation of the precision measurements}{306}}
\citation{gigaz_th}
\citation{thdm}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {101}{\ignorespaces $\Delta \chi ^2$ as a function of the Higgs mass for the electroweak precision data now and after the linear collider $Z$-factory running.}}{307}}
\newlabel{fig:bluebandlc}{{101}{307}}
\citation{ref:pdg}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {102}{\ignorespaces }}{308}}
\newlabel{fig:mwsw_susy}{{102}{308}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Measurements of the CKM matrix}{308}}
\citation{bphys_ee,bphys_had,monhaw_epj}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {103}{\ignorespaces  Sensitivity $\varepsilon _1-\varepsilon _3$ for the present data and the expectation at a linear collider. In the left plot $\varepsilon _2$ has been left free in the fit, equivalent to ignoring $m_{{W}}$ in the $\varepsilon _1 - \varepsilon _3$ fit. In the right plot $\varepsilon _2$ has been fixed to its SM-value. The line marked ``SM'' shows the SM prediction with $m_{{t}}=174$ GeV and varying $m_{{H}}$ from 70 GeV (lower end) to 1 TeV (upper end). The effect of an uncertainty in $m_{{t}}$ of 2 GeV is indicated. $\Delta m_{{t}}=100$ MeV, expected from TESLA is inside the SM line width. For better comparability all central values gave been assumed to be on the SM prediction for $m_{{H}}= 100$ GeV\hbox {}. }}{309}}
\newlabel{fig:eps_lc}{{103}{309}}
\citation{ref:james}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {104}{\ignorespaces bla}}{310}}
\newlabel{fig:stthdm}{{104}{310}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Light quark tagging efficiencies of leading hadrons with $x_p>0.2$}}{311}}
\newlabel{tab:udstag}{{8}{311}}
\citation{lhcprec}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Current and projected uncertainty of the CKM matrix elements compared to the LC measurement from $W$-decays.}}{312}}
\newlabel{tab:ckmres}{{9}{312}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Interactions amongst Gauge Bosons}{312}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {105}{\ignorespaces $W$-pair production cross section for the different production processes separately, the interference and for the sum of all.}}{313}}
\newlabel{fig:wpaircanc}{{105}{313}}
\citation{ref:leptwo_tgc}
\citation{ref:kneur}
\newlabel{eq:surel}{{297}{314}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Experimental procedures}{314}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {106}{\ignorespaces Ratio of the differential cross section for $W$-pair production to the Standard Model prediction (a) and left-right asymmetry for this process (b) as a function of the $W$-production angle for anomalous $\ensuremath  {\kappa _{\gamma }}$ or $\ensuremath  {\kappa _{Z}}$. }}{315}}
\newlabel{fig:tgcpol_pr}{{106}{315}}
\citation{ref:leptwo_tgc}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {107}{\ignorespaces Expected effects on $\kappa _\gamma $ from MSSM loop corrections.}}{316}}
\newlabel{fig:dkmssm}{{107}{316}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Unbinned maximum likelihood fit:}{316}}
\citation{ref:opt1,ref:opt2}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {108}{\ignorespaces Observables available in a $W$-pair event.}}{317}}
\newlabel{fig:angdef}{{108}{317}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Optimal observable methods:}{317}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Spin density matrix:}{317}}
\citation{BILENKY}
\citation{ref:ewppe}
\citation{ref:wolfgang}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Results at LEP and the {\sc  Tevatron}}{318}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {109}{\ignorespaces Result of the 3-parameter fit to the triple gauge couplings at DELPHI, L3 and OPAL. }}{319}}
\newlabel{fig:leptgc}{{109}{319}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}Expectation from the linear collider}{319}}
\citation{juan}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Expected uncertainties of the single parameter fits to the different triple gauge couplings. For $\sqrt  {s}=500 {\rm  \nobreakspace  {}GeV\nobreakspace  {}} {\pcal L}=500\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {fb$^{-1}$}$ and for $\sqrt  {s}=800 {\rm  \nobreakspace  {}GeV\nobreakspace  {}}{\pcal L}=1000\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {fb$^{-1}$}$ has been assumed. For both energies ${\pcal P}_{{e}^-}= 80\%$ and ${\pcal P}_{{e}^+}= 60\%$ has been used. }}{320}}
\newlabel{tab:singtgc}{{10}{320}}
\citation{ref:let1,ref:let2}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {110}{\ignorespaces $1 \sigma $ and $95\%$ c.l. (2D) contours for \ensuremath  {\Delta g^{Z}_1}-\ensuremath  {\Delta \kappa _{Z}}, \ensuremath  {\Delta g^{Z}_1}-\ensuremath  {\lambda _{Z}}, \ensuremath  {\Delta \kappa _{\gamma }}-\ensuremath  {\Delta \kappa _{Z}}\ and \ensuremath  {\lambda _{\gamma }}-\ensuremath  {\lambda _{Z}}\ in the 5-parameter fit ($\sqrt  {s}=800 {\rm  \nobreakspace  {}GeV\nobreakspace  {}} {\pcal L} = 1000 \nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {fb$^{-1}$},\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} {\pcal P}_{{e}^-}=0.8,\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}{\pcal P}_{{e}^+}=0.6$). For the combinations not shown the correlations are small. }}{321}}
\newlabel{fig:fiveparfit}{{110}{321}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Strong electroweak symmetry breaking}{321}}
\citation{timtrho}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {111}{\ignorespaces Comparison of $\Delta \kappa _\gamma $ and $\Delta \lambda _\gamma $ at different machines. For LHC and TESLA three years of running are assumed (LHC: $300\nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {fb$^{-1}$}$, TESLA $\sqrt  {s}=500$ GeV: $900 \nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {fb$^{-1}$}$, TESLA $\sqrt  {s}=800$ GeV: $1500 \nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {fb$^{-1}$}$). }}{322}}
\newlabel{fig:tgccomp}{{111}{322}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {112}{\ignorespaces  Sensitivity to a $\rho $ like resonance in $W$-pair production at $\sqrt  {s} = 800$ GeV and ${\pcal L} = 500 \tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} \nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {fb$^{-1}$}$. }}{323}}
\newlabel{fig:techni}{{112}{323}}
\newlabel{eq:kaptoalph}{{299}{324}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {113}{\ignorespaces  Sensitivity to the effective couplings $\alpha _{1,2,3}$ from the measurement of the triple gauge couplings at a linear collider and from the $Z$-pole precision data. For the $Z$-pole constraint the outer region is without and the inner region with the accurate $m_{{W}}$ measurement. In the lower right plot the $\alpha _2-\alpha _3$ plane with $\alpha _1=0$ or with the $Z$-pole constraint is shown. }}{325}}
\newlabel{fig:alpha_123}{{113}{325}}
\citation{ref:roberto}
\citation{lhcprec}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {114}{\ignorespaces  Sensitivity to $\alpha _4$ and $\alpha _5$ at $\sqrt  {s}=800$ GeV from $e^+e^-\rightarrow \nu \nu {W}^+{W}^-$ and $e^+e^-\rightarrow \nu \nu \rm  {ZZ}$. The inner and outer contours represent 68\% and 90\% c.l. (${\pcal L} = 1000 \nobreakspace  {}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {fb$^{-1}$},\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} {\pcal P}_{{e}^-}=0.8,\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}{\pcal P}_{{e}^+}=0.4$). }}{326}}
\newlabel{fig:alpha45}{{114}{326}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Conclusions}{327}}
\bibcite{ref:pdg}{1}
\bibcite{ref:ewppe}{2}
\bibcite{tdr_phys}{3}
\bibcite{orange}{4}
\bibcite{acfa}{5}
\bibcite{ref:comphep}{6}
\bibcite{YFSWW3:2000}{7}
\bibcite{ref:racoon}{8}
\bibcite{ref:lep_workshop}{9}
\bibcite{ref:epspar}{10}
\bibcite{ref:stdef}{11}
\bibcite{ref:nick}{12}
\bibcite{tdr_det}{13}
\bibcite{ref:sldrev}{14}
\bibcite{alain}{15}
\bibcite{kmrpp}{16}
\bibcite{lhcprec}{17}
\bibcite{ref:wscan}{18}
\bibcite{jens}{19}
\bibcite{ref:aem_data}{20}
\bibcite{ref:aem_data_new}{21}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{328}}
\bibcite{gigaz_th}{22}
\bibcite{thdm}{23}
\bibcite{bphys_ee}{24}
\bibcite{bphys_had}{25}
\bibcite{monhaw_epj}{26}
\bibcite{ref:james}{27}
\bibcite{ref:leptwo_tgc}{28}
\bibcite{ref:kneur}{29}
\bibcite{ref:opt1}{30}
\bibcite{ref:opt2}{31}
\bibcite{BILENKY}{32}
\bibcite{ref:wolfgang}{33}
\bibcite{juan}{34}
\bibcite{ref:let1}{35}
\bibcite{ref:let2}{36}
\bibcite{timtrho}{37}
\bibcite{ref:roberto}{38}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\\ \bf  7\ \ New Physics at the TeV Scale and Beyond}{330}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{330}}
\newlabel{jlh_intro}{{1}{330}}
\citation{jlh_contact_par}
\citation{jlh_pdg}
\citation{jlh_atlas:1999}
\citation{jlh_qqqq}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Contact Interactions and Compositeness}{333}}
\newlabel{jlh_cont}{{2}{333}}
\newlabel{jlh_comp}{{300}{333}}
\citation{jlh_CGH}
\citation{jlh_sabine}
\citation{jlh_CGH}
\citation{jlh_sabine}
\citation{jlh_sabine}
\citation{jlh_Barklow:1996ut}
\citation{jlh_Barklow:1996ut}
\citation{jlh_Barklow:1996ut}
\citation{jlh_Rizzo:1998vf}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip $95\%$ CL search reach in TeV for contact interaction scales with various helicities in numerous processes, assuming $90\%$ electron beam polarization and the final state tagging efficiencies discussed in the text. From \cite {jlh_CGH}.}}{335}}
\newlabel{jlh_contact}{{11}{335}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {115}{\ignorespaces 95\% CL sensitivity to contact interaction scales $\Lambda $ of different helicities for light quark and muon pair production at a 500 GeV Linear Collider. 1 ab$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity, 80\% polarization of the electron beam, and 60\% polarization of the positron beam are assumed. The systematic errors used in the study are as indicated. For the hadronic final states, the corresponding results for the LHC are shown. From \cite {jlh_sabine}. }}{336}}
\newlabel{jlh_sabinefig}{{115}{336}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {116}{\ignorespaces *}}{337}}
\newlabel{jlh_bhapol}{{116}{337}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Extended Gauge Sectors}{337}}
\newlabel{jlh_extew}{{3}{337}}
\citation{jlh_zprevs,jlh_physrep,jlh_lhcilc}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {117}{\ignorespaces Results of a 2-parameter fit to determine the spin of a new particle exchanged in $e^+e^-\to \overline  {f}f$. The 95\% CL contours circle the fitted values. The box in the center corresponds to the Standard Model, the dotted ellipses represent the fit to the four spin-1 cases considered, and the dashed ellipse is for the case of sneutrino exchange. The fit was performed with $\sqrt  s=1$ TeV with 150 fb$^{-1}$.}}{338}}
\newlabel{jlh_spin}{{117}{338}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}$Z'$\index {$Z'$} Discovery Limits and Identification}{339}}
\newlabel{jlh_zprime}{{3.1}{339}}
\citation{jlh_lhcilc}
\citation{jlh_lhcilc}
\citation{jlh_Rizzo:2003sz}
\citation{jlh_Rizzo:2003sz}
\citation{jlh_ayres}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {118}{\ignorespaces $95\%$ CL search limits for extra neutral gauge bosons at the Tevatron and LHC, and the $2\sigma $ and $5\sigma $ sensitivity bounds at the Linear Collider for various extended gauge models. From \cite {jlh_lhcilc}.}}{340}}
\newlabel{jlh_zp}{{118}{340}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {119}{\ignorespaces 95\% CL (or $2\sigma $) sensitivity to $Z'$\index {$Z'$} exchange at a 500 GeV (top panel) and 1 TeV (bottom panel) Linear Collider as a function of luminosity with $P_+=0$ (solid) and $P_+=0.6$ (dashed). From top to bottom, the model correspond to: $E_6$ Grand Unified theories $\psi $ (green) and $\chi $ (red), the Left-Right Symmetric Model (blue) and the Sequential Standard Model (magenta). From \cite {jlh_Rizzo:2003sz}.}}{341}}
\newlabel{jlh_zp2}{{119}{341}}
\citation{jlh_ayres}
\citation{jlh_ayres}
\citation{jlh_zprevs}
\citation{jlh_lhczp}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {120}{\ignorespaces 95\% CL discovery reach at a 1 TeV LC with 1000 fb$^{-1}$ for a sequential $Z'$\index {$Z'$} boson in the $\mu ^+\mu ^-$ and dijet channels. Also shown are the discovery reach of the LHC from Drell-Yan\index {Drell-Yan} production, the present limit from searches at the Tevatron and the expected sensitivity from the Tevatron Run II. From \cite {jlh_ayres}.}}{342}}
\newlabel{jlh_narrowzp}{{120}{342}}
\citation{jlh_Rizzo:1996rx}
\citation{jlh_wp1}
\citation{jlh_sabine}
\citation{jlh_sabine}
\citation{jlh_sabine}
\citation{jlh_sabine}
\citation{jlh_wp1,jlh_jlh,jlh_wp2}
\citation{jlh_wp1}
\citation{jlh_zprevs}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}$W'$\index {$W'$} Discovery Limits and Identification}{343}}
\newlabel{jlh_wp}{{3.2}{343}}
\citation{jlh_wp1,jlh_wp2}
\citation{jlh_wp1,jlh_wp2}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {121}{\ignorespaces *}}{344}}
\newlabel{jlh_zpcoupl}{{121}{344}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {122}{\ignorespaces  95\% CL sensitivity reach for $W'$\index {$W'$} bosons at the LC. The $e\gamma $ reactions are computed for a back-scattered laser configuration and with the Weizs\"acker Williams approximation. From \cite {jlh_wp1,jlh_wp2}.}}{345}}
\newlabel{jlh_stevewp}{{122}{345}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {123}{\ignorespaces  Left Panel: 95\% CL constraints from $e^+e^-\to \nu \overline  {\nu }\gamma $ on couplings of a $W'$\index {$W'$} from the Sequential Standard Model indicated by a star for $\sqrt  {s}=0.5$\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} TeV and $L_{\rm  int}=1000$\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $fb^{-1}$ with a systematic error of 0.5\% (0.25\%) for $\sigma (A_{LR})$ for different $W'$ masses. Right Panel: 95\% C.L. constraints from $e\gamma \to \overline  {\nu } q + X$ on couplings of a $W'$ from the Sequential Standard Model for $\sqrt  {s}=0.5$\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} TeV and $L_{\rm  int}=1000\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}fb^{-1}$ with a 2\% systematic error for different $W'$ masses. }}{346}}
\newlabel{jlh_wpcoupl}{{123}{346}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Extra Spatial Dimensions\index {extra spatial dimensions}}{346}}
\newlabel{jlh_xdim}{{4}{346}}
\citation{jlh_jlhms}
\citation{jlh_add}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Large Extra Dimensions\index {large extra dimensions}}{347}}
\newlabel{jlh_led}{{4.1}{347}}
\citation{jlh_adel}
\citation{jlh_jlhms}
\citation{jlh_grw,jlh_hlz}
\citation{jlh_grw,jlh_emit}
\citation{jlh_teslatdr}
\citation{jlh_ian}
\citation{jlh_hmjw}
\citation{jlh_grw}
\citation{jlh_grw}
\citation{jlh_grw,jlh_hlz,jlh_exch}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {124}{\ignorespaces *}}{350}}
\newlabel{jlh_emitt}{{124}{350}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {125}{\ignorespaces Emission cross section in $e^+e^-$ annihilation as a function of $\sqrt  s$ for $\delta =2-7$ from top to bottom on the right-hand side. The cross sections are normalized to $M_D=5$ TeV and $\delta =2$ at $\sqrt  s$ = 500 GeV\hbox {}. Top: Brane terms are not included. Bottom: The effects of finite brane tension are included, taking the relevant tension parameter to be $\Delta =800$ GeV\hbox {}. Here, the lone solid curve represents the case without brane term effects for $\delta =5$.}}{351}}
\newlabel{jlh_softb}{{125}{351}}
\citation{jlh_exch}
\citation{jlh_exch}
\citation{jlh_tgr_lumi}
\citation{jlh_lhckk}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip $95\%$ CL sensitivity to the fundamental Planck scale\index {Planck scale} $M_*$ in TeV for different values of $\delta $, from the emission process for various polarization configurations and different colliders as discussed in the text.}}{352}}
\newlabel{jlh_emit_tab}{{12}{352}}
\citation{jlh_exch}
\citation{jlh_exch}
\citation{jlh_tgr_lumi}
\citation{jlh_tgr_lumi}
\citation{jlh_tgr_trans}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {126}{\ignorespaces  Bin integrated angular dependence of the Left-Right asymmetry for $e^+e^-\to b\overline  {b}$ at $\sqrt  s=500$ GeV. The solid histogram represents the Standard Model while the `data' points are for $M_D=1.5$ with $\lambda =\pm 1$. The error bars indicate the statistics in each bin for an integrated luminosity of 75 fb$^{-1}$. From \cite {jlh_exch}}}{353}}
\newlabel{jlh_exchng}{{126}{353}}
\citation{jlh_Rizzo:2002pc}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {127}{\ignorespaces 95\% CL search reach for the scale associated with the exchange of graviton KK states in $e^+e^-\to f\overline  {f}$. The solid (dashed) curves correspond to a initial state positron polarization of 0 (60)\%. Each pair of curves is for $\sqrt  s= 0.5\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}, 0.8\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}, 1.0\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}, 1.2\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em},$ and 1.5 TeV, from bottom to top, respectively. From \cite {jlh_tgr_lumi}.}}{354}}
\newlabel{jlh_tgrmh}{{127}{354}}
\citation{jlh_tgr_trans}
\citation{jlh_darius}
\citation{jlh_darius}
\citation{jlh_darius}
\citation{jlh_ant}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip 95\% CL search reach and identification of spin-2 exchange from the azimuthal asymmetries discussed in the text. From \cite {jlh_tgr_trans}.}}{355}}
\newlabel{jlh_tgrpol}{{13}{355}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}TeV-scale Extra Dimensions\index {TeV-scale extra dimensions}}{355}}
\newlabel{jlh_tev}{{4.2}{355}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {128}{\ignorespaces  The angular distribution for $e^-_{R}e^+\to \mathaccentV {tilde}07Ee_R^\mp e_R^\pm $ in standard $D=4$ supersymmetry, plus the addition of bulk graviton KK tower exchange, and with bulk gravitino KK tower\index {KK tower} exchange, corresponding to the bottom, middle, and top curves, respectively. From \cite {jlh_darius}}}{356}}
\newlabel{jlh_boxb}{{128}{356}}
\citation{jlh_bunch}
\citation{jlh_antoniadis}
\citation{jlh_mclhc}
\citation{jlh_leshouches04}
\citation{jlh_tgr_lumi}
\citation{jlh_tgrkk}
\newlabel{jlh_bulkmass}{{4.2}{357}}
\citation{jlh_tgr_lumi}
\citation{jlh_tgr_lumi}
\citation{jlh_nam}
\citation{jlh_splitf}
\citation{jlh_bunch}
\citation{jlh_tgr_cart}
\citation{jlh_martin}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {129}{\ignorespaces $95\%$ CL bound on the scale $M_c$ from the reaction $e^+e^-\to f\overline  {f}$, where $f=\mu , \tau , c,b,t$ have been summed over, as a function of the LC integrated luminosity . The solid (dashed) curves assume a positron polarization $P_+=0 (0.6)$; an electron polarization of $80\%$ has been assumed in all cases. From bottom to top the center of mass energy of the LC is taken to be 0.5, 0.8, 1, 1.2 and 1.5 TeV, respectively. From \cite {jlh_tgr_lumi}.}}{358}}
\newlabel{jlh_tgr_5dsm}{{129}{358}}
\citation{jlh_tgr_cart}
\citation{jlh_tgr_cart}
\citation{jlh_ued}
\citation{jlh_tgr_ued}
\citation{jlh_timt}
\citation{jlh_ued,jlh_tgr_ued}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {130}{\ignorespaces 95\% CL determination of the placement of the left- and right-handed electrons from polarized Bhabha scattering, assuming $M_c=4$ TeV. From outermost to innermost, the concentric ellipses are for $\sqrt  s = 0.5\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}, 1.0 \tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}, 1.5$ TeV. $x_{e(L)}$ represents the position of the right(left)-handed electron. The size of the extra dimension, $\pi R_c$ has been normalized to unity. From \cite {jlh_tgr_cart}.}}{359}}
\newlabel{jlh_cart}{{130}{359}}
\citation{jlh_blkt}
\citation{jlh_cms1}
\citation{jlh_cms2}
\citation{jlh_cms2}
\citation{jlh_marco}
\citation{jlh_cms2}
\citation{jlh_cms2}
\citation{jlh_tait}
\citation{jlh_tait}
\citation{jlh_rs}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {131}{\ignorespaces Mass spectrum, including radiative corrections, of the first level KK\index {KK} states in the Universal Extra Dimensions\index {universal dimensions} scenario, taking $R^{-1}=500$ GeV\hbox {}. From \cite {jlh_cms2}.}}{361}}
\newlabel{jlh_uedfig}{{131}{361}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {132}{\ignorespaces Pair production of 300 GeV smuons and muon KK states at an $e^+e^-$ collider as a function of center of mass energy. $\Delta $ represents the mass splitting between the smuon and LSP as well as of the muon KK\index {KK} and LKP. From \cite {jlh_tait}.}}{362}}
\newlabel{jlh_tait}{{132}{362}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Warped Extra Dimensions\index {warped extra dimensions} with Localized Gravity}{362}}
\newlabel{jlh_warp}{{4.3}{362}}
\citation{jlh_rs}
\citation{jlh_gw}
\citation{jlh_dhr1}
\citation{jlh_dr}
\citation{jlh_dhr1,jlh_dhr3}
\citation{jlh_brits}
\citation{jlh_dhr1}
\citation{jlh_dhr1}
\citation{jlh_dhr1}
\citation{jlh_bulkph}
\citation{jlh_frankrs}
\citation{jlh_frankrs}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip $95\%$ CL search reach for $\Lambda _\pi $ in TeV in the contact interaction regime taking 500 and 100 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity at the LC and LHC, respectively. From \cite {jlh_dhr1}.}}{364}}
\newlabel{jlh_rscont}{{14}{364}}
\citation{jlh_dhr6}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {133}{\ignorespaces  The cross section for $e^+e^-\to \mu ^+\mu ^-$ including the exchange of a KK\index {KK} tower of gravitons with $m_1=500$ GeV. The curves correspond to $k/\overline  m_{Pl}=$ in the range 0.01--0.05. From \cite {jlh_dhr1}.}}{365}}
\newlabel{jlh_kkspect}{{133}{365}}
\citation{jlh_dhr6}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {134}{\ignorespaces The plane $\qopname  \relax o{sin}^2\theta _{eff}$ versus $M_W$ showing current and future sensitivities, Standard Model and RS model\index {RS model} predictions. The diamond show the current measured values of the observables. The large solid and dashed ellipses represent respectively the 68\% and 95\% CL regions from current data, while the smaller solid ellipses anticipate the same after operation of GigaZ. The black dashdot line shows the Standard Model predictions for different Higgs boson masses as labeled, while the solid colored lines show the RS model results for varying values of the first gauge KK\index {KK} excitation mass for two different Higgs masses. The value of $\nu $ denotes the location of the fermions in the $5^{th}$ dimension. From \cite {jlh_frankrs}.}}{366}}
\newlabel{jlh_gigazrs}{{134}{366}}
\citation{jlh_dhr6}
\citation{jlh_dhr6}
\citation{jlh_hadlept}
\citation{jlh_djrev}
\citation{jlh_maa}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {135}{\ignorespaces The solid (red) curve corresponds to the cross section for $e^+e^- \to \mu ^+\mu ^-$ when the additional dimension is orbifolded, {\it  i.e.}, for $S^1/Z_2$, with $m_{10}=600$ GeV, $k/\overline  M_{Pl}=0.03$ and $kR=2.0$. The result for the conventional RS model\index {RS model} is also displayed, corresponding to the dotted curve. From \cite {jlh_dhr6}.}}{367}}
\newlabel{jlh_rs_s1}{{135}{367}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Direct Production of New Particles}{367}}
\newlabel{jlh_part}{{5}{367}}
\citation{jlh_physrep}
\citation{jlh_ll}
\citation{jlh_physrep}
\citation{jlh_djaz}
\citation{jlh_djrev,jlh_djaz,jlh_almnew}
\citation{jlh_almnew}
\citation{jlh_almneut}
\citation{jlh_ll}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}New Leptons}{368}}
\newlabel{jlh_lept}{{5.1}{368}}
\citation{jlh_almneut}
\citation{jlh_almneut}
\citation{jlh_brw}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {136}{\ignorespaces  Single and pair production cross sections of on-shell heavy Dirac and Majorana neutrinos\index {Majorana neutrinos} at $\sqrt  {s} = 500$ GeV for $e^+e^-$ colliders. VDM(VSM) refers to whether the heavy neutrino resides in a SU(2) vector doublet(singlet). From \cite {jlh_almneut}.}}{369}}
\newlabel{jlh_pat3}{{136}{369}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Leptoquarks}{369}}
\newlabel{jlh_lq}{{5.2}{369}}
\citation{jlh_ruckl}
\citation{jlh_mikesteve}
\citation{jlh_mikesteve}
\citation{jlh_joatgr}
\citation{jlh_lhclepto}
\citation{jlh_muchado}
\citation{jlh_ruckl}
\citation{jlh_ruckl}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {137}{\ignorespaces  Leptoquark search limits at a LC from the three processes discussed in the text. The Yukawa coupling is scaled to $e$. The pair and single production reaches are shown for $\sqrt  s=1$ TeV, while the indirect reach is displayed for both $\sqrt  s=0.5,1$ TeV. From \cite {jlh_ruckl}.}}{371}}
\newlabel{jlh_leptosearch}{{137}{371}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Unconventional Theories and Possible Surprises}{371}}
\newlabel{jlh_surprise}{{6}{371}}
\citation{jlh_CPP,jlh_dudas}
\citation{jlh_venice}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.1}String Resonances}{372}}
\newlabel{jlh_strings}{{6.1}{372}}
\citation{jlh_CPP}
\citation{jlh_CPP}
\citation{jlh_seiwit}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {138}{\ignorespaces  Comparison of deviations from the Standard Model prediction for Bhabha scattering at 1 TeV due to corrections from higher dimension operators. The curves correspond to: string model with $M_{str}=3.1$ TeV (solid), KK graviton exchange with $M_D/\lambda ^{1/4}=6.2$ TeV (dotted), VV contact interactions\index {contact interactions} with $\Lambda =88$ TeV (dashed), and AA contact interactions with $\Lambda =62$ TeV (dot-dashed). From \cite {jlh_CPP}.}}{373}}
\newlabel{jlh_michael}{{138}{373}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.2}Non-Commutative Field Theories}{373}}
\citation{jlh_ncrules}
\citation{jlh_jpr}
\citation{jlh_jpr}
\citation{jlh_jpr}
\citation{jlh_jpr}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {139}{\ignorespaces  $\phi $ dependence of the $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \gamma \gamma $ cross section, taking $\Lambda _{NC} = {\sqrt  s}= 500$ GeV and a luminosity of $500 \tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} {\rm  fb}^{-1}$. A cut of $|\qopname  \relax o{cos}\theta | < 0.5$ has been employed. The dashed line corresponds to the SM expectations and the `data' points represent the NCQED results with statistic error bars. From \cite {jlh_jpr}.}}{375}}
\newlabel{jlh_azim}{{139}{375}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {15}{\ignorespaces \relax \fontsize  {8}{10}\selectfont  \abovedisplayskip 6\p@ plus2\p@ minus4\p@ \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 3\p@ plus\p@ minus2\p@ \def \leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep {\leftmargin \leftmargini \topsep 3\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep \parsep }\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip Summary of the $95\%$ CL search limits on the NC scale $\Lambda _{NC}$ from various processes at a 500 GeV Linear Collider with an integrated luminosity of 500 fb$^{-1}$. From \cite {jlh_jpr}.}}{375}}
\newlabel{jlh_nonctab}{{15}{375}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Conclusions}{375}}
\newlabel{jlh_sum}{{7}{375}}
\bibcite{jlh_contact_par}{1}
\bibcite{jlh_pdg}{2}
\bibcite{jlh_atlas:1999}{3}
\bibcite{jlh_qqqq}{4}
\bibcite{jlh_CGH}{5}
\bibcite{jlh_sabine}{6}
\bibcite{jlh_Barklow:1996ut}{7}
\bibcite{jlh_Rizzo:1998vf}{8}
\bibcite{jlh_zprevs}{9}
\bibcite{jlh_physrep}{10}
\bibcite{jlh_lhcilc}{11}
\bibcite{jlh_Rizzo:2003sz}{12}
\bibcite{jlh_ayres}{13}
\bibcite{jlh_lhczp}{14}
\bibcite{jlh_Rizzo:1996rx}{15}
\bibcite{jlh_wp1}{16}
\bibcite{jlh_jlh}{17}
\bibcite{jlh_wp2}{18}
\bibcite{jlh_jlhms}{19}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{376}}
\bibcite{jlh_add}{20}
\bibcite{jlh_adel}{21}
\bibcite{jlh_grw}{22}
\bibcite{jlh_hlz}{23}
\bibcite{jlh_emit}{24}
\bibcite{jlh_teslatdr}{25}
\bibcite{jlh_ian}{26}
\bibcite{jlh_hmjw}{27}
\bibcite{jlh_exch}{28}
\bibcite{jlh_tgr_lumi}{29}
\bibcite{jlh_lhckk}{30}
\bibcite{jlh_tgr_trans}{31}
\bibcite{jlh_Rizzo:2002pc}{32}
\bibcite{jlh_darius}{33}
\bibcite{jlh_ant}{34}
\bibcite{jlh_bunch}{35}
\bibcite{jlh_antoniadis}{36}
\bibcite{jlh_mclhc}{37}
\bibcite{jlh_leshouches04}{38}
\bibcite{jlh_tgrkk}{39}
\bibcite{jlh_nam}{40}
\bibcite{jlh_splitf}{41}
\bibcite{jlh_tgr_cart}{42}
\bibcite{jlh_martin}{43}
\bibcite{jlh_ued}{44}
\bibcite{jlh_tgr_ued}{45}
\bibcite{jlh_timt}{46}
\bibcite{jlh_blkt}{47}
\bibcite{jlh_cms1}{48}
\bibcite{jlh_cms2}{49}
\bibcite{jlh_tait}{50}
\bibcite{jlh_marco}{51}
\bibcite{jlh_rs}{52}
\bibcite{jlh_gw}{53}
\bibcite{jlh_dhr1}{54}
\bibcite{jlh_dr}{55}
\bibcite{jlh_dhr3}{56}
\bibcite{jlh_brits}{57}
\bibcite{jlh_bulkph}{58}
\bibcite{jlh_frankrs}{59}
\bibcite{jlh_dhr6}{60}
\bibcite{jlh_hadlept}{61}
\bibcite{jlh_djrev}{62}
\bibcite{jlh_maa}{63}
\bibcite{jlh_ll}{64}
\bibcite{jlh_djaz}{65}
\bibcite{jlh_almnew}{66}
\bibcite{jlh_almneut}{67}
\bibcite{jlh_brw}{68}
\bibcite{jlh_ruckl}{69}
\bibcite{jlh_mikesteve}{70}
\bibcite{jlh_joatgr}{71}
\bibcite{jlh_lhclepto}{72}
\bibcite{jlh_muchado}{73}
\bibcite{jlh_CPP}{74}
\bibcite{jlh_dudas}{75}
\bibcite{jlh_venice}{76}
\bibcite{jlh_seiwit}{77}
\bibcite{jlh_ncrules}{78}
\bibcite{jlh_jpr}{79}
\citation{philssi}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\\ \bf  8\ \ QCD}{381}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{381}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.1}Hadronic Final States}{381}}
\citation{qcd}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {140}{\ignorespaces  Schematic of the production of hadronic final-states by different interactions: $e^+e^-$ annihilation, deep inelastic lepton-hadron scattering, hadron-hadron collisions, and production and decay of heavy quarkonia. }}{382}}
\newlabel{figstates}{{140}{382}}
\citation{kramer}
\citation{philssi,esw}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.2}Quantum Chromodynamics}{383}}
\citation{sldalp}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.3}QCD and the Linear Collider}{384}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Event Selection}{384}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}The Problem}{384}}
\citation{siggi}
\citation{lep2}
\citation{siggi}
\citation{schumm}
\citation{schumm}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Initial State Radiation and Beamstrahlung}{385}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}Selection Cuts}{385}}
\citation{rgtwo}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {141}{\ignorespaces Composition of event sample versus electron-beam polarisation.}}{386}}
\newlabel{figbruce}{{141}{386}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Precise Measurement of $\alpha _s$}{386}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Introduction}{386}}
\citation{gut}
\citation{alphasrev}
\citation{ew}
\citation{philalp}
\citation{sldalp}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Current Status}{387}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Measurement of $\alpha _s$ at the Linear Collider}{387}}
\citation{sldalp,otmar}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.1}Event Shape Observables}{388}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {142}{\ignorespaces A three-jet event recorded by SLD: the process $e^+e^-\to Z^0\to q\overline  qg$. }}{388}}
\newlabel{fig3jet}{{142}{388}}
\citation{schumm}
\citation{sldalp}
\citation{power}
\citation{thrust}
\citation{power}
\citation{siggi,otmar}
\citation{kunszt}
\citation{resum}
\citation{sldalp}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {143}{\ignorespaces Schematic of particle production in $e^+e^-$ annihilation. }}{390}}
\newlabel{fighadsch}{{143}{390}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {144}{\ignorespaces Mean value of 1-Thrust vs. CM energy = $Q$.}}{391}}
\newlabel{figthrust}{{144}{391}}
\citation{topalp}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {145}{\ignorespaces Hadronisation correction factors calculated using JETSET. }}{392}}
\newlabel{fighad}{{145}{392}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.2}The $t\overline  {t}$ System}{392}}
\citation{toptheor}
\citation{toptheor}
\citation{topexp}
\citation{topexp}
\citation{hoang}
\citation{werner}
\citation{arnd}
\citation{bmass}
\citation{arnd}
\citation{klaus}
\citation{winter}
\citation{rtau}
\citation{gut}
\citation{tasso}
\citation{otmar}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.3}A High-luminosity Run at the $Z^0$ Resonance}{394}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}$Q^2$ Evolution of $\alpha _s$}{394}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {146}{\ignorespaces $\alpha _s$ versus hard scale $Q$; for e$^+$e$^-$ $Q$ = $\sqrt  {s}$. The line shows a NNLO QCD fit to the current data.}}{395}}
\newlabel{figotmar}{{146}{395}}
\citation{lynneold}
\citation{lynnenew}
\citation{lynneold}
\citation{rizzo}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}QCD studies of $t\overline  {t}g$ Events}{396}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Soft Gluon Radiation in $t\overline  {t}g$ Events}{396}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Anomalous Chromomagnetic Top Quark Couplings}{396}}
\citation{sldchromo}
\citation{rizzo}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {147}{\ignorespaces Angular distribution of 5 GeV gluons w.r.t. $\tt  $ axis, at $\sqrt  {s}$ = 1 TeV.}}{397}}
\newlabel{figlynne}{{147}{397}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {148}{\ignorespaces  Distribution of scaled gluon energy $z$ = $E_{gluon}/E_{beam}$ at $\sqrt  {s}$ = 1 TeV. QCD (solid) $\kappa =\pm 1$ (dot-dash), $\pm 2$ (dash), $\pm 3$ (dots).}}{398}}
\newlabel{figrizzo}{{148}{398}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Symmetry Tests Using Beam Polarisation}{398}}
\citation{toddlowe,lance}
\citation{lance}
\citation{toddlowe}
\citation{hagi}
\citation{lance}
\citation{sldtodd}
\citation{sldtoddb}
\citation{murayama}
\citation{philssi}
\citation{delphi4jet}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Further Important Topics}{400}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.1}Casimir factor analysis}{400}}
\citation{doksh}
\citation{torbj}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {149}{\ignorespaces Expectation value of cos$\theta _N$ versus CM energy; contributions from $W$ (long dashes) and $Z^0$ (short dashes) rescattering.}}{401}}
\newlabel{figlance}{{149}{401}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.2}Charged particle multiplicity}{401}}
\citation{philold}
\citation{bower}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {150}{\ignorespaces Casimir classification of tree-level couplings. }}{402}}
\newlabel{figcasim}{{150}{402}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.3}Colour reconnection effects}{402}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.4}Hadronisation studies and renormalon physics}{402}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {151}{\ignorespaces The $T_F/C_F$ versus $N_C/C_F$ plane showing the expectations from various gauge groups; QCD is in good agreement with the data.}}{403}}
\newlabel{figopalcas}{{151}{403}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.5}Jet properties and detector design}{403}}
\bibcite{philssi}{1}
\bibcite{qcd}{2}
\bibcite{kramer}{3}
\bibcite{esw}{4}
\bibcite{sldalp}{5}
\bibcite{siggi}{6}
\bibcite{lep2}{7}
\bibcite{schumm}{8}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {8}Summary and Conclusions}{404}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {9}Acknowledgements}{404}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{404}}
\bibcite{rgtwo}{9}
\bibcite{gut}{10}
\bibcite{alphasrev}{11}
\bibcite{ew}{12}
\bibcite{philalp}{13}
\bibcite{otmar}{14}
\bibcite{power}{15}
\bibcite{thrust}{16}
\bibcite{kunszt}{17}
\bibcite{resum}{18}
\bibcite{topalp}{19}
\bibcite{toptheor}{20}
\bibcite{topexp}{21}
\bibcite{hoang}{22}
\bibcite{werner}{23}
\bibcite{arnd}{24}
\bibcite{bmass}{25}
\bibcite{klaus}{26}
\bibcite{winter}{27}
\bibcite{rtau}{28}
\bibcite{tasso}{29}
\bibcite{lynneold}{30}
\bibcite{lynnenew}{31}
\bibcite{rizzo}{32}
\bibcite{sldchromo}{33}
\bibcite{toddlowe}{34}
\bibcite{lance}{35}
\bibcite{hagi}{36}
\bibcite{sldtodd}{37}
\bibcite{sldtoddb}{38}
\bibcite{murayama}{39}
\bibcite{delphi4jet}{40}
\bibcite{doksh}{41}
\bibcite{torbj}{42}
\bibcite{philold}{43}
\bibcite{bower}{44}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\\ \bf  9\ \ Gamma-Gamma and Other Options}{407}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{407}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {152}{\ignorespaces Kinematics of backward Compton scattering.}}{408}}
\newlabel{fig:compton}{{152}{408}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Luminosity}{408}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}$\gamma \gamma $\nobreakspace  {}Collider}{408}}
\newlabel{eqn:e-gam}{{322}{408}}
\newlabel{eqn:x}{{323}{408}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {153}{\ignorespaces Calculated energy(a) and polarization(b) of back-scattered photons by laser-Compton scattering. Three lines are for different combination of the election and the laser polarization, {\it  i.e.}, $P_eP_L=-1$(solid), $P_eP_L=0$(dash) and $P_eP_L=+1$(dots), respectively.}}{409}}
\newlabel{fig:spectrum}{{153}{409}}
\newlabel{eqn:k}{{324}{409}}
\citation{JLCgg-new}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {16}{\ignorespaces Major parameters of $\gamma \gamma $ collisions at JLC-I.}}{410}}
\newlabel{tbl:parameters}{{16}{410}}
\newlabel{eqn:lum_est}{{325}{410}}
\newlabel{eqn:geom}{{326}{410}}
\citation{cain}
\citation{cain}
\citation{cain}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {154}{\ignorespaces Luminosity distributions simulated by CAIN\cite {cain} for collisions, the solid, dashed and dotted lines are luminosities of $\gamma \gamma $, $e \gamma $\nobreakspace  {} and $e^-e^-$\nobreakspace  {} collisions, respectively, and $\sqrt  {s}$ is their center-of-mass energies.}}{411}}
\newlabel{lumgg}{{154}{411}}
\citation{cain}
\citation{cain}
\citation{cain}
\citation{cain}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {155}{\ignorespaces  Linear-polarization transfers for $x=0.5$, 1 and 4.8, as a function of the scaled energy, $y \equiv E_\gamma / E_e$. }}{412}}
\newlabel{fig:linpol}{{155}{412}}
\newlabel{eqn:lin-anal}{{327}{412}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}$e \gamma $\nobreakspace  {}Collider}{412}}
\newlabel{eqn:lum_eg}{{328}{412}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {156}{\ignorespaces Linearly polarized luminosities and the asymmetries at 120 GeV $\gamma \gamma $\nobreakspace  {} collisions, which are simulated by CAIN\nobreakspace  {}\cite {cain}, where $L^\parallel _{\parallel }$(dashed), $L^\parallel _{\perp }$ (dotted) and $L_{\rm  {total}} \equiv L^\parallel _{\parallel }+ L^\parallel _{\perp }$(solid). The left and right figures correspond to the parameter sets of (b) and (c) in table\nobreakspace  {}16\hbox {}, respectively. }}{413}}
\newlabel{lum-lin}{{156}{413}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {157}{\ignorespaces Luminosity distributions for $e \gamma $\nobreakspace  {}collider mode simulated by CAIN\nobreakspace  {}\cite {cain}, where the solid, dashed and dotted lines are luminosities of $\gamma \gamma $, $e \gamma $\nobreakspace  {} and $e^-e^-$\nobreakspace  {} collisions, respectively, and $\sqrt  {s}$ is their center-of-mass energies.}}{413}}
\newlabel{fig:lum-eg}{{157}{413}}
\citation{ISG}
\citation{cain}
\citation{cain}
\citation{e-e-kath}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {158}{\ignorespaces Luminosity distributions for $e^-e^-$\nobreakspace  {}collider mode simulated by CAIN \cite {cain}.}}{414}}
\newlabel{fig:lumee}{{158}{414}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}$e^-e^-$\nobreakspace  {}Collider}{414}}
\citation{asner}
\citation{TESLAgg}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {17}{\ignorespaces Proposed electron beam parameters of the $\gamma \gamma $\nobreakspace  {}collider optoins for the JLC, NLC and TESLA}}{415}}
\newlabel{tbl:machine}{{17}{415}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.4}Summary of the luminosities}{415}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Higgs Boson in $\gamma \gamma $\nobreakspace  {}interaction}{415}}
\citation{bor93}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {159}{\ignorespaces Couplings of the Higgs boson to two photons.}}{416}}
\newlabel{fig:cou}{{159}{416}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {160}{\ignorespaces The effective production section and expected number of events/year for the Higgs boson production in a $\gamma \gamma $\nobreakspace  {}collider}}{416}}
\newlabel{fig:higg-events}{{160}{416}}
\newlabel{eqn:higgs-eff}{{329}{416}}
\newlabel{eqn:higgs-num}{{330}{416}}
\citation{SLD-b}
\citation{ohgaki-higgs}
\citation{jikia-higgs}
\citation{jikia-higgs}
\citation{jikia-higgs}
\citation{jikia-higgs}
\citation{lcws99-yamashita}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {161}{\ignorespaces Branching ratio for the standard model Higgs boson for a 176 GeV top-quark mass.}}{417}}
\newlabel{fig:bra}{{161}{417}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Two Photon Decay Width of the light Higgs Bosons}{417}}
\citation{atlas}
\citation{atlas}
\citation{atlas}
\citation{asner}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {162}{\ignorespaces Mass distributions for Higgs signal and heavy quark background for $m_h=120$ GeV \cite {jikia-higgs}. }}{418}}
\newlabel{fig:higgs-mass}{{162}{418}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Heavy Higgs Bosons}{418}}
\citation{asner}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {163}{\ignorespaces Number of Higgs Boson observed with 300 $fb^{-1}$ with ALTAS at LHC\cite {atlas}.}}{419}}
\newlabel{fig:atlas}{{163}{419}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Measurement of CP Nature of the Higgs Boson}{419}}
\newlabel{sec:higgs-cp}{{3.3}{419}}
\newlabel{eqn:acp}{{331}{419}}
\newlabel{eqn:cpobs}{{332}{419}}
\citation{Asakawa}
\citation{Asakawa}
\citation{Asakawa}
\citation{JLCgg,konSUSY}
\citation{konSUSY}
\citation{konSUSY}
\citation{JLCgg,konSUSY}
\citation{konSUSY}
\citation{konSUSY}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {164}{\ignorespaces The cross sections of $\gamma _{+} \gamma _{+} \to t_L \overline  {t}_L$ (left), $t_R \overline  {t}_R$ for $tan\beta = 3$. The solid curves show the cross sections with Higgs resonances, the dashed curves is the ones obtained by neglecting the interference, the dot-dashed lines are the continuum contribution, respectively \cite {Asakawa}.}}{420}}
\newlabel{asakawa}{{164}{420}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Supersymmetry }{420}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Sfermion and Chargino Production by $\gamma \gamma $\nobreakspace  {}Collisions}{420}}
\citation{konSUSY}
\citation{konSUSY}
\citation{konSUSY}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {165}{\ignorespaces Slepton mass dependence of the total cross section for each initial beam polarization ($\lambda _{1}^e$, $P_{1}^{c}$) and ($\lambda _{2}$, $P_{2}^{c}$). $\sqrt  {s_{ee}}$ is taken at 1 TeV \cite {konSUSY}. }}{421}}
\newlabel{fig:ggsf}{{165}{421}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Selectron in the $e \gamma $\nobreakspace  {}Collisions}{421}}
\citation{feng}
\citation{feng}
\citation{feng}
\citation{feng}
\citation{feng2}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {166}{\ignorespaces Chargino mass dependence of the total cross sections for each initial beam polarization ($\lambda _{1}$, $P_{1}^{c}$) and ($\lambda _{2}$, $P_{2}^{c}$). $\sqrt  {s_{ee}}$ is at 1 TeV \cite {konSUSY}. }}{422}}
\newlabel{fig:ggcc}{{166}{422}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Selectron in $e^-e^-$\nobreakspace  {}Collisions}{422}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {167}{\ignorespaces Selectron mass dependence of the total cross sections for each initial beam polarization ($\lambda _{1}$, $\lambda _{2}$, $P_{2}^{c}$) $=$ ($0$, $0$, $0$) (a), ($+1/2$, $0$, $0$) (b), ($+1/2$, $+1/2$, $-1$) (c) and ($+1/2$, $-1/2$, $+1$) (d). We take $\sqrt  {s_{ee}}$ $=$ 1 TeV and $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E\chi _1^0 } =m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07EB} =100$ GeV \cite {konSUSY}. }}{423}}
\newlabel{fig:egsz1}{{167}{423}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {168}{\ignorespaces Threshold behavior of the production cross section of right handed selectron pairs in $e^+e^-$\nobreakspace  {}and $e^-e^-$\nobreakspace  {}collision for $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07Ee_R}=200$ GeV \cite {feng}. }}{423}}
\newlabel{fig:e-e-sl}{{168}{423}}
\citation{boudjema}
\citation{miyamoto}
\citation{takahashi95}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Precise Measurement of Standard Model Particles}{424}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Anomalous Coupling of the $W$ bosons}{424}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {169}{\ignorespaces Number of $W$ pair events as a function of the center-of-mass energy. The solid line is the number of generated and circles are the efficiency-corrected number of detected events. The normalization corresponds to a total integrated luminosity of 10${\rm  \nobreakspace  {}fb^{-1}}$. }}{425}}
\newlabel{fig:wevent}{{169}{425}}
\citation{topanom}
\citation{choiT}
\citation{rindani}
\citation{boos}
\citation{toprev}
\citation{soni}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {170}{\ignorespaces Expected 90\% limit in $W$'s anomalous coupling parameter $\delta \kappa _\gamma $, $\lambda _\gamma $. An estimation with an $e^+e^-$\nobreakspace  {}collision is also shown by the dotted and dashed lines. The total integrated luminosity for $\gamma \gamma $ is assumed to be $10{\rm  \nobreakspace  {}fb^{-1}}$.}}{426}}
\newlabel{fig:anom}{{170}{426}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Top quarks in the $\gamma \gamma $\nobreakspace  {}Interaction}{426}}
\citation{ikematsu-top}
\citation{SLD-alr}
\citation{marciano}
\citation{slc-pol}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}Precise Determination of Weinberg Angle by $e^-e^-$\nobreakspace  {}Interaction}{427}}
\newlabel{eff-pol}{{333}{427}}
\citation{marciano}
\citation{marciano}
\citation{marciano}
\citation{ADD}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {171}{\ignorespaces Running of $sin^2 \theta _W (Q^2)$ compared with potential future $e^-e^-$\nobreakspace  {}collider measurements at $\sqrt  {s}=1$ TeV \cite {marciano}.}}{428}}
\newlabel{sinW-moller}{{171}{428}}
\newlabel{doubel-alr}{{334}{428}}
\newlabel{qsq}{{335}{428}}
\newlabel{ydef}{{336}{428}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.4}Search for the Extra-Dimensions}{428}}
\citation{rizzotwo}
\citation{JLCgg,godbole}
\citation{JLCgg,godbole}
\citation{godbole}
\citation{miller,kawabata}
\newlabel{eqn:gauss}{{337}{429}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Other experimental Issues}{429}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.1}Hadronic Cross Section}{429}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {172}{\ignorespaces The total $\gamma \gamma $\nobreakspace  {} cross-section as a function of the energy with various model calculations and data obtained at low energy experiments \cite {JLCgg,godbole}.}}{430}}
\newlabel{fig:minijet}{{172}{430}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.2}Luminosity Measurement}{430}}
\newlabel{eqn:diff}{{338}{430}}
\citation{tel-lum}
\citation{takahashi95,JLCgg}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {173}{\ignorespaces a) Reconstructed events in the process $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow e^+ e^-$, where the circles and asterisks are the measured luminosities with J=0 and J=2, while the solid and dashed lines are the generated luminosities with J=0 and J=2, respectively. b) Estimated statistical error for the luminosity measurement, assuming the integrated luminosity of $10\nobreakspace  {}fb^{-1}$.}}{431}}
\newlabel{fig:lum_meas}{{173}{431}}
\bibcite{JLCgg}{1}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {18}{\ignorespaces Possible topics studied by the linear collider.}}{432}}
\newlabel{topic}{{18}{432}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Summary}{432}}
\bibcite{NLC}{2}
\bibcite{TESLAgg}{3}
\bibcite{e-e-99}{4}
\bibcite{JLCgg-new}{5}
\bibcite{cain}{6}
\bibcite{e-e-kath}{7}
\bibcite{ISG}{8}
\bibcite{gg2000}{9}
\bibcite{bor93}{10}
\bibcite{SLD-b}{11}
\bibcite{ohgaki-higgs}{12}
\bibcite{jikia-higgs}{13}
\bibcite{asner}{14}
\bibcite{atlas}{15}
\bibcite{lcws99-yamashita}{16}
\bibcite{Asakawa}{17}
\bibcite{konSUSY}{18}
\bibcite{tsuka}{19}
\bibcite{feng}{20}
\bibcite{feng2}{21}
\bibcite{boudjema}{22}
\bibcite{choi}{23}
\bibcite{yehudai}{24}
\bibcite{miyamoto}{25}
\bibcite{takahashi95}{26}
\bibcite{topanom}{27}
\bibcite{choiT}{28}
\bibcite{rindani}{29}
\bibcite{boos}{30}
\bibcite{toprev}{31}
\bibcite{soni}{32}
\bibcite{ikematsu-top}{33}
\bibcite{SLD-alr}{34}
\bibcite{marciano}{35}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{433}}
\bibcite{slc-pol}{36}
\bibcite{ADD}{37}
\bibcite{rizzotwo}{38}
\bibcite{godbole}{39}
\bibcite{GRV}{40}
\bibcite{SAS}{41}
\bibcite{JLC-green}{42}
\bibcite{miller}{43}
\bibcite{kawabata}{44}
\bibcite{tel-lum}{45}
\citation{ckm}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\\ \bf  10\ \ CP Violation at the Linear Collider}{435}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{435}}
\citation{prl69p2754}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Single Top Polarimetry}{436}}
\newlabel{tdeq2}{{339}{436}}
\newlabel{tdeq3}{{340}{436}}
\newlabel{dgamdcos}{{342}{437}}
\newlabel{epsat}{{343}{437}}
\newlabel{onesigma}{{344}{437}}
\newlabel{epswt}{{346}{437}}
\citation{plb350p218}
\citation{plb350p218}
\citation{prd45p2405}
\newlabel{epsbardt}{{347}{438}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Top Pair Polarimetry}{438}}
\citation{bjd}
\newlabel{geometric}{{356}{442}}
\newlabel{sssec632}{{3.1}{444}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Constraints on Top Dipole Moments }{444}}
\citation{grz_htt,zpc61p599,plb305p384,npb460p235,npb507p35}
\citation{prl69p33,plb279p389,npb386p63,prl37p657,prd21711,prd23p1613,prd51p1034}
\citation{prd45p2405,npb484p17,plb391172,ijmpa14p1261,rind1,prd50p4372,hepph9602273}
\citation{hepph9602273}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {174}{\ignorespaces  This figure shows various asymmetries in $e^+e^-\to t \overline  t$ resulting from real and imaginary EDM and ZDM for the top quark as a function of $\sqrt  {s}$. For a Real EDM, the solid line shows $\alpha (D_R^\gamma ,O_1)/D_R^\gamma $ and the dashed line shows $\alpha (D_R^\gamma ,O_2)/D_R^\gamma $. For an imaginary EDM, the dotted line shows $\alpha (D_I^\gamma ,O_1)/D_I^\gamma $ and the dash-dot line shows $\alpha (D_I^\gamma ,O_2)/D_I^\gamma $. For a real ZDM, the long dashed line shows $\alpha (D_R^Z,O_2)/D_R^Z$, and for an imaginary ZDM, dash-dot-dot line shows $\alpha (D_I^Z,O_2)/D_I^Z$. We assume the electrons have right helicity and the positrons have left helicity. }}{445}}
\citation{prd53p1162,plb419p340,hepph9710355,prd60p115018}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {19}{\ignorespaces  Attainable 3-$\sigma $ sensitivities with integrated luminosity of $200\nobreakspace  {}fb^{-1}$ to the CP-violating dipole moment  form factors in units of $10^{-18}$ e-cm, with ($P_e=\pm 1$) and without ($P_e=0$) beam polarization. \vspace  \bigskipamount }}{446}}
\newlabel{eetttab1}{{3.1}{446}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Three Particle Final States}{446}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Tree Level $e^+e^-\to t\overline  t H$ and $e^+e^-\to t\overline  t Z$}{446}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq1}{{362}{446}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq2}{{363}{446}}
\citation{prd53p1162,plb419p340,hepph9710355}
\citation{prl77p5172,mpla71765,zpc54p255,prd50p7042,hepph9609453,npb367257,fujii}
\citation{prl77p5172}
\citation{hepph9609453}
\citation{prd53p1162}
\citation{prd60p115018}
\citation{npb367257,fujii}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {175}{\ignorespaces \emph  { Tree-level Feynman diagrams contributing to $e^+e^-\to t\overline  {t} h$ (left hand side) and $e^+e^-\to t\overline  {t} Z$ (right hand side) in the unitary gauge, in a 2HDM. For $e^+e^-\to t\overline  {t} Z$, diagram (a) on the right hand side represents 8 diagrams in which either $Z$ or $\gamma $ are exchanged in the s-channel and the outgoing $Z$ is emitted from $e^+,e^-,t$ or $\overline  {t}$. }}}{448}}
\newlabel{eetthzfig1}{{175}{448}}
\newlabel{2hdmab}{{364}{448}}
\newlabel{2hdmc}{{365}{448}}
\citation{prl77p5172,prd53p1162,hepph9710355}
\citation{plb419p340,hepph9710355}
\newlabel{eetthzeq4}{{366}{449}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq5}{{367}{449}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq6}{{367}{449}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq7}{{368}{449}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq8}{{369}{449}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq9}{{369}{449}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq10}{{369}{449}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq11}{{370}{449}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq12}{{371}{449}}
\citation{hepph9710355}
\newlabel{eetthzeq13}{{372}{450}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq14}{{373}{450}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {176}{\ignorespaces  The cross-sections (in fb) for: (a) the reaction $e^+e^-\to t\overline  {t}h$ with $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta =0.5$ and (b) the reaction $e^+e^-\to t\overline  {t}Z$ with $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta =0.3$, assuming unpolarized electron and positron beams, for Model\nobreakspace  {}II with set\nobreakspace  {}II and as a function of $m_h$ (solid and dashed lines) and $\sqrt  s$ (dotted and dotted-dashed lines). Set\nobreakspace  {}II means $\left \{\alpha _1,\alpha _2,\alpha _3 \right \} \equiv \left \{\pi /2,\pi /4,0 \right \}$. }}{450}}
\newlabel{eetthzfig2}{{4.1}{450}}
\citation{prd53p1162}
\newlabel{eetthzeq15}{{374}{451}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq16}{{375}{451}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq17}{{376}{451}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq18}{{377}{451}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq20}{{378}{451}}
\citation{hepph9710355}
\citation{prd53p1162,hepph9710355}
\citation{plb419p340,hepph9710355}
\newlabel{eetthzeq21}{{379}{452}}
\newlabel{eetthzfig3}{{4.1}{452}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {177}{\ignorespaces  The asymmetry, $A_{\rm  opt}$, and scaled statistical significance, $N_{SD}/\sqrt  L$, for the optimal observable  $O_{\rm  opt}$ for: (a) the reaction $e^+e^-\to t\overline  {t}h$ with $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta =0.5$ and (b) the reaction $e^+e^-\to t\overline  {t}Z$ with $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta =0.3$, as a function of the light Higgs mass $m_h$, for $\sqrt  s=1$ TeV and 1.5 TeV\hbox {}. All graphs are with set\nobreakspace  {}II of the parameters, as in Fig.\nobreakspace  {}4.1\hbox {} }}{453}}
\citation{prl77p5172}
\citation{prd60p115018}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {178}{\ignorespaces  The asymmetry, $A_{\rm  opt}$, and scaled statistical significance, $N_{SD}/\sqrt  L$, for the optimal observable $O_{\rm  opt}$ for: (a) the reaction $e^+e^-\to t\overline  {t}h$ with $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta =0.5$ and (b) the reaction $e^+e^-\to t\overline  {t}Z$ with $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta =0.3$, as a function of the CM energy $\sqrt  s$, for $m_h=100$ GeV and $m_h=360$ GeV\hbox {}. All graphs are with set\nobreakspace  {}II of the parameters, as in Fig.\nobreakspace  {}4.1\hbox {}. }}{454}}
\newlabel{eetthzfig4}{{4.1}{454}}
\citation{prd56p90}
\citation{grz_htt}
\citation{plb350p218,plb314p104,prd48p3225,prd49p4481,prd49p4548,mpla9p205,zpc64p21,plb339p127}
\citation{prd56p90}
\newlabel{sssec623}{{4.2}{455}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}CP asymmetries in $e^+ e^- \to Zh$ with subsequent Higgs decay $h \to t \overline  {t}$ }{455}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq27}{{380}{455}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq28}{{381}{455}}
\newlabel{eetthzeq29}{{382}{455}}
\citation{prd56p90}
\citation{abes_pr}
\newlabel{eetthzeq30}{{383}{456}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {179}{\ignorespaces  The cross-sections (in fb) for: (a) the reaction $e^+e^-\to t\overline  {t}h$ with $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta =0.5$ and (b) the reaction $e^+e^-\to t\overline  {t}Z$ with $\qopname  \relax o{tan}\beta =0.3$, assuming unpolarized electron and positron beams, for Model\nobreakspace  {}II with set\nobreakspace  {}II and as a function of $m_h$ (solid and dashed lines) and $\sqrt  s$ (dotted and dotted-dashed lines). Set\nobreakspace  {}II means $\left \{\alpha _1,\alpha _2,\alpha _3 \right \} \equiv \left \{\pi /2,\pi /4,0 \right \}$. }}{456}}
\newlabel{htt_asy}{{4.2}{456}}
\citation{grz_htt}
\citation{grz_htt}
\citation{abes_pr}
\citation{anseeww,abes_pr}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Some other topics, in brief}{457}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Threshold studies of $e^+ e^- \to t \overline  {t}$}{457}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}$e^+ e^- \to t \overline  {t} g$}{457}}
\bibcite{ckm}{1}
\bibcite{eerev1}{2}
\bibcite{zfpc74p403}{3}
\bibcite{prd21711}{4}
\bibcite{prd52p3803}{5}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3} $e^+ e^- \to t \overline  {t} \nu _e \overline  {\nu }_e$}{458}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {180}{\ignorespaces The 1-loop diagrams contributing to the asymmetry ${\pcal O}_{tt}^h$ in a 2HDM\hbox {}.}}{458}}
\newlabel{eetthzfig6}{{5.3}{458}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Acknowledgements}{458}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{458}}
\bibcite{prd50p4372}{6}
\bibcite{plb339p127}{7}
\bibcite{prl74p220}{8}
\bibcite{prd53p1162}{9}
\bibcite{prl69p2754}{10}
\bibcite{prd51p1034}{11}
\bibcite{prd45p2405}{12}
\bibcite{hepph9704312}{13}
\bibcite{hepph9710355}{14}
\bibcite{plb419p340}{15}
\bibcite{zpc72p79}{16}
\bibcite{collider}{17}
\bibcite{npb460p235}{18}
\bibcite{npb507p35}{19}
\bibcite{hepph9804348}{20}
\bibcite{plb314p104}{21}
\bibcite{prd49p4481}{22}
\bibcite{zpc61p599}{23}
\bibcite{prd56p90}{24}
\bibcite{hepph9602273}{25}
\bibcite{plb279p389}{26}
\bibcite{plb181p157}{27}
\bibcite{bjd}{28}
\bibcite{ggrev32}{29}
\bibcite{ijmpa14p1261}{30}
\bibcite{hepph9806471}{31}
\bibcite{prd541}{32}
\bibcite{prd48p3225}{33}
\bibcite{plb359p369}{34}
\bibcite{plb315p338}{35}
\bibcite{prl78p4339}{36}
\bibcite{plb306p411}{37}
\bibcite{zpc62p397}{38}
\bibcite{mpla71765}{39}
\bibcite{zpc54p255}{40}
\bibcite{prd181632}{41}
\bibcite{npb386p63}{42}
\bibcite{fujii}{43}
\bibcite{ggrev11}{44}
\bibcite{ggrev12}{45}
\bibcite{ggrev21}{46}
\bibcite{ggrev22}{47}
\bibcite{plb305p384}{48}
\bibcite{grz_htt}{49}
\bibcite{plb294p361}{50}
\bibcite{plb350p218}{51}
\bibcite{npb484p17}{52}
\bibcite{plb391172}{53}
\bibcite{prd60p115018}{54}
\bibcite{hepph9609453}{55}
\bibcite{prl77p5172}{56}
\bibcite{npb367257}{57}
\bibcite{prd61p015006}{58}
\bibcite{lc1}{59}
\bibcite{mpla9p205}{60}
\bibcite{prd49p4548}{61}
\bibcite{5}{62}
\bibcite{zpc64p21}{63}
\bibcite{eerev2}{64}
\bibcite{lc2}{65}
\bibcite{eerev3}{66}
\bibcite{rind1}{67}
\bibcite{hepph9610373}{68}
\bibcite{sjnp28p75}{69}
\bibcite{prd23p1613}{70}
\bibcite{prl69p33}{71}
\bibcite{ggrev31}{72}
\bibcite{prl37p657}{73}
\bibcite{prd50p7042}{74}
\bibcite{abes_pr}{75}
\bibcite{anseeww}{76}
\citation{Martinez,Renton,LE}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\\ \bf  11\ \ Overall Perspective}{462}}
\newlabel{chap11:sec01}{{1}{462}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Grand View of Particle Physics }{462}}
\citation{CosParam}
\citation{TeslaPhysics,Snowmass,ACFAreport}
\citation{ILC}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Highlights of the LC Physics Programs}{464}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}The Higgs boson}{464}}
\citation{Martin}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Supersymmetry}{466}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}The top quark and the $W$ boson}{467}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.4}$Z^{0\prime }$s and other 4-fermion interactions}{468}}
\citation{Weiglein}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Relation of the ILC to the LHC}{469}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {181}{\ignorespaces  Schematics illustrating the correspondence between underlying decay Feynman diagrams and resultant jets as observed in a laboratory for heavy `partons' like $W/Z$ and $t$. }}{472}}
\newlabel{Fig:ch11:jets}{{181}{472}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Experimentation at the ILC}{472}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {182}{\ignorespaces  Feynman diagrams for the $e^+e^- \to W^+W^-$ process in the electroweak symmetry limit. }}{474}}
\newlabel{Fig:ch11:eeww}{{182}{474}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Benchmark processes for evaluating the ILC detectors}{475}}
\citation{Ref:ch11:wws}
\newlabel{ch11:eezh}{{5.1}{476}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}$e^+e^- \rightarrow Zh$ }{476}}
\citation{Ref:ch11:glc}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}$e^+e^- \rightarrow Zhh$}{478}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}$e^+e^- \rightarrow t \overline  {t} h$}{478}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {183}{\ignorespaces  The relation between the mass of a particle and its coupling to the Higgs boson in the case of the Standard Model with $m_h = 120$ GeV. }}{479}}
\newlabel{Fig:ch11:masscup}{{183}{479}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.4}$e^+e^- \rightarrow t \overline  {t}$}{479}}
\citation{Ref:ch11:kinfit}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.5}$e^+e^- \rightarrow \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}_R^+ \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{e}_R^-, \tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }_R^+ \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }_R^-$}{481}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {184}{\ignorespaces  A typical muon energy distributions for $e^+e^- \to \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }_R^+ \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }_R^-$ followed by $\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }_R^\pm \to \mu ^\pm \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }_1^0$ (dotted) with neither ISR nor beam effects (BM), (dot-dashed) with ISR only, and (solid) with both ISR and beam effects: $(m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\mu }}, m_{LSP})=(142,118)$GeV at $\sqrt  {s} = 350$GeV. }}{481}}
\newlabel{Fig:ch11:epbmeff}{{184}{481}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.6}$e^+e^- \rightarrow \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }_1^+ \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }_1^-$}{482}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.7}$e^+e^- \rightarrow \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\tau }_1^+ \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\tau }_1^+$}{483}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {185}{\ignorespaces  $P_T$ distributions for the signal and the background $e^+e^-\tau ^+\tau ^-$ events at $\sqrt  {s}=500$ GeV after the cuts: $\delimiter "026A30C \qopname  \relax o{cos}\theta _{jet}\delimiter "026A30C <0.8$ and $\theta _{acop}>30^\circ $, for different minimum veto angles. $10^{4}$ signal events were generated with $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\tau }}=150$ GeV and $m_{\mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }^0_1}=100$ GeV, corresponding to $\DOTSI \intop \ilimits@ L dt= 100$ $fb^{-1}$. }}{484}}
\newlabel{Fig:ch11:staupt}{{185}{484}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.8}$e^+e^- \rightarrow \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }_1^0 \mathaccentV {tilde}07E{\chi }_1^0$ (GMSB)}{484}}
\citation{Snowmass}
\citation{LEWWG}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Choice of the LC energy and Luminosity}{485}}
\citation{whitepaper}
\citation{BattSnow}
\citation{PW}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Conclusions}{487}}
\bibcite{Martinez}{1}
\bibcite{Renton}{2}
\bibcite{LE}{3}
\bibcite{CosParam}{4}
\bibcite{TeslaPhysics}{5}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{Acknowledgements}{488}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{488}}
\bibcite{Snowmass}{6}
\bibcite{ACFAreport}{7}
\bibcite{ILC}{8}
\bibcite{Martin}{9}
\bibcite{Weiglein}{10}
\bibcite{Ref:ch11:wws}{11}
\bibcite{Ref:ch11:glc}{12}
\bibcite{Ref:ch11:kinfit}{13}
\bibcite{LEWWG}{14}
\bibcite{whitepaper}{15}
\bibcite{BattSnow}{16}
\bibcite{PW}{17}
