NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
MISSION SUPPORT CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

SUMMARY OF RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS

(Thousands of Dollars)FY 1996 FY 1997FY 1998
Discrete Projects45,600 42,30039,600
Minor Revitalization72,540 57,90065,700
Minor Construction3,800 3,4001,100
Facility, Planning and Design10,000 18,70019,000
Environmental Compliance and Restoration37,000 33,00034,000
*Reduction(24,000) --- ---
TOTAL144,940 155,300159,400

*In accordance with Appropriation Conference Report 104-384 dated December 7, 1995 accompanying H.R. 2099,

$24 million of excess FY 1994 funding was used to fund FY 1996 construction projects.

Distribution of Program Amount by Installation FY 1996FY 1997 FY 1998
Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center13,955 14,0007,000
John F. Kennedy Space Center13,100 8,20018,100
George C. Marshall Space Center18,030 20,50024,700
John C. Stennis Space Center7,400 4,6007,500
Ames Research Center11,830 9,3008,300
Dryden Flight Research Center4,170 12,7006,400
Langley Research Center8,545 7,2006,100
Lewis Research Center19,265 16,60017,800
Goddard Space Flight Center13,875 20,30018,100
Jet Propulsion Laboratory16,300 18,00017,700
Various Locations..18,470 23,90027,700
TOTAL144,940 155,300159,400


FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES
SUMMARY

MISSION SUPPORT

MISSION SUPPORT DISCRETE PROJECTS Amount Dollars)
Modernization of Process Cooling System, Numerical Aerodynamic
Simulation Facility (ARC)2,700,000
Rehabilitation and Modification of Hangar/Shop (DFRC) 2,800,000
Restoration of Chilled Water Distribution System (GSFC) 2,400,000
Restoration of Space/Terrestrial Application Facility (GSFC) 4,600,000
Construction of Emergency Services Facility (JPL) 4,800,000
Upgrade of Utility Annex Chilled Water Plant (KSC) 5,900,000
Rehabilitation of High Voltage System (LeRC) 9,400,000
Modification of Chilled Water System (MSFC) 7,000,000
TOTAL DISCRETE PROJECTS39,600,000


CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

PROJECT TITLE: Modernization of Process Cooling System, Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation Facility

INSTALLATION: Ames Research Center

FY 1998 Estimate: $2,700,000

LOCATION OF PROJECT: Moffett Field, Santa Clara County, California

COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Aeronautics

FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years funding is related to this project:

Planning and design ConstructionTotal
Specific Construction Funding $200,000 ---$ 200,000
Capitalized Investment --- $39,866,60139,866,601
Total$200,000 $39,866,601$40,066,601

SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

This project will significantly increase the operational reliability of the Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation Facility (NASF) by providing an uninterrupted supply of chilled water required by the critical-task super computers and other water-cooled equipment in Building N-258. Work includes installation of a thermal energy storage system, new non-chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) high energy efficiency chillers, and chilled water piping modifications to reduce energy consumption and improve system reliability. The NASF is required for Ames Research Center to perform its assigned Agency roles and missions.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:

Ames Research Center is NASAís Center of Excellence for Information Technology and the NASF (Building N-258) is the ìheartî of its information system structure. The facility houses the Von Nuemann and Eagle Cray C-90 supercomputers along with data storage, communication, and auxiliary equipment used by both local and national researchers networked into the systems.

The supercomputers and much of the other equipment are water-cooled, requiring an uninterrupted supply of chilled water to stay in operation. Loss of chilled water will cause the supercomputers to shut down within five minutes, disrupting the researchers tied into the computers. Even a brief shutdown causes loss of research data as well as hours of time to bring the computers back up. The critical nature of the computer load requires simultaneous operation of two chillers at all times. This results in excessive power consumption and accelerated chiller wear. The chillers are worn and have a remaining life projection of less than three years, increasing the likelihood of chiller failure and system shutdown.

This project greatly reduces the risk of chiller failure and also reduces the energy consumption of Building N-258, bringing it into compliance with Federal mandates to reduce overall energy use at NASA operated buildings. In addition, it replaces CFC refrigerant chillers with non-ozone-depleting refrigerant chillers.

IMPACT OF DELAY:

Delay of this project will result in loss of critical research data and downtime for the supercomputers of the NASF. This disrupts the work of a large number of researchers tied into this facility and the distribution of their research data Nationwide. Significant reductions in energy consumption and operations and maintenance costs will not be realized. The continued use of an expired refrigerant will have detrimental effects on the environment and will be increasingly expensive to stockpile for continued future use.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This project replaces the four existing 700-ton chillers in Building N-258 with four new 500-ton chillers which use a non-ozone-depleting refrigerant. The project also provides an alternate electrical feed and installs a new thermal energy storage system to serve as emergency backup to the chillers.

Project Cost EstimateUnit of Measure QuantityUnit Cost Cost
Electrical and Communications LS ------ $1,150,000
Mechanical and Plumbing LS ------ 1,500,000
Hazardous Materials Removal LS ------ 20,000
Systems TestingLS ------ 30,000
Total --- ------ $2,700,000

LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan

OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: None

FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT: None


CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

PROJECT TITLE: Rehabilitation and Modification of Hangar/Shop

INSTALLATION: Dryden Flight Research Center

FY 1998 Estimate: $2,800,000

LOCATION OF PROJECT: Edwards Air Force Base, Kern County, CA

COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Aeronautics

FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years funding is related to this project:

Planning and Design ConstructionTotal
Specific Construction Funding $224,000 ---$ 224,000
Capitalized Investment --- $1,623,5621,623,562
Total$224,000 $1,623,562$1,847,562

SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

This project rehabilitates and modifies Hangar/Shop Building 4823, which supports aircraft modification and maintenance functions critical to flight research at Dryden Flight Research Facility. This project repairs and reinforces the structure for seismic safety, modernizes utility systems that are old and deteriorated, and slightly expands the facility to accommodate larger aircraft and centralize related shop functions. This facility is required for the Center to perform its assigned Agency roles and missions.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:

Dryden is located near the San Andreas fault. This hangar will not withstand a major earthquake in its current condition and needs major structural modifications to meet seismic safety standards. The probable consequences of a major earthquake include injury or death and loss of irreplaceable one-of-a-kind, research aircraft. This project will minimize these consequences. Rehabilitation is needed to meet current building codes for environmental, occupational health and safety, fire protection, disabled-employee access, and energy conservation requirements.

Hangar B4823 is Drydenís primary facility for aircraft maintenance and modification. Various related aircraft maintenance functions are currently scattered around the Center. Lack of centralized shop facilities in close proximity to Hangar 4823 is very inefficient, resulting in lost time for travel between shops and the hangar when tools, equipment, or parts are needed to work on aircraft. The dispersion of personnel hinders creative problem solving, cross training, and cross utilization of personnel among shops. This project locates all shops in a single maintenance facility which includes a substantial hangar, greatly increasing efficiency and productivity. Hangar B4823 needs to be slightly enlarged so that more of Dryden's aircraft can be totally enclosed when being maintained.

IMPACT OF DELAY:

Delay of this project would extend the risk to building occupants and unique, extremely high value aircraft in the event of an earthquake at or near Dryden. The Center would continue its inefficient practice of piecemeal repairs and maintenance to various aircraft, and pay more for energy and maintenance than necessary. Delaying this project will increase the exposure of certain aircraft to the elements because they cannot be totally enclosed in the hangar during modification and maintenance.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This project repairs and reinforces the hangar structure to comply with current seismic and other life safety codes. Utility systems will be modernized, including electrical; mechanical; heating, ventilating, and air conditioning; fire suppression; lighting; water; sewer; storm drainage; and the compressed air system. Lead-based paint will be removed and PCB-filled light fixtures will be replaced. The facility will be enlarged by the addition of a 7.6 meter annex so it can fully accommodate standard-size aircraft and the welding shop can be moved to this building. Related functions to be centralized in this building include the sheet metal shop, machine shop, welding shop, fluids lab, composite shop, non-destructive inspection lab, the chemical crib, and the machinery computer-aided design (CAD) room.

Project Cost EstimateUnit of Measure QuantityUnit Cost Cost
Site Work LS ------ $ 280,000
Architectural/StructuralLS ------ 1,420,000
Mechanical LS ------ 500,000
Electrical LS ------ 600,000
Total --- ------ $2,800,000

LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan

OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: Communications and security equipment is estimated at $50,000.

FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT: None


CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

PROJECT TITLE: Restoration of Chilled Water Distribution System

INSTALLATION: Goddard Space Flight Center

FY 1998 ESTIMATE: $2,400,000

LOCATION OF PROJECT: Greenbelt, Prince Georgeís County, Maryland

COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Mission to Planet Earth

FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years funding is related to this project:

Planning and design ConstructionTotal
Specific Construction Funding $663,000 $ 7,000,000$ 7,663,000
Capitalized Investment --- 4,990,3774,990,377
Total $663,000 $11,990,377$12,653,377

SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

This project continues the restoration of major segments of the chilled water distribution system at the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). The project replaces underground piping that is old and undersized, and installs shutoff valves. This segment of the chilled water distribution system supports facilities required for GSFC to perform its assigned Agency roles and missions.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:

GSFC has experienced serious operational problems with the central chilled water distribution system. The underground chilled water piping to be replaced is approximately 30 years old. The pipes and valves have deteriorated and are leaking substantially. The modernization of the central chilled water plant provides new secondary pumps which will boost the pipe distribution pressure and add even more stress to the system. Pipe sizes in several sections of the system are inadequate for existing as well as future design flow rates. Some critical buildings do not have adequate redundancy in the event of a chilled water service failure.

IMPACT OF DELAY:

Delay of this project will result in continued leaking and failures due to old piping and increasing pressures. Some portions of the system will experience flow deficiencies unless pipe sizes are increased. As a result, some buildings will have inadequate chilled water quantities and air conditioning capacity causing shutdown of mission critical and technical support operations.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This project replaces and upgrades various segments of the underground chilled water distribution piping and provides redundant circuits to improve reliability. The scope will include the section of pipe near Building 23 that completes the main eastern loop; the installation of a redundant header from Minitrack Road to Building 10/15/29; and the backup feed to Building 13 required to protect against single point failure shutdown. Work includes installing shutoff valves at connection points in the new piping, and replacing chilled water supply and return lines to various buildings up to and including the isolation valves inside the buildings. New piping will be sized to support current and future loads as well as provide redundancy for other lines. The project includes all site work required for excavation, rerouting other utilities, backfilling, and resurfacing associated with piping work. Asbestos insulation on existing piping will be removed to the extent necessary to perform the work.

Project Cost EstimateUnit of Measure QuantityUnit Cost Cost
Section Near Building 23 LS ------ $ 800,000
Redundant Header to Building 10/15/29LS ------ 700,000
Backup Feed to Building 13LS ------ 900,000
Total-- ---- $2,400,000

LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan

OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: None

FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT: None. However, additional funding will be required in future years to restore other segments of the chilled water distribution system.


CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

PROJECT TITLE: Restoration of Space/Terrestrial Applications Facility

INSTALLATION: Goddard Space Flight Center

FY 1998 CoF ESTIMATE: $4,600,000

LOCATION OF PROJECT: Greenbelt, Prince Georgeís County, Maryland

COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Mission to Planet Earth

FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years funding is related to this project:

Planning and Design ConstructionTotal
Specific CoF Funding $560,000 ---$ 560,000
Capitalized Investment --- $7,982,8767,982,876
Total$560,000 $7,982,876$8,542,876

SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

This project restores portions of architectural, mechanical, electrical, and fire protection/detection systems in the Space and Terrestrial Application Facility, Building 22. The project corrects exterior and interior building system deficiencies in order to effectively support research operations conducted in this facility. Building 22 is required for Goddard Space Flight Center to perform its assigned Agency roles and missions.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:

Building 22 has been in service for 30 years. The existing systems have deteriorated and are beyond their projected useful life, which ranges from 20 to 30 years for critical mechanical and electrical system components. It is essential to restore those components likely to fail to maintain reliable support of the GSFC mission.The functions, operations, and requirements within the building have changed continuously over 30 years, resulting in many modifications. These modifications satisfied immediate isolated demands and in many cases connect new work to old systems to serve localized needs. At this time the facility is not in compliance with current building codes. Operational requirements and budget constraints have severely strained system capabilities, increasing the risk of failure. This project corrects building problems that pose the greatest risk to safety, systems capacities, and reliable facility service.

IMPACT OF DELAY:

System breakdown could occur at any time, resulting in emergency repair/replacement. Building 22 conducts research critical to the GSFC mission. Any unanticipated outage in the facility would seriously impact research operations.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This project restores 14,521 square meters in Building 22. Interior improvements include bringing elevators into compliance with safety, electrical, and accessibility codes and renovating ceilings, floors, and restrooms. Mechanical systems improvements include repairs to induction systems, improving the constant volume distribution systems, rationalizing exhaust systems, removing abandoned equipment, and completing the energy management and control system for the building. Electrical systems improvements include replacing the building load center, motor control center and transformers, as well as some electrical distribution panels, wiring, and conduit. Fire detection system improvements include demolishing the current system and replacing it with a system compatible with the type used centerwide. Fire protection systems will be modified as required incidental to architectural, mechanical, and electrical modifications. The work also includes exterior repairs to wall systems, entrances, and roof systems.

Project Cost EstimateUnit of Measure QuantityUnit Cost Cost
ArchitecturalLS ------ 1,500,000
Mechanical LS ------ 1,200,000
PlumbingLS ------ 700,000
ElectricalLS ------ 1,200,000
Total--- ------ $4,600,000

LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan

FUTURE CoF ESTIMATED FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT: None


CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

PROJECT TITLE: Construction of Emergency Services Facility

INSTALLATION: Jet Propulsion Laboratory

FY 1998 Estimate: $4,800,000

LOCATION OF PROJECT: La Canada-Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California

COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Space Science

FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years funding is related to this project.

Planning and Design ConstructionTotal
Specific Construction Funding$405,514 ---$405,514
Capitalized Investment --- ------
Total$405,514 ---$405,514

SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

This project constructs a two-story building approximately 1700 square meters (SM) to accommodate Medical Services, Plant Security, Fire Department, and Emergency Preparedness Services. These services are currently housed in badly deteriorated facilities that will be demolished upon completion of this new project.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:

These essential services are housed in a combination of substandard buildings and trailers that are dispersed across the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The existing facilities are too small, inefficient, and do not meet current seismic standards. The Fire Department operates 24 hours per day, with a hazardous materials response capability, and is serving over twice the population it was designed to handle. The security console at the Fire and Guard center of operations was designed to monitor 56 alarm stations. It now handles 1,000 stations with plans to add another 3,000 stations. The equipment is now housed in a small, existing, wood-framed structure that is difficult to access, not adequately secured, and lacks proper air circulation for electronic equipment. An Emergency Operations Center is required to house combined fire and security operations. Some space will be used for classroom and training when available during normal operations. Medical services, including counseling, records maintenance, and administrative support have more than doubled to comply with increased testing requirements, employer responsibilities, and regulations. The counseling department is currently located in a trailer without a group meeting area, restroom facilities and sound-controlled counseling rooms.

IMPACT OF DELAY:

Failure to construct this Facility will result in continued operation in substandard facilities that are dispersed, unsafe, and not designed to accommodate the expanded emergency response capabilities and staffing. These facilities are unlikely to withstand a major earthquake, yet house the functions critical to JPLís ability to respond to this and other emergency situations. Existing facilities seriously degrade JPLís ability to perform these functions effectively.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The project constructs a two-story concrete masonry unit, steel-frame, seismic-safe building of approximately 1,700 square meters (SM). It will be located on the north side of Explorer Road, east of Surveyor Road, on the site currently occupied by Buildings 72, 91, and 93 which will be demolished. Windows will have insulated bronze tinted glazing for solar and glare control. Interior spaces will be defined by metal stud and gypsum board partitions. Carpet will be installed in the medical services area, except in the emergency room and storage/utility areas and in the classroom/emergency operations area. Vinyl composition tile flooring will be installed in the fire and plant protection areas. Ceilings will be lay-in acoustical tile with recessed fluorescent lighting fixtures. The computer control room will have access flooring and indirect lighting.

The building will be air conditioned by an energy-efficient, variable-volume, heating and cooling system. The electrical system will include 480/277V power for lighting and 208/120V transformers providing power to receptacles. Other systems in the building will include telephone, fire detection/protection, energy management control system (EMCS), and institutional local area network (ILAN).

Project Cost EstimateUnit of Measure QuantityUnit Cost Cost
Sitework LS ------ $1,000,000
Archectitural/Structural LS ------ 2,500,000
Mechanical LS ------ 800,000
Electrical LS ------ 500,000
Total--- ------ $4,800,000

LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan

OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: None

FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT: None


CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

PROJECT TITLE: Upgrade of Utility Annex Chilled Water Plant

INSTALLATION: John F. Kennedy Space Center

FY 1998 Estimate: $5,900,000

LOCATION OF PROJECT: Kennedy Space Center, Brevard County, Cape Canaveral, Florida

COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Space Flight

FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years funding is related to this project:

Planning and Design ConstructionTotal
Specific Construction Funding $600,000 --- $ 600,000
Capitalized Investment--- $7,877,2877,877,287
Total $600,000$7,877,287 $8,477,287

SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

The central utility annex contains five outdated chillers with a total cooling capacity of 11,500 tons. This project will replace these chillers and upgrade the total cooling capacity of the plant to handle present day demand for chilled water.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:

The existing chillers are over 30 years old, experience increased unscheduled outages including a recent catastrophic failure, use the environmentally unacceptable refrigerant CFC-12, and are highly energy inefficient. Further, existing plant capacity is insufficient to support the cooling requirements of additional facilities scheduled to be connected to the chiller plant over the next three years.

IMPACT OF DELAY:

Failure to upgrade or replace deteriorated equipment continues the risk that unscheduled outages will increasingly interfere with KSCís ability to meet critical mission schedule milestones. Escalating maintenance and repair costs will increase continually, particularly as a result of the recent termination of production and importation of all CFC-12 refrigerant. Ongoing cooling operations will become marginal as additional facilities are connected and activated.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This project upgrades or replaces the five chillers located in the north area utility annex, Building K6-947. It may prove economical to upgrade one or two of the five chillers to provide greater capacity, economy, and environmental compatibility. The remaining chillers cannot be economically revitalized and must be replaced.

Project Cost Estimate
Unit of Measure
Quantity
Unit Cost
Cost
Site & Civil LS ------$ 500,000
Mechanical LS ------4,400,000
Electrical LS ------1,000,000
Total------ ---$5,900,000

LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan

OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: None

FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT: None


CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

PROJECT TITLE: Rehabilitation of High Voltage System

INSTALLATION: Lewis Research Center

FY 1998 ESTIMATE: $9,400,000

LOCATION OF PROJECT: Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, Ohio

COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Aeronautics

FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years funding is related to this project:

Planning and Design Construction Total
Specific Construction Funding $1,890,000 --- $1,890,000
Capitalized Investment --- $6,490,0006,490,000
Total$1,890,000 $6,490,000$8,380,000

SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

This project rehabilitates and modifies substations K, F, and G of the Centerís High Voltage Power System. The project is required to assure continued reliable and safe electrical power supply at LeRC. The system distributes power to all of the Centerís aerospace research and development facilities, computer center, and the institutional facilities. These facilities are required for Lewis Research Center to perform its assigned Agency roles and missions.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:

This system provides power to the major aeropropulsion and space simulation facilities. It is 50 years old, obsolete, and experiencing increased maintenance and emergency repairs each year. Current circuit breaker overloads and single point failures warn of a major failure that could result in a 6 to 12-month shutdown. Economic analysis indicates this project is the most cost-effective approach to maintain an operating system for the next 30 years.

IMPACT OF DELAY:

Unless the system is rehabilitated, failure rates currently being experienced are expected to increase. Major disruptions of electrical services, associated with single point failures, are also anticipated. These failures will result in the shutdown of critical research facilities and the programs they support for periods of up to 12 months.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The work modifies the existing 138 kV Substation K, including new incoming 138 kV circuits, transformers, switching devices, and support structure and equipment. The work also rehabilitates and modifies existing 34.5 kV Substations F&G, including new circuits from Substation K, breakers, and transformers.


Project Cost EstimateUnit of Measure QuantityUnit Cost Cost
138 kV Substation Modifications LS ------$2,800,000
138 kV Circuits and Line Exits LS ------1,200,000
34.5 kV Ties and Line Exits LS ------2,400,000
34.5 kV Circuits and Equipment LS ------3,000,000
Total --- ------ $9,400,000

LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan

OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: None

FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT: None. However, funding will be required in future years to rehabilitate other elements of the Electrical Distribution System.


CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

PROJECT TITLE: Modification of Chilled Water System

INSTALLATION: George C. Marshall Space Flight Center

FY 1998 Estimate: $7,000,000

LOCATION OF PROJECT: Marshall Space Flight Center, Madison County, Alabama

COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Space Flight

FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years funding is related to this project:

Planning and Design Construction Total
Specific Construction Funding$1,574,463 $6,700,000 $8,274,463
Capitalized Investment-- ----
Total$1,574,463 $6,700,000$8,274,463

SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

This project expands the central chiller plant and chilled water distribution system approved by Congress for construction in FY 1997 to additional areas of the Center. It converts the chilled water system from individual chiller units to a central chiller plant with a chilled water (pipeline) distribution system. The project will significantly reduce operations, maintenance, and energy costs; improve reliability in support of critical operations; and help phase out the use of existing refrigerants which are no longer in production. The chilled water system supports facilities required for Marshall Space Flight Center to perform its assigned Agency roles and missions.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:

The Center presently air conditions its facilities and equipment with chilled water produced by individual chillers in each building. These chillers are often backed up with a spare chiller due to redundancy requirements. Consolidating service out of a central chiller plant reduces the total capacity required and the overall cost involved in providing the same level of redundancy. This project also avoids a huge maintenance and repair backlog. Existing chillers affected by this project are old, unreliable, and use refrigerants which are no longer in production. New chillers compatible with the new refrigerants require chiller equipment rooms to be extensively modified, and sometimes relocated, due to the toxic nature of the new refrigerants. Expanding the central chiller plant and distribution system to extend service to additional building areas with abundant individual units will eliminate disruptions associated with piecemeal repairs and will pay for itself in seven to eight years.

IMPACT OF DELAY:

Failure of the existing chillers results in downtimes for extensive repairs that are disruptive to the operation of the Center and which require costly work arounds such as leasing of emergency chillers. Chillers will continue to be replaced individually which is an inefficient financial investment. Failure to convert to the new refrigerants will also require accumulation and stockpiling of the old refrigerant at continually escalating, premium prices.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This project expands the central chiller plant and chilled water distribution system approved by Congress for construction in FY 1997. Scope includes the acquisition and installation of additional cooling tower cells, chillers, and associated mechanical and electrical equipment to extend service to additional areas. Due to technical considerations which surfaced during design, the scope of the FY 1997 project was adjusted to provide service to portions of the 4400 area instead of the 4200 area. This project will extend the 4400 loop to capture additional buildings in that area and constructs the loop that will provide service to most of the 4200 area.

Project Cost EstimateUnit of Measure QuantityUnit Cost Cost
MechanicalLS ------$4,000,000
Electrical LS ------1,000,000
Distribution System and Hook-upLS ------2,000,000
Total --- ------ $7,000,000

LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan

OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: None

FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT: Future CoF funding in the range of $7,500,000 to $9,000,000 is planned in FY 1999 to expand the Central Chiller Plant services to other areas of the Center.


NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

SUMMARY

MINOR REVITALIZATION

Summary of Project Amounts by Location: RepairRehabilitation & Modification Total Revitalization
Ames Research Center $2,850,000 $2,100,000$ 4,950,000
Dryden Flight Research Center 1,350,000 1,550,0002,900,000
Goddard Space Flight Center3,450,000 2,670,0006,120,000
Jet Propulsion Laboratory3,050,000 3,950,0007,000,000
Johnson Space Center3,000,000 600,0003,600,000
Kennedy Space Center4,210,000 3,290,0007,500,000
Langley Research Center3,485,000 1,715,0005,200,000
Lewis Research Center1,800,000 3,050,0004,850,000
Marshall Space Flight Center2,150,000 4,540,0006,690,000
Michoud Assembly Facility 3,450,000 2,610,0006,060,000
Stennis Space Center 2,000,000 1,800,0003,800,000
Wallops Flight Facility 1,800,000 2,330,0004,130,000
Various Locations - 0 - 2,900,0002,900,000
Total $32,595,000 $33,105,000$65,700,000


CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

PROJECT TITLE: Minor Revitalization of Facilities, Not in Excess of $1,500,000 Per Project

INSTALLATION: Various Locations

FY 1998 Estimate: $65,700,000

FY 1996: $70,000,000 FY 1997: $57,900,000

COGNIZANT INSTALLATIONS/LOCATIONS OF PROJECT: Various Locations

COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Management Systems and Facilities

SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

These resources provide for revitalization of facilities at NASA field installations and Government-owned industrial plants supporting NASA activities. The request includes facility revitalization needs for FY 1998 that can be identified at the time of the submission of these estimates that are not in excess of $1.5 million per project. The revitalization program has two components, repair projects and rehabilitation and modification projects. Repair projects restore facilities and components thereof, including collateral equipment, to a condition substantially equivalent to their originally intended and designed capability. Repair work includes the substantially equivalent replacement of utility systems and collateral equipment necessitated by incipient or actual breakdown and major preventive measures that are normally accomplished on a cyclic schedule. Rehabilitation and modification projects may include some restoration of current functional capability but also includes enhancement of the condition of a facility so that it can more effectively accomplish its designated purpose or increase its functional capability. The facilities being revitalized in this program are expected to remain active in the long term and are consistent with current and anticipated Agency roles and missions.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:

NASA is now experiencing ìblock obsolescenceî where a substantial portion of the agencyís facilities have been in use for over 30 years. Repair costs for mechanical and electrical systems in a typical building are almost three times higher after system operations exceed 15ñ20 years than they are during the initial years. Many electrical and mechanical components reach the end of their serviceable or economic life at the 20 year point and should be replaced in the interest of long-term economy. Continued piecemeal repair of these components is more costly in the long run than replacement at the end of the economic life of the original components. Approximately 90 percent of NASAís physical plant has been in service for over 25 years.

The NASA physical plant has a capital investment of $5.9 billion and has a current replacement value of more than $17 billion. A continuing program of revitalization of these facilities is required to accomplish the following:

a. Protect the capital investment in these facilities by minimizing the cumulative effects of wear and deterioration.

b. Ensure that these facilities are continuously available and that they operate at peak efficiency.

c. Improve the capabilities and usefulness of these facilities and thereby mitigate the effects of obsolescence.

d. Provide a better and safer environment for all personnel.

e. Avoid significantly greater future repair costs.

This program includes only facility revitalization work of such a nature and magnitude that it cannot be accomplished by routine day-to-day facility maintenance and repair activities. Projects estimated to cost more than $1.5 million are included as separate discrete projects in the budget request.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Proposed projects for FY 1998 totaling $65.7 million are identified on the following four pages. The projects that comprise this request are of the highest priority based on relative urgency and expected return on investment. Deferral of this mission-essential work would adversely impact the availability of critical facilities and program schedules. The $65.7 million includes repair projects totaling $32.6 million and rehabilitation and modification projects totaling $33.1 million.

During the course of the year, some rearrangement of priorities may be necessary which may force a change in some of the items to be accomplished. Any such changes, however, will be accomplished within total available revitalization resources. The following broad categories of work are included within the repair and the modification and rehabilitation projects identified on the following six pages.

a. Utility Systems $18,400,000
b. General Purpose Buildings 8,795,000
c. Technical Buildings/Structures 25,315,000
d. Pavements and Drainage 940,000
e. Building Exteriors and Roofs 5,730,000
f. Fire Detection/Protection Systems 6,520,000

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE

I. REPAIR


A. Ames Research Center (ARC) .

$2,850,000
1. Repair Natural Gas Distribution System500,000
2. Repair Vane Sets 6 and 7, National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (N-221) . 850,000
3. Repair Pressure Systems . 600,000
4. Repair Building (N-215) . 900,000

B. Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC)

$1,350,000
1. Repair Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems, Various Buildings . 950,000
2. Repair Roofs, Various Buildings . 400,000

C. Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) .

$3,450,000
1. Repair Roofs, Buildings 1 and 16W 700,000
2. Repair Electrical Systems, Various Buildings 800,000
3. Repair Exterior Walls, Building 3 800,000
4. Repair Steam Distribution System 800,000
5. Repair Building Exteriors and Foundations, Various Buildings 350,000

D. Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)

$3.050,000
1. Replace Elevator, Building 198 . 630,000
2. Repair Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Controls, Building 264 620,000
3. Replace 'X' Emergency Generator, Building 230 1,000,000
4. Repair Roofs, Various Buildings . 800,000
E. Johnson Space Center (JSC) .$3,000,000
1. Repair 12.5KV Feeder Cables (2-8 & 1-11) 350,000
2. Repair Mechanical Systems (17) .850,000
3. Replace 300 Area High Voltage Lines .300,000
4. Repair Water and Steam Systems, Various Buildings 900,000
5. Repair Electrical Equipment, Various Buildings . 600,000

F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC) .

$4,210,000
1. Refurbish Elevator Controls, Pads A & B . 600,000
2. Replace Chilled Water System, Vertical Processing Facility . 750,000
3. Replace Potable Water Piping & Firex System, Vertical Assembly Building . 1,300,000
4. Repair Elevator Controls, Vertical Assembly Building, High Bays 1 & 3 1,100,000
5. Restore Visual Landing Aid System 460,000

G. Langley Research Center (LaRC)

$3,485,000
1. Replace Power Supply, Arc-Heated Scramjet Test Facility, (1247B) 1,400,000
2. Replacement of Substation Serving Building 1244 810,000
3. Repair Roof, 1268A400,000
4. Replace Settling Chamber, 20-Inch Mach 6 Tunnel, (1247D) 875,000

H. Lewis Research Center (LeRC)

$1,800,000
1. Repair South Chilled Water Distribution Piping 900,000
2. Repair Chiller #2, Refrigeration Building (9) 900,000

I. Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC)

$2,150,000
1. Repair Roof of High Bay Building (4755) 950,000
2. Repair Electrical and Mechanical Systems (4619) 1,200,000

J. Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF)

$3,450,000
1. Repair LN2/GN2 Steam Boilers (175) 800,000
2. Repair Chilled Water Pumps (103/160)950,000
3. Repair Manufacturing Area Fanhouses (103) 900,000
4. Repair Natural Gas System, Site Wide800,000

K. Stennis Space Center (SSC)

$2,000,000
1. Repairs to High Pressure Gas Piping 600,000
2. Repair 13.8KV Selector Switches and Substations 500,000
3. Repair Motor Control Centers and 480 Volt Electrical Distribution Systems900,000

Various Facilities
L. Wallops Flight Facility (WFF)$1,800,000
1. Repair of Roofs, Various Buildings 400,000
2. Repair of Various Communication Towers500,000
3. Repair of Storm Drainage System 500,000
4. Repair of Elevated Water Tank (X-45)400,000
Total Repair $32,595,000

FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED:

Approximately $30-$40 million per year will be required for continuing repair needs.

II. REHABILITATION AND MODIFICATION


A. Ames Research Center (ARC)

$2,100,000
1. Rehabilitate and Modify Fire Suppression System, N240/N240A 250,000
2. Rehabilitate and Modify Bridge Crane, N227D 350,000
3. Rehabilitate and Modify 60 Mega Watt (MW) DC Power Supply, N238 750,000
4. Modify Compressor Controls for Building N229A 750,000

B. Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC)

$1,550,000
1. Rehabilitate and Modify Fire Alarm Systems, Various Locations 950,000
2. Rehabilitate Warehouses, Various Locations 600,000

C. Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC)

$2,670,000
1. Rehabilitation of Utility Control System 900,000
2. Rehabilitation of Heating Ventilating, Air conditioning (HVAC) System and Controls, Building 21 500,000
3. Rehabilitation and Modification of Laboratory Areas in Building 5 and 22 550,000
4. Modification of TV Facility, Building 3/14 720,000

D.Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)

$3,950,000
1 Modify Administration Building, Building 180 1,400,000
2. Modify Facility Power System, Building 150 550,000
3. Modify Fire Alarm Systems, Various Buildings 1,250,000
4. Modify Photographic Laboratory, Building 111 . 750,000

E. Johnson Space Center (JSC)

$600,000
1. Rehabilitate/Modify Building 7600,000

F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC)

$3,290,000
1. Modify Access Safety Devices, LC-39 Area 750,000
2. Modify Base Support Facilities Fire Protection System (M6-486) 800,000
3. Modify Mobile Launch Platforms HVAC Equipment 800,000
4. Upgrade Two Schwartz Road Intersections 440,000
5. Upgrade Facilities for People with Disabilities, Various Locations 500,000

G. Langley Research Center (LaRC)

$1,715,000
1. Modifications to Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel Control System, Building 1251 1,000,000
2. Modifications for Disabled Accessibility, Various Facilities, Phase II 715,000

H. Lewis Research Center (LeRC)

$3,050,000
1. Rehabilitation of Mechanical and Electrical Systems in Chemistry Laboratory (6) 950,000
2. Rehabilitation of Mechanical and Electrical Systems in 8x6 Supersonic Wind Tunnel Office (54) 950,000
3. Rehabilitation of Mechanical and Electrical System, Materials Processing Lab

(MPL) (105) Phase 2

850,000
4. Modification to Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)in Model Shop(50) 300,000

I. Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC)

$4,540,000
1. Fire Protection and Electrical Modifications to Office Building (4200) 970,000
2. Rehabilitate Heat Treatment Facility (4704) 800,000
3. Modifications for Hydraulic and Electro-Mechanical Actuator Laboratory (4656) 520,000
4. Restoration of Multi-Purpose High Bay Facility (4649) 1,300,000
5. Rehabilitation of Components Service Building (4653) 950,000


J. Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF)
$2,610,000
1. Rehabilitate and Modify Chilled Water System (207/320) 910,000
2. Rehabilitate and Modify Central Plant Air System 800,000
3. Rehabilitate and Modify Central Fire Water Mains (318/400 area) 900,000

K. Stennis Space Center (SSC)
$1,800,000
1. Modify Energy Management Control Systems 900,000
2. Rehabilitate and Modify 4.16KV Switchgear and Controls [B-4400] 900,000

L. Wallops Flight Facility (WFF)

$2,330,000
1. Rehabilitation of Telemetry Receiving and Recording Facility, Building N-162 900,000
2. Rehabilitation of Assembly Shop, Building W-65 580,000
3. Modification of Causeway Bridge 400,000
4. Modification of Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning Systems (HVAC), Systems, Various Buildings 450,000

M. Various Locations

$2,900,000
1. Modifications to DSS-27 & 28, Goldstone, California 900,000
2. Modification of Power Distribution, Madrid, Spain 600,000
3. Modify Chilled Water System, DSS-14, Goldstone, California 700,000
4. Modify Chilled Water System, Canberra, Australia 700,000
Total Rehabilitation and Modification. $33,105,000

FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED:

Approximately $30-40 million per year will be required for continuing rehabilitation and modification needs.


NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

SUMMARY

MINOR CONSTRUCTION

Summary of Project Amounts by Location: Amount
Langley Research Center700,000
Lewis Research Center400,000
Total $1,100,000


CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

PROJECT TITLE: Minor Construction of New Facilities and Additions to Existing Facilities Not in Excess of $1,500,000 Per Project

INSTALLATION: Various Locations

FY 1998 Estimate: $1,100,000

FY 1996: $3,800,000 FY 1997: $3,400,000

COGNIZANT INSTALLATIONS/LOCATIONS OF PROJECT: Various Locations

COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Management Systems and Facilities

SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

These resources will provide for minor facility construction at NASA field Installations. Each project in this program is estimated to cost no more than $1.5 million and involves either the construction of new facilities or additions to existing facilities. The FY 1998 request of $1.6 million will improve the usefulness of NASAís physical plant by changing the utilization of or augmenting the capabilities of various facilities. Included in this request are those programmatic and institutional projects that are essential to the accomplishment of mission objectives.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:

The configuration of NASAís physical plant necessarily must respond to changes in utilization and adaptions required by changes in technology or in mission needs. Demands are generated by research, development, testing, and similar activities.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Included in the FY 1998 minor construction program are those facility projects for institutional or technical facility needs that could be fully identified at the time of submission of this budget estimate. Items of work totaling $1.1 million are included in this resource request. Projects were selected on the basis of the relative urgency of each item and the expected return on the investment. During the course of the year, the revision of priorities may require changes in some of the items to be accomplished. Such changes will be accommodated within the total resources allocated.

These projects represent requirements that must be met in this time frame to support institutional needs and programmatic objectives. They are in the ìTechnical Buildings/Structuresî category of work.

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE

A. Langley Research Center (LaRC) $700,000
1. Construction of Polymer Film Laboratory (1293C) 700,000
B. Lewis Research Center (LeRC)$400,000
1. Construction of Build-up Area at Engine Components Research Laboratory (ECRL - 102) 400,000
Total $1,100,000

FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED: Approximately $4-5 million per year will be required for continuing minor construction needs.


NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

SUMMARY

FACILITY PLANNING AND DESIGNAmount
Master Planning$ 400,000
Sustaining Engineering Support9,000,000
Preliminary Engineering Reports and Related Special Engineering Support 1,600,000
Final Design 8,000,000
Total$19,000,000


CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

PROJECT TITLE: Facility Planning and Design

FY 1998 Estimate: $19,000,000

FY 1996: $10,000,000 FY 1997: $18,700,000

The funds requested in this estimate are required to provide for the following advance planning and design activities related to facilities activities and projects where not otherwise provided for:

a. The accomplishment of necessary studies, development and master planning for field installation and the provision of continuing engineering support and special engineering management and other services.

b. The preparation of preliminary engineering reports, cost estimates, and design and construction schedules. Also includes the preliminary engineering efforts required to initiate design-build projects.

c. The preparation of final designs which include construction plans, specifications, and associated cost estimates and schedules required to implement construction projects.

d. The accomplishment of facilities siting and other investigations, studies and reports.

A. Master Planning$400,000

Provides for updating, developing and automating existing field installation master plans. This effort includes facility studies, site investigations, and analyses of utility systems. The existing utility and civil drawings will be converted into a highly detailed electronic database using a computer-aided-design (CAD) system. Topographical features from original drawings will be merged electronically to create individual area maps or an entire center map. The master plan documents will be updated to reflect as-built conditions and to graphically represent the 5-year facility plan baseline for future development.

The NASA field center master plans are periodically updated. The master plans are essential as reference documents for land use planning, identification of physical relationships of facilities, and proper orientation and arrangement of facilities. The updates reflect as-built condition of facilities and utility systems with emphasis on changes caused by recent facility construction and modifications.

B. Sustaining Engineering Support

$9,000,000

Provisions for facility studies and specific engineering support continue in importance as evidenced in recent years. These efforts are important due to changing cost trends in construction materials and fuels; the operation and maintenance costs for the physical plant; and energy conservation and efficiency.

The following items are included in the FY 1998 requirements:

1. Facilities Engineering Design and Construction Management Studies

This effort involves extremely high leverage facility studies and that are critically important to improve the quality and cost effectiveness of NASAís construction practices and to ensure that developing technology and industry best practices are incorporated into the agencyís construction program.

2. Value Engineering, Cost Validations and Analyses

Provides for engineering services to improve cost-effectiveness of facility projects by subjecting project design criteria, specifications and working drawings for specific material components and systems to detailed independent reviews by engineering specialists. Also provides services necessary to predict and validate facility costs to aid in resources planning.

3. Facility Operation and Maintenance

Provides for studies and engineering support where not otherwise provided for, at NASA field installations relative to functional management of maintenance, automated maintenance management systems, and facilities condition assessments. Included in this activity are field surveys to be conducted at selected NASA field installations to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the operations and maintenance management activities, and to identify possible improvements in productivity.

NASAís facilities infrastructure is critical to achieving current and future space and aeronautics program objectives. Two initiatives begun in FY 1996 and planned to conclude in FY 1998 keep this infrastructure safe, reliable, and available by substantially increasing the rate of return on severely constrained Agency facilities maintenance resources. These initiatives are:

a. Conversion to Reliability Centered Maintenance ($5 million) - Provides for the change from a time driven and reactive/breakdown mode of maintenance to a more proactive program of Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM). This program will focus on implementing the optimal mix of preventive, predictive, proactive, and reactive technologies which yields the required reliability at the minimum cost. It also aims to utilize system performance feedback to design potential failures out of systems. This agency-wide effort will include a detailed assessment of specific RCM opportunities and available Predictive Testing and Inspection (PT&I) technologies, the establishment of RCM processes and procedures, the establishment of responsible RCM organizations, and the acquisition of required PT&I monitoring equipment and training. This conversion to RCM will significantly reduce maintenance cost by minimizing and/or eliminating time driven shutdowns and future breakdown maintenance. This provides the additional resources needed to implement this program, as NASA installations must still perform the current time-driven/breakdown maintenance in order to provide adequate mission support until the conversion is made. It is anticipated that this conversion will lead to an annual savings of $12 million in maintenance costs within three years and thereby ameliorate the negative impact of continuing low budget levels on the facilities infrastructure.

b. Conversion to Performance-Based Maintenance Contracting ($3 million) - Provides for the change from ìumbrellaî cost reimbursement contracts to performance-based, fixed-price contracts for facilities maintenance, repair, and operations contracts. Currently about 90 percent of NASA contracts for these services are cost reimbursement contracts. It is estimated that from $35 to $50 million per year can be saved by successfully converting these contracts to performance-based, fixed-price contracts. This will also lessen the impact of low future budgets. This provides for the substantial up-front effort required to collect and analyze the required data, prepare performance-based specifications that fully support mission urgency and timeliness, tailor and implement comprehensive quality assurance programs, and train personnel.

4. Facilities Utilization Analyses

Provides for the analyses of agencywide facilities utilization data covering (1) office and other types of building space; (2) designate major technical facilities; and (3) special studies comparing the utilization of technical facilities which are similar in type or capability, such as wind tunnels. Such analyses provide for (1) insights into and development of better methods of identifying underutilized facilities; (2) improved techniques to quantify level of facilities use; (3) actions to improve facilities utilization; and (4) recommendations regarding consolidation/closure of facilities to meet Agency physical plant reduction objectives. Work provides for review of each installationís inventory data base in support of the facilities utilization program. Surveys are necessary to validate the reported data in relation to a specific problem or need, and to assist in providing a credible foundation for plans to improve the use of facilities.

5. Facilities Management Systems

Provides for continued engineering support for the technical updating of NASAís master text construction specifications to reflect the use of new materials, state-of-the-art construction techniques and current references to building codes and safety standards. Also provides engineering support for the Major Facilities Inventory, the Real Property Database and the Facilities Utilization Database systems.

6. Independent Analysis and Third Party Reviews

Provides the technical and engineering support analyses, designs, and reviews required to verify, confirm and ensure suitability of construction designs within the project cost estimates.

7. Construction Industries Institute

Covers annual support to the Construction Industries Institute (CII). NASA actively participates in this unique, non-profit institution, established to bring together major facility owners, contractors and academia in a proven effort to improve the quality and cost effectiveness of construction management practices for member organizations as well as the US construction industry.

8. National Research Council

Covers annual support to the Federal Facilities Councilís (FFC) operations and provides for special studies that the Council will perform throughout FY 1998 to help advance the science and technology of Federal Government building and construction. The FFC is subordinate to the National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, and its activities are supported by NASA and other Federal agencies with similar construction programs.

C. Preliminary Engineering Reports and Related Special Engineering Support $1,600,000
1. Preliminary Engineering Reports (PERs) (1,200,000)

This estimate provides for preparation of PERs, investigations, and project studies related to proposed facility projects in the FY 2000 and FY 2001 Construction of Facilities programs. These reports are required to permit the early and timely development of the most suitable project to meet the stated programmatic and functional needs. Reports provide basic data, cost estimates and schedules relating to future budgetary proposals. This request provides for PERs associated with proposed construction.

2. Related Special Engineering Support (400,000)

This estimate provides for investigations and project studies related to proposed facility projects to be included in the subsequent Construction of Facilities programs. Such studies involve documentation and validation of ìas-builtî conditions, survey/study of present condition of such items as roofing and cooling towers, utility plant condition and operational modes, and other like studies. These studies are required to allow for the timely development of projects to meet the stated functional needs and to provide basic data, cost estimates and schedules for related future budgetary proposals.

D. Final Design

$8,000,000

The amount requested will provide for the preparation of designs, plans, drawings, and specifications necessary for the accomplishment of projects. Projects involved are planned for inclusion in the FY 1999 and FY 2000 programs. The goal is to obtain better facilities on line earlier at a lower cost. The request will provide for final design work associated with construction proposed for the FY 1999 program, estimated to cost $110 to $130 million, and for $20 to $30 million of high potential projects proposed for the FY 2000 program.

Total

$19,000,000


NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES

SUMMARY

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND RESTORATION

Summary of Project Amounts by Location: Amount
Ames Research Center$ 600,000
Dryden Flight Research Center700,000
Goddard Space Flight Center 500,000
Jet Propulsion Laboratory2,750,000
Johnson Space Center550,000
Kennedy Space Center4,680,000
Lewis Research Center 3,150,000
Marshall Space Flight Center3,000,000
Michoud Assembly Facility2,000,000
Stennis Space Center3,700,000
Wallops Flight Facility300,000
White Sands Test Facility2,800,000
Various Locations285,000
Miscellaneous Projects Not in Excess of $250,000 Each 245,000
Remedial Investigations, Feasibility Studies, Assessments,
Studies, Design, and Related Engineering
8,740,000
Total $34,000,000


CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
FISCAL YEAR 1998 ESTIMATES


PROJECT TITLE: Environmental Compliance and Restoration Program

INSTALLATION: Various Locations

FY 1998 Estimate: $34,000,000

FY 1996: $37,000,000 FY 1997: $33,000,000

COGNIZANT INSTALLATIONS/LOCATIONS OF PROJECT: Various Locations

COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Management Systems and Facilities

SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

These resources will provide for environmental studies, assessments, investigations, designs, related engineering, and remedial action and construction projects for environmental compliance and restoration measures at NASA field installations, Government-owned industrial plants supporting NASA activities, and other locations where NASA operations have contributed to environmental problems and NASA is obligated to contribute to cleanup costs. In addition, these resources will be used to provide for regulatory agency oversight costs, to acquire land if necessary to implement environmental compliance and restoration measures, and to perform studies and assessments in support of functional leadership initiatives related to environmental compliance and restoration activities. The purpose of this program is to enable NASA to comply with environmental statutory and regulatory requirements and standards, cleanup orders, and regulatory agreements. The resources authorized and appropriated pursuant to this program may not be applied to other activities. The program includes studies or assessments to determine compliance status and options for remedial actions, including evaluations and use of new cleanup technologies, and to support environmental initiatives; conduct of prescribed remedial investigations and feasibility studies as required by environmental laws and regulations; performance of environmental restoration, hazardous waste removal and disposal, cleanups, and closures; and environmental compliance activities.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION/DESCRIPTION:

Proposed environmental compliance and restoration projects and activities for Fiscal Year 1998 total $34.0 million. This program represents this yearís request on a phased approach in relation to the total requirements for environmental restoration that must be implemented within the next several years. Based on relative urgency and potential health hazards, the following listed projects are the highest priority requirements currently planned for accomplishment in FY 1998. Deferral of these necessary compliance and remedial measures would preclude NASA from complying with environmental requirements and regulatory agreements, and jeopardize critical NASA operations. The studies, remedial investigations, feasibility studies, assessments, design, and related engineering costs are estimated to be approximately $8,740,000. Projects estimated to cost less than $250,000 have not been described or identified by specific location. The estimated costs of these projects is $245,000. As studies, assessments, remedial investigations, feasibility studies, and designs progress and as new discoveries or regulatory requirements change, it is expected that priorities may change and revisions of the activities and projects may be necessary.

The following listing summarizes broad categories of effort to be undertaken with the identified estimated costs over $250,000:

a. Hazardous Waste Corrective Actions/Cleanups $22,930,000
b. Hazardous Waste/Material Storage and Control 950,000
c. Water Pollution Control 1,135,000

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE

A. Ames Research Center (ARC) $600,000
1. Remediate Soil Contamination at Area of Investigation No. 10 . 600,000

The project will provide for the removal or in-situ treatment and containment of PCB and oil contaminated soil around the electrical substations that make up Area of Investigation No. 10 at Ames. Initial sampling of the areas have revealed contamination around the transformer pads. Cleanup of the sites is required by the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control.

B. Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC) $700,000
1. Remediation of Soil/Groundwater Contamination 700,000

This project continues the efforts and activities to characterize and remediate site contamination at DFRC. The Center is identified as Operable Unit No. 6 (OU #6) under the Edwards Air Force Base (EAFB) Superfund Program. The project will provide for follow-on phases to investigation activities including risk assessments, feasibility and treatability studies, and proposed remedial plans and reports required to address all sites of concern under OU #6. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) program for OU #6 is conducted in coordination with the Accelerated Site Cleanup process being implemented at the EAFB. This work is required by CERCLA and is subject to the provisions of the EAFB Federal Facilities Agreement.

C. Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) $500,000
1. Remediation of Contaminated Sites 500,000

This project continues the efforts to investigate, characterize and remediate identified contaminated sites, including three abandoned landfills and other sites at GSFC. The work follows-on to the site investigations previously conducted which identified the presence of contamination at these sites. The project is required to bring the facility into compliance with CERCLA/Resources Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and state requirements.

D. Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) . $2,750,000
1. Remediation of Arroyo Seco Groundwater Contamination 1,750,000

This project continues the cleanup effort of the Arroyo Seco aquifer contamination. Site investigations have demonstrated the presence of contaminants beneath the site and in nearby production wells in excess of federal and State of California standards. This portion of the project provides for follow-on actions to site investigations and characterization and site risk assessments. It provides for treatability studies to evaluate and determine appropriate technologies for remedial actions, and project activities to reach decisions on the level and extent of site cleanup. It also provides for interim removal actions for soil and groundwater remediation. The work is being conducted following the federal EPA, state and local requirements. The project also provides for payment of oversight costs as required under the Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA). The site is listed in the Environmental Protection Agencyís (EPA) National Priorities List and is subject to the provisions of CERCLA.

2. Environmental Assessment and Cleanup, Edwards Test Facility (ETF) 1,000,000

This project continues the effort to investigate, characterize, and cleanup site contamination as required for closure of the ETF. The Facility is a tenant of Edwards Air Force Base (EAFB) and is identified as Operable Unit No. 5 under the EAFB Superfund site. This portion continues ongoing work including site characterization and risk assessments, in addition to providing for treatability studies and the evaluation, testing, and implementation of remedial actions for site cleanup. This work is required as part of the CERCLA cleanup process.

E. Johnson Space Center (JSC)$550,000
1. Closure of Impoundments (358)250,000

The project will provide for the proper closure of two surface impoundments located near Building 358, around the Hazardous Waste Facility area. The 500,000 and 25,000 gal surface impoundments provided containment for the hypergolic fuels no longer in use at the facility. Closure of the impoundments will reduce the possibility for misuse of the impoundments for the storage of hazardous substances or wastes, thus preventing noncompliances with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) as well as with spill and discharge requirements under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The project activities will conform with applicable closure requirements under RCRA.

2. Environmental Assessment/Cleanup for NASA Industrial Plant, Downey 300,000

This project continues site assessments and investigations to determine NASAís environmental responsibility prior to excessing some areas of the facility. The project will conduct area site characterizations to identify the extent of remedial actions, as well as provide information on other related environmental activities needed for transfer of property.

F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC)$4,680,000
1. Abandoned Tank Remediation 780,000

This project provides for follow-on actions to site investigations and characterization of underground storage tank (UST) sites. The USTs at these areas have been removed, but site assessments have identified petroleum contamination in the soils and groundwater as a result of previous UST system operations. The project will provide for remediation and proper closure of the sites, to conform with the federal, state and local UST requirements.

2. Closure of Ramson Road Landfill 1,100,000

This project provides for additional work required to properly close the Ramson Road Landfill, to include site remediation and provisions for installation of site monitoring equipment, as required for the closure. Site investigations have identified groundwater contamination above regulatory standards. The landfill closure is mandated under a State of Florida issued consent order, and under an existing permit issued by the EPA. The site has been identified to EPA as a Solid Waste Management Unit under RCRA.

3. Remediation of Components Cleaning Facility (CCF) Laboratory

2,000,000

This project provides for follow-onactions to site investigations and characterization of the CCF area, to provide for site remediation and corrective action activities. Site investigations have identified contaminants in soil and groundwater. Cleanup of the site is required under an existing permit issued by the EPA. This work will be in conformance with RCRA requirements.

4. Remediation of Spaceport USA, Diesel Fuel Storage Area

800,000

This project provides for site remediation of fuel contaminants in the area groundwater. This work follows the site investigations and characterization of the area, and initiates the implementation of remedial actions currently under negotiations to cleanup the site. The project follows requirements under the federal, state and local standards.

G. Lewis Research Center (LeRC) $3,150,000
1. Remediation of Contaminated Sites, Cleveland 2,500,000

This project continues the effort to investigate, characterize, and remediate site contamination for identified contaminated areas within Lewis. This portion of the project provides for follow-on activities to include site investigations, feasibility studies, risk assessments, interim and site remedial actions as required for the multiple contaminated areas identified within the Center. The work follows the CERCLA process and incorporates the State of Ohio regulatory requirements, as specified under the issued Administrative Order by the State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA).

2. Remediation of Underground Storage Tank Sites, PBS 650,000

This project will provide for remediation of fuel contaminated sites around the facility. Prior investigations identified soil and groundwater contamination resulting from leaks and spills associated with previous operation of underground storage tank (UST) systems. The USTs were previously located in these areas, but have been removed. The soil and groundwater contamination will be remediated to conform with the federal RCRA, state and local UST requirements.

H. Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) $3,000,000
1. CERCLA Investigation and Cleanup 2,700,000

This project continues the effort to assess, characterize, and remediate site contamination identified at multiple areas within the Center, as caused by releases of hazardous contaminants into the environment. This phase of the project will provide follow-on actions to remedial investigations, site risk assessments, feasibility and treatability studies, and will provide for evaluation of remedial treatment alternatives and implementation of remedial actions for site cleanups. MSFC is listed on the Environmental Protection Agencyís (EPA) National Priorities List (NPL). This work will follow the CERCLA process and a Federal Facilities Agreement between NASA, EPA and the State of Alabama.

2. RCRA Investigation and Cleanup, Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) 300,000

This project continues the facility remediation program for the assessment, characterization, and cleanup of site contamination at identified RCRA Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs). Contaminants, especially trichloroethylene, have migrated through the existing rock formation and overburden into the groundwater. This portion of the project will provide follow-on activities to groundwater contaminant characterization, risk assessments including interim removal action and corrective action evaluation and implementation for site cleanup. The project is required for compliance with RCRA and the State of California regulations.

I. Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF) $2,000,000
1. Remediation Activities, MAF 1,150,000

This project continues characterization and remediation activities associated with the Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) identified during the RCRA facility investigation. The scope of work includes removal actions, well installation, soil disposal, testing and evaluation of technologies for site cleanup, and corrective measures for the identified contaminated areas. The work will provide for activities identified in the Corrective Measures Study submitted to the regulatory agencies. The project follows requirements under the facility RCRA permit.

2. Install and Upgrade Secondary Containment Areas 850,000

This project will provide for upgrades and modifications to approximately fifteen containment areas located around three sites in the facility. The modifications include modifying containment areas and installing chemical liners under tanks, repairing foundations, and ancillary improvements. These modifications will increase the centerís ability to contain accidental spills of toxic chemicals. The project is required for compliance with the federal Clean Water Act (CWA), state and local environmental requirements.

J. Stennis Space Center (SSC) $3,700,000
1. Remediation of Building 2205 Sites 2,700,000

This work began as an emergency effort in FY 1995. The FY 1995 project was funded with residual Environmental Compliance and Restoration Program funds. This project continues the efforts to study and initiates cleanup of contamination at Sites 12A/16, 18 and 19/23. This portion of the work follows initial remedial activities that include remedial investigations, risk assessments, and feasibility studies. It will provide for treatability studies, interim removal actions as necessary, and remedial actions determined necessary to cleanup these sites. The project is required by federal and state requirements for compliance with RCRA and CERCLA.

2. Remediation of Site 6 Contamination 1,000,000

This work began as an emergency effort in FY 1995. The FY 1995 project was funded with residual Environmental Compliance and Restoration Program funds. This project continues the efforts to study and initiates cleanup of contamination around Building 6 site. This portion of the work follows initial remedial activities that include remedial investigations, risk assessments, and feasibility studies. It will provide for treatability studies, interim removal actions as necessary, and remedial actions determined necessary to cleanup the site. The project is required by federal and state requirements and will comply with RCRA and CERCLA.

K. Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) $300,000
1. Remediation of Contaminated Sites 300,000

The project continues the effort to characterize and remediate soil and groundwater contamination at WFF. This portion of the project continues the implementation of remedial investigations and feasibility studies and initiates necessary remedial action approaches for cleanup of soil and groundwater contamination. The remedial actions will follow and conform with the federal, state and local requirements. The project is required for compliance with CERCLA.

L. White Sands Test Facility (WSTF) $2,800,000
1. Groundwater Contamination Assessment and Remediation 2,100,000

The project continues the effort to assess, characterize, and remediate soil and groundwater contamination at WSTF. This portion of the project continues the implementation of remedial action approaches for cleanup of groundwater contamination. The remedial actions will follow and conform with the federal, and the State of New Mexico regulatory requirements. The project is required to comply with the state issued RCRA 3008(h) consent order.

2. Replace Evaporation Tank Liners 700,000

The project will replace the hazardous waste storage tank liners located around the 200 Area. The project will satisfy the Center requirements under a State of New Mexico issued RCRA permit, requiring periodic replacement of the tank liners to ensure adequate containment of the stored hazardous wastes. The project consists of the removal and disposal of the tank contents, excavation, removal and replacement of the liners, backfilling, and proper disposal of removed materials. In addition, sampling and analyses will be performed at various locations to verify integrity of the system and identify any contamination.

M. Various Locations$285,000
1. Sewage Industrial Treatment Upgrade, Madrid, Spain 285,000

This project provides for the construction and installation of facilities to upgrade the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WTP) to provide effluent treatment for compliance with regulations. The upgrade will include the rerouting of facility drains to the WTP system, addition of chemical reagents dosing systems, chemical mixing and flocculation tanks, sand filter, pumping station, and the associated controls and metering devices. The upgrade will provide for compliance with Spanish Regulations and guidelines set forth by the European Economic Community. It will also allow the reuse of effluent water for irrigation purposes.

N. Miscellaneous Projects Not in Excess of $250,000 Each $245,000
O. Studies Remedial Investigations, Feasibility Studies, Assessments Design, and Related Engineering $8,740,000
Total Environmental Compliance and Restoration $34,000,000

FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED:

Approximately $45 - $55 million per year for the next few years is the current estimate for meeting environmental Compliance and Restoration requirements. This figure will become better defined as studies are completed and remediation projects are reviewed by Federal, state, and local regulators.