(Thousands of Dollars) | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 |
Discrete Projects | 45,600 | 42,300 | 39,600 |
Minor Revitalization | 72,540 | 57,900 | 65,700 |
Minor Construction | 3,800 | 3,400 | 1,100 |
Facility, Planning and Design | 10,000 | 18,700 | 19,000 |
Environmental Compliance and Restoration | 37,000 | 33,000 | 34,000 |
*Reduction | (24,000) | --- | --- |
TOTAL | 144,940 | 155,300 | 159,400 |
*In accordance with Appropriation Conference Report 104-384 dated December 7, 1995 accompanying H.R. 2099,
$24 million of excess FY 1994 funding was used to fund FY 1996 construction projects.
Distribution of Program Amount by Installation | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 |
Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center | 13,955 | 14,000 | 7,000 |
John F. Kennedy Space Center | 13,100 | 8,200 | 18,100 |
George C. Marshall Space Center | 18,030 | 20,500 | 24,700 |
John C. Stennis Space Center | 7,400 | 4,600 | 7,500 |
Ames Research Center | 11,830 | 9,300 | 8,300 |
Dryden Flight Research Center | 4,170 | 12,700 | 6,400 |
Langley Research Center | 8,545 | 7,200 | 6,100 |
Lewis Research Center | 19,265 | 16,600 | 17,800 |
Goddard Space Flight Center | 13,875 | 20,300 | 18,100 |
Jet Propulsion Laboratory | 16,300 | 18,000 | 17,700 |
Various Locations.. | 18,470 | 23,900 | 27,700 |
TOTAL | 144,940 | 155,300 | 159,400 |
MISSION SUPPORT DISCRETE PROJECTS | Amount Dollars) |
Modernization of Process Cooling System, Numerical Aerodynamic | |
Simulation Facility (ARC) | 2,700,000 |
Rehabilitation and Modification of Hangar/Shop (DFRC) | 2,800,000 |
Restoration of Chilled Water Distribution System (GSFC) | 2,400,000 |
Restoration of Space/Terrestrial Application Facility (GSFC) | 4,600,000 |
Construction of Emergency Services Facility (JPL) | 4,800,000 |
Upgrade of Utility Annex Chilled Water Plant (KSC) | 5,900,000 |
Rehabilitation of High Voltage System (LeRC) | 9,400,000 |
Modification of Chilled Water System (MSFC) | 7,000,000 |
TOTAL DISCRETE PROJECTS | 39,600,000 |
PROJECT TITLE: Modernization of Process Cooling System, Numerical
Aerodynamic Simulation Facility
INSTALLATION: Ames Research Center
FY 1998 Estimate: $2,700,000
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Moffett Field, Santa Clara County,
California
COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Aeronautics
FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years
funding is related to this project:
Planning and design | Construction | Total | |
Specific Construction Funding | $200,000 | --- | $ 200,000 |
Capitalized Investment | --- | $39,866,601 | 39,866,601 |
Total | $200,000 | $39,866,601 | $40,066,601 |
SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
This project will significantly increase the operational reliability
of the Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation Facility (NASF) by providing
an uninterrupted supply of chilled water required by the critical-task
super computers and other water-cooled equipment in Building N-258.
Work includes installation of a thermal energy storage system,
new non-chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) high energy efficiency chillers,
and chilled water piping modifications to reduce energy consumption
and improve system reliability. The NASF is required for Ames
Research Center to perform its assigned Agency roles and missions.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
Ames Research Center is NASAís Center of Excellence for
Information Technology and the NASF (Building N-258) is the ìheartî
of its information system structure. The facility houses the Von
Nuemann and Eagle Cray C-90 supercomputers along with data storage,
communication, and auxiliary equipment used by both local and
national researchers networked into the systems.
The supercomputers and much of the other equipment are water-cooled,
requiring an uninterrupted supply of chilled water to stay in
operation. Loss of chilled water will cause the supercomputers
to shut down within five minutes, disrupting the researchers tied
into the computers. Even a brief shutdown causes loss of research
data as well as hours of time to bring the computers back up.
The critical nature of the computer load requires simultaneous
operation of two chillers at all times. This results in excessive
power consumption and accelerated chiller wear. The chillers are
worn and have a remaining life projection of less than three years,
increasing the likelihood of chiller failure and system shutdown.
This project greatly reduces the risk of chiller failure and also
reduces the energy consumption of Building N-258, bringing it
into compliance with Federal mandates to reduce overall energy
use at NASA operated buildings. In addition, it replaces CFC refrigerant
chillers with non-ozone-depleting refrigerant chillers.
IMPACT OF DELAY:
Delay of this project will result in loss of critical research
data and downtime for the supercomputers of the NASF. This disrupts
the work of a large number of researchers tied into this facility
and the distribution of their research data Nationwide. Significant
reductions in energy consumption and operations and maintenance
costs will not be realized. The continued use of an expired refrigerant
will have detrimental effects on the environment and will be increasingly
expensive to stockpile for continued future use.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project replaces the four existing 700-ton chillers in Building
N-258 with four new 500-ton chillers which use a non-ozone-depleting
refrigerant. The project also provides an alternate electrical
feed and installs a new thermal energy storage system to serve
as emergency backup to the chillers.
Project Cost Estimate | Unit of Measure | Quantity | Unit Cost | Cost |
Electrical and Communications | LS | --- | --- | $1,150,000 |
Mechanical and Plumbing | LS | --- | --- | 1,500,000 |
Hazardous Materials Removal | LS | --- | --- | 20,000 |
Systems Testing | LS | --- | --- | 30,000 |
Total | --- | --- | --- | $2,700,000 |
LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan
OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: None
FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE
THIS PROJECT: None
PROJECT TITLE: Rehabilitation and Modification of Hangar/Shop
INSTALLATION: Dryden Flight Research Center
FY 1998 Estimate: $2,800,000
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Edwards Air Force Base, Kern County, CA
COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Aeronautics
FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years
funding is related to this project:
Planning and Design | Construction | Total | |
Specific Construction Funding | $224,000 | --- | $ 224,000 |
Capitalized Investment | --- | $1,623,562 | 1,623,562 |
Total | $224,000 | $1,623,562 | $1,847,562 |
SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
This project rehabilitates and modifies Hangar/Shop Building 4823, which supports aircraft modification and maintenance functions critical to flight research at Dryden Flight Research Facility. This project repairs and reinforces the structure for seismic safety, modernizes utility systems that are old and deteriorated, and slightly expands the facility to accommodate larger aircraft and centralize related shop functions. This facility is required for the Center to perform its assigned Agency roles and missions.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
Dryden is located near the San Andreas fault. This hangar will
not withstand a major earthquake in its current condition and
needs major structural modifications to meet seismic safety standards.
The probable consequences of a major earthquake include injury
or death and loss of irreplaceable one-of-a-kind, research aircraft.
This project will minimize these consequences. Rehabilitation
is needed to meet current building codes for environmental, occupational
health and safety, fire protection, disabled-employee access,
and energy conservation requirements.
Hangar B4823 is Drydenís primary facility for aircraft
maintenance and modification. Various related aircraft maintenance
functions are currently scattered around the Center. Lack of centralized
shop facilities in close proximity to Hangar 4823 is very inefficient,
resulting in lost time for travel between shops and the hangar
when tools, equipment, or parts are needed to work on aircraft.
The dispersion of personnel hinders creative problem solving,
cross training, and cross utilization of personnel among shops.
This project locates all shops in a single maintenance facility
which includes a substantial hangar, greatly increasing efficiency
and productivity. Hangar B4823 needs to be slightly enlarged so
that more of Dryden's aircraft can be totally enclosed when being
maintained.
IMPACT OF DELAY:
Delay of this project would extend the risk to building occupants
and unique, extremely high value aircraft in the event of an earthquake
at or near Dryden. The Center would continue its inefficient practice
of piecemeal repairs and maintenance to various aircraft, and
pay more for energy and maintenance than necessary. Delaying this
project will increase the exposure of certain aircraft to the
elements because they cannot be totally enclosed in the hangar
during modification and maintenance.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project repairs and reinforces the hangar structure to comply with current seismic and other life safety codes. Utility systems will be modernized, including electrical; mechanical; heating, ventilating, and air conditioning; fire suppression; lighting; water; sewer; storm drainage; and the compressed air system. Lead-based paint will be removed and PCB-filled light fixtures will be replaced. The facility will be enlarged by the addition of a 7.6 meter annex so it can fully accommodate standard-size aircraft and the welding shop can be moved to this building. Related functions to be centralized in this building include the sheet metal shop, machine shop, welding shop, fluids lab, composite shop, non-destructive inspection lab, the chemical crib, and the machinery computer-aided design (CAD) room.
Project Cost Estimate | Unit of Measure | Quantity | Unit Cost | Cost |
Site Work | LS | --- | --- | $ 280,000 |
Architectural/Structural | LS | --- | --- | 1,420,000 |
Mechanical | LS | --- | --- | 500,000 |
Electrical | LS | --- | --- | 600,000 |
Total | --- | --- | --- | $2,800,000 |
LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan
OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: Communications and security equipment
is estimated at $50,000.
FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE
THIS PROJECT: None
PROJECT TITLE: Restoration of Chilled Water Distribution System
INSTALLATION: Goddard Space Flight Center
FY 1998 ESTIMATE: $2,400,000
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Greenbelt, Prince Georgeís
County, Maryland
COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Mission to Planet
Earth
FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years
funding is related to this project:
Planning and design | Construction | Total | |
Specific Construction Funding | $663,000 | $ 7,000,000 | $ 7,663,000 |
Capitalized Investment | --- | 4,990,377 | 4,990,377 |
Total | $663,000 | $11,990,377 | $12,653,377 |
SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
This project continues the restoration of major segments of the
chilled water distribution system at the Goddard Space Flight
Center (GSFC). The project replaces underground piping that is
old and undersized, and installs shutoff valves. This segment
of the chilled water distribution system supports facilities required
for GSFC to perform its assigned Agency roles and missions.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
GSFC has experienced serious operational problems with the central
chilled water distribution system. The underground chilled water
piping to be replaced is approximately 30 years old. The pipes
and valves have deteriorated and are leaking substantially. The
modernization of the central chilled water plant provides new
secondary pumps which will boost the pipe distribution pressure
and add even more stress to the system. Pipe sizes in several
sections of the system are inadequate for existing as well as
future design flow rates. Some critical buildings do not have
adequate redundancy in the event of a chilled water service failure.
IMPACT OF DELAY:
Delay of this project will result in continued leaking and failures
due to old piping and increasing pressures. Some portions of the
system will experience flow deficiencies unless pipe sizes are
increased. As a result, some buildings will have inadequate chilled
water quantities and air conditioning capacity causing shutdown
of mission critical and technical support operations.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project replaces and upgrades various segments of the underground
chilled water distribution piping and provides redundant circuits
to improve reliability. The scope will include the section of
pipe near Building 23 that completes the main eastern loop; the
installation of a redundant header from Minitrack Road to Building
10/15/29; and the backup feed to Building 13 required to protect
against single point failure shutdown. Work includes installing
shutoff valves at connection points in the new piping, and replacing
chilled water supply and return lines to various buildings up
to and including the isolation valves inside the buildings. New
piping will be sized to support current and future loads as well
as provide redundancy for other lines. The project includes all
site work required for excavation, rerouting other utilities,
backfilling, and resurfacing associated with piping work. Asbestos
insulation on existing piping will be removed to the extent necessary
to perform the work.
Project Cost Estimate | Unit of Measure | Quantity | Unit Cost | Cost |
Section Near Building 23 | LS | --- | --- | $ 800,000 |
Redundant Header to Building 10/15/29 | LS | --- | --- | 700,000 |
Backup Feed to Building 13 | LS | --- | --- | 900,000 |
Total | -- | -- | -- | $2,400,000 |
LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan
OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: None
FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE
THIS PROJECT: None. However, additional funding will be required
in future years to restore other segments of the chilled water
distribution system.
PROJECT TITLE: Restoration of Space/Terrestrial Applications
Facility
INSTALLATION: Goddard Space Flight Center
FY 1998 CoF ESTIMATE: $4,600,000
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Greenbelt, Prince Georgeís
County, Maryland
COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Mission to Planet
Earth
FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years
funding is related to this project:
Planning and Design | Construction | Total | |
Specific CoF Funding | $560,000 | --- | $ 560,000 |
Capitalized Investment | --- | $7,982,876 | 7,982,876 |
Total | $560,000 | $7,982,876 | $8,542,876 |
SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
This project restores portions of architectural, mechanical, electrical,
and fire protection/detection systems in the Space and Terrestrial
Application Facility, Building 22. The project corrects exterior
and interior building system deficiencies in order to effectively
support research operations conducted in this facility. Building
22 is required for Goddard Space Flight Center to perform its
assigned Agency roles and missions.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
Building 22 has been in service for 30 years. The existing systems
have deteriorated and are beyond their projected useful life,
which ranges from 20 to 30 years for critical mechanical and electrical
system components. It is essential to restore those components
likely to fail to maintain reliable support of the GSFC mission.The
functions, operations, and requirements within the building have
changed continuously over 30 years, resulting in many modifications.
These modifications satisfied immediate isolated demands and in
many cases connect new work to old systems to serve localized
needs. At this time the facility is not in compliance with current
building codes. Operational requirements and budget constraints
have severely strained system capabilities, increasing the risk
of failure. This project corrects building problems that pose
the greatest risk to safety, systems capacities, and reliable
facility service.
IMPACT OF DELAY:
System breakdown could occur at any time, resulting in emergency
repair/replacement. Building 22 conducts research critical to
the GSFC mission. Any unanticipated outage in the facility would
seriously impact research operations.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project restores 14,521 square meters in Building 22. Interior
improvements include bringing elevators into compliance with safety,
electrical, and accessibility codes and renovating ceilings, floors,
and restrooms. Mechanical systems improvements include repairs
to induction systems, improving the constant volume distribution
systems, rationalizing exhaust systems, removing abandoned equipment,
and completing the energy management and control system for the
building. Electrical systems improvements include replacing the
building load center, motor control center and transformers, as
well as some electrical distribution panels, wiring, and conduit.
Fire detection system improvements include demolishing the current
system and replacing it with a system compatible with the type
used centerwide. Fire protection systems will be modified as required
incidental to architectural, mechanical, and electrical modifications.
The work also includes exterior repairs to wall systems, entrances,
and roof systems.
Project Cost Estimate | Unit of Measure | Quantity | Unit Cost | Cost |
Architectural | LS | --- | --- | 1,500,000 |
Mechanical | LS | --- | --- | 1,200,000 |
Plumbing | LS | --- | --- | 700,000 |
Electrical | LS | --- | --- | 1,200,000 |
Total | --- | --- | --- | $4,600,000 |
LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan
FUTURE CoF ESTIMATED FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT: None
PROJECT TITLE: Construction of Emergency Services Facility
INSTALLATION: Jet Propulsion Laboratory
FY 1998 Estimate: $4,800,000
LOCATION OF PROJECT: La Canada-Flintridge, Los Angeles
County, California
COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Space Science
FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years
funding is related to this project.
Planning and Design | Construction | Total | |
Specific Construction Funding | $405,514 | --- | $405,514 |
Capitalized Investment | --- | --- | --- |
Total | $405,514 | --- | $405,514 |
SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
This project constructs a two-story building approximately 1700
square meters (SM) to accommodate Medical Services, Plant Security,
Fire Department, and Emergency Preparedness Services. These services
are currently housed in badly deteriorated facilities that will
be demolished upon completion of this new project.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
These essential services are housed in a combination of substandard
buildings and trailers that are dispersed across the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory. The existing facilities are too small, inefficient,
and do not meet current seismic standards. The Fire Department
operates 24 hours per day, with a hazardous materials response
capability, and is serving over twice the population it was designed
to handle. The security console at the Fire and Guard center of
operations was designed to monitor 56 alarm stations. It now handles
1,000 stations with plans to add another 3,000 stations. The equipment
is now housed in a small, existing, wood-framed structure that
is difficult to access, not adequately secured, and lacks proper
air circulation for electronic equipment. An Emergency Operations
Center is required to house combined fire and security operations.
Some space will be used for classroom and training when available
during normal operations. Medical services, including counseling,
records maintenance, and administrative support have more than
doubled to comply with increased testing requirements, employer
responsibilities, and regulations. The counseling department is
currently located in a trailer without a group meeting area, restroom
facilities and sound-controlled counseling rooms.
IMPACT OF DELAY:
Failure to construct this Facility will result in continued operation
in substandard facilities that are dispersed, unsafe, and not
designed to accommodate the expanded emergency response capabilities
and staffing. These facilities are unlikely to withstand a major
earthquake, yet house the functions critical to JPLís ability
to respond to this and other emergency situations. Existing facilities
seriously degrade JPLís ability to perform these functions
effectively.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project constructs a two-story concrete masonry unit, steel-frame,
seismic-safe building of approximately 1,700 square meters (SM).
It will be located on the north side of Explorer Road, east of
Surveyor Road, on the site currently occupied by Buildings 72,
91, and 93 which will be demolished. Windows will have insulated
bronze tinted glazing for solar and glare control. Interior spaces
will be defined by metal stud and gypsum board partitions. Carpet
will be installed in the medical services area, except in the
emergency room and storage/utility areas and in the classroom/emergency
operations area. Vinyl composition tile flooring will be installed
in the fire and plant protection areas. Ceilings will be lay-in
acoustical tile with recessed fluorescent lighting fixtures. The
computer control room will have access flooring and indirect lighting.
The building will be air conditioned by an energy-efficient, variable-volume, heating and cooling system. The electrical system will include 480/277V power for lighting and 208/120V transformers providing power to receptacles. Other systems in the building will include telephone, fire detection/protection, energy management control system (EMCS), and institutional local area network (ILAN).
Project Cost Estimate | Unit of Measure | Quantity | Unit Cost | Cost |
Sitework | LS | --- | --- | $1,000,000 |
Archectitural/Structural | LS | --- | --- | 2,500,000 |
Mechanical | LS | --- | --- | 800,000 |
Electrical | LS | --- | --- | 500,000 |
Total | --- | --- | --- | $4,800,000 |
LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan
OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: None
FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT: None
PROJECT TITLE: Upgrade of Utility Annex Chilled Water Plant
INSTALLATION: John F. Kennedy Space Center
FY 1998 Estimate: $5,900,000
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Kennedy Space Center, Brevard County,
Cape Canaveral, Florida
COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Space Flight
FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years
funding is related to this project:
Planning and Design | Construction | Total | |
Specific Construction Funding | $600,000 | --- | $ 600,000 |
Capitalized Investment | --- | $7,877,287 | 7,877,287 |
Total | $600,000 | $7,877,287 | $8,477,287 |
SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
The central utility annex contains five outdated chillers with a total cooling capacity of 11,500 tons. This project will replace these chillers and upgrade the total cooling capacity of the plant to handle present day demand for chilled water.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
The existing chillers are over 30 years old, experience increased unscheduled outages including a recent catastrophic failure, use the environmentally unacceptable refrigerant CFC-12, and are highly energy inefficient. Further, existing plant capacity is insufficient to support the cooling requirements of additional facilities scheduled to be connected to the chiller plant over the next three years.
IMPACT OF DELAY:
Failure to upgrade or replace deteriorated equipment continues the risk that unscheduled outages will increasingly interfere with KSCís ability to meet critical mission schedule milestones. Escalating maintenance and repair costs will increase continually, particularly as a result of the recent termination of production and importation of all CFC-12 refrigerant. Ongoing cooling operations will become marginal as additional facilities are connected and activated.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project upgrades or replaces the five chillers located in the north area utility annex, Building K6-947. It may prove economical to upgrade one or two of the five chillers to provide greater capacity, economy, and environmental compatibility. The remaining chillers cannot be economically revitalized and must be replaced.
Project Cost Estimate | Quantity | Cost | ||
Site & Civil | LS | --- | --- | $ 500,000 |
Mechanical | LS | --- | --- | 4,400,000 |
Electrical | LS | --- | --- | 1,000,000 |
Total | --- | --- | --- | $5,900,000 |
LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan
OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: None
FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT: None
PROJECT TITLE: Rehabilitation of High Voltage System
INSTALLATION: Lewis Research Center
FY 1998 ESTIMATE: $9,400,000
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, Ohio
COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Aeronautics
FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years
funding is related to this project:
Planning and Design | Construction | Total | |
Specific Construction Funding | $1,890,000 | --- | $1,890,000 |
Capitalized Investment | --- | $6,490,000 | 6,490,000 |
Total | $1,890,000 | $6,490,000 | $8,380,000 |
SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
This project rehabilitates and modifies substations K, F, and
G of the Centerís High Voltage Power System. The project
is required to assure continued reliable and safe electrical power
supply at LeRC. The system distributes power to all of the Centerís
aerospace research and development facilities, computer center,
and the institutional facilities. These facilities are required
for Lewis Research Center to perform its assigned Agency roles
and missions.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
This system provides power to the major aeropropulsion and space
simulation facilities. It is 50 years old, obsolete, and experiencing
increased maintenance and emergency repairs each year. Current
circuit breaker overloads and single point failures warn of a
major failure that could result in a 6 to 12-month shutdown. Economic
analysis indicates this project is the most cost-effective approach
to maintain an operating system for the next 30 years.
IMPACT OF DELAY:
Unless the system is rehabilitated, failure rates currently being
experienced are expected to increase. Major disruptions of electrical
services, associated with single point failures, are also anticipated.
These failures will result in the shutdown of critical research
facilities and the programs they support for periods of up to
12 months.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The work modifies the existing 138 kV Substation K, including
new incoming 138 kV circuits, transformers, switching devices,
and support structure and equipment. The work also rehabilitates
and modifies existing 34.5 kV Substations F&G, including new
circuits from Substation K, breakers, and transformers.
Project Cost Estimate | Unit of Measure | Quantity | Unit Cost | Cost |
138 kV Substation Modifications | LS | --- | --- | $2,800,000 |
138 kV Circuits and Line Exits | LS | --- | --- | 1,200,000 |
34.5 kV Ties and Line Exits | LS | --- | --- | 2,400,000 |
34.5 kV Circuits and Equipment | LS | --- | --- | 3,000,000 |
Total | --- | --- | --- | $9,400,000 |
LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan
OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: None
FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT: None. However, funding will be required in future years to rehabilitate other elements of the Electrical Distribution System.
PROJECT TITLE: Modification of Chilled Water System
INSTALLATION: George C. Marshall Space Flight Center
FY 1998 Estimate: $7,000,000
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Marshall Space Flight Center, Madison County, Alabama
COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Space Flight
FY 1997 AND PRIOR YEARS FUNDING: The following prior years
funding is related to this project:
Planning and Design | Construction | Total | |
Specific Construction Funding | $1,574,463 | $6,700,000 | $8,274,463 |
Capitalized Investment | -- | -- | -- |
Total | $1,574,463 | $6,700,000 | $8,274,463 |
SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
This project expands the central chiller plant and chilled water distribution system approved by Congress for construction in FY 1997 to additional areas of the Center. It converts the chilled water system from individual chiller units to a central chiller plant with a chilled water (pipeline) distribution system. The project will significantly reduce operations, maintenance, and energy costs; improve reliability in support of critical operations; and help phase out the use of existing refrigerants which are no longer in production. The chilled water system supports facilities required for Marshall Space Flight Center to perform its assigned Agency roles and missions.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
The Center presently air conditions its facilities and equipment
with chilled water produced by individual chillers in each building.
These chillers are often backed up with a spare chiller due to
redundancy requirements. Consolidating service out of a central
chiller plant reduces the total capacity required and the overall
cost involved in providing the same level of redundancy. This
project also avoids a huge maintenance and repair backlog. Existing
chillers affected by this project are old, unreliable, and use
refrigerants which are no longer in production. New chillers compatible
with the new refrigerants require chiller equipment rooms to be
extensively modified, and sometimes relocated, due to the toxic
nature of the new refrigerants. Expanding the central chiller
plant and distribution system to extend service to additional
building areas with abundant individual units will eliminate disruptions
associated with piecemeal repairs and will pay for itself in seven
to eight years.
IMPACT OF DELAY:
Failure of the existing chillers results in downtimes for extensive
repairs that are disruptive to the operation of the Center and
which require costly work arounds such as leasing of emergency
chillers. Chillers will continue to be replaced individually which
is an inefficient financial investment. Failure to convert to
the new refrigerants will also require accumulation and stockpiling
of the old refrigerant at continually escalating, premium prices.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project expands the central chiller plant and chilled water distribution system approved by Congress for construction in FY 1997. Scope includes the acquisition and installation of additional cooling tower cells, chillers, and associated mechanical and electrical equipment to extend service to additional areas. Due to technical considerations which surfaced during design, the scope of the FY 1997 project was adjusted to provide service to portions of the 4400 area instead of the 4200 area. This project will extend the 4400 loop to capture additional buildings in that area and constructs the loop that will provide service to most of the 4200 area.
Project Cost Estimate | Unit of Measure | Quantity | Unit Cost | Cost |
Mechanical | LS | --- | --- | $4,000,000 |
Electrical | LS | --- | --- | 1,000,000 |
Distribution System and Hook-up | LS | --- | --- | 2,000,000 |
Total | --- | --- | --- | $7,000,000 |
LIST OF RELATED GRAPHICS: Figure 1 - Location Plan
OTHER EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: None
FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE
THIS PROJECT: Future CoF funding in the range of $7,500,000
to $9,000,000 is planned in FY 1999 to expand the Central Chiller
Plant services to other areas of the Center.
Summary of Project Amounts by Location: | Repair | Rehabilitation & Modification | Total Revitalization |
Ames Research Center | $2,850,000 | $2,100,000 | $ 4,950,000 |
Dryden Flight Research Center | 1,350,000 | 1,550,000 | 2,900,000 |
Goddard Space Flight Center | 3,450,000 | 2,670,000 | 6,120,000 |
Jet Propulsion Laboratory | 3,050,000 | 3,950,000 | 7,000,000 |
Johnson Space Center | 3,000,000 | 600,000 | 3,600,000 |
Kennedy Space Center | 4,210,000 | 3,290,000 | 7,500,000 |
Langley Research Center | 3,485,000 | 1,715,000 | 5,200,000 |
Lewis Research Center | 1,800,000 | 3,050,000 | 4,850,000 |
Marshall Space Flight Center | 2,150,000 | 4,540,000 | 6,690,000 |
Michoud Assembly Facility | 3,450,000 | 2,610,000 | 6,060,000 |
Stennis Space Center | 2,000,000 | 1,800,000 | 3,800,000 |
Wallops Flight Facility | 1,800,000 | 2,330,000 | 4,130,000 |
Various Locations | - 0 - | 2,900,000 | 2,900,000 |
Total | $32,595,000 | $33,105,000 | $65,700,000 |
PROJECT TITLE: Minor Revitalization of Facilities, Not in Excess
of $1,500,000 Per Project
INSTALLATION: Various Locations
FY 1998 Estimate: $65,700,000
FY 1996: $70,000,000 FY 1997: $57,900,000
COGNIZANT INSTALLATIONS/LOCATIONS OF PROJECT: Various Locations
COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Management Systems
and Facilities
SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
These resources provide for revitalization of facilities at NASA field installations and Government-owned industrial plants supporting NASA activities. The request includes facility revitalization needs for FY 1998 that can be identified at the time of the submission of these estimates that are not in excess of $1.5 million per project. The revitalization program has two components, repair projects and rehabilitation and modification projects. Repair projects restore facilities and components thereof, including collateral equipment, to a condition substantially equivalent to their originally intended and designed capability. Repair work includes the substantially equivalent replacement of utility systems and collateral equipment necessitated by incipient or actual breakdown and major preventive measures that are normally accomplished on a cyclic schedule. Rehabilitation and modification projects may include some restoration of current functional capability but also includes enhancement of the condition of a facility so that it can more effectively accomplish its designated purpose or increase its functional capability. The facilities being revitalized in this program are expected to remain active in the long term and are consistent with current and anticipated Agency roles and missions.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
NASA is now experiencing ìblock obsolescenceî where
a substantial portion of the agencyís facilities have been
in use for over 30 years. Repair costs for mechanical and electrical
systems in a typical building are almost three times higher after
system operations exceed 15ñ20 years than they are during
the initial years. Many electrical and mechanical components reach
the end of their serviceable or economic life at the 20 year point
and should be replaced in the interest of long-term economy. Continued
piecemeal repair of these components is more costly in the long
run than replacement at the end of the economic life of the original
components. Approximately 90 percent of NASAís physical
plant has been in service for over 25 years.
The NASA physical plant has a capital investment of $5.9 billion
and has a current replacement value of more than $17 billion.
A continuing program of revitalization of these facilities is
required to accomplish the following:
a. Protect the capital investment in these facilities by minimizing
the cumulative effects of wear and deterioration.
b. Ensure that these facilities are continuously available and
that they operate at peak efficiency.
c. Improve the capabilities and usefulness of these facilities
and thereby mitigate the effects of obsolescence.
d. Provide a better and safer environment for all personnel.
e. Avoid significantly greater future repair costs.
This program includes only facility revitalization work of such
a nature and magnitude that it cannot be accomplished by routine
day-to-day facility maintenance and repair activities. Projects
estimated to cost more than $1.5 million are included as separate
discrete projects in the budget request.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Proposed projects for FY 1998 totaling $65.7 million are identified
on the following four pages. The projects that comprise this request
are of the highest priority based on relative urgency and expected
return on investment. Deferral of this mission-essential work
would adversely impact the availability of critical facilities
and program schedules. The $65.7 million includes repair projects
totaling $32.6 million and rehabilitation and modification projects
totaling $33.1 million.
During the course of the year, some rearrangement of priorities
may be necessary which may force a change in some of the items
to be accomplished. Any such changes, however, will be accomplished
within total available revitalization resources. The following
broad categories of work are included within the repair and the
modification and rehabilitation projects identified on the following
six pages.
a. Utility Systems | $18,400,000 |
b. General Purpose Buildings | 8,795,000 |
c. Technical Buildings/Structures | 25,315,000 |
d. Pavements and Drainage | 940,000 |
e. Building Exteriors and Roofs | 5,730,000 |
f. Fire Detection/Protection Systems | 6,520,000 |
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
I. REPAIR
A. Ames Research Center (ARC) . | $2,850,000 |
1. Repair Natural Gas Distribution System | 500,000 |
2. Repair Vane Sets 6 and 7, National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (N-221) . | 850,000 |
3. Repair Pressure Systems . | 600,000 |
4. Repair Building (N-215) . | 900,000 |
B. Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC) | $1,350,000 |
1. Repair Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems, Various Buildings . | 950,000 |
2. Repair Roofs, Various Buildings . | 400,000 |
C. Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) . | $3,450,000 |
1. Repair Roofs, Buildings 1 and 16W | 700,000 |
2. Repair Electrical Systems, Various Buildings | 800,000 |
3. Repair Exterior Walls, Building 3 | 800,000 |
4. Repair Steam Distribution System | 800,000 |
5. Repair Building Exteriors and Foundations, Various Buildings | 350,000 |
D. Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) | $3.050,000 |
1. Replace Elevator, Building 198 . | 630,000 |
2. Repair Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Controls, Building 264 | 620,000 |
3. Replace 'X' Emergency Generator, Building 230 | 1,000,000 |
4. Repair Roofs, Various Buildings . | 800,000 |
E. Johnson Space Center (JSC) . | $3,000,000 |
1. Repair 12.5KV Feeder Cables (2-8 & 1-11) | 350,000 |
2. Repair Mechanical Systems (17) . | 850,000 |
3. Replace 300 Area High Voltage Lines . | 300,000 |
4. Repair Water and Steam Systems, Various Buildings | 900,000 |
5. Repair Electrical Equipment, Various Buildings . | 600,000 |
F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC) . | $4,210,000 |
1. Refurbish Elevator Controls, Pads A & B . | 600,000 |
2. Replace Chilled Water System, Vertical Processing Facility . | 750,000 |
3. Replace Potable Water Piping & Firex System, Vertical Assembly Building . | 1,300,000 |
4. Repair Elevator Controls, Vertical Assembly Building, High Bays 1 & 3 | 1,100,000 |
5. Restore Visual Landing Aid System | 460,000 |
G. Langley Research Center (LaRC) |
$3,485,000 |
1. Replace Power Supply, Arc-Heated Scramjet Test Facility, (1247B) | 1,400,000 |
2. Replacement of Substation Serving Building 1244 | 810,000 |
3. Repair Roof, 1268A | 400,000 |
4. Replace Settling Chamber, 20-Inch Mach 6 Tunnel, (1247D) | 875,000 |
H. Lewis Research Center (LeRC) | $1,800,000 |
1. Repair South Chilled Water Distribution Piping | 900,000 |
2. Repair Chiller #2, Refrigeration Building (9) | 900,000 |
I. Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) | $2,150,000 |
1. Repair Roof of High Bay Building (4755) | 950,000 |
2. Repair Electrical and Mechanical Systems (4619) | 1,200,000 |
J. Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF) | $3,450,000 |
1. Repair LN2/GN2 Steam Boilers (175) | 800,000 |
2. Repair Chilled Water Pumps (103/160) | 950,000 |
3. Repair Manufacturing Area Fanhouses (103) | 900,000 |
4. Repair Natural Gas System, Site Wide | 800,000 |
K. Stennis Space Center (SSC) | $2,000,000 |
1. Repairs to High Pressure Gas Piping | 600,000 |
2. Repair 13.8KV Selector Switches and Substations | 500,000 |
3. Repair Motor Control Centers and 480 Volt Electrical Distribution Systems | 900,000 |
Various Facilities | |
L. Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) | $1,800,000 |
1. Repair of Roofs, Various Buildings | 400,000 |
2. Repair of Various Communication Towers | 500,000 |
3. Repair of Storm Drainage System | 500,000 |
4. Repair of Elevated Water Tank (X-45) | 400,000 |
Total Repair | $32,595,000 |
FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED:
Approximately $30-$40 million per year will be required for continuing repair needs.
II. REHABILITATION AND MODIFICATION
A. Ames Research Center (ARC) | $2,100,000 |
1. Rehabilitate and Modify Fire Suppression System, N240/N240A | 250,000 |
2. Rehabilitate and Modify Bridge Crane, N227D | 350,000 |
3. Rehabilitate and Modify 60 Mega Watt (MW) DC Power Supply, N238 | 750,000 |
4. Modify Compressor Controls for Building N229A | 750,000 |
B. Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC) | $1,550,000 |
1. Rehabilitate and Modify Fire Alarm Systems, Various Locations | 950,000 |
2. Rehabilitate Warehouses, Various Locations | 600,000 |
C. Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) | $2,670,000 |
1. Rehabilitation of Utility Control System | 900,000 |
2. Rehabilitation of Heating Ventilating, Air conditioning (HVAC) System and Controls, Building 21 | 500,000 |
3. Rehabilitation and Modification of Laboratory Areas in Building 5 and 22 | 550,000 |
4. Modification of TV Facility, Building 3/14 | 720,000 |
D.Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) | $3,950,000 |
1 Modify Administration Building, Building 180 | 1,400,000 |
2. Modify Facility Power System, Building 150 | 550,000 |
3. Modify Fire Alarm Systems, Various Buildings | 1,250,000 |
4. Modify Photographic Laboratory, Building 111 . | 750,000 |
E. Johnson Space Center (JSC) | $600,000 |
1. Rehabilitate/Modify Building 7 | 600,000 |
F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC) | $3,290,000 |
1. Modify Access Safety Devices, LC-39 Area | 750,000 |
2. Modify Base Support Facilities Fire Protection System (M6-486) | 800,000 |
3. Modify Mobile Launch Platforms HVAC Equipment | 800,000 |
4. Upgrade Two Schwartz Road Intersections | 440,000 |
5. Upgrade Facilities for People with Disabilities, Various Locations | 500,000 |
G. Langley Research Center (LaRC) | $1,715,000 |
1. Modifications to Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel Control System, Building 1251 | 1,000,000 |
2. Modifications for Disabled Accessibility, Various Facilities, Phase II | 715,000 |
H. Lewis Research Center (LeRC) | $3,050,000 |
1. Rehabilitation of Mechanical and Electrical Systems in Chemistry Laboratory (6) | 950,000 |
2. Rehabilitation of Mechanical and Electrical Systems in 8x6 Supersonic Wind Tunnel Office (54) | 950,000 |
3. Rehabilitation of Mechanical and Electrical System, Materials Processing Lab
(MPL) (105) Phase 2 | 850,000 |
4. Modification to Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)in Model Shop(50) | 300,000 |
I. Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) | $4,540,000 |
1. Fire Protection and Electrical Modifications to Office Building (4200) | 970,000 |
2. Rehabilitate Heat Treatment Facility (4704) | 800,000 |
3. Modifications for Hydraulic and Electro-Mechanical Actuator Laboratory (4656) | 520,000 |
4. Restoration of Multi-Purpose High Bay Facility (4649) | 1,300,000 |
5. Rehabilitation of Components Service Building (4653) | 950,000 |
J. Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF) | $2,610,000 |
1. Rehabilitate and Modify Chilled Water System (207/320) | 910,000 |
2. Rehabilitate and Modify Central Plant Air System | 800,000 |
3. Rehabilitate and Modify Central Fire Water Mains (318/400 area) | 900,000 |
K. Stennis Space Center (SSC) | $1,800,000 |
1. Modify Energy Management Control Systems | 900,000 |
2. Rehabilitate and Modify 4.16KV Switchgear and Controls [B-4400] | 900,000 |
L. Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) | $2,330,000 |
1. Rehabilitation of Telemetry Receiving and Recording Facility, Building N-162 | 900,000 |
2. Rehabilitation of Assembly Shop, Building W-65 | 580,000 |
3. Modification of Causeway Bridge | 400,000 |
4. Modification of Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning Systems (HVAC), Systems, Various Buildings | 450,000 |
M. Various Locations | $2,900,000 |
1. Modifications to DSS-27 & 28, Goldstone, California | 900,000 |
2. Modification of Power Distribution, Madrid, Spain | 600,000 |
3. Modify Chilled Water System, DSS-14, Goldstone, California | 700,000 |
4. Modify Chilled Water System, Canberra, Australia | 700,000 |
Total Rehabilitation and Modification. | $33,105,000 |
FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED:
Approximately $30-40 million per year will be required for continuing rehabilitation and modification needs.
Summary of Project Amounts by Location: | Amount |
Langley Research Center | 700,000 |
Lewis Research Center | 400,000 |
Total | $1,100,000 |
PROJECT TITLE: Minor Construction of New Facilities and Additions
to Existing Facilities Not in Excess of $1,500,000 Per Project
INSTALLATION: Various Locations
FY 1998 Estimate: $1,100,000
FY 1996: $3,800,000 FY 1997: $3,400,000
COGNIZANT INSTALLATIONS/LOCATIONS OF PROJECT: Various Locations
COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Management Systems
and Facilities
SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
These resources will provide for minor facility construction at
NASA field Installations. Each project in this program is estimated
to cost no more than $1.5 million and involves either the construction
of new facilities or additions to existing facilities. The FY
1998 request of $1.6 million will improve the usefulness of NASAís
physical plant by changing the utilization of or augmenting the
capabilities of various facilities. Included in this request are
those programmatic and institutional projects that are essential
to the accomplishment of mission objectives.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
The configuration of NASAís physical plant necessarily
must respond to changes in utilization and adaptions required
by changes in technology or in mission needs. Demands are generated
by research, development, testing, and similar activities.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Included in the FY 1998 minor construction program are those facility
projects for institutional or technical facility needs that could
be fully identified at the time of submission of this budget estimate.
Items of work totaling $1.1 million are included in this resource
request. Projects were selected on the basis of the relative urgency
of each item and the expected return on the investment. During
the course of the year, the revision of priorities may require
changes in some of the items to be accomplished. Such changes
will be accommodated within the total resources allocated.
These projects represent requirements that must be met in this
time frame to support institutional needs and programmatic objectives.
They are in the ìTechnical Buildings/Structuresî
category of work.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
A. Langley Research Center (LaRC) | $700,000 |
1. Construction of Polymer Film Laboratory (1293C) | 700,000 |
B. Lewis Research Center (LeRC) | $400,000 |
1. Construction of Build-up Area at Engine Components Research Laboratory (ECRL - 102) | 400,000 |
Total | $1,100,000 |
FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED: Approximately
$4-5 million per year will be required for continuing minor construction
needs.
FACILITY PLANNING AND DESIGN | Amount |
Master Planning | $ 400,000 |
Sustaining Engineering Support | 9,000,000 |
Preliminary Engineering Reports and Related Special Engineering Support | 1,600,000 |
Final Design | 8,000,000 |
Total | $19,000,000 |
PROJECT TITLE: Facility Planning and Design
FY 1998 Estimate: $19,000,000
FY 1996: $10,000,000 FY 1997: $18,700,000
The funds requested in this estimate are required to provide for
the following advance planning and design activities related to
facilities activities and projects where not otherwise provided
for:
a. The accomplishment of necessary studies, development and master
planning for field installation and the provision of continuing
engineering support and special engineering management and other
services.
b. The preparation of preliminary engineering reports, cost estimates,
and design and construction schedules. Also includes the preliminary
engineering efforts required to initiate design-build projects.
c. The preparation of final designs which include construction
plans, specifications, and associated cost estimates and schedules
required to implement construction projects.
d. The accomplishment of facilities siting and other investigations,
studies and reports.
A. Master Planning | $400,000 |
Provides for updating, developing and automating existing field installation master plans. This effort includes facility studies, site investigations, and analyses of utility systems. The existing utility and civil drawings will be converted into a highly detailed electronic database using a computer-aided-design (CAD) system. Topographical features from original drawings will be merged electronically to create individual area maps or an entire center map. The master plan documents will be updated to reflect as-built conditions and to graphically represent the 5-year facility plan baseline for future development.
The NASA field center master plans are periodically updated. The
master plans are essential as reference documents for land use
planning, identification of physical relationships of facilities,
and proper orientation and arrangement of facilities. The updates
reflect as-built condition of facilities and utility systems with
emphasis on changes caused by recent facility construction and
modifications.
B. Sustaining Engineering Support | $9,000,000 |
Provisions for facility studies and specific engineering support
continue in importance as evidenced in recent years. These efforts
are important due to changing cost trends in construction materials
and fuels; the operation and maintenance costs for the physical
plant; and energy conservation and efficiency.
The following items are included in the FY 1998 requirements:
1. Facilities Engineering Design and Construction Management Studies
This effort involves extremely high leverage facility studies
and that are critically important to improve the quality and cost
effectiveness of NASAís construction practices and to ensure
that developing technology and industry best practices are incorporated
into the agencyís construction program.
2. Value Engineering, Cost Validations and Analyses
Provides for engineering services to improve cost-effectiveness
of facility projects by subjecting project design criteria, specifications
and working drawings for specific material components and systems
to detailed independent reviews by engineering specialists. Also
provides services necessary to predict and validate facility costs
to aid in resources planning.
3. Facility Operation and Maintenance
Provides for studies and engineering support where not otherwise
provided for, at NASA field installations relative to functional
management of maintenance, automated maintenance management systems,
and facilities condition assessments. Included in this activity
are field surveys to be conducted at selected NASA field installations
to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the operations
and maintenance management activities, and to identify possible
improvements in productivity.
NASAís facilities infrastructure is critical to achieving
current and future space and aeronautics program objectives. Two
initiatives begun in FY 1996 and planned to conclude in FY 1998
keep this infrastructure safe, reliable, and available by substantially
increasing the rate of return on severely constrained Agency facilities
maintenance resources. These initiatives are:
a. Conversion to Reliability Centered Maintenance ($5 million)
- Provides for the change from a time driven and reactive/breakdown
mode of maintenance to a more proactive program of Reliability
Centered Maintenance (RCM). This program will focus on implementing
the optimal mix of preventive, predictive, proactive, and reactive
technologies which yields the required reliability at the minimum
cost. It also aims to utilize system performance feedback to design
potential failures out of systems. This agency-wide effort will
include a detailed assessment of specific RCM opportunities and
available Predictive Testing and Inspection (PT&I) technologies,
the establishment of RCM processes and procedures, the establishment
of responsible RCM organizations, and the acquisition of required
PT&I monitoring equipment and training. This conversion to
RCM will significantly reduce maintenance cost by minimizing and/or
eliminating time driven shutdowns and future breakdown maintenance.
This provides the additional resources needed to implement this
program, as NASA installations must still perform the current
time-driven/breakdown maintenance in order to provide adequate
mission support until the conversion is made. It is anticipated
that this conversion will lead to an annual savings of $12 million
in maintenance costs within three years and thereby ameliorate
the negative impact of continuing low budget levels on the facilities
infrastructure.
b. Conversion to Performance-Based Maintenance Contracting ($3
million) - Provides for the change from ìumbrellaî
cost reimbursement contracts to performance-based, fixed-price
contracts for facilities maintenance, repair, and operations contracts.
Currently about 90 percent of NASA contracts for these services
are cost reimbursement contracts. It is estimated that from $35
to $50 million per year can be saved by successfully converting
these contracts to performance-based, fixed-price contracts. This
will also lessen the impact of low future budgets. This provides
for the substantial up-front effort required to collect and analyze
the required data, prepare performance-based specifications that
fully support mission urgency and timeliness, tailor and implement
comprehensive quality assurance programs, and train personnel.
4. Facilities Utilization Analyses
Provides for the analyses of agencywide facilities utilization
data covering (1) office and other types of building space; (2)
designate major technical facilities; and (3) special studies
comparing the utilization of technical facilities which are similar
in type or capability, such as wind tunnels. Such analyses provide
for (1) insights into and development of better methods of identifying
underutilized facilities; (2) improved techniques to quantify
level of facilities use; (3) actions to improve facilities utilization;
and (4) recommendations regarding consolidation/closure of facilities
to meet Agency physical plant reduction objectives. Work provides
for review of each installationís inventory data base in
support of the facilities utilization program. Surveys are necessary
to validate the reported data in relation to a specific problem
or need, and to assist in providing a credible foundation for
plans to improve the use of facilities.
5. Facilities Management Systems
Provides for continued engineering support for the technical updating
of NASAís master text construction specifications to reflect
the use of new materials, state-of-the-art construction techniques
and current references to building codes and safety standards.
Also provides engineering support for the Major Facilities Inventory,
the Real Property Database and the Facilities Utilization Database
systems.
6. Independent Analysis and Third Party Reviews
Provides the technical and engineering support analyses, designs,
and reviews required to verify, confirm and ensure suitability
of construction designs within the project cost estimates.
7. Construction Industries Institute
Covers annual support to the Construction Industries Institute
(CII). NASA actively participates in this unique, non-profit institution,
established to bring together major facility owners, contractors
and academia in a proven effort to improve the quality and cost
effectiveness of construction management practices for member
organizations as well as the US construction industry.
8. National Research Council
Covers annual support to the Federal Facilities Councilís
(FFC) operations and provides for special studies that the Council
will perform throughout FY 1998 to help advance the science and
technology of Federal Government building and construction. The
FFC is subordinate to the National Research Council, National
Academy of Sciences, and its activities are supported by NASA
and other Federal agencies with similar construction programs.
C. Preliminary Engineering Reports and Related Special Engineering Support | $1,600,000 |
1. Preliminary Engineering Reports (PERs) | (1,200,000) |
This estimate provides for preparation of PERs, investigations,
and project studies related to proposed facility projects in the
FY 2000 and FY 2001 Construction of Facilities programs. These
reports are required to permit the early and timely development
of the most suitable project to meet the stated programmatic and
functional needs. Reports provide basic data, cost estimates and
schedules relating to future budgetary proposals. This request
provides for PERs associated with proposed construction.
2. Related Special Engineering Support | (400,000) |
This estimate provides for investigations and project studies
related to proposed facility projects to be included in the subsequent
Construction of Facilities programs. Such studies involve documentation
and validation of ìas-builtî conditions, survey/study
of present condition of such items as roofing and cooling towers,
utility plant condition and operational modes, and other like
studies. These studies are required to allow for the timely development
of projects to meet the stated functional needs and to provide
basic data, cost estimates and schedules for related future budgetary
proposals.
D. Final Design | $8,000,000 |
The amount requested will provide for the preparation of designs,
plans, drawings, and specifications necessary for the accomplishment
of projects. Projects involved are planned for inclusion in the
FY 1999 and FY 2000 programs. The goal is to obtain better facilities
on line earlier at a lower cost. The request will provide for
final design work associated with construction proposed for the
FY 1999 program, estimated to cost $110 to $130 million, and for
$20 to $30 million of high potential projects proposed for the
FY 2000 program.
Total | $19,000,000 |
Summary of Project Amounts by Location: | Amount |
Ames Research Center | $ 600,000 |
Dryden Flight Research Center | 700,000 |
Goddard Space Flight Center | 500,000 |
Jet Propulsion Laboratory | 2,750,000 |
Johnson Space Center | 550,000 |
Kennedy Space Center | 4,680,000 |
Lewis Research Center | 3,150,000 |
Marshall Space Flight Center | 3,000,000 |
Michoud Assembly Facility | 2,000,000 |
Stennis Space Center | 3,700,000 |
Wallops Flight Facility | 300,000 |
White Sands Test Facility | 2,800,000 |
Various Locations | 285,000 |
Miscellaneous Projects Not in Excess of $250,000 Each | 245,000 |
Remedial Investigations, Feasibility Studies, Assessments,
Studies, Design, and Related Engineering | 8,740,000 |
Total | $34,000,000 |
PROJECT TITLE: Environmental Compliance and Restoration Program
INSTALLATION: Various Locations
FY 1998 Estimate: $34,000,000
FY 1996: $37,000,000 FY 1997: $33,000,000
COGNIZANT INSTALLATIONS/LOCATIONS OF PROJECT: Various Locations
COGNIZANT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE: Office of Management Systems
and Facilities
SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
These resources will provide for environmental studies, assessments,
investigations, designs, related engineering, and remedial action
and construction projects for environmental compliance and restoration
measures at NASA field installations, Government-owned industrial
plants supporting NASA activities, and other locations where NASA
operations have contributed to environmental problems and NASA
is obligated to contribute to cleanup costs. In addition, these
resources will be used to provide for regulatory agency oversight
costs, to acquire land if necessary to implement environmental
compliance and restoration measures, and to perform studies and
assessments in support of functional leadership initiatives related
to environmental compliance and restoration activities. The purpose
of this program is to enable NASA to comply with environmental
statutory and regulatory requirements and standards, cleanup orders,
and regulatory agreements. The resources authorized and appropriated
pursuant to this program may not be applied to other activities.
The program includes studies or assessments to determine compliance
status and options for remedial actions, including evaluations
and use of new cleanup technologies, and to support environmental
initiatives; conduct of prescribed remedial investigations and
feasibility studies as required by environmental laws and regulations;
performance of environmental restoration, hazardous waste removal
and disposal, cleanups, and closures; and environmental compliance
activities.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION/DESCRIPTION:
Proposed environmental compliance and restoration projects and
activities for Fiscal Year 1998 total $34.0 million. This program
represents this yearís request on a phased approach in
relation to the total requirements for environmental restoration
that must be implemented within the next several years. Based
on relative urgency and potential health hazards, the following
listed projects are the highest priority requirements currently
planned for accomplishment in FY 1998. Deferral of these necessary
compliance and remedial measures would preclude NASA from complying
with environmental requirements and regulatory agreements, and
jeopardize critical NASA operations. The studies, remedial investigations,
feasibility studies, assessments, design, and related engineering
costs are estimated to be approximately $8,740,000. Projects estimated
to cost less than $250,000 have not been described or identified
by specific location. The estimated costs of these projects is
$245,000. As studies, assessments, remedial investigations, feasibility
studies, and designs progress and as new discoveries or regulatory
requirements change, it is expected that priorities may change
and revisions of the activities and projects may be necessary.
The following listing summarizes broad categories of effort to
be undertaken with the identified estimated costs over $250,000:
a. Hazardous Waste Corrective Actions/Cleanups | $22,930,000 |
b. Hazardous Waste/Material Storage and Control | 950,000 |
c. Water Pollution Control | 1,135,000 |
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
A. Ames Research Center (ARC) | $600,000 |
1. Remediate Soil Contamination at Area of Investigation No. 10 . | 600,000 |
The project will provide for the removal or in-situ treatment
and containment of PCB and oil contaminated soil around the electrical
substations that make up Area of Investigation No. 10 at Ames.
Initial sampling of the areas have revealed contamination around
the transformer pads. Cleanup of the sites is required by the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and the State of California
Department of Toxic Substances Control.
B. Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC) | $700,000 |
1. Remediation of Soil/Groundwater Contamination | 700,000 |
This project continues the efforts and activities to characterize
and remediate site contamination at DFRC. The Center is identified
as Operable Unit No. 6 (OU #6) under the Edwards Air Force Base
(EAFB) Superfund Program. The project will provide for follow-on
phases to investigation activities including risk assessments,
feasibility and treatability studies, and proposed remedial plans
and reports required to address all sites of concern under OU
#6. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) program for OU #6 is conducted in coordination
with the Accelerated Site Cleanup process being implemented at
the EAFB. This work is required by CERCLA and is subject to the
provisions of the EAFB Federal Facilities Agreement.
C. Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) | $500,000 |
1. Remediation of Contaminated Sites | 500,000 |
This project continues the efforts to investigate, characterize
and remediate identified contaminated sites, including three abandoned
landfills and other sites at GSFC. The work follows-on to the
site investigations previously conducted which identified the
presence of contamination at these sites. The project is required
to bring the facility into compliance with CERCLA/Resources Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) and state requirements.
D. Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) . | $2,750,000 |
1. Remediation of Arroyo Seco Groundwater Contamination | 1,750,000 |
This project continues the cleanup effort of the Arroyo Seco aquifer
contamination. Site investigations have demonstrated the presence
of contaminants beneath the site and in nearby production wells
in excess of federal and State of California standards. This portion
of the project provides for follow-on actions to site investigations
and characterization and site risk assessments. It provides for
treatability studies to evaluate and determine appropriate technologies
for remedial actions, and project activities to reach decisions
on the level and extent of site cleanup. It also provides for
interim removal actions for soil and groundwater remediation.
The work is being conducted following the federal EPA, state and
local requirements. The project also provides for payment of oversight
costs as required under the Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA).
The site is listed in the Environmental Protection Agencyís
(EPA) National Priorities List and is subject to the provisions
of CERCLA.
2. Environmental Assessment and Cleanup, Edwards Test Facility (ETF) | 1,000,000 |
This project continues the effort to investigate, characterize,
and cleanup site contamination as required for closure of the
ETF. The Facility is a tenant of Edwards Air Force Base (EAFB)
and is identified as Operable Unit No. 5 under the EAFB Superfund
site. This portion continues ongoing work including site characterization
and risk assessments, in addition to providing for treatability
studies and the evaluation, testing, and implementation of remedial
actions for site cleanup. This work is required as part of the
CERCLA cleanup process.
E. Johnson Space Center (JSC) | $550,000 |
1. Closure of Impoundments (358) | 250,000 |
The project will provide for the proper closure of two surface
impoundments located near Building 358, around the Hazardous Waste
Facility area. The 500,000 and 25,000 gal surface impoundments
provided containment for the hypergolic fuels no longer in use
at the facility. Closure of the impoundments will reduce the possibility
for misuse of the impoundments for the storage of hazardous substances
or wastes, thus preventing noncompliances with the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) as well as with spill and discharge requirements
under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The project activities will conform
with applicable closure requirements under RCRA.
2. Environmental Assessment/Cleanup for NASA Industrial Plant, Downey | 300,000 |
This project continues site assessments and investigations to
determine NASAís environmental responsibility prior to
excessing some areas of the facility. The project will conduct
area site characterizations to identify the extent of remedial
actions, as well as provide information on other related environmental
activities needed for transfer of property.
F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC) | $4,680,000 |
1. Abandoned Tank Remediation | 780,000 |
This project provides for follow-on actions to site investigations
and characterization of underground storage tank (UST) sites.
The USTs at these areas have been removed, but site assessments
have identified petroleum contamination in the soils and groundwater
as a result of previous UST system operations. The project will
provide for remediation and proper closure of the sites, to conform
with the federal, state and local UST requirements.
2. Closure of Ramson Road Landfill | 1,100,000 |
This project provides for additional work required to properly
close the Ramson Road Landfill, to include site remediation and
provisions for installation of site monitoring equipment, as required
for the closure. Site investigations have identified groundwater
contamination above regulatory standards. The landfill closure
is mandated under a State of Florida issued consent order, and
under an existing permit issued by the EPA. The site has been
identified to EPA as a Solid Waste Management Unit under RCRA.
3. Remediation of Components Cleaning Facility (CCF) Laboratory | 2,000,000 |
This project provides for follow-onactions to site investigations
and characterization of the CCF area, to provide for site remediation
and corrective action activities. Site investigations have identified
contaminants in soil and groundwater. Cleanup of the site is required
under an existing permit issued by the EPA. This work will be
in conformance with RCRA requirements.
4. Remediation of Spaceport USA, Diesel Fuel Storage Area | 800,000 |
This project provides for site remediation of fuel contaminants
in the area groundwater. This work follows the site investigations
and characterization of the area, and initiates the implementation
of remedial actions currently under negotiations to cleanup the
site. The project follows requirements under the federal, state
and local standards.
G. Lewis Research Center (LeRC) | $3,150,000 |
1. Remediation of Contaminated Sites, Cleveland | 2,500,000 |
This project continues the effort to investigate, characterize,
and remediate site contamination for identified contaminated areas
within Lewis. This portion of the project provides for follow-on
activities to include site investigations, feasibility studies,
risk assessments, interim and site remedial actions as required
for the multiple contaminated areas identified within the Center.
The work follows the CERCLA process and incorporates the State
of Ohio regulatory requirements, as specified under the issued
Administrative Order by the State of Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency (OEPA).
2. Remediation of Underground Storage Tank Sites, PBS | 650,000 |
This project will provide for remediation of fuel contaminated
sites around the facility. Prior investigations identified soil
and groundwater contamination resulting from leaks and spills
associated with previous operation of underground storage tank
(UST) systems. The USTs were previously located in these areas,
but have been removed. The soil and groundwater contamination
will be remediated to conform with the federal RCRA, state and
local UST requirements.
H. Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) | $3,000,000 | |
1. CERCLA Investigation and Cleanup | 2,700,000 |
This project continues the effort to assess, characterize, and
remediate site contamination identified at multiple areas within
the Center, as caused by releases of hazardous contaminants into
the environment. This phase of the project will provide follow-on
actions to remedial investigations, site risk assessments, feasibility
and treatability studies, and will provide for evaluation of remedial
treatment alternatives and implementation of remedial actions
for site cleanups. MSFC is listed on the Environmental Protection
Agencyís (EPA) National Priorities List (NPL). This work
will follow the CERCLA process and a Federal Facilities Agreement
between NASA, EPA and the State of Alabama.
2. RCRA Investigation and Cleanup, Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) | 300,000 |
This project continues the facility remediation program for the assessment, characterization, and cleanup of site contamination at identified RCRA Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs). Contaminants, especially trichloroethylene, have migrated through the existing rock formation and overburden into the groundwater. This portion of the project will provide follow-on activities to groundwater contaminant characterization, risk assessments including interim removal action and corrective action evaluation and implementation for site cleanup. The project is required for compliance with RCRA and the State of California regulations.
I. Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF) | $2,000,000 |
1. Remediation Activities, MAF | 1,150,000 |
This project continues characterization and remediation activities
associated with the Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) identified
during the RCRA facility investigation. The scope of work includes
removal actions, well installation, soil disposal, testing and
evaluation of technologies for site cleanup, and corrective measures
for the identified contaminated areas. The work will provide for
activities identified in the Corrective Measures Study submitted
to the regulatory agencies. The project follows requirements under
the facility RCRA permit.
2. Install and Upgrade Secondary Containment Areas | 850,000 |
This project will provide for upgrades and modifications to approximately
fifteen containment areas located around three sites in the facility.
The modifications include modifying containment areas and installing
chemical liners under tanks, repairing foundations, and ancillary
improvements. These modifications will increase the centerís
ability to contain accidental spills of toxic chemicals. The project
is required for compliance with the federal Clean Water Act (CWA),
state and local environmental requirements.
J. Stennis Space Center (SSC) | $3,700,000 |
1. Remediation of Building 2205 Sites | 2,700,000 |
This work began as an emergency effort in FY 1995. The FY 1995
project was funded with residual Environmental Compliance and
Restoration Program funds. This project continues the efforts
to study and initiates cleanup of contamination at Sites 12A/16,
18 and 19/23. This portion of the work follows initial remedial
activities that include remedial investigations, risk assessments,
and feasibility studies. It will provide for treatability studies,
interim removal actions as necessary, and remedial actions determined
necessary to cleanup these sites. The project is required by federal
and state requirements for compliance with RCRA and CERCLA.
2. Remediation of Site 6 Contamination | 1,000,000 |
This work began as an emergency effort in FY 1995. The FY 1995
project was funded with residual Environmental Compliance and
Restoration Program funds. This project continues the efforts
to study and initiates cleanup of contamination around Building
6 site. This portion of the work follows initial remedial activities
that include remedial investigations, risk assessments, and feasibility
studies. It will provide for treatability studies, interim removal
actions as necessary, and remedial actions determined necessary
to cleanup the site. The project is required by federal and state
requirements and will comply with RCRA and CERCLA.
K. Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) | $300,000 |
1. Remediation of Contaminated Sites | 300,000 |
The project continues the effort to characterize and remediate
soil and groundwater contamination at WFF. This portion of the
project continues the implementation of remedial investigations
and feasibility studies and initiates necessary remedial action
approaches for cleanup of soil and groundwater contamination.
The remedial actions will follow and conform with the federal,
state and local requirements. The project is required for compliance
with CERCLA.
L. White Sands Test Facility (WSTF) | $2,800,000 |
1. Groundwater Contamination Assessment and Remediation | 2,100,000 |
The project continues the effort to assess, characterize, and
remediate soil and groundwater contamination at WSTF. This portion
of the project continues the implementation of remedial action
approaches for cleanup of groundwater contamination. The remedial
actions will follow and conform with the federal, and the State
of New Mexico regulatory requirements. The project is required
to comply with the state issued RCRA 3008(h) consent order.
2. Replace Evaporation Tank Liners | 700,000 |
The project will replace the hazardous waste storage tank liners
located around the 200 Area. The project will satisfy the Center
requirements under a State of New Mexico issued RCRA permit, requiring
periodic replacement of the tank liners to ensure adequate containment
of the stored hazardous wastes. The project consists of the removal
and disposal of the tank contents, excavation, removal and replacement
of the liners, backfilling, and proper disposal of removed materials.
In addition, sampling and analyses will be performed at various
locations to verify integrity of the system and identify any contamination.
M. Various Locations | $285,000 |
1. Sewage Industrial Treatment Upgrade, Madrid, Spain | 285,000 |
This project provides for the construction and installation of
facilities to upgrade the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WTP) to
provide effluent treatment for compliance with regulations. The
upgrade will include the rerouting of facility drains to the WTP
system, addition of chemical reagents dosing systems, chemical
mixing and flocculation tanks, sand filter, pumping station, and
the associated controls and metering devices. The upgrade will
provide for compliance with Spanish Regulations and guidelines
set forth by the European Economic Community. It will also allow
the reuse of effluent water for irrigation purposes.
N. Miscellaneous Projects Not in Excess of $250,000 Each | $245,000 |
O. Studies Remedial Investigations, Feasibility Studies, Assessments Design, and Related Engineering | $8,740,000 |
Total Environmental Compliance and Restoration | $34,000,000 |
FUTURE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUIRED:
Approximately $45 - $55 million per year for the next few years
is the current estimate for meeting environmental Compliance and
Restoration requirements. This figure will become better defined
as studies are completed and remediation projects are reviewed
by Federal, state, and local regulators.