U.S. Food and
Drug Administration
Performance Plan
2002
Total Program Resources:
FY 2003 Current Estimate |
FY 2002 Current Estimate |
FY 2001 Actual |
FY 2000 Actual |
FY 1999 Actual |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total ($000) | 40,688 | 42,882 | 36,248 | 36,248 | 32,109 |
The National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) conducts FDA mission-critical, peer-reviewed research that is targeted to develop a more scientifically sound basis for regulatory decisions and reduce risks associated with FDA-regulated products to protect, promote, and enhance America's public health. Specific aims of NCTR's research are:
The NCTR provides the Agency with a high-quality, cost-effective, health science research program, which provides new scientific knowledge through the application and leveraging of research findings from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and academia to enhance the FDA's regulatory practices. NCTR also leverages Agency scientific research resources through partnerships with other federal agencies, national and international organizations, and industry to best meet Agency needs.
As a critical resource for enhancing the science base of the FDA, the center director and scientists foster scientific forums with NCTR's stakeholders, namely the product centers and the Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA). These recurring discussions allow NCTR the opportunity to present and validate its planned/ongoing research, as it relates to the Agency's priorities, as well as to solicit the anticipated research needs of the product centers and the ORA. NCTR's strategic research goals support the FDA's mission to bring safe and efficacious products to the market rapidly and to reduce the risks of products on the market. NCTR's strategic goals are as follows:
A. Strategic Goal Explanation
One of the NCTR's highest priorities is to increase the ability of FDA reviewers to evaluate and predict rapidly and accurately the adverse effects of FDA-regulated human products. This capability is critical to the Agency's ability to carry out its mission to analyze the safety and efficacy of FDA-regulated products during the pre-market application review process. To adequately predict the adverse effects of human exposure to a toxic agent, a group of tests must be developed, validated, and applied. NCTR uses a multi-disciplinary approach to predict human toxicity and to evaluate human risk using appropriate animal and non-animal models.
Toxicology research is moving away from its dependence on whole animal test systems that use large numbers of animals and seek relatively few endpoints. These animal test systems are costly, time-intensive, and do not adequately mimic the human response. Thus, scientists must develop and use alternate systems and tests to better understand chemical toxicity and strengthen the extrapolation from animal models to humans. Because of America's quest for good health, increasing evidence of adverse drug/chemical reactions in humans, point to a need to identify and protect susceptible subpopulations of people at higher risk from exposure to drugs, contaminated foods, or other regulated products.
The NCTR methods used in the identification of and quantitative measurement of the potency of suspected carcinogens and mutagens are essential to the FDA regulatory process. The systems developed and characterized (Performance Goal 1) are capable of simulating human exposure, and increasing the ability to detect weak carcinogens. Other NCTR programs, through partnerships and collaborative projects with other federal agencies, use human data they have collected to better understand the mechanisms of carcinogenesis and to provide new knowledge on the identification of subpopulations, particularly as they relate to individual susceptibility (Performance Goal 2).
B. Summary of Performance Goals
Performance Goals | Targets | Actual Performance |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|
1.
Introduce the know-ledge of new
genetic systems and computer-assisted
toxicology (bioinformatics) into
the application review process.
(16001) |
FY 03: Provide an evaluation
of the new molecular technology
for detecting alterations in
multiple genes. FY 02: Conduct one biologically based mechanistic study combined with pre-dictive modeling to improve extrapolation of animal data to the human condition. FY 01: Provide peer reviewed articles on new Genetic and transgenic systems and knowledge to product reviewers. FY 00: Evaluate a new biological assay to measure genetic changes and validate two existing models that predict human genetic damage. FY 99: Develop better Biological assays to measure genetic changes and predict human genetic damage |
FY 03:
FY 02:
FY 01: Publications submitted
to peer reviewed journals:
(1) describing methodology
damage to mitochondria and
(2) providing a review of the
possibility of using new genotypic
selection for risk assessment. |
|
2.
Develop, with other organizations,
gene chip and gene array technology.
(16002) |
FY 03: Present one finding and
publish one result of the microarray
technology polymorphism study.
FY 02: Support at least two multi-disciplined DNA and RNA-based microarray technologies. FY 01: Develop "risk chip" technology to screen large numbers of people for biomarkers simultaneously. FY 00: Conduct molecular epidemiology studies to Identify biomarkers of the most frequently occurring cancers in highly suscep-tible subpopulations. FY 99: Complete biochemical and epidemiological studies to define the basis of susceptibility of humans to the toxicity of regulated products |
FY 03: FY 02: FY 01: Risk chip used to screen population resulted in initiation of negotiations to extend the use of biomarkers and other subpopulations for further investigation. FY 00: Established and validated conventional genotyping methods for 28 gene targets and polymor-phisms; 686 colonoscopy individuals were genotyped for all common NAT2 alleles; analysis ongoing on completed case-control colorectal cancer study. FY 99: Biochemical studies on pancreatic and colorectal cancer were completed and epidemiology studies on cancer are in the enrollment phase. FY 98: Conducted case Control molecular epidemiology studies to assess breast and prostate cancer in African-American women/men. FY 97: Initiated studies to evaluate the use of molecular biomarkers in clinical studies and to identify subpopulations of Increased risk. |
|
TOTAL
FUNDING:
($000) |
FY 03: 25,242 FY 02: 29,361 FY 01: 23,271 FY 00: 17,160 FY 99: 15,084 |
C. Goal by Goal Presentation of Performance
1. Introduce the knowledge of new genetic systems and computer-assisted toxicology into the application review process. (16001)
2. Develop, with other organizations, gene chip and gene array technology. (16002)
A. Strategic Goal Explanation
To meet the rapidly changing technology, the Agency needs unique computer-based predictive systems to aid in assessing human toxicity and to improve the safety of human clinical trials. The FDA reviewers face an ever-increasing quantity and complexity of data in new drug and product applications. Clearly, tools that provide reviewers quick access to relevant scientific information and a capability for predicting toxicity can expedite review decisions.
Estrogen exposure of the human population via plant-derived food is virtually universal and infants consuming soy formula are exposed to the highest doses. Additionally, estrogenic activity is found in environmental products, such as plastics and pesticides, and in FDA-regulated products. Thus, it is important to understand the varying toxicological and pharmacological properties of these compounds as well as their common mechanism of action.
B. Summary of Performance Goals
Performance Goals | Targets | Actual Performance | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
3.
Develop computer-based models
and infrastructure to predict
the health impact of increased
exposure to estrogens and anti-estrogen
compounds. (16003) |
FY 03: Maintain existing computational
databases of estrogenic and androgenic
compounds for use by reviewers. FY 02: Maintain existing computational databases of estrogenic and androgenic compounds for use by reviewers. FY 01: Validate a predictive model for androgens. FY 00: Validate predictive model for estrogenic or estrogenic-like compounds. FY 99: Demonstrate a model toxicity knowledge base to support and expedite product review |
FY 03: FY 02: FY 01: Predictive model for androgen receptors was developed and assessment of 204 chemicals completed. FY 00: The estrogenicity of 150 chemicals was asses-sed using an estradiol receptor-binding assay validating the predictive model. Two additional assays were evaluated for androgen binding. FY 99: Thirty (30) chemicals for CFSAN and six chemicals for CDER have been used to confirm the predictive value of the computer modeling system. Partnering continues with other agencies (EPA, etc.) and industry (CMA). FY 98: Computer-based predictive system used to develop model for rodent and human estrogen receptor binding. FY 97: Prototype presented at FDA Science Forum. |
|
TOTAL
FUNDING: ($000) |
FY 03: 15,466 FY 02: 13,521 FY 01: 12,977 FY 00: 4,382 FY 99: 3,853 |
C. Goal by Goal Presentation of Performance
3. Develop computer-based models and infrastructure to predict the health impact of increased exposure to estrogens and anti-estrogen compounds. (16003)
A. Strategic Goal Explanation
Most regulatory research begins as a precise exploration of a specific agent, a concept, or the use of a particular method. Once techniques are developed, these novel approaches can be applied to answer compelling questions of human health and safety. This strategic goal includes three performance goals that address the Agency strategy for developing science-based product and process standards.
The identification of carcinogens has depended classically upon two approaches, epidemiological studies and lifetime animal exposure studies, each of which has its own strengths and weaknesses. The development of new techniques to assess carcinogenic risk provides the basis for alternative methods of assessing carcinogenic potential that can augment, or perhaps, even replace, the need for expensive animal testing.
Committed to the Food Safety Initiative, the NCTR will continue studies that will identify markers of foodborne pathogens and assess whether these microorganisms undergo change, thus becoming more virulent. Excessive use of antibiotics in medicine and the food industry has led to widespread antibiotic resistance among pathogenic bacteria and is now considered a potentially dangerous health problem.
NCTR scientists will continue to build biologically based dose-response models of microbial infection to assess survival, growth, and infectious components of microbial risk. NCTR is developing research protocols to study the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of genetically modified foods using in vivo and in vitro transgenic systems that have been evaluated and validated in-house.
B. Summary of Performance Goals
Performance Goals | Targets | Actual Performance | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
4.
Study FDA-regulated compounds
to relate the mechanism(s) by
which a chemical causes toxicity.
(16004) |
FY 03: Continue toxicological
evaluations of anti-HIV therapeutics
and photoactive compounds. FY 02: Initiate analytical/ biological studies to assess the toxicity of at least one, FDA high priority dietary supplement. FY 01: Study two FDA-regulated compounds. FY 00: Conduct studies to relate how a compound causes damage to the damage itself, thus strengthening the scientific basis for regulation of compounds. FY99: Develop faster, more accurate tests based on mechanisms of toxic actions. |
FY 03:
FY 01: Developed protocols
to conduct comprehensive toxicological
evaluations of Aloe vera
and mixtures of anti-HIV therapeutics.
Conducted literature review
of retinyl palmitate. |
|
5. Develop methods and build biological dose-response models to replicate bacterial survival in the stomach. (16007) |
FY 03: Identify and characterize
the role antibiotic resistance
plays in emerging and evolving
foodborne diseases. FY 02: Report at scientific meetings and/or publish preliminary results on the development of new methodologies to identify genetically modified foods, drug residues in foods and antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria. FY 01: Provide model to replicate bacterial survival in the stomach. FY 00: Develop methods of predicting, more quicklyand accurately, the risk associated with such foodborne pathogens as Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and Campylobacter spp. FY 99: Develop rapid and sensitive methods for identifying pathogens, foodborne bacteria, and microbial contaminants. |
FY 03:
FY 02:
FY 01: Performed pre-validation
studies that examines the efffect
of low-level antibiotic residues
on the human intestinal microflora
by using a chemostat to model
the human intestinal tract. |
|
6. Catalogue biomarkers and develop standards to establish safety and effectiveness of imaging devices for potential use in the diagnosis of toxicity. (16012) |
FY 03: Develop one instru-mental
rapid sensor detection method. Outfit upgraded laboratory, provide for supplies (agents, chemicals/pathogens) and construct library databases of proteins and test to find toxin related markers; Recruit additional expertise in Computational Science, Chemistry and Microbiology FY 02: Continue development of solid-phase colorimetric bacterial detection system. Acquire high-resolution mass spectrometer for use with protein from bacteria, food toxins and genomics studies. Upgrade existing laboratory facilities to BSL-3 to support BSE/TSE and microbial bioterrorism work. Recruit additional expertise in Computational Science, Chemistry and Microbiology. FY01: Begin developing solid-phase colorimetric bacterial detection system. FY 00: Begin developing solid-phase colorimetric . bacterial detection system. FY 99: Develop method to identify biomarker proteins; translate method to colorimetric field kit. |
FY 03: FY 02: FY 01:Application/extension of Fresh Tag® technologies for detection of nitrogen-based explosives began. FY 00: |
|
7.Use new technologies (bioinformatics, imaging, proteomics, and metabonomics) for diagnosis of toxicity. (16013) |
FY 03: Evaluate, for use Agency-wide,
one new technology such as proteomics
or genomics for determining liver
damage by regulated products. FY 02: Publish at least one scientific paper describing one technology for use in reviewing regulated compounds. FY 01: Develop at least three concept papers exploring new technologies for the assessment of toxicity. |
FY 03:
FY 02: |
|
TOTAL FUNDING: ($000) |
FY 03: 16,263 FY 02: 14,791 FY 01: 14,559 FY 00: 14,980 FY 99: 13,172 |
C. Goal by Goal Presentation of Performance
4. Study FDA-regulated compounds to relate the mechanism(s) by which a chemical causes toxicity. (16004)
5. Develop methods and build biological dose-response models to replicate bacterial survival in the stomach. (16007)
6. Catalogue biomarkers and develop standards to establish safety and effectiveness of imaging devices for potential use in the diagnosis of toxicity. (16012)
7. Use new technologies (imaging, proteomics, and metabonomics) for diagnosis of toxicity. (16013)
As a research component of the FDA, the National Center for Toxicological Research provides peer-reviewed research that supports the regulatory function of the Agency. To accomplish this mission, it is incumbent upon the Center to solicit feedback from its stakeholders and partners, which include other FDA centers, other government agencies, industry and academia. Scientific program services are provided by the Science Advisory Board (SAB) composed of non-government scientists from industry, academia, and consumer organizations. The SAB is guided by a charter that defines the scope of the review to include quality of the science and the overall applicability to FDA regulatory need. This board is further supplemented with subject matter experts and scientists representing all of the FDA product centers. Programs described are evaluated at least once every five years by the SAB.
Research proposals are monitored through partnerships with other scientific organizations. Scientific and monetary collaborations include inter-agency agreements with other government agencies, Cooperative Research and Development Agreements and technology transfer with industry, and grants or informal agreements with academic institutions.
NCTR uses several strategies to ensure the quality of its research and the accuracy of data collected in specific research studies. Study protocols are developed collaboratively by principal investigators and FDA product centers. Findings are recorded by and verified by internal and external peer review. Statistical analyses are performed by the principal investigator and reviewed by members of the Biometry and Risk Assessment staff. The analytic approach is checked by different members of the scientific staff and the Deputy Director for Research to verify the scientific integrity of the data.
To ensure that the performance data are accurate and timely, the NCTR Planning Division staff monitors research progress at the project level on a recurring basis. The Project Management System utilized by the Planning Staff is capable of tracking planned and actual research projects and expenditures in all three strategic goals and in the outlined performance goals. Quality Assurance Staff monitor the experiments that fall within the Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) guidelines. Research accomplishments and goals are published annually in the NCTR Research Accomplishments and Plans document. Publications reporting research findings are tracked by project, and final reports are archived and distributed to interested parties. Over the past four or five years, NCTR has published yearly 175-250 research documents, manuscripts, book chapters, and abstracts in recognized scientific journals.
NCTR's research findings are also presented at national and international scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Many of the scientific meetings are sponsored or co-sponsored by NCTR scientists. The scientists make over 400 presentations and invited speeches a year at local science seminars and at national and international meetings. Many NCTR scientists also serve on international scientific advisory boards.
Contact Information:
Planning Staff, Office of Planning,
FDA
Phone: 301-827-5210
Previous Section | Table of Contents | Next Section
Office
of Planning Home Page
FDA Home Page
| Search
| A-Z
Index | Site
Map | Contact
FDA
FDA/Office
of Planning
Web page created by clb
2002-FEB-20.