SIR - I respond to Ulrich Mueller's comment on social status and sex (ratio of offspring), based on an examination of biographical compilations2. The authors are presumably interested in the biologic- al phenomenon of sex ratio at (live) birth. The representation of children in compila- tions such as Who's Who is a socially stressed report that is subject to a variety of distortions: reporting of perinatal mor- tality, illegitimacy, children of plural mar- riages, adoption and repudiation: all these are likely to be biased by social class and by sex. The data given can hardly be accepted at face value. If they were to be, we would then have to remove confound- ing with variables such as parity and age of mother, as well as differential prenatal mortality that may be associated with infection, malnutrition and other socially correlated causes. Unfortunately, it is difficult to find large datasets organized by biological family relationship. The large population census datasets are acquired by household rather than family, and are beset with many errors in statistical detail'*. Joshua Lederberg The Rockefeller University, 1230 YorkAvenue, New York, New York 10021-6399, USA 1. Beck, R.A. tVatufe356,189 (1992). 2. Mueller, U. NatureSS3.490 (1993). 3. Trivers, R. L.&Willard D. E. S&ence179.90-92 (1973). 4. Clutton-Brock, T. Ii. & lason, G. R. Q. Rev. No/. 61, 33%-374U986). 5. James, W.tt. 1. theor. Biol. 69.721-752 (1987). 6. James, W. H. 1. theor. Biol. 143.555-564 (1990). 7. Chahnazarian. A., Blumberg. 8. S.&London. W. ?.J. biosoc. Sci. 20,357-370 (1988). 8. James, W. Ii. J. tbeor. Biol. 140.39-40 (1989). 9. James, W. H. Hum. Biol. 59,873-900 (i987).' 10. Blackman. M. R., Weintraub. B. D.. Rosen, 5. W. & Hannan. S. M. 1. c/in. endow. hfebb. 68. -95 (1988). 11. James, W. H. 1. biosoc. Sci. 22,517-518 (1990). 12. Bodmer. W. F. &Lederberg.J. CensusDataforSfudiesof. GeneticDemography, Proc. III Int. Congressof Human Genetics 459-I71 (John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1967). NATURE - VOL 365 . 2 SEPTEMBER 1993 P8 #