Mark Hess Headquarters, Washington, D.C. December 26, 1990 (Phone: 202/453-4164) RELEASE: 90-165 SPACE STATION INTEGRATED DESIGN REVIEW COMPLETED The Integrated System Preliminary Design Review (ISPDR) for the Freedom space station, a major milestone leading to the construction, launch and assembly of the station, was completed on schedule this week marking the end of a year-long assessment of Freedom's preliminary design by the NASA centers, their prime contractors and the international partners involved in the space station project. Over the course of the last 13 months, over 80 separate design reviews were conducted at NASA centers and contractor facilities to ensure Freedom's preliminary design could satisfy requirements for safety, physical and functional compatibility and for its ability to be built, integrated with other hardware, and tested. During this time, every major component, subsystem and system, which together comprise the space station, were examined. "We did it," said Marc Bensimon, Deputy Manager for Freedom's Program and Operations Office, Reston, Va., who headed the ISPDR effort. "We established the schedule for the PDR last April and we met every milestone as planned." "This was an outstanding effort," said Robert Moorehead, Deputy Director for Space Station Freedom Program and Operations. "Not only did we accomplish the PDR on schedule, we made the schedule despite having to devote a lot of time and attention to other issues, like weight and power and EVA (extravehicular activity) resources." Preliminary figures for Freedom's weight as of June 1990 were 143,000 pounds higher than the allocated limit of 512,000 pounds for the total space station, and housekeeping power exceeded the maximum 45 kw available by nearly 15 kw. An intensive summer-long resources scrub reduced weight estimates by 130,000 pounds and reduced the housekeeping power by 13 kw. Users will receive 30 kw of power to conduct their experiments. Despite the added rigors of the ISPDR review progress, weight and power levels have remained stable. "What this means is that the design is maturing and converging," said Bensimon. "While a PDR is typically conducted with the hardware only 10 percent designed, I was impressed with the detail of the preliminary design and the knowledge our systems managers displayed with respect to expected performance of their systems." While hardware was a major focus of the ISPDR, space station managers also reviewed and baselined ground processing procedures, computer software specifications and pre-flight verification plans for Freedom. They also approved design modifications such as those suggested by Dr. William F. Fisher and Charles R. Price, Co-chairman of the External Maintenance Task Team. In the EVA systems area, program managers approved a change that would provide a handle on all external orbital replacement units so that those components could be replaced by robots as well as humans. Both Moorehead and Bensimon acknowledge the current restructure assessment (begun in November as a result of a 1991 fiscal year budget shortfall of more than $550 million along with a Congressional mandate to significantly reduce out-year spending) will have an impact on the design but are confident that the ISPDR has laid a firm foundation for the restucturing. "Certainly there will be design changes," said Moorehead, "but I think that from a systems and subsystems standpoint, the ISPDR configuration provides us with an excellent baseline to work from for the restructuring. Afterall, regardless of what Freedom will look like from an overall configuration standpoint, we will still have to have systems like power, thermal control, data management and guidance and control. I anticipate being able to use a significant proportion of those systems in the station that comes out of our restructure assessment." Bensimon said the next major milestone in the development process will take place next spring. By then, engineers will have completed incorporating the design changes that come out of the restructuring and can begin a series of stage design reviews that carefully examine the configuration at various steps along the assembly sequence. At each stage, engineers must make certain the station can function like an independent spacecraft, with all the necessary backups, to ensure overall mission success.