This is the html version of the file http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_125.pdf.
G o o g l e automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:3Mq3Vq_p6RgJ:www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_125.pdf+statistics++%22standard++error++for++ratios++&hl=en


Google is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These search terms have been highlighted: statistics standard error for ratios 

Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2, Number 125 (5/98)
Page 1
Series 2
No. 125
1988 National Maternal and
Infant Health Survey: Methods
and Response Characteristics
May 1998
Vital and
Health Statisticsdiv>
From the CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION / National Center for Health Statisticsdiv>
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Health Statisticsdiv>
Copyright Information
All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be
reproduced or copied without permission; citation as to source, however, is
appreciated.
Suggested citation
Sanderson M, Scott C, Gonzalez JF. 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health
Survey: Methods and response characteristics. National Center for Health
Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2(125). 1998.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Sanderson, Maureen, Ph.D.
1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey: methods and response
characteristics / [by Maureen Sanderson, Chester Scott, and Joe Fred
Gonzalez].
p. cm. — (Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and
methods research ; no. 125) (DHHS publication ; no. (PHS) 98-1399)
‘‘This report describes the procedures to select the sample, impute
missing data, make national estimates, and estimate sampling errors for the
1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey. The demographic
characteristics of survey respondents and nonrespondents are provided.’’
‘‘March 1998.’’
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN 0-8406-0540-4
1. Health surveys—United States—Statistical methods. 2.
Mothers—Health and hygiene—United States—Statistics. 3. Infants—Health
and hygiene—United States—Statistics. 4. National Maternal and Infant Health
Survey (U.S.) I. Scott, Chester. II. Gonzalez, Joe Fred. III. Title. IV. Series. V.
Series: DHHS publication ; no. (PHS) 98-1399.
[DNLM: 1. Prenatal Care—United States—Statistics. 2. Health
Surveys—United States—Statistics. 3. Health Survey—United States. 4.
Pregnancy Outcome—United States. W2 A N148vb no. 125 1998]
RA409.U45 no. 125
[RG530.3.U5]
362.1'173 s—dc21
[614.4'273'2852]
DNLM/DLC
for Library of Congress
97-52830
CIP
For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office
Superintendent of Documents
Mail Stop: SSOP
Washington, DC 20402-9328
Printed on acid-free paper.
1988 National Materal and
Infant Health Survey: Methods
and Response Characteristics
Series 2:
Data Evaluation and Methods
Research
No. 125
Hyattsville, Maryland
May 1998
DHHS Publication No. 98-1399
Vital and
Health Statisticsdiv>
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Health Statisticsdiv>
National Center for Health Statisticsdiv>
Edward J. Sondik, Ph.D., Director
Jack R. Anderson, Deputy Director
Jack R. Anderson, Acting Associate Director for
International Statisticsdiv>
Lester R. Curtin, Ph.D., Acting Associate Director for
Research and Methodology
Jennifer H. Madans, Ph.D., Acting Associate Director for
Analysis, Epidemiology, and Health Promotion
P. Douglas Williams, Acting Associate Director for Data
Standards, Program Development, and Extramural Programs
Edward L. Hunter, Associate Director for Planning, Budget,
and Legislation
Jennifer H. Madans, Ph.D., Acting Associate Director for
Vital and Health Statistics Systems
Stephen E. Nieberding, Associate Director for Management
Charles J. Rothwell, Associate Director for Data Processing
and Services
Division of Vital Statisticsdiv>
Mary Anne Freedman, Director
James A. Weed, Ph.D., Deputy Director
Harry M. Rosenberg, Ph.D., Chief, Mortality Statisticsdiv>
Branch
Kenneth G. Keppel, Ph.D., Acting Chief, Reproductive
Statistics Branch
Nicholas F. Pace, Chief, Systems, Programming, and
Statistical Resources Branch
Ronald F. Chamblee, Chief, Data Acquisitions and
Evaluation Branch
Preface
This report presents a detailed description of the sample
design, imputation procedures, weighting procedures,
variance estimation, and response characteristics for the 1988
National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (NMIHS). The
survey was designed by staff of the former Followback
Survey Branch in the Division of Vital Statistics at the
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). The NCHS
contracted with the Demographic Surveys Division of the
U.S. Bureau of the Census to conduct the survey. The
Survey Design Staff of the Office of Research and
Methodology (ORM) at NCHS were responsible for the
sample design. The Statistical Methods Staff in ORM were
responsible for developing estimation procedures for the
NMIHS.
Van L. Parsons of the Statistical Methods Staff in ORM
served as a peer reviewer of this report.
At NCHS, the authors would like to acknowledge James
Weed, Paul Placek, Gloria Simpson, Michael Kogan,
Michelle Davis, and Steven Botman. At the U.S Bureau of
the Census, we would like to acknowledge Robert Mangold,
Robert Wilson, Debbie Usitalo, Nan Sukla, and David
Hackbarth.
The NMIHS was supported in part by a number of
Federal agencies, most of whom participated in the design of
the questionnaires and the survey.
iii
Contents
Text Tables
v
Detailed Tables
vi
Objectives
The 1988 National Maternal and
Infant Health Survey (NMIHS) was
conducted by the National Center for
Health Statistics to study factors related
to poor pregnancy outcome, such as
adequacy of prenatal care; inadequate
and excessive weight gain during
pregnancy; maternal smoking, drinking,
and drug use; and pregnancy and
delivery complications.
Methods
The NMIHS is a nationally
representative sample of 11,000 women
who had live births, 4,000 who had late
fetal deaths, and 6,000 who had infant
deaths in 1988. Questionnaires were
mailed to mothers based on information
from certificates of live birth, reports of
fetal death, and certificates of infant
death. Information supplied by the
mother, prenatal care providers, and
hospitals of delivery was linked with the
vital records to expand knowledge of
maternal and infant health in the United
States.
Results
The response rates in all three
components of the NMIHS differed
according to the mothers’
characteristics. Mothers were more
likely to respond if they were 20–39
years of age, were white, were married,
had fewer than four children, entered
prenatal care early, had more prenatal
visits, had more years of education, or
resided in the Midwest Region. The
percent of respondents was lower for
teenage mothers, mothers of races
other than white, and mothers with four
or more children, little prenatal care, or
fewer years of education. Mothers
whose infants weighed less than 2,500
grams were less likely to respond in the
live-birth and infant-death components
than mothers whose infants weighed
2,500 grams or more.
Conclusions
The NMIHS will provide an
invaluable tool for researchers and
practitioners seeking solutions to
perinatal and obstetric problems.
Keywords: mother’s characteristics c
infant characteristics c prenatal care c
infant birthweight
1988 National Maternal and
Infant Health Survey: Methods
and Response Characteristics
Maureen Sanderson, Ph.D., University of South Carolina; Chester
Scott, Division of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health
Statistics; and Joe Fred Gonzalez, M.S., Offıce of Research and
Methodology, National Center for Health Statisticsdiv>
Introduction
T
he purpose of this report is to
present detailed methods and
response characteristics for the
1988 National Maternal and Infant
Health Survey (NMIHS). Areas that are
emphasized in this report are survey
design specifications, sample design,
data collection instruments used in the
survey, imputation of missing data,
weighting to produce national estimates,
approximation of sampling errors, and
response rates for mothers, their
hospitals of delivery, and their primary
prenatal care providers.
Background
The National Center for Health
Statistics (NCHS) conducts
‘‘followback’’ surveys to gain additional
information from vital records. The term
‘‘followback’’ is used to indicate that
sources named on vital records are
contacted to provide supplemental
information. Previous followback
surveys include the National Natality
Surveys (NNS’s) in 1963, 1964–66,
1967–69, 1972, and 1980; a National
Infant Mortality Survey (NIMS) in
1964–66; and a National Fetal Mortality
Survey (NFMS) in 1980. The National
Maternal and Infant Health Survey is
the equivalent of a combined NNS,
NFMS, and NIMS. By comparing
previous surveys with the National
Maternal and Infant Health Survey and
controlling for the use of different
samples, trends over time can be studied
among subgroups of women for factors
such as prenatal care, weight gain
during pregnancy, maternal smoking and
drinking, and pregnancy and delivery
complications as they relate to birth
outcome.
The 1988 National
Maternal and Infant
Health Survey
T
he 1988 NMIHS was conducted
by NCHS to assist researchers in
studying factors related to poor
pregnancy outcome. The survey is a
nationally representative sample of
9,953 women who had live births, 3,309
who had late fetal deaths, and 5,332
who had infant deaths in 1988. The
infants of approximately 88 mothers
appear in both the live-birth and
infant-death components. In addition,
the mothers of 310 infants in the
live-birth cohort reported that these
children had died before the mothers
completed the questionnaire. Mothers
were mailed questionnaires using names
and addresses from certificates of live
birth, reports of fetal death, and death
certificates for infants. The mother’s
questionnaire included information on
prenatal care and health habits, previous
and subsequent pregnancies,
characteristics of the parents, and the
baby’s health through 6 months of age.
Page 1
Each mother was asked to provide
names and addresses of the hospital of
delivery, all hospitals to which she or
the baby was admitted before or after
delivery, and up to seven prenatal care
providers. Mothers were asked to sign a
request statement allowing her hospitals
and prenatal care providers to release
medical information to the NCHS.
Followup attempts for nonresponse to
the mother’s questionnaire included a
second mailing of the questionnaire, a
postcard reminder, and a telephone or
personal interview. Data were collected
by the U.S. Bureau of the Census under
a contract with NCHS.
If the mother signed a request
statement, questionnaires were mailed to
all of the medical sources she identified.
Signed request statements from mothers
were included with the questionnaires
sent to medical sources in an attempt to
increase response rates from medical
sources. The hospital and prenatal care
provider questionnaires asked for
information on timing and number of
prenatal care visits, health characteristics
of the mothers and infants, and delivery
diagnoses and procedures using the
International Classification of Diseases,
9th Revision, Clinical Modification
(ICD–9–CM)(1). NCHS contracted with
the American Health Information
Management Association, formerly the
American Medical Records Association,
to transcribe medical records onto
questionnaires and to verify ICD–9–CM
codes. Nonresponse followup included a
second mailing and up to three
telephone reminders.
The 1988 NMIHS incorporated
several design features that were not
present in its immediate predecessor, the
1980 NNS/NFMS. First, the 1988
NMIHS included an infant-mortality
component. Second, the NMIHS
included unmarried mothers, whereas
only married mothers were mailed
questionnaires in the NNS/NFMS. With
25.7 percent of 1988 births being to
unmarried mothers in the United States,
it was essential that this group be
included in the NMIHS (2). Third,
because black infants have rates of low
birthweight and infant mortality about
twice that of white infants (3), black
infants were oversampled in the
live-birth, fetal-death, and infant-death
components of the NMIHS to increase
the reliability of the data. Very
low-birthweight (less than 1,500 grams)
and moderately low-birthweight
(1,500–2,499 grams) infants were
oversampled in the live-birth component
to obtain a sufficient number of
high-risk births for special studies. A
full description of the 1980 NNS/NFMS
methods is published elsewhere (4).
The 1988 NMIHS provides an
invaluable tool for researchers and
practitioners seeking solutions to
perinatal and obstetric problems. It also
can be used to monitor progress in
achieving maternal and infant health
objectives set by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services for the year
2000 (5).
Conduct of the Survey
Many Federal agencies collaborated
with NCHS in planning and funding the
NMIHS, including:
+ Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry
+ Center for Prevention Services of
the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
+ Division of Diabetes Translation of
the Centers for Disease Control
(CDC)
+ Office of Minority Health of the
CDC
+ Center for Devices and Radiological
Health of the Food and Drug
Administration
+ Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition of the Food and Drug
Administration
+ Health Care Financing
Administration
+ Maternal and Child Health Bureau
of the Health Resources and
Services Administration
+ Indian Health Service
+ Office of Minority Health of the
Public Health Service
+ National Institute on Alcoholism and
Alcohol Abuse
+ National Institute of Child Health
and Human Development
+ National Institute on Drug Abuse
+ National Institute of Mental Health
+ Food and Nutrition Service of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture
+ Texas Department of Health
Availability of Data and
Findings
A public-use data tape of the 1988
NMIHS, containing information from
the mothers’ questionnaires and vital
records, may be purchased from the
National Technical Information Service
(NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road,
Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 487-4650.
Previous NNS data tapes are also
available for purchase (6). Data from all
components of the survey are available
on CD-ROM from NCHS.
Design Specifications
Survey Objectives
T
he primary purpose of the
NMIHS was to collect data
needed by Federal, State, and
private researchers to study factors
related to low birthweight, fetal loss,
and infant death. Additional objectives
were to produce national estimates of
unique information not available on vital
records; facilitate surveillance, analytic,
and epidemiologic research using the
extensive information provided by
hundreds of new survey items; compare
the characteristics of live births, fetal
deaths, and infant deaths, and assess
demands on maternal and infant health
delivery systems; generate new direct
and standardized estimates for States
and local areas; and evaluate the quality
and completeness of information on
State vital records.
Domain and Precision
Specifications
The target population of the
NMIHS was registered births, late fetal
deaths (defined as 28 weeks gestation or
more), and infant deaths to mothers who
were residents of the United States in
1988. The live-birth and fetal-death
components were restricted to women
15 years of age or over, and the
infant-death component included women
under 15 years of age. States were asked
Page 2 [ Series 2, No. 125
to provide the sampled birth certificates,
reports of fetal death, and death
certificates for infants, along with the
corresponding birth certificates, to
NCHS.
Groups at risk for adverse
pregnancy outcomes were oversampled
in the NMIHS to increase the reliability
of estimates for these subdomains.
Table A presents the subdomains based
on child or fetus race and birthweight,
for which separate analyses can be
conducted. The NMIHS sample was
designed to have approximately equal
precision for each of the analytical
subdomains.
Sample sizes for the NMIHS were
based on precision requirements,
response rates from the 1980
NNS/NFMS, and budgetary resources.
NMIHS precision requirements were to
detect (a) with 80-percent confidence, a
15-percent difference (α = 0.05) in the
proportion of subdomains of live births
defined by infant’s birthweight and
mother’s race (and marital status for
black women) with a characteristic of
interest; (b) with 80-percent confidence,
a 15-percent difference (α = 0.05) in the
proportion of other subdomains of
approximately 160,000 live births or
larger with a characteristic of interest;
and (c) with 80-percent confidence, a
15-percent difference (α = 0.05) in the
proportion of subdomains of fetal deaths
and infant deaths of approximate size
1,500 grams or larger with a
characteristic of interest. The expected
and actual sample sizes in each
subdomain of the NMIHS are shown in
table B. The expected sample size was
10,000 in the live-birth component,
4,000 in the fetal-death component, and
6,000 in the infant-death component.
Black infants were oversampled in all
three components, and very
low-birthweight and moderately
low-birthweight infants were
oversampled in the live-birth
component. The actual sample sizes
were inflated to compensate for
projected nonresponse.
Operational Requirements
Mail questionnaires were to be sent
to mothers using names and addresses
from the vital record. Mothers not
responding to the mail questionnaire
could complete a telephone or personal
interview. Proxy interviews were not
accepted. Respondent burden was to be
held to a minimum.
Mothers were asked to provide
contact information for the hospital of
delivery, all hospitals where the mother
or baby were admitted before and after
delivery, and up to seven prenatal care
providers. Questionnaires were not to be
sent to medical sources unless the
mother signed a request statement
allowing hospitals and providers to
release medical information to NCHS.
It was expected that 77 percent of
mothers in the live-birth component and
75 percent of mothers in the fetal-death
and infant-death components would
respond to the questionnaire. The
expected response rate for hospitals was
87 percent for all three components.
Eighty percent of prenatal care providers
in the live-birth component and
75 percent of prenatal care providers in
the fetal-death and infant-death
components were expected to respond to
the questionnaire.
Sample Design
Summary
T
he NMIHS sample represents
women who had a live birth, fetal
death, or infant death in 1988.
The live-birth and fetal-death
components were restricted to women
15 years of age or over, and the
infant-death component included women
under 15 years of age. The NMIHS
drew stratified systematic samples from
live births and infant deaths that were
registered in 48 States, the District of
Columbia, and New York City in 1988;
and from fetal deaths that were
registered in 46 States, the District of
Columbia, and New York City in 1988.
Black infants were oversampled in the
Table A. Analytical subdomains classified by race and birth outcome in the 1988 National
Maternal and Infant Health Survey
Black
Other than black
Live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Live birth
Less than 1,500 grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less than 1,500 grams
1,500–2,499 grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,500–2,499 grams
2,500 grams or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,500 grams or more
Fetal death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fetal death
Infant death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Infant death
Table B. Expected and actual sample sizes, by race and birth outcome in the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey
Birth outcome
Black
Other than black
Number of
expected
respondents
Actual
sample
size
Number of
actual
respondents
Number of
expected
respondents
Actual
sample
size
Number of
actual
respondents
Live birth
Less than 1,500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
750
1,296
841
750
951
710
1,500–2,499 grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
750
1,194
803
750
938
714
2,500 grams or more . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,500
4,948
3,582
3,500
4,090
3,303
Fetal death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,000
2,624
1,297
2,000
2,149
2,012
Infant death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,000
4,532
2,770
3,000
3,634
2,562
Series 2, No. 125 [ Page 3
live-birth, fetal-death, and infant-death
components of the NMIHS, and very
low-birthweight (less than 1,500 grams)
and moderately low-birthweight
(1,500–2,499 grams) infants were
oversampled in the live-birth
component.
Although race of mother and father
are reported on the birth certificate,
tabulations are by race of child. Because
race of child is not reported directly on
the birth certificate, it was determined
for statistical purposes by an algorithm,
used at the time for the United States,
based on the information reported for
the mother and father. In cases of mixed
parentage, where one parent was white,
the child was assigned the race of the
other parent. When neither parent was
white, the child was assigned the race of
the father, with one exception: If either
parent was Hawaiian, the child was
assigned to Hawaiian.
Certain records of vital events
selected for the NMIHS were excluded
for a number of reasons. Vital events to
unmarried mothers in Arizona, Kansas,
and North Dakota were excluded. In
addition, registration areas had the
option of excluding births because of
privacy and confidentiality concerns.
Colorado, Oregon, and Washington
sought mothers’ permission to include
the vital records of their infants in the
NMIHS. Records were excluded if the
mother refused permission.
Survey Procedures
Sampling of Certificates of Vital
Events
The sampling frames for the
live-birth and infant-death components
of the NMIHS consisted of the files of
birth certificates and certificates of
infant death for all registration areas
except Montana and South Dakota.
Montana did not participate in the
survey because State clearance was not
received in time to sample certificates.
After providing a limited number of
certificates for inclusion in the survey,
South Dakota withdrew clearance
because of a State law that required the
attending physician’s approval for
release of the medical record. The
sampling frame for the fetal-death
component of the NMIHS consisted of
the file of reports of late fetal death for
all registration areas except Montana,
Michigan, New York State, and South
Dakota. State laws in Michigan and
New York State prohibit the provision
of reports of fetal death for followback
surveys; therefore, those States were
eliminated from the sampling frame for
the fetal-death component of the
NMIHS. The three sampling frames
included no records from Puerto Rico,
the Virgin Islands, or Guam.
Certificates of live birth, reports of
late fetal death, and certificates of infant
death to nonresidents of the United
States were excluded from their
respective sampling frames. Attempts
were made to exclude mothers under 15
years of age from the sampling frames;
however, maternal age is not reported
on certificates of infant death, and
corresponding birth certificates were not
available until after the sample was
drawn. A small percent of the
infant-death (0.5 percent) sampling
frame included women under 15 years
of age. To decrease the possibility of
overlap of the NMIHS with CDC’s
Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring
System (PRAMS), approximately
one-half of the certificates of live birth
and infant death were excluded from the
sampling frames for Maine, Michigan,
and West Virginia, which participated in
PRAMS. The District of Columbia,
Indiana, and Oklahoma sent all sample
certificates to NCHS rather than
one-half of the certificates as instructed;
weights were adjusted to account for
this sampling inconsistency. In the case
of Missouri, the live-birth and
infant-death sampling frames were
restricted to January 1 through June 30,
1988.
It is estimated that more than
99 percent of all live births and deaths
to infants that occurred in the United
States in 1988 were registered (7,8). The
number of fetal deaths that are not
registered is unknown (8), however,
underregistration is thought to increase
as gestational age decreases. The
NMIHS was designed to restrict fetal
deaths to 28 weeks gestation or more to
minimize the effect of underregistration.
The reporting of fetal deaths varies
by State or registration area, with some
reporting at all periods of gestation,
some 20 weeks gestation or more, and
some a combination of gestational age
and/or birthweight (8). Prior to selecting
the sample, approximately three in five
reports of fetal death with particular file
numbers assigned by the State or
registration area were requested by
NCHS for screening. A total of 23,483
records were screened for gestations of
28 completed weeks or more, based on
last menstrual period or physician’s
estimate of gestation. There were
instances where information on the final
fetal-death certificate differed from the
preliminary fetal-death certificate used
in screening. Of the 4,773 fetal deaths
sampled, 92 had gestational ages less
than 28 completed weeks, and 601 were
missing gestational age. These fetal
deaths should have been ineligible for
the NMIHS but were included in the
study. Gestational age was missing from
a total of 5,679 (19.3 percent) reports of
all fetal deaths in 1988 (8).
Within registration areas, sampling
strata were formed on the basis of
child’s or fetus’s race (black or other
than black), and in the live-birth
component, birthweight (less than 1,500
grams, 1,500–2,499 grams, 2,500 grams
or more). Table A presents the six
sampling subdomains in the live-birth
component and the two sampling
subdomains in the fetal-death and
infant-death components of the NMIHS.
Implicit stratification was employed to
ensure that samples were representative
with respect to maternal and infant
characteristics. Within each sampling
stratum in the live-birth and fetal-death
components, records were sorted by
mother’s marital status and age before
being selected for the sample. In the
infant-death component, records were
sorted by child’s sex and age at death
within each sampling stratum.
According to the vital registration
system for 1988, 4,234 certificates of
live birth lacked a response for
birthweight (7). In addition, data items
used to form poststratification cells may
have been missing because vital records
used to draw the NMIHS sample were
not imputed. The following conventions
were used when a data item used to
Page 4 [ Series 2, No. 125
sample the records was unknown:
child’s or fetus’s race was assigned to
other than black, birthweight was
assigned to 2,500 grams or more, and
marital status was assigned to married.
Values for mother’s age, child’s sex, and
infant age at death were randomly
assigned.
Sampling of certificates and reports
was without replacement, meaning that
each certificate or report was subjected
to sampling only once. However, the
infants of approximately 88 mothers
were sampled and appear in both the
live-birth and infant-death components.
Sequential file numbers are assigned to
each vital event within each State and
registration area. The registration areas
sent computer tapes of live births and
infant deaths to NCHS, which used
terminal digits of file numbers to select
the samples for those components.
Using information supplied by NCHS
following screening, State registrars
selected the sample of fetal deaths based
on the terminal digits of file numbers.
On average, 34 of every 10,000 birth
certificates, 3 of every 10 eligible
reports of fetal death, and 2 of every 10
death certificates for infants were
selected. In the case of fetal deaths, all
reports for black fetuses and 40 percent
of reports for fetuses other than black
were selected for the sample. The
registration areas sent copies of sample
records to NCHS for processing; in the
infant-death component, the
corresponding birth certificate was also
sent. The deadline for receipt of records
was October 30, 1989.
Table C presents the total number of
registered live births in the United
States in 1988 to women who were 15
years of age or over, the sample selected
for the NMIHS, the inverse of the
probability of selection, and average
weights in each sampling stratum. The
live-birth component of the NMIHS
consisted of 13,417 certificates of live
birth from a resident population of
3,898,922 live births (representing
approximately 1 in 291 live births). A
total of 10,588 births were excluded
from the 3,909,510 live births in 1988
because they were to mothers under 15
years of age (7). The resident population
of 3,898,922 live births includes births
occurring in Montana and South Dakota,
which were excluded from the sampling
frame. The lower inverse of the
probability of selection in categories of
black persons and in very low- and
moderately low-birthweight categories
reflects the oversampling by race and
birthweight in the live-birth component.
Table D presents the total number
of registered late fetal deaths in the
United States in 1988 to women who
were 15 years of age or over, the
sample selected for the NMIHS, the
inverse of the probability of selection,
and average weights in each sampling
stratum. The fetal-death component of
the NMIHS consisted of 4,773 reports
of fetal death of 28 weeks gestation or
more from a resident population of
15,259 reports of fetal death
(representing approximately 1 in 3 late
fetal deaths). The resident population of
15,259 late fetal deaths includes those
occurring in Montana, South Dakota,
Table C. Total number of resident live births to women 15 years of age or over in the United States in 1988, number of fetal deaths included
in the sample for the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey, inverse of probability of selection, and average weights by race and
birthweight
Race and birthweight
Resodemt
live births
1
Sample
size
Inverse of
probability
of selection
Average
weight
2
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,898,922
13,417
. . .
. . .
Black
Less than 1,500 grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18,403
1,296
14
21.8822611
1,500–2,499 grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
67,651
194
55
84.24777
2,500 grams or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
579,740
4,948
113
161.8481219
Other than black
Less than 1,500 grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29,815
951
29
41.9928622
1,500–2,499 grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
153,379
938
160
214.8166309
2,500 grams or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,049,934
4,090
720
923.3830125
. . . Category not applicable.
1
The total number of resident live births to women 15 years or over in the United States in 1988 includes births occurring in Montana and South Dakota, which were excluded from the sampling frame.
2
The average weight is the weight after adjustment for selection probabilities, nonresponse, and poststratification for each sampling subdomain.
Table D. Total number of resident fetal deaths to women 15 years of age or over in the United States in 1988, number of fetal deaths
included in the sample for the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey, inverse of probability of selection, and average weights by
race
Race
Resident
fetal deaths
1
Sample
size
Inverse of
probability
of selection
Average
weight
2
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15,259
4,773
88
88
Black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,850
1,230
1.67
2.9894527
Other than black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11,409
2,079
3.7
5.5709367
1
The total number of resident fetal deaths to women 15 years or over in the United States in 1988 includes fetal deaths occurring in Michigan, Montana, New York City, and South Dakota, which were
excluded from the sampling frame.
2
The average weight is the weight after adjustment for selection probabilities, nonresponse, and poststratification for each sampling subdomain.
Series 2, No. 125 [ Page 5
Michigan, and New York City, which
were excluded from the sampling frame.
Black births were oversampled in the
fetal-death component of the NMIHS,
reflected in the lower inverse of the
probability of selection.
Table E presents the total number of
registered infant deaths in the United
States in 1988, the sample selected for
the NMIHS, the inverse of the
probability of selection, and average
weights in each sampling stratum. The
infant-death component of the NMIHS
consisted of 8,166 death certificates for
infants from a resident population of
38,917 infant death certificates
(representing approximately 1 in 5
infant deaths). The actual population of
1988 infant deaths was 38,910 (8),
slightly less than the 38,917 in table E.
The resident population in table E was
based on the projected number of infant
deaths, which accounts for this
discrepancy. The resident population of
38,917 infant deaths includes those
occurring in Montana and South Dakota,
which were excluded from the sampling
frame. Again, the lower inverse of the
probability of selection in black
categories reflects the oversampling in
this group in the infant-death
component.
Certain records of vital events
selected for the NMIHS were excluded.
Arizona, Kansas, and North Dakota
excluded the vital events to unmarried
mothers selected for the NMIHS.
Colorado, Oregon, and Washington
excluded the vital events of mothers
who refused to have their infants
included in the NMIHS.
Sources of Information
Vital Records
The content of birth certificates
varies somewhat by registration area but
generally conforms to the U.S. Standard
Certificate of Live Birth. Table F shows
the data items that vary among the
registration areas. Information on
demographic characteristics of the
parents, pregnancy history,
characteristics of the newborn, and other
items was coded from the birth
certificate as part of the data record for
each NMIHS live birth. Information
concerning complications of pregnancy,
labor, and delivery was not coded
because the format for reporting these
items differed among registration areas.
The content of reports of fetal death
also varies somewhat by registration
area but generally conforms to the U.S.
Standard Report of Fetal Death. Table G
shows the data items that vary among
registration areas. Information on
demographic characteristics of the
parents and pregnancy history was
coded in the same format as the birth
certificate as part of the data record for
each NMIHS fetal death. Information
concerning when the fetus died, cause of
fetal death, and whether an autopsy was
performed was not coded.
The content of death certificates for
infants also varies somewhat by
registration area but generally conforms
to the U.S. Standard Certificate of
Death. Table H shows the data items
that vary among registration areas.
Information on demographic
characteristics of the decedent,
underlying cause of death, and multiple
cause-of-death conditions was coded
from the death certificate as part of the
data record for each NMIHS infant
death.
Mothers
Names and address from the vital
record were used to mail questionnaires
to mothers. The mother’s questionnaire
supplemented the vital record with
information on social and demographic
characteristics of the parents and timing
and content of prenatal care. Each
mother was asked to provide names and
addresses for her hospital of delivery, all
hospitals where she or the baby was
admitted before and after delivery, and
up to seven prenatal care providers. In
addition, mothers were asked to sign a
request statement authorizing her
hospitals and prenatal care providers to
release medical information to NCHS.
Medical-source questionnaires were not
mailed if mothers refused to release
their medical records to NCHS.
Hospitals and Prenatal Care
Providers
Using names and addresses supplied
by the mother, questionnaires were
mailed to hospitals and prenatal care
providers to obtain additional
information concerning labor and
delivery, the health of the mother and
infant, and prenatal care. Separate
prenatal care questionnaires were not
mailed for mothers who indicated they
received their prenatal care from a
hospital because this information would
be available from the hospital
questionnaire. If prenatal care providers
sent the prenatal record to the hospital
prior to delivery, information on prenatal
Table E. Total number of resident infant deaths to women 15 years of age or over in the United States in 1988, number of fetal deaths
included in the sample for the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey, inverse of probability of selection, and average weights by
race
Race
Resident
fetal deaths
1
Sample
size
Inverse of
probability
of selection
Average
weight
2
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
38,917
8,166
. . .
. . .
Black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11,840
4,532
2.56
4.2743695
Other than black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27,077
3,634
7.36
10.5687115
. . . Category not applicable.
1
The total number of resident infant deaths in the United States in 1988 includes infant deaths occurring in Montana and South Dakota, which were excluded from the sampling frame.
2
The average weight is the weight after adjustment for selection probabilities, nonresponse, and poststratification for each sampling subdomain.
Page 6 [ Series 2, No. 125
care was available from both sources.
Data from these and other prenatal care
sources were unduplicated and
combined to form a single prenatal care
record.
Number of Sources in the
NMIHS
Information from 13,417 certificates
of live birth, 4,773 reports of fetal
death, and 8,166 death certificates for
infants was used to mail questionnaires
to mothers (table J). Of the potential
13,417 mothers who had live births,
4,773 mothers who had late fetal deaths,
and 8,166 mothers who had infant
deaths, a total of 9,953 mothers
Table F. Areas reporting selected items on the certificate of live birth for each State, 1988
Area
Marital
status
of mother
Educational
attainment
of parents
Ethnic
origin
Hispanic
origin
Dates of
last live
birth and
other
terminations
‘‘Other’’
terminations
less than
20 weeks
and 20 weeks
or more
Date last
normal
menstrual
period
began
Number of
prenatal
visits
1-minute
Apgar
score
5-minute
Apgar
score
Complica-
tions of
pregnancy
Complica-
tions of
labor
Congenital
anomalies
Alabama . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X**/***
X***
X***
Alaska . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Arizona . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Arkansas . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
California . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Colorado . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Connecticut . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X**/***
X***
X***
Delaware . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
District of Columbia . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Florida . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Georgia . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Hawaii . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X**/***
X***
X***
Idaho . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Illinois . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Indiana . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X**/***
X***
X***
Iowa . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Kansas . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Kentucky . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X**/***
X***
X***
Louisana . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Maine . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X**/***
X***
X***
Maryland . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Massachusetts . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Michigan . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Minnesota . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Mississippi . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Missouri . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Montana . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X**/***
X***
X***
Nebraska . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Nevada . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X**/***
X***
X***
New Hampshire . . . .
X
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X**/***
X***
X***
New Jersey . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
New Mexico . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
New York City . . . . .
X
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X**/***
X***
New York State . . . .
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X**/***
X***
North Carolina . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X**/***
X***
X***
North Dakota . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Ohio . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Oklahoma . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Oregon . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pennsylvania . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Rhode Island . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
South Carolina . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
South Dakota . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Tennessee . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Texas . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Utah . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Vermont . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Virginia . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Washington . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
West Virginia . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Wisconsin . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Wyoming . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
*Reported ‘‘other terminations’’ as spontaneous and induced at any time after conception.
**Reported complications of pregnancy as medical risk factors for this pregnancy.
*** Used checkbox format.
Series 2, No. 125 [ Page 7
(74.2 percent) who had live births, 3,309
mothers (69.3 percent) who had late
fetal deaths, and 5,332 mothers
(65.3 percent) who had infant deaths
responded to the questionnaire. Also,
9,296 responding mothers (93.4 percent)
who had live births, 3,092 responding
mothers (93.4 percent) who had late
fetal deaths, and 4,954 responding
mothers (92.9 percent) who had infant
deaths signed the request statement
permitting contact with their hospitals
and providers.
Not all mothers who signed the
request statement provided names and
Table G. Areas reporting selected items on the report of fetal death for each State, 1988
Area
Marital
status
of mother
Education
of father
Education
of mother
Date last
normal
menstrual
period
began
Month
prenatal
care
began
Number of
prenatal
visits
‘‘Other’’
terminations
less than
20 weeks
and 20 weeks
or more
Complica-
tions of
pregnancy
Complica-
tions of
labor
Physician’s
estimate
of gestation
Congenital
anomalies
Alabama . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X**/***
X***
X
X
Alaska . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Arizona . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Arkansas . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
California . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Colorado . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Connecticut . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X**/***
X***
X
X
Delaware . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
District of Columibia . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Florida . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Georgia . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Hawaii . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X
Idaho . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Indiana . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X**/***
X***
X
X
Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Kansas . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Kentucky . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X**/***
X***
X
X
Louisana . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Maine . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X**/***
X***
X
X
Maryland . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Massachusetts . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Michigan . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Minnesota . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Mississippi . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Missouri . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Montana . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X**/***
X***
X
X
Nebraska . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Nevada . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X**/***
X***
X
X
New Hampshire . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X**/***
X***
X
X
New Jersey . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
New Mexico . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
New York City . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X**/***
X***
X
New York State . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X**/***
X***
X
North Carolina . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X**/***
X***
X
X
North Dakota . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Oregon . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pennsylvania . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Rhode Island . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
South Carolina . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
South Dakota . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Tennessee . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Texas . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Utah . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Vermont . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Virginia . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Washington . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
West Virginia . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Wyoming . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
*Reported ‘‘other terminations’’ as spontaneous and induced at any time after conception.
**Reported as medical risk factors for this pregnancy.
***Used checkbox format.
Page 8 [ Series 2, No. 125
addresses for their hospital of delivery:
8,916 responding mothers (89.6 percent)
who had live births, 2,928 responding
mothers (88.5 percent) who had late
fetal deaths, and 4,704 responding
mothers (88.2 percent) who had infant
deaths. Less then one-fourth of mothers
identified a hospital where they were
admitted prior to delivery, ranging from
15.1 percent (500 responding mothers)
in the fetal-death component to
22.5 percent in the infant-death
component (1,198 responding mothers).
The percentage of mothers who reported
a postnatal or infant hospitalization was
very low.
Fewer mothers supplied contact
information for primary prenatal care
providers: 86.4 percent (8,603
responding mothers) in the live-birth
component, 84.9 percent (2,809
responding mothers) in the fetal-death
component, and 82.0 percent (4,373
responding mothers) in the infant-death
component. Almost one-fourth of
mothers identified a secondary prenatal
care provider, ranging from 24.1 percent
(2,396 responding mothers) in the
live-birth component to 27.0 percent
(1,439 responding mothers) in the
infant-death component. Very few
mothers identified more than two
prenatal care providers.
Questionnaires
The same mother’s questionnaire
was used for all three components in the
NMIHS; similarly, the medical-source
questionnaires did not differ among
outcomes. Similar cover letters were
used for medical sources in the NMIHS.
Two approaches for contacting mother’s
were used, but the cover letter for
mothers differed, depending on the
approach used. In the direct approach,
the infant’s name and date of delivery
were stamped on the questionnaire
(form NMIHS-1). In the indirect
approach, the mother was asked to
provide the infant’s name and date of
delivery if she had a live birth, stillbirth,
or infant who died before 1 year of age
in 1988 (form NMIHS-2).
A pretest of the NMIHS was
conducted in 1987 and was based on
247 live births, 127 fetal deaths, and
201 infant deaths that occurred in
Arkansas, Michigan, Tennessee, and
Wisconsin. It was designed to test data
collection instruments and methods,
particularly the direct and indirect
approaches for contacting mothers (9).
The States were given the decision
to use the direct or indirect approach for
contacting mothers, and in the main
survey, the majority of States used the
direct approach. Delaware and New
Mexico used the indirect approach for
all mothers; Maine, New Hampshire,
Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island used the
indirect approach for unmarried
mothers; and Washington and Texas
used the indirect approach for unmarried
mothers under 18 years of age.
Table H. Areas reporting selected items on the certificate of infant death: Each State, 1988
Area
Hispanic
origin
State of
birth
Underlying
cause of
death
Was autopsy
performed
Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Alaska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Arkansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
District of Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Hawaii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Idaho . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Louisana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Maine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Montana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Nebraska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
New Hampshire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
New Jersey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
New Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
New York State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Rhode Island . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
South Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Tennessee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Utah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Vermont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
West Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Series 2, No. 125 [ Page 9
Mother’s Questionnaire
The mother’s questionnaire included
questions about prenatal care and health
habits, delivery of the baby,
hospitalizations before and after
delivery, previous and subsequent
pregnancies, socioeconomic
characteristics of the parents, and the
baby’s health through 6 months of age.
Women who had a fetal death were
instructed to skip the section on baby’s
health. The wording of questions for
mothers who had suffered a fetal or
infant loss was given special attention in
the NCHS National Laboratory for
Cognition and Survey Methodology
Measurement. Participants in the U.S.
Department of Agriculture’s Women,
Infants, and Children (WIC) program
were recruited to test the questionnaire.
A support group of mothers who had a
miscarriage, stillbirth, or infant death
provided insight on the sensitivity of the
questionnaires and accompanying
brochure. Interviewers received
sensitivity training from a social worker
who specialized in grief therapy.
Mothers were mailed an NMIHS-1
(direct approach) or NMIHS-2 (indirect
approach) questionnaire. Followup
attempts for nonresponse included a
postcard reminder, a second mailing of
the questionnaire, and then contact by
an interviewer for a telephone or
personal interview (form NMIHS-3).
The only difference between form
NMIHS-3 and forms NMIHS-1/2 was
the prompts for use by interviewers.
In the 1980 NNS/NFMS, request
statements were routinely included in
questionnaires sent to medical sources
and were effective in increasing
response rates (4). Similarly, in the
NMIHS, mothers completing the
questionnaire were asked to sign the
following request statement:
I request my hospitals, doctors, and
other medical care providers to release
information about me and my baby,
including costs of care, from the time
my pregnancy began through today’s
date. I understand that the National
Center for Health Statistics will use this
information only for statistical purposes
in health research, and no information
which identifies me, my baby, my
hospitals, my doctors or other medical
care providers will ever be released or
published. This request expires one year
from date of signature, unless I tell you
otherwise.
Mothers who completed telephone
interviews were read the request
statement, along with this question: ‘‘Do
you agree with the request statement
which I just read?’’ Interviewers signed
and dated ‘‘proxy request statements’’
for mothers who agreed. In the 1980
NNS/NFMS, medical sources were less
likely to provide medical information
when proxy request statements were
provided (4). Therefore, mothers were
sent a copy of the request statement to
obtain an original signature.
Hospital Questionnaire
The hospital questionnaire (form
NMIHS-4) provided information on
prenatal care; hospitalizations before,
during, and after the delivery; health
status and care of the infant; and infant
rehospitalizations after the delivery.
Questions about gestational age, birth
length and weight, Apgar scores, and
congenital anomalies were included. The
prenatal care section of the hospital
questionnaire was identical to the
prenatal care provider questionnaire
described later. Medical records
administrators assisted in the
reorganization of the hospital
questionnaire to make it easier for
medical records personnel to complete.
Prenatal Care Provider Questionnaire
The prenatal care provider
questionnaire (form NMIHS-5) sought
information on the care mothers
received during their pregnancy,
including chorionic villus sampling,
amniocentesis, sonograms, and other x
rays. Providers were asked to record
values for weight, blood pressure,
hematocrit/hemoglobin, and urine
glucose/protein at each prenatal and
postnatal visit. Obstetricians reviewed
the prenatal care questionnaire.
Collection of Survey Data
Contacting Mothers
NCHS contracted with the U.S.
Bureau of the Census to collect NMIHS
data from mothers between January
1989 and August 1990. Mothers were
sent a questionnaire with its
accompanying cover letter
(NMIHS-1/2), a brochure, and a prepaid
return envelope. The brochure
emphasized the importance of the
survey, described its voluntary and
confidential nature, and stressed that the
mother’s participation could provide
information that might help other
Table J. Number of potential sources of information in the 1988 National Maternal and
Infant Health Survey, by type of source and birth outcome
Source
Birth outcome
Live birth
Fetal
death
Infant
death
Vital records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13,417
4,773
8,166
Respondent mothers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,953
3,309
5,332
Signed request statement . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,296
3,092
4,954
Provided hospital(s) contact information
Delivery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,916
2,928
4,704
Prenatal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,742
500
1,198
Postnatal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
491
248
412
First infant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
397
N/A
269
Second infant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
895
N/A
447
Third infant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
256
N/A
206
Provided prenatal care provider(s)
Contact information
Primary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,603
2,809
4,373
Second . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,396
937
1,439
Third . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
463
198
319
Fourth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27
15
26
Fifth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
5
3
Sixth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
0
1
Seventh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
0
0
Page 10 [ Series 2, No. 125
women. Mothers were offered
informational pamphlets on a variety of
topics, ranging from prenatal care to
breastfeeding to dealing with grief. The
brochure included a toll-free telephone
number, in English and Spanish, to
allow mothers to call NCHS and
complete the questionnaire by telephone.
An NCHS interviewer conducted
Spanish interviews over the telephone.
To minimize problems of recall,
questionnaires were mailed as soon as
possible after the vital event. The mean
interval between delivery and interview
was 17 months for the live-birth
component, 16 months for the
fetal-death component, and 19 months
for the infant-death component. The
mean interval between death and
interview was 17 months for the
infant-death component.
When questionnaires were returned
by the post office as undeliverable, an
attempt was made to obtain an address
from the hospital to remail the
questionnaire. Followup attempts for
nonresponse to the first mailing included
a reminder postcard after 7 days and a
second mailing of the questionnaire after
4 weeks. Mothers who did not respond
within 2 months of the initial mailing
were contacted to schedule a telephone
or personal interview. When telephone
numbers were available, telephone
interviews were attempted; otherwise,
interviewers tried to locate mothers to
conduct personal interviews. Proxy
interviews were not accepted.
No further attempts were made to
contact mothers who refused to
participate in the survey. Completed
questionnaires were manually edited and
mothers were recontacted by telephone
to obtain missing information. Copies
were made of original and proxy request
statements for inclusion in the
questionnaires mailed to medical
sources.
The response rates for mothers in
the live-birth, fetal-death, and
infant-death components are presented
in table K. Mothers were considered
respondents if they provided at least
some of the information requested.
Seventy-four percent of mothers in the
live-birth component, 69.3 percent of
mothers in the fetal-death component,
and 65.3 percent of mothers in the
infant-death component were classified
as respondents. Mothers in the
fetal-death component were more likely
to respond to a first or second mailing
(34.9 percent) than were other mothers,
and mothers in the live-birth component
were more likely to complete a
telephone or personal interview
(41.0 percent).
The percent of nonrespondents
ranged from 25.8 percent of mothers in
the live-birth component to 34.7 percent
of mothers in the infant-death
component. Reasons for nonresponse
differed among the three components.
Interviewers were unable to locate or
could not contact 16.1 percent of
mothers in the live-birth component,
17.8 percent of mothers in the
fetal-death component, and 18.7 percent
of mothers in the infant-death
component. The largest percentage of
women who refused to participate were
mothers in the fetal-death component
(8.3 percent), followed by mothers in the
infant-death component (6.9 percent),
and by mothers in the live-birth
component (3.9 percent). Additional
reasons for nonresponse in order of
frequency included certificate excluded
by State, other noninterview,
nonresident, mother claims no
pregnancy, mother deceased, mother
gave baby up for adoption, multiple
birth duplicate, and not biological
mother.
Contacting Hospitals and Prenatal
Care Providers
Using names and addresses supplied
by the mother, U.S. Bureau of the
Census staff mailed questionnaires to
hospitals and prenatal care providers
between June 1989 and May 1991.
Hospital addresses were verified using
American Hospital Association
identification numbers, and medical
directories were used to check prenatal
care provider addresses. Medical sources
were sent a hospital or prenatal care
provider questionnaire with its cover
letter, a brochure, a prepaid return
envelope, and a copy of the mother’s
original or proxy request statement in
batches. A cover letter and brochure
were sent to hospital administrators, in
addition to medical records directors,
with the first batch of questionnaires.
The brochure emphasized the survey’s
importance, its confidentiality, and its
endorsement by professional
associations. Hospitals and providers
were offered publications from the 1980
NNS/NFMS.
Interviewers attempted to locate
new addresses and remail questionnaires
that were returned by the post office as
undeliverable. Hospitals and prenatal
care providers who did not respond
within 6 weeks were mailed a second
questionnaire. Nonrespondents to the
second mailing received telephone
reminders at 9 and 11 weeks after the
initial mailing. Hospitals that did not
respond to the telephone reminders were
called a third time by the American
Health Information Management
Table K. Number and percent distribution of mothers in the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey, according to response status
Birth outcome
Respondents
Non-
respondents
Number
Total
Reponse status
All
responses
First
mailing
Second
mailing
Personal
Telephone
Percent distribution
Live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13,417.0
100.0
74.2
22.7
7.8
21.1
19.9
25.8
Fetal death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,773.0
100.0
69.3
25.5
9.4
16.8
15.8
30.7
Infant death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,166.0
100.0
65.3
20.4
7.1
19.5
16.0
34.7
Series 2, No. 125 [ Page 11
Association (AHIMA) and were
remailed a questionnaire if necessary.
AHIMA reminders increased the
NMIHS pretest hospital response rate
from 75.2 percent to 93.0 percent (10).
Hospitals and prenatal care
providers had the option of completing
the questionnaire themselves or partially
completing the questionnaire and
returning it with photocopies of the
medical records for the mother and
infant. Medical sources were
remunerated for completing the
questionnaire or photocopying the
medical record. NCHS contracted with
AHIMA to transcribe photocopied
medical records onto the questionnaires
and to verify the ICD–9–CM coding on
questionnaires completed by hospitals
(1). The prenatal care provider
questionnaire requested information on
prenatal procedures. AHIMA did not
verify coding on this questionnaire.
Between October 1989 and July 1991,
AHIMA transcribed 56.0 percent of all
hospital questionnaires and 26.9 percent
of all provider questionnaires. The
remaining 44.0 percent of hospital
questionnaires were verified for
ICD–9–CM coding; the ICD–9–CM
coding on prenatal care provider
questionnaires completed by the
providers was not verified. AHIMA
developed a procedure manual and
quality control system to ensure the
accuracy of these data.
No further attempt was made to
contact medical sources who refused to
participate in the survey or who
indicated that they had no record of the
patient. Completed questionnaires were
manually edited, and hospitals or
prenatal care providers were recontacted
by mail to obtain missing information.
In addition to the hospital of delivery,
each mother was asked to identify the
hospitals where she was admitted
prenatally and/or postnatally, and up to
three hospitals where the infant was
admitted prior to 6 months of age.
Along with the primary prenatal care
provider, mothers could identify an
additional six prenatal care providers.
Data from all these sources were
unduplicated and combined to form a
single medical-source record.
The response rates for hospitals and
primary prenatal care providers are
shown in table L. In calculating
medical-source response rates for the
1980 NNS/NFMS, the numerator was
the total number of questionnaires
received, and the denominator was the
total number of questionnaires mailed
(4). The 1988 NMIHS medical-source
response rates were calculated
differently, by combining information
from multiple sources for each mother
and dividing that number by the total
number of mothers who signed request
statements. This calculation focuses on
the percent of mothers about whom
some information from the providers
was available as opposed to the rate at
which all contacted providers returned
records.
The response rates for hospitals of
delivery were similar in all three
components, ranging from 75.5 percent
for mothers in the live-birth component
to 73.2 percent for mothers in the
infant-death component. Multiplying
these response rates by the percentage
of mothers signing request statements
gives us the percentage of mothers for
whom hospital of delivery information
is available: 70.5 percent for mothers in
the live-birth component, 69.3 percent
for mothers in the fetal-death
component, and 65.6 percent for mothers
in the infant-death component. The
largest percentage of primary prenatal
care respondents was in the live-birth
component (56.9 percent), followed by
mothers in the fetal-death component
(55.4 percent), and by mothers in the
infant-death component (49.8 percent).
Multiplying these response rates by the
percent of mothers signing request
statements gives us the percent of
mothers for whom prenatal care
information is available: 53.1 percent for
mothers in the live-birth component,
51.7 percent for mothers in the
fetal-death component, and 44.6 percent
for mothers in the infant-death
component.
Reasons for nonresponse among
hospitals were similar for all three
components and included refusal
(8.0 percent), no response (9.3 percent),
and no hospital reported (2.6 percent).
Reasons for nonresponse in primary
prenatal care providers were similar
among components, including no
response (19.1 percent), refusal
(5.5 percent), and no provider reported
(5.5 percent). Additional reasons for
hospital and primary prenatal care
provider nonresponse included no record
of patient, not included in
hospital/provider phase-address or
request problem, unable to locate, no
records of patients or records not
available, duplicate record with different
identification number, not a hospital or
provider, responded for wrong
pregnancy, and untranscribed medical
record.
Data Processing and
Imputation
The units of observation in the
NMIHS are individual live births, fetal
deaths, and infant deaths. Each record
includes information from a certificate
of live birth, report of fetal death, or
death certificate for infants with the
accompanying birth certificate; and
information from the mother, hospital,
Table L. Number of mothers who signed request statements and percent of mothers for
whom data were available from hospitals and prenatal care providers in the 1988 National
Maternal and Infant Health Survey
Birth outcome
Number
Percent of
mothers
Live birth
Hospitals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,296
75.5
Primary prenatal care providers . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,296
56.9
Fetal death
Hospitals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,092
74.2
Primary prenatal care providers . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,092
55.4
Infant death
Hospitals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,954
73.2
Primary prenatal care providers . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,954
49.8
NOTE: Percent of mothers with data available was calculated by combining information from multiple medical sources for each
mother and dividing that number by the total number of mothers who signed request statements.
Page 12 [ Series 2, No. 125
and prenatal care provider
questionnaires.
Processing of Vital Records
The ‘‘Vital Statistics Classification
and Coding Instructions for Live Birth
Records, 1988,’’ NCHS Instruction
Manual, Part 3a, was used to classify
and code information from certificates
of live birth. Similarly, the ‘‘Vital
Statistics Classification and Coding
Instructions for Fetal Death Records,
1988; NCHS Instruction Manual, Part
3b, was used to classify and code
information from reports of fetal death,
and the ‘‘Vital Statistics Classification
and Coding Instructions for Death
Records, 1988, NCHS Instruction
Manual, Part 2a, was used to classify
and code information from death
certificates for infants. Vital record data
were keyed by NCHS with 100-percent
verification.
Vital record data were missing
when the information was not provided
or when the data item was not included
on the vital record used by the
registration area (see tables F, G, and
H). Invalid values were outside the
range of acceptable values for each data
item. Missing and invalid data, termed
‘‘item nonresponses,’’ are normally
imputed on the vital record. Imputation
is the replacement of an item
nonresponse with actual data from a
similar respondent. Vital record data
included in the NMIHS were not
imputed prior to sampling. If data items
used to obtain the samples were
missing, values were randomly assigned.
Other vital record data items that were
missing or invalid were assigned
missing value codes.
Two certificates of live birth, 42
reports of fetal death, and 1,356
corresponding birth certificates for
infants in the infant-death component
were missing because the States did not
send certificates or reports to NCHS.
Future releases of the NMIHS public
use data will be matched to the 1988
birth cohort of NCHS’s Linked
Birth/Infant Death File to locate the
missing birth certificates for infants in
the infant-death component.
The infant-death certificate and
mother’s questionnaire were used to
build 1,356 substitute birth certificates
consisting of the following variables:
child’s sex, father’s race, mother’s race,
child’s race, mother’s age, father’s age,
birthweight, plurality, mother’s
education, father’s education, marital
status, month prenatal care began, and
total number of prenatal visits. There
was no question on the mother’s
questionnaire concerning infant
birthweight; therefore, the infant’s
gestational age as reported by the
mother was used to infer birthweight;
preterm was defined as less than 2,500
grams, and term/postterm was defined as
2,500 grams or more. Schoendorf et al.
(11) reported greater than 80-percent
agreement between the birth certificate
and mother’s questionnaire for all of
these variables except father’s age,
month prenatal care began, and total
number of prenatal visits. Similar
procedures were used to build reports of
fetal death for the 42 missing vital
records. A flag (location 5692) indicates
whether the vital record was built.
Date of last menstrual period, often
used to determine gestational age, was
missing or incomplete on 19.9 percent
of vital records. When last-menstrual-
period date was missing on the vital
record, four different methods were used
to assign a date for those mothers who
had signed a request statement. Data
from the hospital or provider do not
appear on this version of the NMIHS
public use file but were available
in-house for calculating the date.
Preference was given to
last-menstrual-period date available from
the hospital or provider. The next three
methods used gestational age to
compute date of last menstrual period:
gestational age available from the
hospital or provider, physician’s
estimate of gestation available from the
report of fetal death, or an estimate of
gestation from the mother’s
questionnaire. This procedure reduced
the percent of vital records missing date
of last menstrual period to 3.9 percent.
The percents of missing-last-menstrual-
period dates assigned using each method
were date available from hospital or
provider (74.5 percent), gestational age
available from hospital or provider
(21.4 percent), physician’s estimate of
gestation available from report of fetal
death (0.5 percent), and estimate of
gestation from the mother’s
questionnaire (3.6 percent). It should be
noted that this method of assigning
last-menstrual-period date differs from
the method used to impute gestational
age on NCHS’s Natality Files and
Linked Birth/Infant Death Files, which
require valid month and year of
last-menstrual-period date and birth, and
infant’s race and birthweight. A flag
(location 4269) indicates which method
was used to assign date of last
menstrual period.
Processing of Mother’s
Questionnaire
Completed mothers’ questionnaires
were keyed on magnetic tape with
100-percent verification. Duplicate
questionnaires were rejected, and range
and consistency checks were done.
Range checks identified responses that
were outside an acceptable range of
values. Consistency checks were
designed to ensure that responses to
related questions were internally
consistent. For example, a mother’s
response about the content of her
prenatal visits was compared with her
response on whether she received
prenatal care. Inconsistent responses
were either recoded with appropriate
values or treated as item nonresponses.
Data from the mother’s questionnaire
were merged with the corresponding
vital record(s).
Item nonresponses on the mother’s
questionnaire were replaced, using a
‘‘hot-deck imputation’’ procedure. This
type of imputation procedure replaces an
item nonresponse with an appropriate
value from a previous record in the file.
Predictor items were selected to ensure
that the characteristics of the donor were
similar to those of the respondent with
the item nonresponse: marital status,
mother’s age, race, and (in the live-birth
component) birthweight. Imputations
were done separately in the three
components. The data files for live
births, fetal deaths, and infant deaths
were randomly sorted within strata, and
Series 2, No. 125 [ Page 13
information from the previous record in
the file with similar predictor values was
assigned to the current record.
A total of 461 variables was
imputed in the NMIHS. Of these, 299
were imputed in less than 1 percent of
cases, 68 were imputed in 1–2 percent
of cases, 71 were imputed in
2–5 percent of cases, 14 were imputed
in 5–10 percent of cases, and 9 were
imputed in more than 10 percent of
cases. The nine variables that were
imputed in more than 10 percent of
cases are listed in table M. Data items
that were imputed were flagged.
In the NMIHS, the live-birth and
infant-death samples were not
independent, and a small number of
records appeared in both components.
Mothers who were sampled in both the
live-birth and infant-death components
were mailed a questionnaire for either,
but not both, occurrences. Following
imputation, her completed questionnaire
was copied from the live-birth
component into the infant-death
component or vice versa. Researchers
should use caution when combining the
live-birth and infant-death components
for analysis.
Processing of Hospital and
Prenatal Care Provider
Questionnaires
Hospital and prenatal care provider
questionnaires were keyed on magnetic
tape with 100-percent verification, and
duplicate records were deleted. The
consistency between prenatal visit dates,
date of admission, and date of delivery
was checked to ensure that the hospital
provided the medical record for the
correct pregnancy. Records were deleted
if a prenatal visit date preceded the date
of delivery by more than 10 months, or
the hospital delivery date differed from
the vital record delivery date by more
than 5 days, or the date of admission for
delivery differed from the vital record
delivery date by more than 35 days. The
questionnaires underwent range,
consistency, and blanking edits similar
to those used for the mother’s
questionnaire. Item nonresponses were
not imputed on medical-source
questionnaires.
Questionnaires returned by hospitals
of delivery, hospitals where the mother
or infant was admitted, and prenatal care
providers were combined to produce a
single data record for each respondent
mother. If prenatal care providers sent
the prenatal record to the hospital prior
to delivery, prenatal care information
was available from both sources.
Mothers could identify up to six
prenatal providers, in addition to the
primary prenatal care provider.
Therefore, prenatal care data may have
been provided by a maximum of eight
different sources (hospital of delivery
and up to seven prenatal care providers).
Prenatal care information from all
prenatal sources was merged
sequentially by date of visit to form a
single ‘‘amalgamated’’ prenatal care
record. If there was only one source for
a particular data item, the value was
copied ‘‘as is’’ on the amalgamated
prenatal record. When more than one
source provided a response for a
particular item, data items were
compared to determine the most
appropriate entry for the amalgamated
record. For example, if multiple sources
reported the same date for a prenatal
visit, information from one of these
sources was retained. Preference for
ordering multiple sources was given to
the primary prenatal care provider,
followed by the hospital of delivery and,
lastly, subsequent prenatal care
providers. A reporting flag identifies
those medical sources that provided
each prenatal care data item.
Medical-source information was
then merged with the vital record and
mother’s questionnaire. If no medical
sources provided information for a
respondent mother, her record consisted
of the vital record and mother’s
questionnaire only. Similarly, a
respondent mother’s record may have
included the hospital-of-delivery
questionnaire and the amalgamated
prenatal care record, merged with the
vital record and mother questionnaire.
Consistency Between Responses
Many data items were available
from more than one source. Mother’s
education was present on the vital
record and the mother’s questionnaire.
Mothers may have completed an
additional year of school between the
time they delivered and completed the
questionnaire. Mother’s prepregnant
weight was available from the mother’s
questionnaire and the prenatal care
questionnaire. Self-reported prepregnant
weight may have differed significantly
from the prepregnant weight reported by
her provider. Inconsistencies between
different sources were inevitable and
were not adjusted.
Estimation
The NMIHS was designed to make
inferences about registered births and
late fetal deaths to mothers who were
residents of the United States and were
15 years of age or over in 1988, and
about infant deaths to mothers who were
residents of the United States in 1988.
The NMIHS was based on probability
samples of vital events that occurred in
the United States in 1988; therefore,
data can be weighted to produce
national estimates. Each mother who
responded to the questionnaire received
a final weight that permits estimation of
population totals. Nonrespondents to the
mother’s questionnaire were assigned a
final weight of zero. Weights were
calculated including live births and
infant deaths occurring in Montana and
South Dakota, and fetal deaths occurring
in Michigan, Montana, New York City,
and South Dakota, which were excluded
from the sampling frame.
There were six sampling
subdomains in the live-birth component
and two sampling subdomains in the
fetal-death and infant-death components
present the poststratification cells or
weighting strata in the live-birth,
fetal-death, and infant-death components
of the NMIHS. Poststratification cells
were defined by the sampling
subdomains and implicit stratification on
mother’s marital status and age in the
live-birth and fetal-death components,
and child’s sex and age at death in the
infant-death component of the NMIHS.
An estimator, x for any population
total, x, is the weighted sum over all
sample elementary units
^
x = Σ
u
x (u)W
f
(u)
(1)
Page 14 [ Series 2, No. 125
where u represents a sample elementary
unit, x(u) is the characteristic of interest
for unit u, and W
f
(u) is the NMIHS
final weight for unit u. The estimation
procedure described applies to statisticsdiv>
derived from the NMIHS mother’s
questionnaire. Similar methods can be
used to define sample weights based on
the NMIHS hospital and prenatal care
provider questionnaires.
Estimation Procedures for Vital
Events
The NMIHS estimator of a
population total as presented in equation
(1) takes into account the selection
procedures of the survey design to
define the final weight W
f
for each
sample elementary unit. The final weight
is the product of three weighting factors:
1. Inverse of the probability of selection
2. Nonresponse adjustment
3. Ratio adjustment (poststratification)
The first weight, the inverse of the
probability of selection, reflects the
unequal probabilities of selection within
each weighting stratum or
poststratification cell presented in
tables CE. Black infants and very
low-birthweight and moderately
low-birthweight infants had higher
probabilities of selection because they
were oversampled in the NMIHS.
Failure to weight NMIHS data leads to
biased population estimates, because
some mothers are overrepresented and
others are underrepresented.
The second weight adjusts for
nonresponse to the survey and may
reduce potential bias introduced by
differential response to the survey.
Based on response rates from previous
surveys, the anticipated NMIHS
response rates in the live-birth and
fetal-death components were 77 percent,
and in the infant-death component was
75 percent. The nonresponse adjustment
was derived by dividing the number of
sample vital events eligible for the
NMIHS in the ith weighting stratum by
the number of sample vital events
responding to the NMIHS in the ith
weighting stratum. The base weight,
W
basei
, is the product of the first and
second weight in the ith weighting
stratum
W
basei
=
1
P
i
n
si
n
ri
(2)
where p
i
is the probability of selection
of each sample vital event in the ith
weighting stratum, n
si
is the number of
sample vital events in the ith weighting
stratum, and n
ri
is the number of survey
respondents in the ith weighting stratum.
In the infant-death component, base
weights were also adjusted for sampling
inconsistencies. In States that
participated in PRAMS, only one-half of
the certificates were eligible for the
NMIHS. The District of Columbia,
Indiana, and Oklahoma sent all sample
certificates to NCHS rather than
one-half of the certificates as instructed.
The base weights of 347 infant deaths
were multiplied by 0.5 to account for
this sampling inconsistency.
The third weight used information
from the vital registration system to
perform poststratified ratio adjustment.
Within each poststratification cell, the
total number of U.S. resident live births
to women 15 years of age or over in
1988, U.S. resident late fetal deaths to
women 15 years of age or over in 1988,
or U.S. resident infant deaths in 1988
was divided by the summed base
weights to derive the third weight. This
adjustment corrects for incomplete
population coverage and may reduce the
variability of estimates because the
weighted number of vital events in the
sample corresponds to the total number
of events from the vital registration
system.
The final weight in the ith
poststratification cell, W
fi
is the product
of the base weight and the third weight
W
fi
= w
basei
c
N
i
ΣW
basei
(3)
where w
basei
is the base weight in the ith
poststratification cell, N
i
is the control
total number of population vital events
in the ith poststratification cell, and the
summation in the denominator is over
all sample vital events in the ith
poststratification cell.
Using cell number 1 in the
live-birth component as an example (see
table M), the inverse of the probability
of selection (29) was multiplied by the
inverse of the response rate (1.36) to
derive the base weight (39.44). The base
weight was multiplied by the 157 births
in the NMIHS in cell number 1
(6,192.08). The total number of births to
residents of the United States in 1988
who were 15 years or over (6,905) was
divided by the sum of the base weights
to derive the poststratification
adjustment factor (1.11513). The base
weight was then multiplied by the
poststratification adjustment factor to
derive the final weight (43.98072). In
this example, each mother in cell
number 1 reflects 44 mothers with
similar characteristics who delivered a
very low-birthweight infant in 1988.
This weighting procedure was
applied in each of the 47
poststratification cells in the live-birth
component (table N), the 18
poststratification cells in the fetal-death
component (table O), and the 16
poststratification cells in the infant-death
component (table P). Data items for
these poststratification cells were
available from the vital record. In
situations where a data item used to
weight the sample was unknown, child’s
Table M. Percent imputed for variables imputed in more than 10 percent of cases, 1988
National Maternal and Infant Health Survey
Variable
Source
code
Percent
imputed
Number of visits to primary prenatal care provider . . . . . . .
SC023
10.3
Nights in hospital during pregnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SC155
43.6
Nights in hospital after delivery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SC160
52.7
Hours mother worked each week . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SC234
10.9
Father’s weight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SC241
10.9
Months of vocational or trade school father completed . . . .
SC243
13.2
Father’s industry/occupation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SC2484950
14.1
Hours father worked each week . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SC253
18.6
Household income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SC255
18.4
Series 2, No. 125 [ Page 15
or fetus’s race was assigned to other
than black, birthweight was assigned to
2,500 grams or more, and marital status
was assigned to married. Values for
mother’s age, child’s sex, and infant age
at death were randomly assigned.
Sampling Error
Because the NMIHS drew stratified
systematic samples with different
probabilities of selection, population
estimates are subject to sampling error.
Black infants and very low-birthweight
and moderately low-birthweight infants
were oversampled to increase the
reliability of estimates for these
subdomains. However, the
disproportionate probabilities of
Table N. 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey poststratification cell definitions, number of live births in the survey, number of
live births to residents of the United States in 1988, and sampling weights
Cell
number
Cell definitions
Number
of births
in survey
Number of
births in
1988
3,4
Inverse
of proba-
bility of
selection
Inverse of
response
rate
Base
weight
Poststrat-
ification
adjustment
Final
weight
Birthweight
in grams
Marital
status
1
Race of
child
2
Age of
mother in
years
Total
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
9,953
3,898,922
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
1
Less than 1,500
M
W,O
Under 25
157
6,905
29
1.36
39.44000
1.11513
43.98072
2
Less than 1,500
M
W,O
25–29
179
6,893
29
1.22
35.38000
1.08842
38.50829
3
Less than 1,500
M
W,O
30–34
136
5,294
29
1.23
35.67000
1.09129
38.92631
4
Less than 1,500
M
W,O
35 or over
64
2,478
29
1.23
35.67000
1.08547
38.71871
5
Less than 1,500
M
B
Under 25
91
1,675
14
1.48
20.72000
0.88835
18.40661
6
Less than 1,500
M
B
25–29
84
1,834
14
1.44
20.16000
1.08300
21.83328
7
Less than 1,500
M
B
30 or over
106
1,980
14
1.38
19.32000
0.96683
18.67915
8
Less than 1,500
UN
W,O
15–19
54
2,579
29
1.54
44.66000
1.06940
47.75940
9
Less than 1,500
UN
W,O
20–24
55
2,590
29
1.60
46.40000
1.01489
47.09089
10
Less than 1,500
UN
W,O
25 or over
65
3,076
29
1.57
45.53000
1.03938
47.32297
11
Less than 1,500
UN
B
15–19
184
3,741
14
1.45
20.30000
1.00155
20.33146
12
Less than 1,500
UN
B
20–24
172
4,237
14
1.66
23.24000
1.05997
24.63370
13
Less than 1,500
UN
B
25–29
116
2,862
14
1.73
24.22000
1.01868
24.67243
14
Less than 1,500
UN
B
30 or over
88
2,074
14
1.61
22.54000
1.04562
23.56827
15
1,500–2,499
M
W,O
Under 25
185
37,208
160
1.28
204.80000
0.98205
201.12383
16
1,500–2,499
M
W,O
25–29
178
37,591
160
1.23
196.80000
1.07310
211.18606
17
1,500–2,499
M
W,O
30–34
143
26,922
160
1.16
185.59999
1.01436
188.26520
18
1,500–2,499
M
W,O
35 or over
54
11,850
160
1.20
191.99998
1.14294
219.44443
19
1,500–2,499
M
B
Under 25
79
6,311
55
1.47
80.85000
0.98808
79.88626
20
1,500–2,499
M
B
25–29
87
6,467
55
1.37
75.35000
0.98651
74.33353
21
1,500–2,499
M
B
30 or over
86
6,470
55
1.29
70.95000
1.06036
75.23254
22
1,500–2,499
UN
W,O
15–19
55
11,861
160
1.47
235.19998
0.91690
215.65484
23
1,500–2,499
UN
W,O
20–24
44
13,317
160
1.89
302.39999
1.00086
302.66005
24
1,500–2,499
UN
W,O
25 or over
55
14,630
160
1.58
252.79999
1.05222
266.00120
25
1,500–2,499
UN
B
15–19
189
14,119
55
1.35
74.25000
1.00611
74.70366
26
1,500–2,499
UN
B
20–24
177
16,130
55
1.59
87.45000
1.04208
91.12989
27
1,500–2,499
UN
B
25–29
114
10,591
55
1.61
88.55000
1.04916
92.90311
28
1,500–2,499
UN
B
30 or over
71
7,563
55
1.80
99.00000
1.07597
106.52102
29
2,500 or more
M
W,O
15–19
147
142,410
720
1.28
921.59998
1.05119
968.77670
30
2,500 or more
M
W,O
20–24
671
613,998
720
1.24
892.79999
1.02492
915.04855
31
2,500 or more
M
W,O
25–29
1,035
913,548
720
1.18
847.59998
1.03891
882.65794
32
2,500 or more
M
W,O
30–34
728
621,416
720
1.15
828.00000
1.03091
853.59349
33
2,500 or more
M
W,O
35 or over
259
231,777
720
1.20
863.99994
1.03575
894.88790
34
2,500 or more
M
B
15–19
64
11,513
113
1.58
178.53999
1.00756
179.88976
35
2,500 or more
M
B
20–24
391
62,401
113
1.36
153.68001
1.03848
159.59360
36
2,500 or more
M
B
25–29
495
76,558
113
1.32
149.15999
1.03689
154.66250
37
2,500 or more
M
B
30–34
312
49,337
113
1.33
150.28999
1.05218
158.13212
38
2,500 or more
M
B
35 or over
138
20,694
113
1.25
141.25000
1.06164
149.95665
39
2,500 or more
UN
W,O
15–19
134
164,640
720
1.63
1173.59998
1.04691
100.0
40
2,500 or more
UN
W,O
20–24
165
183,690
720
1.52
1094.40002
1.01724
100.0
41
2,500 or more
UN
W,O
25–29
90
103,825
720
1.52
1094.40002
1.05410
100.0
42
2,500 or more
UN
W,O
30 or over
74
74,630
720
1.38
993.59998
1.01501
100.0
43
2,500 or more
UN
B
15–19
725
115,559
113
1.37
154.81000
1.02960
159.39238
44
2,500 or more
UN
B
20–24
780
130,941
113
1.43
161.59000
1.03888
167.87261
45
2,500 or more
UN
B
25–29
415
69,372
113
1.42
160.45999
1.04176
167.16080
46
2,500 or more
UN
B
30–34
190
31,662
113
1.44
162.71999
1.02410
166.64153
47
2,500 or more
UN
B
35 or over
72
11,703
113
1.47
166.10999
0.97852
162.54194
. . . Category not applicable.
1
M=married; UN=unmarried.
2
W,O=white and other; B=black.
3
The national vital registration sytem data included a small proportion of cases without information on birthweight (0.001 percent). These cases were reallocated according to the births with information.
4
The total number of resident live births to women 15 years or over in the United States in 1988 includes births occurring in Montana and South Dakota, which were excluded from the sampling frame.
Page 16 [ Series 2, No. 125
selection often increase the sampling
error when estimating population
parameters over aggregated domains.
Standard Error
The standard error is a measure of
the sampling variability of an estimator
over all possible samples chosen from
the sampling frame. When we assume
that nonsampling error does not exist,
the reliability of an estimator can be
stated in terms of the relative standard
error—the standard error divided by the
expectation of the population estimator.
The smaller the relative standard error,
the greater the reliability of an estimate.
NCHS considers relative standard errors
of 30 percent or more to be unreliable.
Estimates are considered unreliable
when they are based on fewer than 30
sample cases. Using the average weight
in each sampling subdomain from
tables C–E, 30 sample cases in the
Table P. 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey poststratification cell definitions, number of infant deaths in the survey, number of
infant deaths to residents of the United States in 1988, and sampling weights
Cell
number
Cell definitions
Number of
deaths in
NMIHS
Number of
deaths in
1988
3
Inverse
of proba-
bility of
selection
Inverse
of response
rate
Base
weight
Poststrat-
ification
adjustment
Final
weight
4
Race of
child
1
Sex of
child
2
Age at
death
Total . . . . . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
5,332
38,917
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
1 . . . . . . .
W,O
M
Less than 24 hours
547
5,292
7.36
1.34
9.86240
1.02597
10.11853
2 . . . . . . .
W,O
M
1–6 days
267
2,600
7.36
1.39
10.23040
0.09870
10.09740
3 . . . . . . .
W,O
M
7–27 days
173
1,759
7.36
1.32
9.71520
1.07772
10.47026
4 . . . . . . .
W,O
M
1–12 months
562
5,856
7.36
1.42
10.45120
1.04342
10.90499
5 . . . . . . .
W,O
F
Less than 24 hours
369
4,083
7.36
1.47
10.81920
1.05121
11.37325
6 . . . . . . .
W,O
F
1–6 days
156
1,931
7.36
1.47
10.81920
1.19384
12.91639
7 . . . . . . .
W,O
F
7–27 days
123
1,335
7.36
1.34
9.86240
1.14714
11.31355
8 . . . . . . .
W,O
F
1–12 months
365
4,221
7.36
1.54
11.33400
1.05348
11.94056
9 . . . . . . .
B
M
Less than 24 hours
617
2,684
2.56
1.61
4.12160
1.08173
4.45846
10 . . . . . . .
B
M
1–6 days
245
961
2.56
1.60
4.09600
0.98995
4.05483
11 . . . . . . . .
B
M
7–27 days
156
618
2.56
1.51
3.86560
1.05179
4.06580
12 . . . . . . .
B
M
1–12 months
525
2,240
2.56
1.62
4.14720
1.05907
4.39218
13 . . . . . . .
B
F
Less than 24 hours
505
2,173
2.56
1.67
4.27520
1.04370
4.46203
14 . . . . . . .
B
F
1–6 days
177
750
2.56
1.60
4.09600
1.05536
4.32275
15 . . . . . . .
B
F
7–27 days
122
509
2.56
1.56
3.99360
1.06656
4.25941
16 . . . . . . .
B
F
1–12 months
423
1,905
2.56
1.76
4.50560
1.02623
4.62378
. . . Category not applicable.
1
W,O=white and other; B=black.
2
M=male; F=female.
3
The total number of resident infant deaths in the United States in 1988 includes infant deaths occurring in Montana and South Dakota, which were excluded from the sampling frame.
4
347 infant deaths from the District of Columbia, Indiana, and Oklahoma were inadvertently sampled and received one-half of the final weight.
Table O. 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (NMIHS) poststratification cell definitions, number of fetal deaths in the NMIHS,
number of fetal deaths of 28 weeks gestation or more to residents of the United States in 1988, and sampling weights
Cell
number
Cell definitions
Number of
fetal deaths
in the NMIHS
Number of
eligible fetal
deaths in 1988
Inverse
of proba-
bility of
selection
Inverse
of response
rate
Base
weight
Poststrat-
ification
adjustment
Final
weight
Marital
status
1
Race of
fetus
2
Age of
mother in
years
Total . . . . . . . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
3,309
15,259
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
1 . . . . . . . . .
M
W & O
<20
112
804
3.70
1.37
5.06900
1.41617
7.17857
2 . . . . . . . . .
M
W & O
20–24
386
2,435
3.70
1.38
5.10600
1.23547
6.30831
3 . . . . . . . . .
M
W & O
25–29
576
3,114
3.70
1.30
4.81000
1.12396
5.40625
4 . . . . . . . . .
M
W & O
30–34
403
2,307
3.70
1.28
4.73600
1.20873
5.72455
5 . . . . . . . . .
M
W & O
35+
219
1,289
3.70
1.35
4.99500
1.17835
5.88586
6 . . . . . . . . .
M
B
<20
36
284
1.67
1.64
2.73880
2.88042
7.88889
7 . . . . . . . . .
M
B
20–24
109
606
1.67
1.65
2.75550
2.01765
5.55963
8 . . . . . . . . .
M
B
25–29
142
586
1.67
1.45
2.42150
1.70422
4.12677
9 . . . . . . . . .
M
B
30–34
111
451
1.67
1.46
2.43820
1.66642
4.06307
10 . . . . . . . . .
M
B
35+
73
260
1.67
1.40
2.33800
1.52337
3.56164
11 . . . . . . . . . .
UN
W & O
<20
82
409
3.70
1.70
6.29000
0.79297
4.98778
12 . . . . . . . . .
UN
W & O
20–24
99
491
3.70
1.75
6.47600
0.76596
4.95959
13 . . . . . . . . .
UN
W & O
25–29
68
279
3.70
1.69
6.25300
0.65616
4.10297
14 . . . . . . . . .
UN
W & O
30+
67
281
3.70
1.84
6.80800
0.61604
4.19400
15 . . . . . . . . .
UN
B
<20
233
468
1.67
1.41
2.35470
0.85301
2.00858
16 . . . . . . . . .
UN
B
20–24
299
586
1.67
1.46
2.43820
0.80382
1.95987
17 . . . . . . . . .
UN
B
25–29
154
348
1.67
1.81
3.02270
0.74759
2.25974
18 . . . . . . . . .
UN
B
30+
140
261
1.67
1.61
2.68870
0.69338
1.86429
. . . Category not applicable.
Series 2, No. 125 [ Page 17
live-birth component of the NMIHS
correspond to 938 very low-weight
births, 4,367 low-weight births, and
15,763 normal-weight births; 30 sample
cases in the fetal-death component of
the NMIHS correspond to 138 fetal
deaths; and 30 sample cases in the
infant-death component of the NMIHS
correspond to 219 infant deaths.
Estimation of Standard Error
One method of estimating standard
errors is by using a computer software
package that takes all the NMIHS
design features into account. ‘‘Software
for SUrvey DAta ANalysis’’ (SUDAAN)
was developed by the Research Triangle
Institute in collaboration with NCHS
and other Public Health Service
agencies (12). SUDAAN uses the
first-order Taylor-series approximation
method to estimate sampling variances.
It allows analysts to incorporate the
sample design in the calculation of
standard errors and is designed to
handle a poststratified estimator, such as
that used in the NMIHS.
The standard errors for the NMIHS
can be approximated by using inflation
factors. Inflation factors measure the
amount the variance estimator
underestimates or overestimates the true
variance of a statistic (13). Skinner et al.
(13) referred to inflation factors as
misspecification effects, which are
commonly called ‘‘design effects.’’
Design effects are usually calculated
during the design of a survey, but
misspecification effects or inflation
factors are calculated during the analysis
of a survey (13). Inflation factors are
calculated for complex surveys such as
the NMIHS, in which different
probabilities of selection were applied
within sampling subdomains. Black
infants and very low-birthweight and
moderately low-birthweight infants were
oversampled. Differential probabilities of
selection increase the variance of
estimates across sampling subdomains.
Standard Error Approximation
Inflation factors are defined as the
ratio of the variance of an estimate from
complex computer software (i.e.,
SUDAAN) to the variance of the
estimate from traditional computer
software (i.e., SAS or SPSS), which
does not take the complex sample
design into account. An inflation factor
close to 1.0 indicates that the complex
sample design had little effect on the
variance of the estimates. In systematic
samples, such as the NMIHS, inflation
factors are usually greater than 1.0.
The inflation factors, ratios of the
variance for maternal age calculated
using SUDAAN to the variance
calculated using SAS, are shown in
table Q. The inflation factors in the
black and other-than-black subdomains
of the live-birth component of the
NMIHS are 1.0 and 1.3. These inflation
factors represent no increase and an
increase of 30 percent over traditionally
computed variance estimates. The
overall inflation factor of 2.0 for the
combined races in the live-birth
component represents an increase of
100 percent in the variance of estimates.
This large inflation factor for the
combined races indicates that the
live-birth component lends itself to
separate analyses by race. In the
fetal-death and infant-death components,
the inflation factors are 1.1 and 1.2 for
the combined races. One problem with
using inflation factors to approximate
standard errors is that inflation factors
are limited to select subdomains.
Clearly, variances for NMIHS estimates
should not be calculated without taking
the complex sample design into account
because this would produce gross
underestimates of the variances.
Standard Error Applications
(1) Standard error for aggregate
estimates
The number of vital events in a
poststratification cell or any combination
of poststratification cells (tables N–P)
has been adjusted to the vital
registration system and has a standard
error of 0.0. If the total for a
characteristic of interest is defined as a
subdomain consisting of
poststratification cells, the approximate
standard error of the estimated number
of vital events with a particular
characteristic x is calculated by
SE(
^
x ) =
Œ
^
x (N
D
^
x)
n
D
c IF
D
(4)
and its relative standard error is
RSE(
^
x ) =
SE(
^
x )
^
x
(5)
where n
D
is the sample size within
subdomain D, N
D
is the estimated total
number of sampling units in the
population within subdomain D, x is the
estimated total number of vital events
with a particular characteristic x, and IF
is the average inflation factor in
subdomain D.
Example: In the live-birth
component of the NMIHS, it is
estimated that 564,973 mothers under 25
years of age smoked cigarettes during
the 12 months before their 1988
delivery.
The estimated standard error is
SE(
^
x )
=
Œ
564,973(1,545,824–564,973)
4,519
c (2.0)
= 15,661
and the relative standard error in percent
is
RSE(
^
x ) =
15,661
564,973
= 2.8 percent
An approximate 95-percent
confidence interval for the number of
mothers under 25 years of age who
smoked cigarettes during the 12 months
Table Q. 1988 National Maternal and Infant
Health Survey estimated inflation factors
for racial and birthweight categories
Birth outcome
Inflation
factors
Live birth
Black (3 strata)
Less than 1,500 grams
1,500–2,499 grams
1.0
2,500 grams or more
Other than black (3 strata)
2.0
Less than 1,500 grams
1,500–2,499 grams
1.3
2,500 grams or more
Fetal death
Black
1.1
Other than black
Infant death
Black
1.2
Other than black
}
}
}
}
Page 18 [ Series 2, No. 125
before their delivery is 564,973 ± (1.96)
(15,661), or 534,277–595,669 mothers.
(2) Standard error for ratios or
proportions when the denominator is
formed by poststratification cells
When the denominator is formed by
poststratification cells, it is not subject
to sampling error. Thus, the approximate
standard error and relative standard error
may be calculated using the formulas
SE(
^
p ) =
Œ
^
p (1–
^
p )
n
D
c IF
D
(6)
RSE(
^
p ) =
SE(
^
p )
^
p
(7)
where n
D
is the sample size within
subdomain D, p is the estimated
proportion of vital events with a
particular characteristic x, and IF is the
average inflation factor in subdomain D.
Example: An estimated 36.5 percent
(564,973) of mothers under 25 years of
age in the live-birth component of the
NMIHS (1,545,824) smoked cigarettes
during the 12 months before delivery.
The number of mothers under 25 years
of age is a combination of
poststratification cells specified in
table N. Therefore, the standard error for
the percent is
SE( p
^
) =
Œ
(36.5)(63.5)
4,519
c (2.0)
= 1.0 percent
and its relative standard error in percent
is